Kantian Philosophy: Immanuel Kant

990 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Deontological theories of ethics

Immanuel Kant was German philosopher who was an influential figure in modern philosophy since he was one of the first to analyze the process of thinking. Kant was not only just a prominent figure in philosophy, but contributed greatly in metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics. Some of his major works were the Critique of Pure Reason, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Critique of Practical Reason, and Critique of Judgement. His form of ethics or philosophy is known as Kantian Ethics which are mostly based off of deontology, which is the ethical position that judges an action based on its morality and not the consequence. Like any philosophy on ethics, there are pros and cons to it and we will analyze them. I personally believe that …show more content…

It was said he never even traveled more than a few miles away from the city his whole life. Kant lived a very strict, disciplined life and was never married. Kant lived such a strict life that it was said that “Kant followed such a practiced routine that his neighbors could set a watch by his schedule”(Stone). His social life, however, was very good as he was a popular teacher and successful author. So when he died, his funeral was a city-wide event because he was so respected and admired by …show more content…

This means that there will be exceptions with universal rules. Let's take the universal rule “Don’t Kill” as an example. What if a person is thrust in a situation where somebody breaks into their house to rob, harm, or do something even worse? Would killing this person be immoral if it is in self defense? Or what about the universal rule: never steal. What if a family is starving and is just trying to feed their kids, but they have no other option but to steal? Would that be immoral as well? There will often be exceptions with trying to make absolute universal rules because there are so many situations and variables to account for. Also, another critique is that people would be acting out of moral duty instead of inclination, which is bad. Would you want somebody to do something because they must or because they want to? For example, if you were very sick and your friends came to visit you and they told you they only came because it was their “duty”. That would not feel too good. If we were to follow Kant’s ethics of duty, us people would seem more inhuman since we would only obey absolute rules for duty instead of

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Nietzsche And Kant's Theory Of Ethics

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s theory of ethics is rooted in deontology. Describing Kant’s ethics as deontological means that they are derivative of mankind’s moral duty. For Kant, this critical component of ethics is an extension of Hume’s fork as it creates a third category, which is synthetic Apriori. This category is comprised of math, ethics and causality. His rules-based ethics revolves around the good will, as deontology in its nature revolves around adhering to the rules. Kant says that intelligence is great by nature, but means very little unless you apply them in virtuous and good will. In order for something to be truly good, it must be intrinsically good and without qualification.

    Read More

  • Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    The philosopher Immanuel Kant in “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” in his chapter I, brings to us a magnificent explanation about moral philosophy where analyze and critics the conduct, acts of the human beings. Kant states, “Nothing can possibly be convinced in the world, or even out it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will”. I agree with this affirmation because everything we do must be doing it by good will. If we do this we reach happiness according with the author in his words, “Thus a good will appears to constitute the indispensable condition even of being worthy of happiness”.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Transcendental Deductions of the pure concept of the understanding in Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, in its most general sense, explains how concepts relate a priori to objects in virtue of the fact that the power of knowing an object through representations is known as understanding. According to Kant, the foundation of all knowledge is the self, our own consciousness because without the self, experience is not possible. The purpose of this essay is to lay out Kant’s deduction of the pure concept of understanding and show how our concepts are not just empirical, but concepts a priori. We will walk through Kant’s argument and reasoning as he uncovers each layer of understanding, eventually leading up to the conclusion mentioned above.

    Read More

  • Moral Law According To Kant

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a deontologist from Germany in the eithteenth century. He believed that the only test of whether a decision is right or wrong is whether it could be applied to everyone. Would it be all right for everyone to do what you are doing? If not, your decision is wrong. It would be wrong, for example, to make a promise with the intention of breaking it because if everyone did that, no one would believe anyone's promises. In ethics, Kant tried to show that doing one's duty consisted in following only those principles that one would accept as applying equally to all.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant and The Hypothetical Imperatives

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant an influential philosopher of deontological, or duty based, ethics. Kant believed actions are given moral worth, not by the outcome, but by the motive behind it, and the only way to act morally is one that comes about based on universal laws. There is a class of imperatives that we must do, despite the outcome. Kant called these "categorical imperatives," we can call these moral actions. We do them because we feel obligated, they are our duty, and we do so whether we like the outcome, or not. There is also "hypothetical imperatives," these are things we need to do to get a specific outcome. Kant states that if we believe that an action is moral that we could argue that it be a universal law.

    Read More

  • Ethics: Ethics And Ethics Of Kantian Ethics

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kantian ethic is based upon the well-known teaching of the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. According to Kant, an action has moral worth only if the action is done with the right intentions out of a “sense of duty.” I believe that Kant’s formulation of humanity requires for us human beings to not thread merely as a means to an end. As the saying goes “do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “For Kant, individuals are intelligent beings who has the mental capability to think for themselves and make choices” Despite our choices made, they should be done with a motive right intention, not to appease yourself, or for a reward (MacKinnon).

