Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human growth and development of childhood
Immanuel kant and abortion
Kant theory of morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human growth and development of childhood
Growing up, I was given the freedom to choose who I wanted to be, to decide what I wanted to do. I grew up with many different opportunities and chances to try out new things. A simple life I led as a child, sheltered and loved by all, but I was oblivious to reality, lost in my own “perfect” world. Yet as I grew up and began to surpass the age of imaginary worlds, the idea of “perfection” had begun to fade and reality began to settle in. Like a splash of cold water, I went from a childish mindset to an adult’s. Child hood play was a thing of the past and responsibility became the norm. According to Kantian’s theory he rejects all the previous notions of the way to live a happy life by other theorists and instead believes only moral goods and intrinsic acts can lead to the good life. My childhood I could say was a happy life, yet according to some of the other theorists, I was missing some components. Now as a college student I have yet to figure out the road to this so called happy life, so through this class I took a journey looking at many theories, ideas, theorists, and philosophy components in search of the optimum guide to the happy life, yet what I discovered was that there is no “perfect” guide to the happy life. Kant has a great idea, but so does some other theorists, therefore my conclusion is this; I can follow any or all of the theorists in search of the “perfect” happy life yet in each I will find faults or limits in them. There is no “perfect” guide to follow, only people who in themselves have found satisfaction in one theory and mindless of the limits or faults stick with that idea. Kant is the closest theorist I would have to say to following a “real” happy life, he has some really good points and objectives. Ho... ... middle of paper ... ...rson’s part to pay a reparation to that person they wronged. Therefore I lean more towards ethical egoism which would help people think more before they act and cause the world to become a better place over Kant’s idea of saying moral good, moral wrong, end of story, but no consequence involved. In Kant’s perspective it is just a slap on a child’s hand and saying bad, but then the child repeats that same action again, but with ethical egoism, it is a serious punishment and that child will think twice before doing that action again. Overall Kant’s theory is the closest we can come to when following the path to the good life. Even though he agrees with abortion and the idea that a tiny slap to a person will make a difference, he does fight against anything that does not show ultimate intention or good will. Works Cited Professor Stevens PowerPoint slides/notes
In Intro to Ethics, we have discussed each moral theory in the context of how the theories dealt with the theory of right conduct and with the deontic status the action had. When we looked at how each theory we talked about dealt with deontic status, we looked at how the actions were right or wrong. The main theories we looked at this semester that dealt with right conduct were utilitarianism, Kant’s moral theory, and virtue ethics. Although each of these moral theories has its own flaws, I believe that Kant’s moral theory is the strongest and most superior out of all the moral theories.
Happiness. People go to any means by which to obtain the many varied materials and issues
Kant theory is saying that everyone must do things for the right reasons. According to Deontological ethics theory, an action is considered favourable sometimes because of some good aspect of action in itself without considering its good result from the action. This theory is much based upon the one’s morals and values which expresses the “sake of duty” and virtue. Deontology tells us to be fair and not to take advantage of others while teleology tells about doing whatever we want and it gives us a result that is good to us. [17]
His theory is based on one’s judgment rather than what the society considers right or wrong. Kant bases his theory on the rightness or wrongness of a deed rather than the consequences that follow the act. He explains that people need not follow the rules blindly just for the results, but carefully consider the morality of the actions themselves.
