Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast juvenile and adult jail
Juveniles rehabilitation
What are the differences between the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast juvenile and adult jail
Residential placement centers are like rehabs. Juveniles may be sent to an institution, camp, ranch, or group home to live there for a period of time to receive therapy for substance abuse, mental illness, or other kind of behavioral problems. It may be a ranch type environment. When the juvenile is released from residential placement, most juveniles are required to serve aftercare. So that means juvenile is still under the supervision of the juvenile corrections department. If the juvenile does not obey with the rules of the residential facility, the aftercare will be rescinded and be back to the facility.
Before there was a juvenile justice system, juveniles received the same punishment as adults. Some of the differences between the adult criminal justice system and the juvenile justice system are juvenile justice systems aim to recover and improve the juvenile offender so that they can go back to society without a problem. Juveniles are accused of delinquent acts. Public trials by jury are not given to juveniles. If a juvenile commits a crime, the judge will decide if the minor is delinquent. This process is called adjudication. After a juvenile has been deemed delinquent, a court judge will decide a disposition in the case. The disposition implicates probation or residential placement.
…show more content…
After a case has been stated to juvenile court, it is sent to intake. In the juvenile court, there’s an important process mad. Usually the case is dismissing from the juvenile, the matter is handle informally, the case will be pushed in the juvenile justice system. The second step is whether or not the officer chooses to process the juvenile further in the system. The prosecutor could decide to file a petition in juvenile court. The third main step is adjudication. If there is a file of petition against the juvenile declaring delinquent conduct, then the next level is
The Court ruled for the juvenile, stating that his rights to due process were indeed violated according to the Fourteenth Amendment. “The proceedings of the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the Constitution. The Court held that the proceedings for juveniles had to comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment” (Oyez, n.d.). The Court analyzed the juvenile court's method of handling cases, verifying that, while there are good reasons behind handling juveniles in a different way from adults, adolescents seeking to settling delinquency and detainment cases are qualified for certain procedural safeguards under the Due Process Act of the Fourteenth
The state of Florida has passed a new law pertaining to the Juvenile Justice System which gives the officer that makes first contact with the youth offender. The officer may, if the youth has no prior criminal acts and the offense is a non-violent or non-drug related offense, just file a civil citation. This happens to be a new program designed to address a youth’s behavior at their first encounter with the Juvenile Justice system providing an alternative to being arrested. Vital to the Department of Juvenile Justice’s effort, civil citations will help reform the juvenile justice system by handing first-time misdemeanor offenders the chance to participate in intervention programs at the earliest stage of delinquency. Civil citations saves millions of dollars by curving first-time misdemeanor offenders, that would have otherwise been spent if the youth had been arrested and forced to go through formal delinquency procedures. The civil citation process put into place by the state of Florida starts with the arrest forms being held and then a diversion process begins. Once the assessment completed to determine the youth’s needs a referral to the appropriate Community Diversion Service is given. The diversion service may consist of a Teen Court, First Offender Program, or any other Diversion Programs the community may have set up. If successful the teen will have no juvenile record and be released from the program. With unsuccessful youths, there arrest form will be completed and a record of the offense will go on the books then they will be sent to delinquency intake to spend some time in a facility for juvenile offenders.
Police officers have a great amount of discretion. Since they are not always supervised and on patrol they choose which cases should be process and which one should just be not. Police discretion is the most important part because it determines the outcomes of the interaction between the police and the juvenile. Krisberg and Austin noted that police have five basic options in deciding what course of action to pursue with juveniles. The first one would be release, accompanied by a warning to the juvenile. The second one would be release, accompanied by an official report. The third one would be Station adjustment. Which include release to parent accompanied by an official reprimand, referral to a community youth agency, or referral to a public or private social welfare or mental health agency. Fourth would be Referral to juvenile court without detention and last referral to the juvenile court with detention.
Although putting juveniles into institutions, for many juvenile offenders occurred in the first decades of the 1900s, extensive use of probation for juveniles existed as well. As it does today, probation gave a middle ground nature for judges connecting release and placement in an institution. By 1927, trial programs for juvenile offenders existed in approximately every state. In the 1940s and 1950s, reformers attempted to improve the conditions found in most juvenile institutions. Alternatives to institutions emerged, such as forestry and probation camps. These camps provided a prearranged setting for male juvenile offenders, while emphasizing learning and occupational skills. Though, the efficiency of these options as alternatives to incarceration was dubious since they were not obtainable to the worst offenders. Yet, these changes marked the start of formal, community-based instruction that would turn out to be more extensive in following decades.
This paper will inform you on the intake process of a juvenile. There are three main parts.
In the last 42 years little to no changes have been made to correct the standards that govern punitive measures towards juvenile delinquency. Today juvenile law is governed by state and many states have enacted a juvenile code. However, in numerous cases, juveniles are transferred to adult court when juvenile courts waive or relinquish jurisdiction. Adolescents should not be tried in the adult court system or sentenced to adult penitentiary's on account of: teen brains are not mature which causes a lack of understanding towards the system, incarceration in an adult facility increases juvenile crime, and children that are sentenced to adult prison are vulnerable to abuse and rape.
