Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child development stages
Child development stages
Juvenile justice system rules compared to adult justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child development stages
They Are Just Children The we as adults routinely right off as just children are being rammed into the adult justice system, because petty adults do not want to believe that a child is capable of the the unthinkable. A child, someone who doesn’t vote vote because they are too immature and too young to understand, cannot be charged as an adult. Is this really how these children should be treated? Children are very distinctive and are not the same as adults. They should not be able to be held to those same high standards. Gail Garinger author of the article Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences says,“Young people are biologically different from adults. Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain responsible controlling …show more content…
Well, that's not the case. In Kids Are Kids - Until They Commit Crimes Marjie Lundstrom says, “It is a vexing question these days for the under- eighteen crowd, the groups that we routinely write off as ‘only kids’. It’s why they can’t smoke, or drink, or go to R rated movies without our OK. Its why they don’t vote. It’s why they have curfews. It’s why we fret over their Internet access and fuss about driving privileges” (Lundstrom para 3). Now, isn't this true? We do not give them the rights that adults have because of the fact that they are just kids! They are not developed fully and are immature so they are not given these rights. So if we aren't giving them these rights how can we then turn around and call them adults in the justice system! Marjie Lundstrom also says in the same article, “That is, until they foul up. Until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager we are to call them adults. It's a glaring inconsistency that's getting more glaring by the hour as children as young as twelve and thirteen” (Lundstrom para 5-6). Which isn't this amazing! Once again she is correct everyone is so excited to call them adults all of a sudden. It is the inconsistency at which we do this; that causes those blurred lines! If you are going to charge a child as an adult, give them all the rights of an adult! But, does the sense of …show more content…
Stranger still, brain cells and connections are only being lost in areas controlling impulses, risk taking, and self control. These frontal lobes, which inhabit our violent passions, rash actions, and regulate our emotions, are vastly immature throughout the teenage years” (Thompson para 7). This, shows that the teenage brain actually goes through a recession in the areas that control impulses, risk taking, and self control. Proving that these children do not know what they are doing. He also says, “While research on brain - tissue loss can help us to understand teens better, it cannot be used to excuse their violent or homicidal behavior. But it can be used as evidence that teenager are not yet adults, and the legal system shouldn’t treat them as such” (Thompson para 11). This proves that they do not think or act the same as adults and cannot be treated like
McMahon’s “Inside Your Teenager’s Scary Brain” discusses how adolescent’s brains are delicate and can easily affect their development in a good or bad way, depending on the individual’s experiences. According to Jensen, a Harvard neuroscientist and senior neurologist at two Boston hospitals, “teenage years comprise one of the brain’s most critical periods of development”. She parallels her experiences with her own children with observations of teens in general. With new research continuing to surface, studies illustrate how susceptible juvenile’s brain are and how this could generate different techniques on how society, parents, and teachers handle them.
...who reflects on his or her own teenage years: Young teens lack the maturity, independence, and future orientation that adults have acquired” (Stevenson, 2014, p. 268). Bryan tries to explain this to the court as a way to prove that trying children as adults is unethical.
Reaves, Jessica. ¨Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?¨ Time.com, Time Inc, 17 May 2001 content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,110232,00.html.
It is expected that at a young age, children are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong in all types of situations. The majority of Supreme Court Justices abolished mandatory life in prison for juveniles that commit heinous crimes, argued this with the consideration of age immaturity, impetuosity, and also negative family and home environments. These violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault and the like depending on state law. With these monstrous acts in mind the supreme court justices argument could be proven otherwise through capability and accountability, the underdevelopment of the teenage brain and the severity of the crime. Juveniles commit heinous crimes just like adults
Similarly, going along with the prior rebuttal of the importance of differentiating juvenile’s characteristics and actions of that of an adult, science is compiling more evidence of its vitality. Many adults can look back and reminisce about an action he or she did when younger and say, “Wow I cannot believe I did that.” Science has proven the reason behind that is because an adolescent’s brain has not yet fully matured. Tsui states “Studies conclusively established that the brain of an adolescent is not fully developed, particularly in the area of the prefrontal cortex, which is critical to higher order cognitive functioning and impulse control” (645). The facts of scientific research need to be taken into consideration when distinguishing
According to the article of “Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?” at Buzzle.com, “It is a proven fact that when a child is at the age around nine or ten that they do not have the mental accessibility to think as an adult” (Borkar). Citizens see this statistic as a reason as to why children should not be tried as adults. “Children are five times more likely to be sexually assaulted in adult prisons than in juvenile facilities” (Equal Justice Initiative). These juveniles are subject to much harsher punishments which includes life sentencing (Michon). These people do not feel that these children should be in a prison for the rest of their life for something they did when they were 13. Broken families can be a reason for a child to rebel and become trouble. “Psychology speaking, it is said that there are no ‘problem children’ but only ‘problem parents’” (Borkar). Parents roles are to guide their kids in the right way. Children will not know what is right or wrong if parents do n...