Emerging adults are always in the search of their own identity while experimenting with their life, love life and career path. Constant changes in emerging adult’s life are common. From changing residential place to love life, work and education, instability often presents during emerging adulthood (Santrock, 2013). In addition, emerging adults tend to place focus on themselves where they have no commitment and responsibilities toward others. This provides them a great chance to exercise their own will and to execute their plans for the future. During emerging adulthood, many feel like as if they do not belong to either adolescents or adult. The transition ends only when they have distinct marks of an adult. According to Arnett (as cited in Santrock, 2014), “emerging adulthood is the age of possibilities” (p. 296). The age of possibilities is when an individual has the opportunity to turn things around in life, especially when they are from a poor family
One misconception of happiness is that some people think in order to be happy they need to live a perfect life. Well, there is no such thing as perfect since every one’s definition of perfect is different. But perfect life here implies to one’s ideal life or to be accepted by most people and make mistakes as little as possible. It might sound like a nonsense, but there are some people out there believe perfect life will make one happy. Of course, to live one’s perfect life is not an easy thing to achieve as it also puts enormous pressure in one’s life, although in some rare cases it could be turned into a motivation. Those pressures to be perfect, which at the same time also to be happy, become the seeds of unhappiness. My best friend has been living in that kind of life even until now. She believes to meet people’s expectations and to make only few blunders in life eventually will make her happy. Thus, she keeps putting a smile on her face and do what people expect her to do, especially her parents who expect her to be as brilliant as her brother. To be honest, I always find it
Morality has been a subject of many philosophical discussions that has prompted varied responses from different philosophers. One of the most famous approaches to morality is that of Immanuel Kant in his writing Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morals. Kant in this work argues that the reason for doing a particular action or the drive to do good things is a fundamental basis of defining moral quality in a person. To him, an action could be considered morally right only if the motivation behind doing that action was out of ‘goodwill’. When he defines these moral rules, he characterizes them in the form of imperatives – the hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative. While hypothetical imperatives deal with motivations and actions that lead to a particular end, categorical imperatives are a product of rational behavior in human beings. Kant considers such categorical imperatives to be the moral basis for life.
These philosophers offer a rounded perspective on achieving happiness. In examining these philosophers, I believe Marx is too focused on the materialistic items, and it is possible to be happy and not have anything. It is equally possible to be rich and unhappy. On the other perspective with the philosopher Kant, I do not believe that reason is the sole driving factor to achieve happiness. My views seem to align most with St Thomas and Plato. I agree that others may have different types of happiness depending on what they value, as Plato
Kant is strictly a non-consequentialist philosopher, which means that he believes that a person's choices should have nothing to do with the desired outcome, but instead mankind simply goes about doing good because it is morally correct. Kant theorizes that moral reasoning is not based on factual knowledge and that reason by itself can reveal the basic principles of morality. Ideas contemplated and developed and theorized by Kant include the concepts of good will, the categorical imperative, universal acceptability, and humanity as an end rather than a means. These non-consequential concepts have made a remarkable impression on current ethical views.
Egoism states the egoism, holds that moral conduct ought to be judged through self-interest. Egoism states that the good consequences for the individual agent outweigh the consequences placed upon others. In egoism, actions could be considered ethical for the individual if the one taking the action is benefited, while any benefit or detriment to the welfare of others is a side effect and not as important as the consequences for the individual.
Daisy Grewal, who holds a BA in psychology from UCLA and PhD in social psychology from Yale University, put an article on scientificamerican on February 18, 2014 —“A happy life may not be a meaningful life.” This essay points out that happiness and meaning do not always go together.
Everyone just wants to be happy, right? But is there a path to happiness and wellbeing?
Since the start of the world, Man has been searching for the meaning of life. He has looked everywhere but often failed to find it. The reason to live is to savor life and to live one filled with joy. This is another problem Man has often faced: how to be happy. Most of us think that we are happy when everyone else is proud of us, when we have achieved something for them or done something for the rest of the world. We strive to accomplish what others expect us to do, whether it is our parents, our friends, or even our teachers. The truth is something that has always been shunned: Man finds happiness by accomplishing the goals he sets for himself, realizing the dreams he holds. It turns out that the pursuit of happiness, something men have killed themselves in the frustration of grasping, is not so elusive after all.
We might not have the same opinions, paths, and ways of living; but we all, millions of people around the world, share the same purpose of life: Being able to say “I am having a good life!” What we mean by “good life” is living in pure happiness and having a wonderful peace of mind. The difference between us is that each one of us chooses a different way in his pursuit of happiness. Some find it in stability with a big house, a family, and a good paying job. Some find it in adventure and wildness, travel, and taking risks. While others don’t really have specific criteria or an organized plan, they just believe that happiness comes with living each day as if it was the last, with no worries about the rest. Personally, I find it in trying to be the best version of myself, in staying true to my principles, and in the same time in being able to make my own decisions; which reminds me of what George Loewenstein said “Just because we figure out that X makes people happy and they're choosing Y, we don't want to impose X on them.”
When I was young, I of ten told to myself that when I grew up I could be anything I wanted to be and I always took for granted that this was true. I knew exactly what I was going to be, and I would spend hours dreaming about how wonderful my life would be when I grew up. One day, though, when did I grew up I realized that things had not turned out the way I had always expected they would.