    Read More

  • Kant and Deontological Theory

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    While Kant’s theory may seem “overly optimistic” (Johnson, 2008) now, it was ruled as acceptable and rational behavior then. Kant believed that any moral or ethical decision could be achieved with consistent behavior. While judgment was based on reason, morals were based on rational choices made by human beings (Freeman, 2000). A human’s brain is the most advanced in the animal kingdom. Not only do human beings work on instinct, but they have the ability to sort out situations in order to make a decision. This includes weighing the pros and cons of decisions that could be made and how they affect others either positively or negatively. This is called rational thought. Kant believed that any human being able to rationalize a decision before it was made had the ability to be a morally just person (Freeman, 2000). There were certain things that made the decision moral, and he called it the “Categorical Imperative” (Johnson, 2008). If someone was immoral they violated this CI and were considered irrational. The CI is said to be an automatic response which was part of Kant’s argument that all people were deserving of respect. This automatic response to rational thinking is where he is considered, now, to be “overly optimistic” (Johnson, 2008).

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant And Kant

    1575 Words  | 4 Pages

    Concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character, the foundations of morality have long been subject to much controversy in the world, from this, the notion of morality and its impact in our daily life doesn't cease to be relevant. Even though human being might be created equal, differences among their ability to think, to reason, to act have been pointed out. From the fact that for most of people nowadays, the human being is judge by his actions in society, can we really define a basis for morality? Notice that Morality deals with the behavior, like objectives, motives and goals. Using comparison between Schopenhauer and Kant’s argument, I will try to figure out what is the real basis of morality for human being? What are the motives of our actions? What might be the repercussions in our daily life?

    Read More

  • Kants Formalism Theory

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    The theories of Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, have had an impact on the formulation and shaping of ethics today. Immanuel Kant graced this earth from 1724 to 1804. During his eighty year life time, he formulated many interesting ideas regarding ethical conduct and motivation.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant Research Paper

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was born April 22, 1724, to Johann and Anna Kant in Konigsberg, Prussia, known today as Kaliningrad, Russia. He was the fourth child in series of nine. Kant’s parents were devoted followers of Pietism—a revival of piety in the Lutheran Church. Without his family’s connection to the church and the priest’s acknowledgement of Kant’s potential, Kant would never have received a formal education. In turn, this priest had part in molding one of the greatest minds that has held relevance for several centuries. (Biography).

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant Research Paper

    1772 Words  | 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant, a famous philosopher, is most well known for his everlasting influence in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics, and other fields. From a Pietist working class family, Kant learned early on about the importance of hard work, honesty, cleanliness, and independence. Kant was born in Königsberg, now considered a part of Russia, and attended the University of Königsberg where he grew passionate about philosophy and was greatly influenced by Christian Wolff, G. W. Leibniz, and even Isaac Newton. Immanuel Kant spent his life teaching as a private tutor and a professor at the university. He published scientific works, books, Latin dissertations, and philosophical works. He developed arguments for God’s

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Influence On Modern Philosophy

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant is one of the most influential modern philosophers because he laid the groundwork of modern philosophy and works impacted modern philosophers after him and still impact modern philosophy today. Kant bases his ethics on duty, rationality, and motive. Kant bases his epistemology on priori knowledge, posteriori knowledge and the world as it relates to the mind.

    Read More

  • Lying And Maxim Analysis

    246 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alright, I’ll see if I can clarify this further. Essentially, Kant thought that there were two kinds of duties: perfect and imperfect duties. When you’re considering a particular action, there’s generally a maxim that you can extract from that action. A typical example is lying and the maxim “you should lie”. When we make this maxim a universal law, we make it something everyone should do, all the time. In other words, we get the law “you should always lie”. But it’s not possible for us to want this to be a universal law, because such a law is illogical; if everyone always lied, the very concept of a lie would be destroyed because lying is only possible if people sometimes tell the truth. This sort of logical impossibility leads to a perfect

    Read More

  • The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

    2523 Words  | 6 Pages

    Criticism is Kant's original achievement; it identifies him as one of the greatest thinkers of mankind and as one of the most influential authors in contemporary philosophy. But it is important to understand what Kant means by'criticism', or 'critique'. In a general sense the term refers to a general cultivation of reason 'by way of the secure path of science' (Bxxx). More particularly, its use is not negative, but positive, a fact that finds expression in the famous expression, 'I have therefore found it necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith' (Bxxx). Correspondingly, its negative use consists in not allowing one's self to 'venture with speculative reason beyond the limits of experience' (Bxxiv). Thus, criticism removes the decisive hindrance that threatens to supplant or even destroy the 'absolutely necessary practical employment of pure reason..in which it {pure reason} inevitably goes beyond the limits of sensibility' (Bxxv). Accordingly, the critique guarantees a secure path for science by confining speculative reason and by giving practical reason the complete use of its rights: rights that thus far had not been recognised.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory

    761 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) discussed many ethical systems and reasoning’s some were based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant’s eyes, reason is directly correlated with morals and ideals. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for appropriateness or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. A moral act is an act done for the "right" reasons. Kant would argue that to make a promise for the wrong reason is not moral you might as well not make the promise. You must follow a certain code in order to find truth behind your actions. Kant believed that you should treat everyone with value, dignity, and respect.

    Read More

More about Kantian Philosophy: Immanuel Kant

Open Document