Kant's Theory Of Ethical Dilemma

Parents are faced with ethical dilemmas constantly throughout the life of their children. It has been widely accepted across the world that a parent should do whatever it takes to take care of their children, but what happens when taking care of your children means you may have to break a law. This scenario involves a loving parent who is a nursing assistant who wants to take care of their dying child in need by getting them the proper medication, in which their insurance does not cover, nor do they have the money to afford it. The parent cannot afford the administrated drugs to assist their child. That’s when this particular parent was faced with an ethical dilemma. The parent decided that because they work at the local hospital they could

Each and every person has moral values and follow some type of personalized moral code. Nursing assistants and other professionals have a duty to care for their patients/customers assist people in need and be held accountable. Based on the scenario mentioned, is the parent considered a thief because they took the medications from the hospital without any consent or proof of purchase. Is this scenario cut, dry and simple? By utilizing Kant’s theory of ethics, you can easily state the parent in the scenario actions were not justified. Kant’s idea is that the categorical imperative should be used as a tool to determine right or wrong actions. Overall, he basically states that you shouldn’t perform any actions you wouldn’t want to be universal law. In essence, basically you should not do anything you wouldn’t won’t someone else to do. Thinking back to universal law, based off of Kant’s theory, his approach when referencing stealing would

The Choice be that stealing is bad and unacceptable no matter the case. The problem with that theory is that

3

it leaves no room for the unknown, variables, or life threatening situations.

The decisions we make in life are not just as simply put as Kant’s theory of ethics.