Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of Shakespeare and his plays to the contemporary world
Relevance of Shakespeare and his plays to the contemporary world
Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part 1 Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the historical play Henry V by William Shakespeare, we are introduced to the story of a young and influential King Henry V of England, and his quest to conquer France under the ruler ship of Charles VI of France. This play details Henry’s life leading up to and following the Battle of Agincourt in the year 1415, which according to the “Hundred Years’ War”, was fought between England and France from 1337 to 1453. Now, in the source “William Shakespeare Biography”, it was found that Shakespeare lived from “c. 1564-1616” and is “widely considered the greatest dramatist of all time.” He too is of English descent, which suggests the bias that is present in this play, as according to “Henry V List of Characters”, Shakespeare’s primary purpose …show more content…
in writing this piece is, “to portray King Henry as the ultimate hero: noble, humble, and strong.” For this reason, there are certain historical aspects that are omitted or skewed in this play, such as the compressing of the Battle of Agincourt in order to concentrate “on certain aspects to highlight Henry’s strengths, ignore his weaknesses, and create the archetype for heroic Kings.” In this passage, King Henry has just been presented a chest full of tennis balls sent from the Dauphin, who is the son of the King of France, as a form of mockery to indicate that King Henry is much too young, and ought to be out playing tennis instead of leading a country. This then leads up to Henry’s powerful rant that he delivers in retaliation to the mockery.
From the information delivered by Shakespeare on King Henry, it symbolizes the significance of Henry’s multifaceted personality in becoming a successful ruler, and the fact that relationships will be torn apart, in order to achieve success on the battlefield. When analyzing this specific passage of Henry V, one of the most prevalent literary elements within King Henry’s monologue is his usage of hyperboles to symbolize the anger and vengeance he wishes to impose on the Dauphin when he threatens, “And tell the pleasant prince this mock of his Hath turned his balls to gun stones,” (293-294). This line exemplifies not only King Henry’s ruthless behavior, but also his seriousness of approach to war in comparison to the Dauphin, as his threat to unleash cannonballs upon France indicates the importance of war to him as monarch, and that he is prepared to defend himself and his country’s honor when necessary. It also suggests the maturity Henry possesses in dealing with the subject of war, as the Dauphin’s threat actually backfires on him when Henry responds in a passionate and …show more content…
no-nonsense tone. Thus, this line also denotes the double-edged personality of King Henry as a leader, given the very fiery personality he unleashes when angered. Another instance of his usage of hyperboles to indicate the wrath he wishes to impose on France is when he later bellows, “His soul Shall stand sore charged for the wasteful vengeance That shall fly with them; for many a thousand widows.” (294-297). In this passage, Henry has released his fury upon the Dauphin, in which his usage of multiple hyperboles in this passage serves to provide imagery of the destruction and death that will come to the country of France for being mocked. This passage also portrays Henry’s merciless behavior when it comes to war, and it foretells how Henry will later address high-pressure situations during the war which ultimately both helps and hinders his situation as ruler. Next, another important literary element to consider from King Henry’s speech is the violent imagery he delivers to the reader in order to showcase the amount of rage he holds against the Dauphin and the French. One passage in particular that exemplifies Henry’s intention to arise with all his might, and bring forth utter destruction is when he proclaims, “But I will rise there with so full a glory That I will dazzle all the eyes of France,” (290-291). From this passage, the reader is given insight as to how boastfully Henry thinks of himself through his depiction of the gunfire and explosions that “will dazzle” France as a result of him being “mocked”. Another example of the crucial effect imagery plays, is when he speaks upon the after effects that will occur in France after he has brutalized the entire country in retaliation to the French people who have mocked him by ordering, “When thousands more weep than did laugh at it.—Convey them with safe conduct.” (309-310). In this example, his strong usage of imagery allows him to foretell how sorrowful and ashamed the French people will feel about joining in with the Dauphin to mock Henry, and we are once again given an insight as to how ruthless King Henry really is, and just how abusively Henry wishes to instill fear within all of the French hearts when the time comes to engage in war. In addition, another noteworthy element is Henry’s devotional allusion to God, as he holds the belief that God will be in approval with him to strike vengeance upon France when he announces, But all this lies within the will of God, To whom I do appeal, and in whose name Tell you the Dauphin I am coming on, To venge me as I may and to put forth My rightful hand in a well-hallowed cause. (302-306) This allusion to God can be interpreted as a reference to the famous Biblical verse from Galatians 6:7, “You reap what you sow”, as well as the phrase, “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”.
