We the people have suffered greatly because of the one and only King George III. King George III purposely directed the abuse towards us and many other colonies, but for what? To establish a tyrannical government? To make himself a richer man? What about us? The people. We’ve waited patiently for things to settle down but how can it settle down when you’re excessively taxing us and trying to rule us when we’ve made it crystal clear that we don’t want you and your nonsense tyranny. This man deserves no freedom, no justices. What this man needs is jail time and many years of it. This man is and will forever be guilty. Let’s begin with the tyranny government he tried to establish upon us. The fundamental idea of having a representative government
is people having power to make laws for the publics well-being. King George III on the other hand has always rejected the idea of legislation we would propose to him not to mention he replaced all of mine and many other colonial governments and appointed his own ministers for the job. He wanted to control everything from the government to our civil rights. Not even that we could have. King George III would send in troops to “teach” us lessons on who the leader is, and he kept among us, in our time of peace, standing armies without our consent. We had to quarter our own enemies provide shelter, food, basically anything they needed. How can home feel like home when you know you have armed men who can pull the trigger at any time they please.
The reasoning behind the Constitution of the United States is presented as 'based upon the philosophy of Hobbes and the religion of Calvin. It assumes the natural state of mankind in a state of war, and that the carnal mind is at enmity with God.' Throughout, the struggle between democracy and tyranny is discussed as the Founding Fathers who envisioned the Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 believed not in total democracy, but instead saw common man as selfish and contemptuous, and therefore in need of a 'a good political constitution to control him.' Being a largely propertied body, with the exception of William Few, who was the only one who could honestly be said to represent the majority yeoman farmer class, the highly privileged classes were fearful of granting man his due rights, as the belief that 'man was an unregenerate rebel who has to be controlled' reverberated.
In the Summer of 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 out of the 13 states in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation. They met in philadelphia because the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Shay’s rebellion was the end of the Articles of Confederation bringing down the whole network calling for a change of government. They did this to prevent a tyrant or tyranny. A tyrant/tyranny is when someone or a group abuses their power. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, Separation of powers, Checks and Balances, and The Great Compromise.
The Americans had won their independence, much to the dismay of the British crown. King George III lost his American colonies for a number of reasons. The responsibility of the American Revolution and King George III’s loss of his colonies cannot be placed on one specific event, but rather a build-up of tensions over the years causing the idea of freedom to ring through the colonies and drive them to make the United States of America a free country ‘with liberty and justice for all.’ Works Cited “Boston Tea Party.” Columbia University Press.
John Locke, one of the leading philosophers of the European Enlightenment was very important when it came to political thought in the United States. His ideas of the reasons, nature, and limits of the government became especially important in the development of the Constitution. In one of his most famous writings of that time, Two Treatises on Government (1689), Locke established a theory where personal liberty could coexist with political power ; meaning that the people would agree to obey the government and in return, the government would have the responsibility of respecting the people’s natural rights. In other words, he laid out a social contract theory that provided the philosophy and source of a governing author...
The measures made to ensure the king does not have absolute power are not enough to prevent him from ultimately getting his way no matter what that may be. On page 27 Paine tells how the king made the declaration that there will be no law unless put in place by himself. This effort to make the colonists powerless as to how they are governed is tyranny. Paine’s also argues that this event shows how Britain believes America has become too powerful and is trying to slow its growth and development (27). Those who are in parliament so far away from the tragic events that take place in America who live in such a vastly different world are too ignorant to make judgements for America (23). Paine’s statement that in America “law is king,” demonstrates the author’s argument that law developed for the people should be what runs the country not a single man (30). This coincides with the way America was running well before the war ended and Britain decided to exert more power over the colonies. This is made even more evident when Thomas Paine states Britain cannot be relied on to defend them because Britain is the entity that had been trying to take away America’s power and the people rights. Furthermore,
many problems faced by the nation during his time and set standards by which we still follow
He wanted to stress people right to liberty and fundamental rights as human beings as central values, making people united as a whole, rejecting the monarchy, aristocracy and the political power, he wanted citizens to be independent in thee way they implemented their civic duties, and as a way to disparage corruption.
America’s form of representative democracy came as a result of the transgressions Britain committed against their colonies. Several hundred years of salutary neglect served well for those living an ocean away from their motherland. Realizing the prosperity that colonies had obtained through a semi-free market society, the King of England and the parliament began enacting many taxes and acts. Taking away the colonies freedom was unsettling amongst the colonists and eventually led to a revolution. This revolution secured freedom from Britain as well as founded a new nation with the first ever constitution. Although the process to achieve democracy in America was a long, laborious road the freedom, prosperity and equality of opportunity shared by those amongst the states could not be denied.
gave to the people of the country, he took power from the government and let the
What is his opinion of the American Founders? What characteristics does he praise about them? What is their
Jefferson repeatedly uses “He has” to list all of the unfair actions and laws that King George has done or passed. Jefferson uses “he” to communicate that all of the actions can be tied back to solely the king and no one else. The king is the only one responsible for all these actions. King George III took away the colonists unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Thomas Jefferson used civil disobedience to help rebel against the king of Great Britain and to help document the separation between the two countries. Jefferson hoped for other colonists to help separate the 13 colonies from Great Britain, to help restore their unalienable rights.
During his first inaugural speech, in 1861, he expanded the nature of democracy by denouncing secession as anarchy, shedding light to popular rule by balancing the restraints that governed the American system ( Angle 1992 p.64). He believed on a true sovereign with entailed free people achieved v...
the government so that the common man could vote, he paid little attention to his interests
Lawyer James Otis and other colonist rebels referred to King George as a tyrant. As stated by James Otis in The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved (1763), . . . “The very act of taxing exercised over those who are not represented appears to me to be depriving them of one of their most essential rights as freemen, and if continued seems to be in effect and entire disfranchisement of every civil right.” James Otis’s point of view seemed to express concerns for the civil and constitutional rights and liberties of the colonists.
Although history has labeled King George III of Britain primarily as the “mad” king responsible for the loss of America, a closer look at the 1780s, the heart of his reign, proves George III to be a particularly effective monarch rather than the bungling idiot some scholars have dubbed him. George III’s effectiveness, during the 1780s, stemmed from his immense popularity with the common people, which lay in direct contrast to his lack of popularity with Parliament. The popularity that George III enjoyed with the masses was largely due to his personal integrity and moral character, and his lack of popularity with Parliament was a result of his desire to reclaim the monarchial power lost in the reigns of George I and II.