Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marx view on capitalism
Marx view on capitalism
Marx view on capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Das Kapital, Karl Marx explains alienation, or Entfremdung, a tool of cultural hegemony: the idea that capitalism has caused workers to be alienated from the product of their work, the act of working, their “species-essence” or Gattungswesen, and other workers. America’s public education system was built around the Prussian Industrial-Model, a way of mass producing a docile proletariat labor force through public education, and as such it should not be surprising that capitalist alienation is experienced in schools. Whether through memorization or testing, American schools are teaching the wrong thing: capitalist cultural hegemony.
Students are unable to see themselves in the product of their work. Students’ labor is used to study, work on
…show more content…
projects, and write essays, among other tasks. Rather than taking the information that they have been taught and using it to produce a piece truly reflective of all that they know and their ability to think, students are producing bubbled-in sheets as a result of their labor. The meaning of a student's labor is then further obscured from her by reducing it to a letter grade or a percentage. Instead of teaching children how to apply knowledge, schools are teaching children that their labor’s only practical purpose is to be quantified. Here is where the commodification of a student’s labor is best seen. With the factory system, labor has become a product to be bought and sold at the lowest possible cost to the capitalists. In schools, labor has been standardized so that teachers and schools become responsible for teaching students the most basic knowledge in the most efficient way possible. Teachers become the functional capitalist, one responsible for managing the means of production, and are thusly punished when the school is not churning out standardized students. This then lends itself to the capitalization of the act of learning. For students, the act of producing translates to the act of learning. America’s public education has made it so that learning is little more than memorization. Information is memorized rather than mastered because mastery is not efficient. The word “analysis” has lost nearly all meaning. Rather than having students analyze information, far too often, students are taught to memorize the analysis deemed most correct. For example, in history, students are not analyzing events, rather they are memorizing the given analysis for said event. Flashcards are proliferated and encouraged in schools. The very concept of flashcards exemplifies the factory system’s encroachment into education; read the front, say the answer, flip, next card, read the front, say the answer, flip, next card, repeat ad nauseum. This mechanization of learning is leading to the mechanization of students themselves. Workers become alienated from themselves as producers- from their Gattungswesen (which roughly translates to “species essence”).
Gattungswesen is traditionally thought of as being based in social interactions. Marx was a dialectical materialist that famously believed that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles”. This led to his belief that Gattungswesen is based in labor and production. However, a person’s labor is only relevant to him when the work is purposeful. By not being able to connect to their work or see its purpose, laborers are severed from their Gattungswesen, the core of their humanity. In schools, any question as to how the curriculum is relevant to the “real world” is quickly shut down, most infamously in math. Often times, the curriculum is specialized to a degree where any relevance to the student as a person is lost. If a student is interested in one area of a class and would like to learn more about it, teachers simply can not allow for more time than originally allotted for a specific topic. With class sizes so large and syllabi so structured, a student’s education is so generalized that he is often unable to find his niche, his passion, what it is that he wants to do with his life. A student’s inability to connect to his work leads to school being reduced to a
competition. Students are alienated from each other as fellow scholars. Because of the commodification of students’ labor, through standardization or, more specifically, assigning letter grades or percentages, students are easily comparable. Increasingly, higher education is becoming the only option for students to succeed, thusly making getting into college inherently more competitive (Altbach). With this, class rank and taking as many advanced courses as humanly possible, has become more important than ever. As such, “low-achieving” students are frequently left behind in large classes that focus even more heavily on memorization rather than analysis. Generally, all of this in combination has led to lower level classes (and, by extension, those who are enrolled in them) being stigmatized. Rather than working to make lower level classes less neglected, students have, for the most part, fed into the rugged individualism of capitalism. The extent to which America’s public education system is a tool of capitalist cultural hegemony is truly alarming. Not only are schools dehumanizing children, they are also instilling a toxic sense of rugged individualism that effectively teaches children their place in the class system on the first day of school. Despite the standardized curriculum and specialized syllabi, capitalist cultural hegemony is the one thing that schools are truly teaching.