In this speech, Henry is alluding to both phrases as a sense of Biblical justification for him to impose destruction on France as a result of the Dauphin mocking him. This passage also displays the religious side of King Henry and his willingness to use evidence in support of his decisions rather than purely making decisions off of first instinct. While at the same time, this passage also shines light on Henry’s strategic, yet arrogant nature as a ruler when making the claim that through God’s will, it is only just that he declares war with the French when clearly there are many different interpretations that can be made when reading from The Bible based on the person’s background and culture. As a result, Henry’s interpretation is shaped by his noble bloodline, as well as his forefathers’ rich history with conquering the French, as King Charles later references in Act 4 of Scene 2. Therefore, King Henry’s usage of biblical allusions to God symbolizes his cunning and decisive nature when making decisions, but also how recklessly he chooses to retaliate against his enemies, and how that ultimately works against him as it severs his relationships with others such as Sir John Falstaff. When analyzing the form of King Henry’s violent monologue, one of its most striking features
is his inclusion of repetition by using the word “mock” as another manner of allusion to phrases mentioned earlier in The Bible in order to depict the retribution he will impose on the French for being mocked with the chest full of tennis balls. This is demonstrated during Henry’s tirade as he begins to address the Ambassadors about the images the French will be seeing when England has invaded France and the horrific events that will ensue as a result, when he declares, “Shall this mock mock out of their dear husbands, Mock mothers from their sons, mock castles down;” (298-299). Through Henry’s such deliberate usage of the word “mock” repeatedly within this passage, it signals how much rage he currently holds against the Dauphin and the French, as well as the amount of impatience he has with the interest of destroying France into ruins. Even more, due to the malicious and vile tone he uses with the word “mock”, it can be inferred how sharply Henry and the Dauphin’s approaches to war contrast with one another. In particular, Henry views war in a much more serious and spiritual manner, while the Dauphin approaches war in a much more childish and insignificant manner. This is clearly evident based on Henry’s retaliation to the Dauphin’s childish “mock”, which then provoked Henry to threaten to unleash savage death and destruction on the entire country of France, while the Dauphin still views Henry as a child who is incapable of leading a country. For this reason, Henry’s incessant use of the word “mock” exposes his savage and prideful nature that plays a defining role in portraying himself as a menacing leader who is unafraid to fight for what he believes is righteous. One other literary element worth noting in regards to the form and syntax of King Henry’s speech is the inclusion of two dashes, as he is just about to send the Ambassadors away. When considering the importance of Henry’s usage of the dash, you must consider that Henry has been going off on a rampage about the damage he will inflict on France, and he is continuing to ramble on about the vengeance he will put forth on the Dauphin by proposing to invade and unleash destruction on France during this tennis match of a war that the Dauphin has proposed. Immediately after, Henry then portrays his multifaceted personality by switching from a wrathful to reverent tone as he addresses the Ambassadors before exiting by saluting, “When thousands weep more than did laugh at it. —Convey them with safe conduct. —Fare you well.” From this passage, we are given insight into the caring and restrained nature of King Henry as well, which is noted through Shakepeare’s inclusion of dashes to indicate this dramatic shift/pause that occurs when he wishes peace for the Ambassadors as they depart back to France. It also suggests the humble nature of Henry as well in that even though he may sound very boastful and irate when handling the war, he still understands how to keep his composure and remain respectful as a leader and diplomat. In short, the literary elements presented in this passage allow us to uncover the defining characteristics that shaped King Henry into the well renowned historical figure of today. While at the same time, how crucial of a role his multidimensional personality plays in determining the many different interpretations of him as a person, which ultimately does not negate his successes as King of England.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
The fact that Henry V is one of Shakespeare's histories is very significant because history is the backbone of the episode. References to their history with Romulans are made. Such as to events on Galornden Core, in which Beverly the doctor explains that she recently gained a lot of experience with Romulan physiology.
But in Henry’s own mind he describes himself as “the mirror of all Christian kings” and also a “true lover of the holly church. In the beginning of the play Henry is set up to be the ideal of a Christian King. Interestingly, Shakespeare highlights this as an important characteristic as this occurs earlier in the play. Therefore readers are tricked to respect and agree with Henry’s decisions later on in the play.
