Max Weber and Karl Marx, two prolific Sociologists who share different views with the origins and development of modern capitalism. They wanted to understand the rise of capitalism, the causes of it, as well as the direction it was heading. As they started to dissect capitalism they developed two separate conclusions generated from completely different factors. It’s hard to fathom the fact that Weber and Marx could arrive at two distinct conclusions while studying a similar event. They took two separate angles of approach, which caused them to have to opposing theories. Due too Weber and Marx approaching capitalism from different angles, their views of the dynamics, and the understanding of the origins differed.
These differences are evident in their explanations of the origins of capitalism. Marx credited the rise of capitalism to the fall of feudal society and the rise of the bourgeoisie. During this time there was an increase in the population, which caused the demand for specialized goods to grow making the traditional mode of production. Division of labor was then implemented on massive scales to satisfy those needs, which created a surplus and turned necessities into commodities. This change in the mode of production from guilds to giant manufactures is what brought about the rise of capitalism according to Marx.
Weber also took the same approach, but credited the rise of capitalism to the religious discipline of the Protestant faith. In fact, Weber believed that there was a connection between Protestantism and capitalism. Now, let’s not forget, that these people lived during a time of uncertainty, and if they felt protected and safe about their future they would invest in it. A central theme for the Protestant faith is the ...
... middle of paper ...
...did not believe any outside influences created or continued to run capitalism, so he saw more room for change than Weber did.
Weber and Marx’s essentially took different approaches to break down the origins, workings and the direction capitalism was heading.
Comparing the two could be a tough task , Marx doesn’t think that religion could influence the origins or capitalism, because he thought material conditions was what determined a societies beliefs. Differing to Marx, Weber supposed the social climate of capitalism was created from the principles the protestant religion installed into its disciples and then passed on to the present and future partisans of capitalism. This difference in the observation of the same capitalistic culture is a result of their different approaches to the subject, but neither theory could be said to hold more water than the other does.
Even before the beginning of the twentieth century, the debate between socialists and capitalists has raged. In The Jungle, by Upton Sinclair, he portrays capitalism as the cause of all evils in society. Sinclair shows the horrors of capitalism. In The Gospel of Wealth, by Andrew Carnegie, he portrays capitalism as a system of opportunity. However, both Carnegie and Sinclair had something to gain from their writings; both men had an agenda. Capitalism and socialism both have advantages and pitfalls; when capitalism is adopted using certain socialist ideals, a truly prosperous society exists.
Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) and Max Weber (1864 - 1920) both recognised that economic categories played a large part in social class structure. Nineteenth Century history plays an important part in understanding how class influenced identities. The Industrial revolution was changing the structure of the communities, the rich or landowners having a far better standard of living with better education, health care, property ownership and power than the poor. The working class would have a daily struggle to survive. The change in Trade Unions meant that the working class had a voice, helping to push their needs forward, looking for better standards of living and working conditions. Marx's concept of class was based around the production of goods. The emerging owners of these goods, or capital, were known as the ruling class. Marxism would define only two classes, the ruling class and the working class. The influence on identity of these two class structures would be very relevant in those days. The working class would earn a wage from the production of the goods but the ruling class would sell these for a profit and exploit the workers. The two classes were on two different levels of wealth, property ownership and social standing and they would struggle to mix, they were dependent on each other but the rewards would be unevenly matched.
While growing up in Germany Max Weber witnessed the expansion of cities, the aristocracy being replaced by managerial elite, companies rapidly rising, and the industrial revolution. These changes in Germany, as well as the rest of the western world, pushed Weber to analyze the phenomenon, specifically to understand what makes capitalism in the west different and how capitalism was established. In The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism, Weber explains that capitalism is all about profit and what creates the variance between capitalism in the west and the rest of the world is rationalization, “the process in which social institutions and social interaction become increasingly governed by systematic, methodical procedures and rules”
1). Weber and Marx views differ when it comes to their interpretations about the origins and dynamics of capitalism, Weber’s view focuses on the Protestant reformation and the spirit of capitalism in the west and how “the widespread influence of Protestantism after the reformation helped explain why full blown rational capitalism developed where and when it did” (Mcintosh pg. 115). Although he doesn’t believe that Protestantism caused for the creation of capitalism he does believe that Calvinism a branch of Protestantism plays a roll due to the effects it shaped upon these people and their protestant ethics. Mcintosh helps to explain that “in such a time the religious forces which express themselves through such channels are the decisive influences in the formation of national character” (Mcintosh pg. 122). In other words due to the asceticism and the spirit of capitalism amongst these religious followers they abstained from various worldly pleasures to obtain their spiritual “calling”. In decreasing pleasures and increasing work, production and profits, they were hopeful that they were increasing their chances of going to heaven due to their belief about predestination which states “in theology, the doctrine that all events have been willed by God. John Calvin interpreted biblical predestination to mean that God willed eternal damnation for some people and salvation for others” (www.wikipedia.com). Thus they followed the doctrine precisely, which they believed could possibly decrease their chances of being the individuals who were damned to hell. Although Wesley argued “I fear that wherever riches have increased, the essence of religion has decreased in the same proportion. So although the form of religion remains, the spirit i...
