Kent Monkman Shame And Prejudice

518 Words2 Pages

At the Agnes Etherington Arts Centre, Kent Monkman's exhibit entitled Shame and Prejudice: A Story of Resilience responds to the critique of Orientalism by addressing cultural appropriation in art, Said's concept of the Orient and the ways that 'the other' is depicted in art and media. Monkman's work is important in the context of ethnographic present and the concept of cultural appropriation. The exhibit helps frame issues surrounding how we think about 'the other'. In this case, the 'other' includes everyone who does not conform to western ideologies and traditions, regardless of where they live in the world. The Canadian Oxford dictionary defines ethnography as a branch of anthropology that deals with the scientific description of individual cultures, while cultural appropriation is defined as the unacknowledged or inappropriate …show more content…

He contends that "Orientalism is a style of thought based on an ontological and epistemological distinction made between the Orient and the Occident" (Said). Distinctions between the East and West have been a starting point for theories, epics, novels, social descriptions and political accounts concerning the customs and people of the Orient (Said). Orientalism is one of the West's deepest and most reoccurring images of 'the other' (ibid). The concept of 'the other', or those not from the west, is openly depicted in aspects of Monkham's work through his representations of Aboriginal people as the 'other'. For example, in "The Scream", he depicts the tragic removal of Aboriginal children from their parents, when they were sent into the Aboriginal school system. For myself, another example is Monkman's painting depicting a group of Aboriginal men pushing a horse down a railroad, which has meaningful similarities to the destructive creation of the Canadian Pacific

Open Document