Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teachers rights in public schools
Teachers rights in public schools
Political ideology and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Summary:
In his argument, “Kenneth Cole Gets Schooled,” David Sirota’s thesis is that Kenneth Cole’s crusade against public schools, teachers, and unions is wrongheaded and ideologically extreme. Supposedly, Cole’s campaign portrays the debate of “Teacher’s Rights vs. Students’ Rights.” However, there are many flaws in the campaign. Sirota states, “[The campaign] is the mirror opposite of how things actually work. Without extending teachers’ rights … it would be difficult … for public schools to recruit the best teacher to the specific at-risk schools that need them the most,” (para. 11.).
Analysis:
The apparent audience for Sirota’s argument are teachers, parents with children in public schools, and those debating “Teachers’ Rights vs.
Students’ Rights.” Sirota states, “Most likely, these inconvenient truths are of little concern to someone like Kenneth Cole … He sends his kids to private school, making him part of the larger trend of elites who are trying to foist radical policies onto public schools, knowing that their own kin won’t be hurt by those policies,” (para. 13). The argument is divided into four sections; first, providing background information on the ongoing campaign against organized labor; second, reporting about Kenneth Cole’s campaign and its faults; third, giving Sirota’s position and his reasons behind it; fourth, concluding with questioning Kenneth Cole’s credibility to debate the topic. Sirota does admit that a debate to determine the criteria needed to determine what an “underperforming teacher” is would be fair. Key strategies include questioning Cole’s credibility, adding the point that his children go to private school so they would not be affected by the negative effects of his campaign, and including questions in the argument to engage the reader. An explicit key question that came to my mind while reading is, were any teacher or students offended by Cole’s campaign? After reading the update on the bottom of the article stating that there was a mass outcry from teachers, I am concluding that yes, it did.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but should it be broadcast for everyone to see? In David Sirota’s article “Kenneth Cole Gets Schooled”, Sirota highly criticizes Kenneth Cole’s controversial billboard ad about teacher’s unions. Kenneth Cole, a high end clothing company, placed an ad that pits the idea of teacher’s rights against student’s rights; Sirota explains that Kenneth Cole’s advertisement created the idea that corrupt teachers are safe under teacher unions but doesn’t expand on the true purpose of a teacher’s union or talk about the struggles of not being wealthy. In Sirota’s view, Kenneth Cole’s ad symbolizes the power of the wealthy and their political opinions which can cause people to overlook actual issues in the schools. Sirota exposes Cole’s bias by examining the truth about unions, the effect of poverty on education, and the complexity of accountability.
No greater obligation is placed on school officials than to protect the children in their charge from foreseeable dangers, whether those dangers arise from the careless acts or intentional transgressions of others. Although the overarching mission of a board of education is to educate, its first imperative must be to do no harm to the children in its care. A board of education must take reasonable measures to assure that the teachers and administrators who stand as surrogate parents during the day are educating, not endangering, and protecting, not exploiting, vulnerable children (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003).
Guggenheim uses those and other devices to inspire action within the masses, and highlight a topic that has been recently shrouded by other problems our nation faces today. He also places blame upon the ‘system’ itself, many reasons add to this conclusion such as refusal to make change, with tenure being the central idea that cripples education.
The authors of The Ethics of Teaching, Kenneth A. Strike and Jonas F. Soltis, present ideas about equal opportunity and the democratic community. Kenneth Strike and Jonas Soltis mention what the NEA Code states about discrimination. The NEA states the educator cannot “exclude any student from participating in any program”. (Strike; Soltis, pg. 55). An educator also cannot exclude any student from receiving benefits. Chapter 4 mentions providing equal educational opportunities for every student. Strike and Soltis provide the Brown v. Board of Education as an example of giving equal opportunity to everyone. According to Strike and Soltis, “…segregation is illegal because it does
In the article “Against School”, John Taylor Gatto urges Americans to see the school system as it really is: testing facilities for young minds, with teachers who are pounding into student 's brains what society wants. Gatto first explains that he taught for 30 years at the best and worst schools in Manhattan. He claims to have firsthand experience of the boredom that students and teachers struggle with. Gatto believes that schooling is not necessary, and there are many successful people that were self-educated. He then explains the history and importance of mandatory schooling. To conclude his article, Gatto gives his foresight for the future of schooling. Although Gatto has a well thought out argument for his opinion on schooling, he focuses
In many low income communities, there are teachers that are careless and provide their students with poor quality education. These teachers are there just to make sure that they keep receiving their monthly paychecks and act in this way because they believe that low income students do not have the drive, the passion, or the potential to be able to make something of themselves and one day be in a better place than they are now. Anyon reveals that in working class schools student’s “Work is often evaluated not according to whether it is right or wrong but according to whether the children followed the right steps.” (3). This is important because it demonstrates that low income students are being taught in a very basic way. These children are being negatively affected by this because if they are always being taught in this way then they will never be challenged academically, which can play a huge role in their futures. This argument can also be seen in other articles. In the New York Times
John Taylor Gatto, who was a teacher at the public school for twenty-six years, and the writer of the essay “Against School” that first appeared in Harper’s magazine in 2001, censures and blames the American public school’s educational system in his argumentative essay with various convincible supporting ideas. Gatto argues that the demands of public education system’s schooling are essential problems in “Against School”. Gatto shows some positive examples of the educating without forced schooling and shows models of the ‘success without forced modern schooling’. Indeed, the writer insists that historically forced schooling is not related to intellectual and financial success in American history. James Bryant Conant, who was the twenty-third
Doctor Benjamin Barber’s article The Educated Student: Global Citizen or Global Consumer? discusses how the schools are being attacked by advertising campaigns. Barber talks about the poor school districts being targeted by a company called Channel One. Channel One provides these less fortunate schools with computers, televisions, and other technology. In return the schools have to show the students a twelve minute video that contains three minutes of advertising. In my opinion, this means were trading out our textbooks for fashion and material things. I do not believe the upper class schools have to deal with the same inequalities as the lower class schools. Doctor Barber’s intentions in his writings are about educating people about empowering themselves through culture and education. Doctor Barber assumes that 9/11 would empower more people and help produce a better education system. Doctor Barber stated ‘’in the aftermath of 9/11, it was particularly those public-official-citizens. All citizens because in what they do, they are committed to the welfare of their neighbors, their children, to future generations.” (Barber 420). I believe that 9/11 has had more negative effects than positive, and education has not profited from the tragedy that occurred more than ten y...
