Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparisons between the movie and the book of much ado about nothing
Much ado about nothing branagh's version
Much ado about nothing branagh's version
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I enjoyed watching Kenneth Branagh’s adaptation of Much Ado About Nothing. I visualized a lot of the play fairly differently than what was shown on screen, however, I felt most of the imagery still worked cohesively with the original work. Starting with characters, I really enjoyed Branagh as Benedick. I thought that he did an excellent job of staying true to Shakespearan Benedick’s comedic style. One of my favorite scenes–which I think many people can echo–was the Prince and his entourage tricking Benedick. Branagh is brilliant in this scene; his performance is hilarious, but also completely unaware of itself which allows the audience to stay fully immersed in it. Beatrice was also fantastic, however, I did not see an Emma Thompson-esque person …show more content…
Something of an older-sister-like figure. I did not enjoy her tricking scene as much. I feel like there could have been just a bit more screen time/attention put towards it. It just did not seem as thought out as Benedick’s. I thought the casting choices for the roles of Claudio and Hero were very well done. I didn’t “see” in my head all of the PDA between Claudio and Hero, but it did a lot for their in-film characterization and definitely made the wedding scene all the more shocking. As far as the Princes go, I really, really liked Denzel Washington’s performance. As with many of these characters, I didn’t originally see the Prince as Denzel Washington, but, he does a great job of being the slightly naive, clearly well intentioned Prince. I have to confess, I did not really enjoy Keanu Reeves’ performance as Don John. I felt that he was far too dramatic, although that could be an acting choice to show the ridiculousness of the character. Even if that is the case, a performance shouldn’t remove the viewer from the show. I think the film lost out on that. Despite this, I really enjoyed Dogberry and Verges’
Overall, I enjoyed this play. Even with the dull ending, I found it to be entertaining and a good use of my time. The cast was great and they made good use of a decent
Overall, the actors chosen to play each role were well picked. All of them portrayed the role they were supposed to very well. In particular, I think the best two were Ruby Archuleta and Ladd Devine. Ruby is a strong character in general, with obvious weaknesses, like her stubbornness in what may not have been the best times to be stubborn, making her well rounded. Ladd Devine is a good ‘villain’.
...ce Borachio confesses about his and Don John's plot, everyone lays their grudges and challenges aside. Claudio still marries Hero while Benedick and Beatrice also wed together.
Much Ado About Nothing is a tale of two very different relationships. The relationship between Beatrice, the niece of the Governor of Messina and Benedick, a close friend of the Nobleman Don Pedro and that of a young soldier called Claudio and The Governor’s young and beautiful daughter Hero.
Set in the sixteenth century, Much Ado About Nothing is revolved around the thought of love and marriage. Primarily, this is prevalent in the two main characters, Beatrice and Benedick. They have once been courted which suggests more maturity than the majority of couples in Shakespeare’s various plays. In the duration of the play, the violent language between Benedick and Beatrice is most evident through their ridicule. Both characters always speak critically regardless of whether they are talking to each other or out loud about one another. This is highlighted when Beatrice exclaims, “What should I do with him—dress him in my apparel / and make him my waiting gentlewoman? He that hath a / beard is more than / a youth, and he that hath no beard is less than a/ man; and he that is more than a youth is not for me, and he that is less than a/ man, I am not for him...
The modernization of nearly outdated and cliché settings typically used for Shakespearian plays such as Much Ado helps enforce Whedon's attempt to make the film and play familiar, as well as creates accessibility for the audience regardless of how well they may understand Shakespeare's language. Both the ensemble and individual cast members assist in achieving Whedon's vision by creating an atmosphere that seems familiar if only that it could be our own family and friends throwing that same banter back and forth between each other. Their playful and occasionally raw performances combine with a spectacular setting to help make Whedon's Much Ado About Nothing a stellar film that is a nearly perfect modern translation of a classic, centuries old
In the play of `Much Ado About Nothing', Beatrice is portrayed as a witty and strong willed woman who talks a great deal, appearing determined not to marry. However, Don Pedro concocts a plot that brings her together with Benedick and they marry at the end.