In John Gatto’s essay “Against Schools” he states from experience as a school teacher that are current educational system is at fault (148). He claims that classrooms are often filled with boredom manufactured by repetitive class work and unenthusiastic teachings. Students are not actively engaged and challenged by their work and more often than not they have either already covered the concepts taught in class or they just do not understand what is being taught to them. The children contained in classrooms have come to believe that their teachers are not all that knowledgeable about the subjects that they are teaching and this advances their apathy towards education. The teachers also feel disadvantaged while fulfilling their roles as teachers because the students often bring rude and careless attitudes to class. Teachers often wish to change the curriculums that are set for students in order to create a more effective lesson plan, but they are restricted by strict regulations and consequences that bind them to their compulsory teachings (148-149). An active illustration of John Gatto’s perspective on our educational system can be found in Mike Rose’s essay “I Just Wanna Be Average” (157). Throughout this piece of literature the author Mike Rose describes the kind of education he received while undergoing teachings in the vocational track. During Mike’s vocational experiences he was taught by teachers that were inexperienced and poorly trained in the subjects they taught. As a result, their lesson plan and the assignments they prepared for class were not designed to proficiently teach students anything practical. For example, the curriculum of Mike Rose’s English class for the entire semester consisted of the repeated reading of ...
We live in a society where we are surrounded by people telling us that school/education and being educated is the only way to succeed. However, the school system is not up to the standards we want it to uphold. There are three issues we discuss the most which are the government, the student, and the teacher. In John Taylor Gatto 's essay “Against School”, we see the inside perspective of the educational system from the view of a teacher. In “I Just Wanna Be Average”, an essay written by Mike Rose, we hear a student 's experience of being in a vocational class in the lower level class in the educational system when he was supposed to be in the higher class.
Karl Marx 's writing of ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848 has been documented by a vast number of academics as one of the most influential pieces of political texts written in the modern era. Its ideologically driven ideas formed the solid foundation of the Communist movement throughout the 20th century, offering a greater alternative for those who were rapidly becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the growing wealth and social divisions created by capitalism. A feeling not just felt in by a couple of individuals in one society, but a feeling that was spreading throughout various societies worldwide. As Toma highlights in his work, Marx felt that ‘capitalism would produce a crisis-ridden, polarized society destined to be taken over by
Clean your room! Do the dishes! Finish your homework! All these commands have been barked at kids since they were little. At a young age, there was no question where the authority lay in the household; the parent obviously had the say so on what went on. However, as the adolescents in the home began to grow up, the line between authority holder and the individual respecting that authority begins to blur. For example, if you’re eighteen and technically an adult, but still live in your parents’ house, do you have a say in what goes on? This is where the question of authority comes in. Karl Marx discusses authority and force on a greater level in his work
Karl Marx (1818-1883) is a German philosopher and revolutionary socialist. Karl Marx born in Prussia on May 5, 1818. He began exploring sociopolitical theories at university among the Young Hegelians after that he became a journalist and his socialist writings expelled him from Germany and France. In 1848, he published The Communist Manifesto with Friedrich Engels and then he was exiled to London, where he wrote his first volume of Das Kapital.
Massey et al. states, “To put it crudely, parents of upper-class children have no interest in devoting resources to the education of lower-class children, so that poor and working-class students end up going to lousy schools to receive a lousy education to prepare them for the lousy jobs they will hold as adults.” (Massey et al., 20). This example shows in a simple manner how critical theory functions to generate socioeconomic inequality because the lousy schools that poor and working-class students have to attend are the result of not enough resources going into the educations of lower-class children. Massey et al. shows that the structure of dominance is generating a system that disadvantages historically underrepresented students. Furthermore, hooks writes, “That shift from beloved, all-black schools to white schools where black students were always seen as interlopers, as not really belonging, taught me the difference between education as the practice of freedom and education that merely strives to reinforce domination.” (hooks, 3). hooks was disadvantaged because she was not accustomed to the segregated school as the white students were. Critical Theory states that inequality is reproduced by specific institutional arrangements, such as the arrangements that hooks dealt with. In addition to the experiences in higher education due to the structure of dominance, hooks
In John Gatto’s essay “Against Schools” he states from experience as a school teacher that are current educational system is at fault (148). He claims that classrooms are often filled with boredom manufactured by repetitive class work and unenthusiastic teachings. Students are not actively engaged and challenged by their work and more often than not they have either already covered t...
