Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of democracy
United States democracy evolved over time
Historical roots of american democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of democracy
Democracy in America has been a guiding principle since the foundation of the country. Many over the years have commented on the structure and formation of democracy but more importantly the implementation and daily function within the democratic parameters that have been set. Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political thinker and historian born July 29, 1805. He is most famously known for his work Democracy in America. Democracy in America has been an evolving social and economic reform, and has continually changed since it’s founding.
America’s form of representative democracy came as a result of the transgressions Britain committed against their colonies. Several hundred years of salutary neglect served well for those living an ocean away from their motherland. Realizing the prosperity that colonies had obtained through a semi-free market society, the King of England and the parliament began enacting many taxes and acts. Taking away the colonies freedom was unsettling amongst the colonists and eventually led to a revolution. This revolution secured freedom from Britain as well as founded a new nation with the first ever constitution. Although the process to achieve democracy in America was a long, laborious road the freedom, prosperity and equality of opportunity shared by those amongst the states could not be denied.
In a time of uncertainty and turmoil in France, Alexis de Tocqueville came to America under the pretense of studying the American penal system, which was considered the best in the world at that time. The July Revolution of 1830, led to the
Louise-Philippe to take the throne. This left Tocqueville in a crisis, with his father in a loss of position, as well as his own career in a precarious position, ...
... middle of paper ...
...an can be seen as a one of the greatest achievements in the nation and arguably the world. At the same time affording the opportunity for focus solely on the material aspects of life and not on the beliefs that made the country great.
Works Cited
de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. New York: Schocken, 1961.
Goldhammer, Arthur. "From the OED:." Www.people2.fas.harvard.edu. Web. 27 Feb.
2012..
Johri, Vikram. "'Alexis De Tocqueville': The First French Critic of the US." The
Christian Science Monitor. The Christian Science Monitor, 10 Apr. 2007. Web.
27 Feb. 2012. .
Reeve, Henry. "Democracy in America: TOC." American Studies @ The University of
Virginia. Web. 27 Feb. 2012.
.
In today’s society, American citizens tend to believe that America has been, “American” since the day that Christopher Columbus set foot in the Bahamas. This is a myth that has been in our society for a multitude of years now. In A New England Town by Kenneth A. Lockridge, he proves that America was not always democratic. Additionally, he proves that America has not always been “American”, by presenting the town of Dedham in 1635. Lockridge presents this town through the course of over one hundred years, in that time many changes happened as it made its way to a type of democracy.
Tocqueville was a Frenchman who was interested in America and its democratic design. He spoke of his observations about America in his book, Democracy in America. Tocqueville’s attitudes towards Americans seem to be very appreciative. He saw democracy as a perfect balance between freedom and equality. Yet, while he is appreciative, he is also quite critical of some of the effects of democracy in America. Tocqueville believed that there were some faults with democracy and states them in his book.
Alexis De Tocqueville painted a portrait of a flourishing democracy within the text, Democracy in America. Tocqueville proposed that equality was one of the fundamental tenets that aided the success of American democracy. He defined equality of conditions as the end of aristocracy: “the noble has fallen on the social ladder, and the commoner has risen; the one descends, the other climbs. Each half century brings them nearer, and soon they are going to touch” (Democracy in America, book, 6). American democracy flourishes because there is an established equality of conditions for all; American democracy enforced the absence of formal rank and the end of births into positions of power while encouraging forms of power that challenged rank and privilege. However, in his analysis, Alexis De Tocqueville recognized the presence of race based inequality and cautioned that the reinforcement of a racial hierarchy could be detrimental to American democracy. Such observations characterize Tocqueville as insightful and
For both Tocqueville in his “Democracy in America” and Locke in his “Second Treatise of Civil Government”, liberty holds a place of paramount importance in the pantheon of political values, specifically those in relation to democratic and republican systems (though Locke does not explicitly demand a republic as Tocqueville does) . From Tocqueville’s belief in the supremacy of liberty over equality , to Locke’s inclusion and conflation of liberty with property and life itself in his natural rights , liberty plays the crucial role of linchpin in both author’s political philosophy. Though this belief in the centrality of liberty is found in both Tocqueville and Locke, they each derivate liberty from fundamentally disparate sources, and thus hold
Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation of the American prison system brought out several interesting facts about America and how it governs itself. He talks of the danger of greed for money, the importance of forming associations, and the power of influence in town government. Although many of his observations have since changed, many of them bring about legitimate points about American government and society.
