Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A basic outline of Marx’s theory
Karl Marx's view of a communist society
Karl Marx Political Sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A basic outline of Marx’s theory
Name: Vinit Sanghvi
Course: M.Sc. – Finance
Subject: Economics
Roll No: 14-MF-22
REVIEW OF ‘A CONTRIBUTION TO THE CRITIQUE OF POLITICAL ECONOMY’
Author: Karl Marx
First Published: 1859
Translated: S. W. Ryazanskaya
INTRODUCTION
Although studying law, Karl Marx was fascinated by philosophy and philosophical ideologies of G. W. F. Hegel had a huge impact on him. Marx turned his attention towards economic questions while he was an editor of Rheinische Zeitung during 1842-43 thereafter writing extensively on communist ideology and critiquing the political economy. Marx wrote the title ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy’ during 1859 analyzing the political economy. Many of the ideas presented in this book forms the basis of a
The working class provided the necessary labor for the production of commodity while the middle class held the assets and had access to industrial production. Marx analyzed the bourgeois economy into 3 major aspects: the Commodity, Money or simple circulation, and Capital.
The book analyzes only the first 2 aspects in greater detail. I would also like to take into account certain economic aspects such as Gold Standard, Arbitrage for my interpretation which are not part of the discussion of the book.
THE COMMODITY
According to English Economists, commodity is “anything necessary, useful or pleasant in life”1 and the objective of bourgeois society is to maximize commodity accumulation thereby termed as Capitalists according to Marxist Philosophy. However, for any product to be termed as commodity, it must possess two intrinsic properties: use-value and exchange-value1.
1 Chapter I: The Commodity, “A Contribution to the Critique of Political
A few grains of grass, growing wild in the woods, and unfit for any human purpose.”
Thus, universal equivalents imbibes universal labor time equivalents in them. The discrepancy in the labor time involved in the production of the commodity may lead to the process of arbitrage where an individual indulges into buying and selling at the same time at different rate and maximizing the earnings. As the use value of a loaf of bread do not change, the change in the labor time affects the local exchange value which can be different from the universal exchange value leading to the event of arbitrage.
The exchange of one commodity for another ensues the concept of Barter. In such cases, a commodity may not have exchange value as it is not demanded for any other universal equivalent. Thus a commodity which in nominal terms is having an exchange value is not having an exchange value in real sense owing to lack of demand of that commodity. This shows that exchange values of the commodities conform to the supply-demand equilibrium. Thus, to avoid this discrepancy, the exchange value of all the commodities is equated with an exclusive commodity called
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader . 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
A commodity looks simple enough, says the pro-capitalist economist. Most such economists say a commodity is any object with a use value that somebody wants and is willing to pay for, and its monetary value is determined by supply and demand. Nothing drives such a common sense economist more to distraction than reading Karl Marx who says a commodity is “a very queer thing, abounding in metaphysical subtleties and theological niceties.” What did Marx mean? Economics is a science, a mathematical science, what has it got to do with metaphysics and theology?
In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relat...
In Marxian political economy it analysis the Capitalist mode of production (CMP), Begins with the commodity. Commodity is itself more general category than capitalist Production. This is distinguish between Simple mode of production (SCP) and Capitalist mode of production (CMP). By simple commodity mode of production is meant a system of social production wherein (a) where an individual producers own their means of production,
British political economy was brought about by the social analysis of early capitalism by writers such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. (Bilton, Bonnett, Jones, 2002, p.476) Using these concepts as a base to his theories, Marx further argued against the capitalist regime and was a firm believer of the revolution of the workers which would one day bring about the destruction of capitalism. Marx was also influenced by the philosophical ideas of Georg W.F. Hegel. However, unlike Hegel who was an idealist Marx was a materialist as he believed that the processes of reality as real, concrete existences in the social world. Hegel believed that although these processes were dynamic, they were an expression of development rather than being solid.