Henry excites fear by stating he is passionately ready to sacrifice for his country. This play towards pathos, or appealing to the audience’s emotions, is an effective way of trying to convince the House to go to war against Britain. This pathos, combined with the logic of Henry’s speech, makes for a convincing argument. Logically taking the House step by step from stating that because he has an outlook on their situation, he should express it to them, to stating his argument before the House, to saying that lacking freedom is worse than death, then taking it full circle pronouncing he would prefer to be “give[n] death” then to have his freedom taken away by the British.
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
King Henry used diction to contrast between his opinions on the rich versus those he had about the poor. When describing royalty like himself he used softer words such as “perfum’d chambers of the great” (9) to emphasize how his bedroom was calming and ideal for sleeping yet he could not sleep. He then said “why liest thou with the vile in loathsome beds” (12-13) in reference to the poor to display his jealousy that “less deserving” people get to rest easy. He complains about the life of a king being difficult than the rest of the masses so he should be able to sleep. King Henry ends his soliloquy with “Deny it to a King?” (27) to show how he believes that he is entitled to get sleeps since he has the most responsibility. The diction also relates to imagery. He describes the
Appearance vs. Reality in Henry IV Shakespeare's play Henry IV begins with a king (King Henry) beginning a pilgrimage after killing King Richard II. Henry believes that by gaining the throne of England. He has done an honourable deed, yet he admits that the fighting and bloodshed could continue, A.. . ill sheathed knife. . . @ 1.1.17. -.
One of Shakespeare’s series of Henry plays, Henry V chronicles the titular character’s conquest of the country ‘cross the channel from his own kingdom. Beloved by England for its heroic description of the famed ruler, Shakespeare’s play is highly regarded and often listed with his other masterworks. However, one striking difference separates it from other scripts: its altogether lack of an obvious antagonist. While Much Ado About Nothing had Don Jon and Macbeth had, well, Macbeth, Henry V possess no such villain to oppose the protagonist, King Henry. Nevertheless, if one dares to explore the story further, a couple characters come into consideration for the position of villain. On the one side is the King of France, who is certainly made out to be in the wrong. Opposite him is none other than the golden boy himself, Henry. Despite the general appearance of Henry, there may be more underneath the surface.
Shakespeare, William. The Life of King Henry the Fifth. New York: Unicorn Publishers Inc, 1950. Pg. 173-295.
Henry V, written by William Shakespeare, is by far one of his more historically accurate plays. This play is the life of young King Henry V, who ascended to the throne after his father, Henry IV's death. These times were much different for England, as Henry V was a noble lord whom everyone loved, whereas angry factions haunted his father's reign. Shakespeare portrays a fairly accurate account of the historical Henry V, but certain parts are either inflated"deflated, or conflated to dramatize Henry V as a character suitable for a Renaissance audience.
King Henry V is considered to be by far one of the greatest rulers to ever have graced the throne of England. Shakespeare demonstrates this belief by exemplifying Henry’s strong attributes showing just how great and powerful of a leader Henry was. However the issue of power and ethics plays a tremendous role in the personification of Henry as a person. There is no doubt that Henry’s power and ethical stance makes him a great king, but by being a great king, Henry is forced to act in a way that can be construed as dissolute. Henry betrays a number of his friends including Falstaff, and threatens the Governor of Harfleur ordering him to surrender or he will kill the innocent children of Harfleur. It is through the issue of power and ethics demonstrated by King Henry V that the blurred line between hero and villain can be seen and in the end one can see that it is possible to describe Henry as being an immoral human being.
Shakespeare, William. Henry V. The Norton Shakespeare Based on the Oxford Edition: Histories. Eds. Greenblatt, Stephen et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. 736-793.
Identity is a concept that has long been explored by many kinds of people. Yet, there has never been a clear answer, no matter how many times in how many ways it has been analyzed. It is no different for the two plays, Henry IV and Six Characters in Search of an Author. In their own ways, each play has an idea of defining their identity. The reality of the plays
Overall, Shakespeare portrays King Henry V as a dependable young man; ruthless with his enemies, but steadfast in his love for his country. Henry's commanding qualities of leadership were necessary to stabilize the nation and were not just the actions of a tyrant, but of an effective king. His compassionate and sincere connection with his people marks the softer image of a common man who genuinely wants the best for his country, his people, and lastly, himself. The Life of King Henry V illustrates the picturesque form of not only a powerful king with relentless determination, but also an epic hero in the hearts of his people.
In Book III Henry says (175): ”I was always embarrassed by the words sacred, glorious, sacrifice and the expres...