...the real world, we need to adopt a modern approach that is proven to work and built to last.” He says that parents, not politicians or bureaucrats, should be in charge of the education dollars spent on their children and that teachers need to be liberated from the politicized, bureaucratic status quo and rewarded for the educational value they create. Robert Sarvis plans on maximizing school choice through public-school matching programs, ending education fads, deregulating private schools and public-school reform, and fostering every aspect of education policy.
The Quality of a child’s education often either limits or opens up a world of opportunities. Those who study the purpose of public education and the way it is distributed throughout society can often identify clear correlations between social class and the type of education a student receives. It is generally known by society that wealthy families obtain the best opportunities money can buy. Education is a tool of intellectual and economical empowerment and since the quality of education is strongly influenced by social class, a smaller portion of the American population obtains the opportunities acquired from a top notch education. Many people believe that educational inequalities are perpetuated from the interests of specific classes, but some researchers like John Gatto believe that there are even stronger social forces in play. In the essay “Against Schools” the author John Gatto presents three arguments: (1) that are educational system is flawed, (2) that the American educational system is purposely designed to create a massive working class that is easy to manipulate, and (3) alternative teaching methods should be applied to teach children to think for themselves. In this essay I will be summarizing and relating each of these arguments to other educational essays. Also, I will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s argument.
Fischer, L., Schimmel, D., & Stellman, L. (2007). Teachers and the law (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Even though the Brown v. Board of Education was 62 years ago, African Americans are still fighting to have an equal education opportunity. “But many schools are as segregated today as they were before the ruling, and black children throughout the United States are performing at the bottom of the American educational system” (Jackson 1). Nevertheless, it took decades of hard work and struggle by numerous African Americans for a better education system. Education is the key to success, it gives people the knowledge that they need to strive and become more intelligent thinkers, which leads to more opportunities for them in the job industry. Ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned discrimination of any kind, African Americans have every right to have this equal educational opportunity like everyone else. But yet, they were stopped in their tracks by disapproving Americans, who confined the succession of African Americans in the education system. Now that we are in the 21st century, there’s still negligence on black’s education. The black community do not have equal education opportunities because of the lack of funding, poverty experienced by the children in the neighborhoods and society’s views of the black community.
The “Not So Gleeful” case is full of issues that concern the teaching profession - both morally and legally. In analyzing this case I will be using the lens of having knowledge of and understanding of selected laws, regulations and other formal and informal rules which apply to public schooling in Ontario. I will also be using the method outlined in the Allison & Allison article, Working on case studies and other professional problems learned in Week 1 of this 5002 course. My analysis begins by summarizing what the story is about and listing the issues in the case, then leads to identifying and analyzing three important legal issues in depth. The “Not So Gleeful” story is an event that begins with a small crowd of teachers, who are gathered
The budget cuts within educational services are affecting students, teachers and the schools in general in countless ways. First, students are at a heightened disadvantage when there are fewer funds within the field of education. As the amount of money per student continues to decrease in many states, students’ education is being compromised in unfavorable ways (Emeagwali). It is true that when budget cuts force education services to reduce many opportunities for pupils, their learning is often hurt. For example, when a student from a low income family enters a school that is suffering from receiving a high budget allowance, that student, who most likely needs increased attention within the school, is not able to be provided with the education needed to grow to a level equivalent with others of his age because of the removal of extra programs within that school along with overcrowded classrooms forced upon teachers. As a result, the student’s learning is hindered, and they now have to work harder in years later just to try and be at an average level (Feldman). It is not simply a student with a certain background who is being affected by lack of funds within educational services either. Students everywhere are faced with a paucity of opportunities for a sound basic education which damages their constitutional rights, according to Rebell (Rebell, “Safeguarding the Right” 1855). Scarcity of sound basic education for children leads to poor learning habits and needs; therefore, a child’s ability to learn becomes insufficient, which causes difficulties for him in later years of his life (Rebell, “Safeguarding the Right” 1860-61). Despite legislatures claims that fiscal pressure “in no way lessens the constitutional duties [for...
Creativity was allowed, materials were available, direction was more specific, and the teachers over all seemed to show great compassion and care for their students. Both of these studies I believe support the claims made by Bowles & Gintis. Bowles & Gintis' claims were based in the fact that education is inherently unequal among social classes and that the children of these social classes are made ready to give their labor power through schools. Anyon adds to this to say that these are the characteristics of the classrooms and how those characteristics are translated into the social class's workplace. Anyon also adds to the argument that schools adds to the inequality of social classes. Lareau adds to the argument that these social dynamics are so engrained into our everyday lives that most of the time it’s not