He elaborates on many of Marx teachings regarding commodity and how commodity feticism ultimately leads to the proletariat class of people becoming nothing more than objects in the game that is capitalism. Lukacs says that, “as the commodity becomes universally dominant, this situation changes radically and qualitatively. The fate of the worker becomes the fate of society as a whole” (Lukacs 8). Essentially, Lukacs is arguing much of what Marx explained to the world earlier, that when commodity becomes the driving force in a society, the working class in the society will suffer. This is exactly what they believed would happen in a capitalistic society.
Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.
The contributions of a worker diminish once owners figure out ways to increase the means of production. If an employee is producing twenty pairs of shoes a day, and working ten long excruciating hours earning the minimum of ten dollars an hour. The company begins to incorporate new technology that speeds up the production process, and now the worker is producing forty pairs of shoes. If each pair of shoes is selling for forty-five dollars, then the total profit made is 1,800 dollars. After compensating the worker for their labor, the surplus value of that company is 1,700 dollars just accounting for one employee. If the new technology speeds up the process of production, then the worker may end up working less hours and her role makes less of an impact. Marx recognizes that the worker is an “expendable object that performs routinized tasks” in a capitalist economy (Appelrouth & Edles, 2016). The worker is at a disadvantage because companies will determine their decisions based on profiting over jeopardizing their economy by placing the worker first. Capitalism reinforces globalization because relocation tends to take place, and then there are individuals competing for labor and
Karl Marx was a philosopher, a sociologist, economist, and a journalist. His work in economics laid a foundation for the modern understanding of distribution of labor, and its relation to wealth generation. His theories about the society, economic structure and politics, which is known as Marxism led to him developing social classes. He later on showed how social classes were determined by an individual’s position in relation to the production process, and how they determine his or her political views. According to Karl Marx, capitalism was a result of the industrial revolution. Capitalism is a system that has been founded on the production of commodities for the purpose of sale. Marx defined the
The capitalist is motivated by being rewarded wealth. Capital can only multiply by giving itself in return of labor power. This exchange is based on specified percentages. For example, after a long 12 hours of weaving the worker is only compensated two shillings. They attain residual wealth by taking advantage of workers. These workers are being compensated less than the value of their work. The workers endure great deals of exploitation. Workers put their labor power into effect to acquire means of survival which makes existence possible. The amount of commodities is based on the cost of life and the workers’ work ethic. Marx foreseen that class conflict between the bourgeoisie and proletariat would result in the collapsing of capitalism. The motivations of the capitalist and the workers create conflict because the capitalist attempt to uphold capitalism by advocating their principles, beliefs, and fabricated perceptions that prevent proletariats from rebelling. Once the two classes conflict with one another the cla...
In contrast, Marx offered the perspective that the development of class and industry was due to the way men “[produced] their means of subsistence” (3). The rise of industrialism directly resulted from the ways men obtained their means for living. For example, some men could own property and industries, while others could not. As a result, those who don’t own property or industries have to work for those who do. In addition, with the development of individual families also comes the development of “unequal distribution [of] labor and its products” which creates a society with a more dominate or superior class and a lower class.
This begins the capitalistic cycle where someone is repetitively buying some commodity solely to sell it, hoping to make a positive surplus-value. This general formula of capital is M → C → M’ where M is the money used to buy a commodity, C, and where M’ is the original exchange-value plus the surplus-value. (Marx 1867: 329-336) This type of circulation is essentially Marx’s basic idea of capitalism, where there is a never-ending lust for profit causing this cycle to occur over and over
Capitalist produce commodities for the exchange market and to stay competitive must extract as much as possible from the workers at the lowest possible cost. Workers sell their work for a wages to the capitalists, which in turn sell the product. Marx said that commodities have two values, the “use-value”
Karl Marx had very strong viewpoints in regards to capitalism, making him a great candidate for this assignment. People constantly debate over whether his ideologies held any grain of truth to them. I believe that although not everything Marx predicted in his writings has come true (yet), he was definitely right on about a lot of issues. As a matter of fact, his teachings can definitely be applied to today’s society. This paper will give a summary of Marx’s political philosophy. It will also discuss a contemporary issue: the current economic crisis— and how Marx believed racism played a crucial a role in it. Finally, through the lens he has developed, I will explain how Marx would analyze this issue and how one can argue that it spurred the current movement known as Occupy Wall Street.