According to Max Weber, the guide line developed by the Protestantism movement influenced the capitalism in different ways. First of all, since Protestant movement created a new religion different from Catholic Church, the church membership created division among people and caused the social classes which characterized the capitalism. In addition, protestant movement promoted the “spirit of hard work, of progress.” (Page11) Since people had to work hard, it was easy for them to accumulate materials and to encourage the materialism spirit. Also, since Catholicism considered the Colling to be a matter of priest or people who work in church activities, the new understanding of this terminology by Martin Luther, as “the fulfilment of worldly duties is under all circumstances the only way to live acceptably,” (Page 41) encouraged each
Unlike Marx who didn’t believe that culture influenced capitalism, Weber focused primarily on that and ideas. Weber says that traditional capitalism was when the elite kept their traditional values and status in the society, they didn’t have to take any actions to keep living as they normally had. Where as in rational capitalism, the spirit of capitalism shows that the culture has duties they need to keep up with instead of just keeping the norms that have already been in place. They have to work for what they get. Through rational capitalism, according to Weber, Life is to be lived with a specific goal in mind, which is making money. As humans, if we are organized, honest and overall good we believe that making more, and more money will come to us.
Weber had argued that Marx was too narrow in his views. He felt that Marx was only concerned with the economic issues and believed that that issue is a central force that changed the society. Weber, on the other hand, tried to look at the macro-sociological phenomenon in his explanation. Weber felt that there is just more than one explanation about causes of change.
Despite their different approaches, both theories conclude in universal equality, a real equality between humans that has never before been observed in any lasting civilization. While both theories operate on reason and seem to be sound, they remain unproven due to their contingency on various factors of time and place, but mainly on their prerequisite of incorruptibility. Now, while both theories may very well have the odds dramatically stacked against their favor, I believe they must be thoroughly dissected for their content before attempting to condemn them to utopianism. In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man-made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, Marx is able to outline a repeating variable....
Max Weber’s main contention in this work is that what he calls the “Protestant Ethic” played a vital role in fostering the development of industrial capitalism in Europe and the United States. The Protestant Ethic was the idea found in some sects of Protestantism that one had a duty to God to succeed in their life’s work, but were bound to a lifestyle of asceticism that prevented them from spending the wealth they earned on themselves. The wealth that was accumulated through this lifestyle was reinvested into the work process in order to create more wealth. This continual reinvestment of wealth provided the necessary capital and conditions that allowed for the development of modern capitalism.
People became capitalists not as a result of their religion, but due to their religious ideas, and norms. People began to validate themselves for their hard work, and focused on rationalization of the world (Weber in Appelrouth and Edles 2016). With the rationalization of life, individuals let go of their traditional spiritual drive. Everything was highly calculated and controlled, there was an elimination of spontaneity, creativity, and autonomy. People began to validate themselves for their success, and no longer requiring God’s approval. People became mesmerized with commodity fetishism, and they acquired things for mere comfort, and pleasure. According to Weber, we got trapped in an “iron cage” instead of wearing a disposable “saint-like cloak” because we have become so dependent on our commodities, that they run our lives. So, although these modified ideas are unhealthy for our spiritual needs, they are beneficial to modern capitalism (Weber, in Appelrouth and Edles:
Once capitalism came about, it was like a machine that you were being pulled into without an alternative option. Currently, whether we agree or disagree, for example if you want to survive you need to have a job and you need to make money. Weber believed that social actions were becoming based on efficiency instead of the old types of social actions, which were based on lineage or kinship. Behavior had become dominated by goal-oriented rationality and less by tradition and values. According to Web...
Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.
Marx also focused on the alienation of individuals from society due to capitalism. He saw it as the people were separate from their labor. In older times, people had a trade that they were good at and it described them but after capitalism came into play then their labor just became a job and was no longer personal. Neither Durkheim nor Weber believed this to be so. This is also a difference between them. ( Ritzer, 2004) Marx also tended to go more into depth about the capital and co...
His most influential theory was he believed that it was the protestant faith which was linked with capitalism not exploitation which Karl Marx believed. Weber thought the protestant beliefs and ethics were the catalyst to the capitalism system. Weber believed it was not the Protestant ethic that caused capitalism but it provided the necessary moral in which capitalism could happen. It was both the Industrial revolution and capitalism in which massively impacted changes to happen. It was this in which Weber used to make a link between religious ideas and social change. Calvinism (16th and 17th century) is a branch of Protestantism that believed few were chosen by god to go to heaven. Accumulation of wealth was the sign of those chosen. This attitude and ethic caused people to try accumulate more capital and invest more in order to gain more. “The fulfilment of duty in worldly affairs is the highest form of moral activity” (Sztompka). This he interpreted as an encouragement within the protestant faith to work hard and save money which then resulted in the division in labour and social class. The people of this faith Were driven to work hard and save their money instead of spending it. They invested it into their businesses. As a result of this it meant that when the industrial revolution needed a large investment of capital, there were this particular group of people within society with good work ethics and money to
Karl Marx was a philosopher, a sociologist, economist, and a journalist. His work in economics laid a foundation for the modern understanding of distribution of labor, and its relation to wealth generation. His theories about the society, economic structure and politics, which is known as Marxism led to him developing social classes. He later on showed how social classes were determined by an individual’s position in relation to the production process, and how they determine his or her political views. According to Karl Marx, capitalism was a result of the industrial revolution. Capitalism is a system that has been founded on the production of commodities for the purpose of sale. Marx defined the