The start of the American Revolution, described by Edmund Morgan as, “the shot heard around the world,” was the “Americans’ search for principles” (Bender 63). Although the world’s colonies did not necessarily seek independence much like the Americans, the world’s colonies were nonetheless tired of the “administrative tyranny” being carried out by their colonizers (Bender 75). The American Revolution set a new standard in the colonies, proclaiming that the “rights of Englishmen” should and must be the “rights of man,” which established a new set foundation for the universal rights of man (Bender 63). This revolution spread new ideas of democracy for the colonized world, reshaping people’s expectations on how they should be governed. Bender emphasizes America as challenging “the old, imperial social forms and cultural values” and embracing modern individualism” (Bender 74). Bender shapes the American Revolution as a turning point for national governments. The American Revolution commenced a new trend of pushing out the old and introducing new self-reliant systems of government for the former
Alexis de Tocqueville, felt that the Revolution’s objective was no longer liberty, which in his opinion is what it should have been. Tocqueville insisted that the failure of not making liberty a primary objective is what brought down the French Revolution and impacted revolutions for years to come. He was concerned that all future revolutions would fall short and face shortcomings if liberty was not the main objective to create a legacy of the revolution. His theories show strength based upon the fact that in the beginning, the Revolution had clear goals and objectives, however towards the end it lacked sufficient proof that liberty was the objective at the end of the
In this excerpt from Democracy in America Alexis Tocqueville expresses his sentiments about the United States democratic government. Tocqueville believes the government's nature exists in the absolute supremacy of the majority, meaning that those citizens of the United States who are of legal age control legislation passed by the government. However, the power of the majority can exceed its limits. Tocqueville believed that the United States was a land of equality, liberty, and political wisdom. He considered it be a land where the government only served as the voice of the its citizens. He compares the government of the US to that of European systems. To him, European governments were still constricted by aristocratic privilege, the people had no hand in the formation of their government, let alone, there every day lives. He held up the American system as a successful model of what aristocratic European systems would inevitably become, systems of democracy and social equality. Although he held the American democratic system in high regards, he did have his concerns about the systems shortcomings. Tocqueville feared that the virtues he honored, such as creativity, freedom, civic participation, and taste, would be endangered by "the tyranny of the majority." In the United States the majority rules, but whose their to rule the majority. Tocqueville believed that the majority, with its unlimited power, would unavoidably turn into a tyranny. He felt that the moral beliefs of the majority would interfere with the quality of the elected legislators. The idea was that in a great number of men there was more intelligence, than in one individual, thus lacking quality in legislation. Another disadvantage of the majority was that the interests of the majority always were preferred to that of the minority. Therefore, giving the minority no chance to voice concerns.
Democracy in the United States became prominent in the early to mid 19th century. Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, was inaugurated in 1829 and was best known as the person who mainstreamed democracy in America. Because he came from a humble background, he was the “genuine common man.” (Foner, pg. 303) He claimed he recognized the needs of the people and spoke on behalf of the majority [farmers, laborers].
The very history of the country, a major contributor to the evolution of its political culture, shows a legacy of democracy that reaches from the Declaration of Independence through over two hundred years to today’s society. The formation of the country as a reaction to the tyrannical rule of a monarchy marks the first unique feature of America’s democratic political culture. It was this reactionary mindset that greatly affected many of the decisions over how to set up the new governmental system. A fear of simply creating a new, but just as tyrannic...
In this article, the author states the facts behind how America was adopted, which is important to understanding the government. John Adams, a founder of America, writes that the separation from Britain is “an opportunity of beginning government anew from the foundation.” In the beginnings, George Washington was offered to become the king by the people, but he wanted a republic instead. Once the colonies was independent, the first business the Whigs wanted to take care of was eliminating the monarchy and the idea of any kings. However, the concept of governing themselves was new because no other nation was doing it. This lead to worries from Adams who was afraid that the people were used to governing single cities not the possibility of 20 - 50 states. He also worried that because half of the population was under sixteen years of age. The author also explains how despite a democracy being formed, it was a common understanding at the time that there wouldn't be citizenship for Indians,women, and blacks. Additionally, the author mentions that in order to be successful, one must own land which was abundant and cheap at the time. Overall, the article explains in a factual manner how the government was formed based on the creation of
Between 1780 and1787, individual liberty and rights changed as federalists stopped believing the first Articles of confederation, although anti-federalist were reluctant of the ratification, they pushed for the introduction of the bill of rights. With the ratification people had a voice in the matter, which in turn, emphasized popular democratic tendencies in the United States after the Revolution. Citizen’s involvement in this ratification during the 18th century contributed to the growth of popular democracy in government.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a French aristocrat, traveled to the United States in 1831 to study the American democratic system (“Democracy in America”). While in America, Tocqueville developed a perceptive interest in the sentiments and mechanisms behind American practices, which he documented in his two-part book Democracy in America. One particular observance Tocqueville chronicled was American literature and language. A quote from Tocqueville in Democracy in America that consolidates his research into American language states, “Little by little enlightenment spreads; one sees the taste for literature and the arts awaken…. and literature becomes an arsenal open to all, from which the weak and the poor came each day to seek arms” (4-5). Because
American society’s unique foundation in “equality of conditions” is seemingly looked to in great admiration by Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America -- as he sees such a societal state as the inevitable outcome of a historical cause-and-effect chain in which “the noble has fallen on the social ladder, and the commoner has risen.” Despite such reverence however, Tocqueville also warns of several potential pitfalls arising from an equal state. In this paper, I will use Tocqueville's work to discuss one such perils of “equality of conditions”-- individualism -- and how it subsequently breeds an isolation among fellow countrymen that could very well lead to the demise of democracy, as Tocqueville himself puts it. I will do so through the
In Democracy in America Tocqueville introduces concepts such as individualism, the effects of the law of inheritance, the parental government figure, and tyranny of the majority.