If children are too young to vote, drink alcohol, drive, and go watch rated R movies, why should they be tried as adults? It has always been an issue if whether an adolescent, under the age of eighteen, convicted of violent crimes should be tried as an adult or not. There are children as young as eleven years old that are being sent to adult prisons (Krikorian 2003). In such cases the jury does not take into consideration the fact that they are too young to stand trial, their brains are not fully developed, and that they are capable of rehabilitating.
Juveniles are more than just kids. They are capable of doing anything an adult is capable of doing. One has probably heard the saying, “If you want to be treated like an adult, then act like an adult.” If they’re going to do crimes that “only” adults are capable of doing, then they should treated like an adult and be tried and sentenced like one. Imagine being close to a murder victim, wouldn’t you want them to feel hell? “How would you feel if you never got to see your child alive again while their killer served only a short sentence before being released from jail?” (hchs1259). This quote hits hard. One can only imagine being in the position of a parent whose child was murdered.
...to the article Startling Finds on Teenage Brains by Paul Thompson from Sacramento Bee, published on May 25, 2001 “...brain cells and connections are only being lost in areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control.”, during this loss of brain tissue, the juvenile cannot their impulses which can cause erratic behavior. Juveniles may not even mean to act this way they just do. It may even be something that they are necessarily aware of. Or they may be aware of it but do not notice the need to change. Juveniles just need a something to keep them out of trouble and not everyone has one.
Even though adolescents are thought to be more mature as they enter the teenage years, but according to starling finds on teenage brains by Paul Thompson (The Sacramento Bee) states that " in recent years teen-brain research is the finding that a massive loss of brain tissue occurs in teen years"(4); which means that the adolescent does not have he brain capacity to know the difference between right and wrong. This article as well states that " Gray matter, which brain researchers believe support all our thinking and emotion is purged at rate one percent to percent a year"(7). This theory supports of finding mentioned in the teenage brain produced by frontline
... the court system do this, this minor is just a kid!?” But in reality
The juvenile justice system has continued to take steps in the right direction. Scientific evidence concerning the mental development of humans during adolescence has been taken into account. It is more recognized today than it was twenty years ago that juveniles are not “miniature adults.” Instead, scientists have seen that the brain of a juvenile plays a role in their decision making skills and critical thinking processes (or lack
Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson,
In the article, “kids are kids-until they commit crimes” is about how kids are considered kids until they commit a crime. In other words, people say that kids are not kids because they commit crimes. That is why a lawmaker, Ron Wilson, had had enough with those statements. Wilson said if kids were being trialed as adults then so be it. But you have to lower the age of voting to 14. And really in light of things, how crazy would that be. The group of 18 and under, is what people usually write off as “only kids.” It is the reason why they can't drink or smoke. Why? Because they are only kids. It's like saying, ok, if you want to trial kids as adults, then let them smoke and drink and drive and all the things an adult is able to do.
Suppose you’re at the mall with your friends and you see a boy from school running out of an expensive store, and the next day you see him on the tv for burglary and second-degree murder. This young man had a bright future ahead of him like many other teenagers or children, before they unintentionally murder someone and have been convicted for something they probably didn’t even thoroughly think about, and later imprisoned. It is simply the impulsive, erratic behavior teenagers have in their teenage years caused by the significant amount of tissue loss that led the teenager to make homicidal decisions. In the United States, teenagers can be tried as adults, go to prison for possibly the rest of their life and the youngest a child can be arrested