...With its unforgettable characters and witty charm, this Much Ado entertains the masses and at the same time reveals the troubles and adversity of love and mistrust. Kenneth Branagh creates his own individualistic adaptation of this classic through the use of visual imagery, characterization, and setting. Branagh cut many lines and speeches from the text to better support his interpretation of a more open and informal society of warm-hearted, affectionate characters. Though Shakespeare's mood is more formal, Branagh remains true to the essence of the play as all of the same characters and most of the dialogue are justly included in the film. Although distinct differences can be made between Branagh’s film and Shakespeare’s written work, they both share a common denominator of good old-fashioned entertainment; and in the world of theater, nothing else really matters.
Besides the fact that I didn't like this play, the actors did do a pretty good job with their acting and memorization of their lines. Couple times Marisol hesitated with her lines but it wasn't too bad. I like the accents they were using. It wasn't to hard to understand what they were saying, but once again there were those times when their accents did effect a little on their pronunciations and my understanding on what they were saying. Overall, I don't think they were too believable with their characters. They didn't reach me.
Feminist critics of Much Ado About Nothing, like Sylvia Townsend Warner, praise Beatrice for being "free and uninhibited" ("Women as Writers," Warner, 272). Beatrice is a strong female character who marries only after asserting her disapproval for the traditionally voiceless role of women in marriage and courtship relationships of the 16th and 17th c. Beatrice is a fearless verbal warrior, and Benedick is her greatest challenger. Their verbal bantering allow for each of their strengths and opinions to show, and together they glory in the challenge of their next duel.
All of the characters in Much Ado About Nothing seemed to develop a personality of their own from the very first scene. It also helped that I saw the movie version of Much Ado About Nothing before we read the play so I could almost get a picture in my head as to what each character looked like. As the character's had their own personality, so did the two love relationships in the play. Benedick and Beatrice seemed to hate each other so much from the very start of the play that as the play carried on it almost seemed like the two went full circle in their relationship. But their relationship might not have changed for the better without help from Claudio, Don Pedro, Leonato, Ursula or Hero. In Claudio's and Hero's relationship seemed to be much more conventional in the way they came together. Claudio first saw Hero and instantly fell in love with her, while Hero stood by and took orders from her father, Leonato. Only when Don John devised his deception to break Claudio and Hero apart that I felt the relationship was in trouble, but even then I felt there was hope.
scene 1 'If he send me no husband for which is a blessing…Lord I could
William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing Much Ado About Nothing is clearly a classic comedy; lots of wit, puns, a group of stupid characters (Dogberry and the Watch) and although there are complications during the middle Acts, everything turns out right in the end. The first scene contains a lot of witty jokes and uses puns to show that right from the start of the play it is a comedy. Messenger: 'And a good soldier too, lady. ' Beatrice: 'And a good soldier to a lady. ' Beatrice and Benedick appear to have a 'teasing relationship'.
Shakespeare’s influence continues even in the world of film, not invented until several hundreds of years after his death in 1616. As well as the inevitable BBC remakes of most of his plays, newer adaptation such as Kenneth Branagh’s ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ (starring Keanu Reeves and Denzel Washington) and Baz Luhrmann’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ (featuring Claire Danes and Leonardo DiCaprio) have met critical acclaim and can be credited with bringing Shakespeare to a new generation not inclined to visiting theatres.
Reelviews review of the film describes the life and vitality of the play as amazing. The majority of this vitality and energy within the play exudes from Thompson and Branaghs sparkling duet. Packed full of passion and charisma they capture the essence of Shakespeare’s original words and deliver a terrific performance onto the silver screen. Between the two they successfully convey the huge amount of chemistry between them onto the screen, undoubtedly leaving any onlooker with a smile on their face. Beatrice and Benedicks developing relationship is such a joy to watch throughout the play. Not only has Branagh successfully kept the comedic value of the original play intact, but also cemented a spectacular romantic one throughout. Word count: 495