There are two pathways that juvenile facilities are divided into first are detention centers and second are correctional centers. Detention centers hold juvenile during the pre-adjudication phase of the case or in rare cases post-adjudicated juveniles for example, they are waiting for a placement into a residential program. Pre-adjudication refers not having the court hear facts supporting the allegations against the juvenile whereas post-adjudication refers to having been found to have committed a delinquent act by a judge. Some reasons that young people enter into detention centers include: perceived to be at high risk...
The Juvenile Justice system, since its conception over a century ago, has been one at conflict with itself. Originally conceived as a fatherly entity intervening into the lives of the troubled urban youths, it has since been transformed into a rigid and adversarial arena restrained by the demands of personal liberty and due process. The nature of a juvenile's experience within the juvenile justice system has come almost full circle from being treated as an adult, then as an unaccountable child, now almost as an adult once more.
What is important to understand in terms at the difference between the juvenile and adult system is that there is a level of dependency that is created tween the two and the juvenile system focuses on how to help rather than in prison individuals at such a young age. However, it usually depends on the type of crimes that have been committed and what those crimes me for the families and how they impact of the greater society. The adult system distinguishes between dependence and delinquency mainly because there was a psychological transition that occurs with juveniles that is not always a predictor of a cyclical life of crime. However, if an adult is committed to the justice system there can be a dependency of delinquency and a cycle of crime that is more likely to be sustained at that age and level of cognitive ability then in comparison to a juvenile. The reasoning behind this is important is that is focused on maintaining a level of attention to the needs and capacity abilities of individuals living and working in different types of societies (Zinn et al.,
One of the fasting growing juvenile treatment and interventions programs are known as teen courts. Teen courts serve as an alternative juvenile justice, to young offenders. Non-violent, and mostly first time offenders are sentenced by their peers’ in teen courts. Teen courts also serve as juvenile justice diversion programs. Teen courts vary from state to state, and sometimes within the same state. With this program, all parties of the judicial setting are juveniles with the exception of the judge. Each teen court, is designed specifically to meet the needs of the community it serves. Teen courts were created to re-educate offenders throughout the judicial process, create a program with sanctions that will allow the youth not to have a juvenile record, and to also instil a sense of responsibility.
for youngsters who have a long history of convictions for less serious felonies for which the juvenile court disposition has not been effective” (qtd. in Katel).
This is a hearing since the juveniles do not stand before a trial. The hearing will be scheduled by the intake officer. While proceeding to the court, the judge may talk to the people concerned about the juvenile, evaluate any evidence that was collected if a crime was committed or any other complaints against the juvenile, and consider the youth’s previous history if any crimes were committed and how many times the juvenile has been in trouble with the law. The judge will then order an outcome which can result in probation, institutionalization, formal diversion, or even holding the juvenile for charges against him or her. Probation is supervised and the juvenile must stay at home or in a community setting, but must report to his or her officer regularly. The juvenile must follow all probation conditions granted by the court such as obeying the laws, staying in school, staying away from drugs and alcohol and other requirements instructed. Institutionalization is a form of detention system that is to rehabilitate deviant youths. They also serve as a protection for at-risk youths. There are two types of Juvenile institutions: Long-term correctional and short-term temporary care. Long-term includes, for the most part, training schools, youth ranches and camps, and boot camp. They also usually place male and females separately. Short-term facilities include jails, shelters, detention homes, and reception areas. In the facility you also
Group homes serve as a form of intervention for juvenile offenders, usually court ordered and less restrictive than other residential placement facilities and foster care placements, in which the juvenile is under 24-hour supervision (Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention, n.d.).
In order to establish effective and fair juvenile justice policies, there must be a complete understanding of the factors affecting the development of decision-making capabilities over the course of adolescence and into adulthood. Research on developmental immaturities has important implications for establishing mitigating factors that diminish the culpability of juvenile offenders and affect their ability to participate in criminal court. This developmental research supports a categorical distinction between juveniles and adults, bringing into question the validity of statutes requiring juvenile transfer to adult court.
As stated by Bartol and Bartol “Juvenile delinquency is an imprecise, nebulous, social, clinical, and legal label for a wide variety of law- and norm-violating behavior” (2011, Pg 139). The juvenile delinquency term has come to imply disgrace in today's correctional institution. Our government is up hold to procedures and expected to come with a solution to solving the delinquent problem. An underage offender can be labeled a delinquent for breaking any number of laws, ranging from robbery to running away from home, and especially being involved in school violence. The following situations faced by correction officials when dealing with juvenile delinquents will be examined. Three main areas (child development, punishments, and deterrence tactics) will be briefly analyzed to give adequate explanation of the issue.