Analysis of the Main Strengths and Weaknesses of Marx’s Sociological Thought “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” Marx and Engels (1967, p.67) Born in 1818, Karl Marx, using his philosophical and socialist ideas, attempted to show how conflict and struggle in social development were important in the development of a society. The works of Marx were influenced by three distinct intellectual traditions: German idealist philosophy, French socialism and British political economy. German idealist philosophy is an approach based on the thesis that only the mind and its content really exist. This philosophy maintains that it is through the advance of human reason that human beings progress. French socialism is a political doctrine that emerged during the French Revolution and emphasised social progress led by a new industrial class.
Sociology question on Marx 1. Briefly outline the relationship between, Hegel, Feuerbach and Marx Hegel who was an idealistic philosopher he developed the theory of dialectical. Hegel applied the dialectic theory to the history of human society; he used idealism instead of materialism. Hegel moveable variables in his dialectic were human ideas and thoughts. He came to a conclusion that society is essentially an expression of people’s thoughts.
Inspired by the works of Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin nonetheless drew his ideology from many other great 19th century philosophers. However, Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” was immensely important to the success of Russia under Leninist rule as it started a new era in history. Viewed as taboo in a capitalist society, Karl Marx started a movement that would permanently change the history of the entire world. Also, around this time, the Populist promoted a doctrine of social and economic equality, although weak in its ideology and method, overall. Lenin was also inspired by the anarchists who sought revolution as an ultimate means to the end of old regimes, in the hope of a new, better society. To his core, a revolutionary, V.I. Lenin was driven to evoke the class struggle that would ultimately transform Russia into a Socialist powerhouse. Through following primarily in the footsteps of Karl Marx, Lenin was to a lesser extent inspired by the Populists, the Anarchists, and the Social Democrats.
A free-market gives way to power and control to a certain group of individuals at the top of economic system, which results in inequality. The inequality sets the working class at a disadvantage because there is minimal to no intervention in protecting the workers. Karl Marx claimed that capitalism exploited the working class, which would eventually alienate the individual in a work setting, from himself, and humanity. In order to deter further alienation and exploitation of workers, Marx figured that the working class had to think alike in ordinance to the problem of a capitalist system to agree that social change was necessary.
Did you know that while Karl Marx popularized and became the face of European Socialism and thus Marxism through his books and propaganda pieces, he was not and did not think of himself as a Marxist? This is stated in a letter Marx wrote to a friend in which he clarified, "I know only one thing, I am not a Marxist." Karl Marx was a profoundly outspoken writer and activist for socialism and soon became the face of socialism through his bold critiques of economy that would unfortunately lead him to being expelled from both Paris and Belgium. What really elevated him to becoming the poster child of the socialism movement was the book cowritten by him and one of his closest colleagues Friedrich Engels.
According to Marx class is determined by property associations not by revenue or status. It is determined by allocation and utilization, which represent the production and power relations of class. Marx’s differentiate one class from another rooted on two criteria: possession of the means of production and control of the labor power of others. The major class groups are the capitalist also known as bourgeoisie and the workers or proletariat. The capitalist own the means of production and purchase the labor power of others. Proletariat is the laboring lower class. They are the ones who sell their own labor power. Class conflict to possess power over the means of production is the powerful force behind social growth.
It was in the ancient Greek city-states that political thought was born. But it was not until the industrial revolution that political thought began to truly evolve. Urbanization and capitalism had begun to significantly reshape society at this time, and it was due to this fact that an opposing political thought was produced. Socialism. It is a socio-economic system that is identified for its belief in both social ownership and egalitarian control over the means of production. And it was in the 1840s that a man had formed a political theory that would be structured upon the absence of any divisions in social classes, any type of monetary system, and any form of state. The man was the German political theorist Karl Marx and his revolutionary
Karl Marx was a journalist, revolutionary, sociologist. He was born in Prussia, educated in Trier, and later began his democratic career. He was a person who became democratic because of the horrible things that happened in his era.