Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juvenile justice voacbulary
Challenges and issues in the juvenile justice system
Challenges and issues in the juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Juvenile justice voacbulary
The Juvenile Justice System should be reformed and focus on educating and rehabilitating juveniles instead of utilizing abusive techniques in juveniles prison. I believe that by providing a youth with an education and providing therapy and training schools to an incarcerated youth will prevent him/her to enter the system once they are out in the community.
My reasons to believe in more community- based programs are the fact that they will be a reduction in the frequency and severity of Juvenile Crime, also training schools will provide the youth with a financial resource that will present them from committing a crime for financial reason, besides government funding should be available to help the programs succeed.
I personally believe that our youth are in need of more places that will focus on their rehabilitation and a proper education in order to reinstate them into the community.
According to Barry Krisberg, from the early 1970s
…show more content…
Government funding is crucial when it comes to having resources available for incarcerated youth, there are various way in which the government is trying to assist in this matter such as, local Jurisdictions have provided funds towards community- based alternatives, State Funds in the form of a line item budget or grants, grants from non- profit foundations that invest in Juvenile Justice.
States have developed a number of broad initiatives to accomplish heavily on community- based programs, such as , the creation of fiscal incentives for localities to keep youth out of state facilities and treat them in the community, as well as downsizing their secure facilities to redirect funding to community- based alternatives.
Community- Based Programs in The Juvenile Justice System, by bringing this initiative to our communities and facilities will allocate crimes in our
There are pros and cons to community treatment programs of juvenile offenders. Personally, I would not want a juvenile treatment program in my neighborhood, and here are a few reasons why.
Studies and anecdotes have shown that our modern approach, however, is ill-equipped to reduce crime or deal with chronic delinquents while at the same time protecting their due liberties. We now stand on the precipice of decision: How can we strike an appropriate balance in the juvenile justice system? Should we even retain a separate system for children at all? The answers are usually difficult, sometimes subtle, but always possible to attain.
The historical development of the juvenile justice system in the United States is one that is focused on forming and separating trying juveniles from adult counterparts. One of the most important aspects is focusing on ensuring that there is a level of fairness and equality with respect to the cognitive abilities and processes of juvenile as it relates to committing crime. Some of the most important case legislation that would strengthen the argument in regard to the development of the juvenile justice system is related to the reform of the justice system during the turn of the 19th century. Many juveniles were unfortunately caught in the crosshairs of being tried as adults and ultimately receiving punishments not in line with their ability
One of the major differences between juvenile and adult corrections is the large number of private facilities in the juvenile system. Private facilities have the luxury of being able to "cherry-pick" their clients, and they can also sometimes do things and perform treatments that public facilities cannot do. One of the big problems in public juvenile justice is how long it takes to get an arrested juvenile tried and adjudicated as a delinquent. Only after they have been so adjudicated can they technically be placed in a "rehabilitation" program, and obviously, this kind of delay exacerbates the problem of delivering psychological services in a timely fashion. Juveniles who are still in detention status can only receive substance abuse treatment, sex education, remedial education, and crisis intervention services.
...ing with young minds and punishing them in juvenile courts may be of advantage to the young people and at the same time reduce propagating them into developing a violent future in criminal activities. Correctional facilities that address and cater for the juveniles are the way forward to streamlining the youths (Kristin, page4).
Harassment, reckless endangerment, and burglary are all juvenile offenses. These juvenile offenses almost always stay on the juvenile’s criminal record, and the offenses displayed on a juvenile’s criminal record may cause employers, educators, and other authority figures to think less of the juvenile offender. As a viewer can see, this one mistake or lapse in judgment can ruin the juvenile offenders chance to further their success in life. For example, juvenile offenders may not obtain the dream job that they have always wanted, get into the college that they have always wanted to, or be eligible for a scholarship whether athletic or academic. However, there is a loophole in the juvenile justice system called teen courts. Teen courts give first-time offenders and some re-offenders a second chance because the offense (s) do not go on their criminal record, and their peers get to decide what sanctions the juvenile offender receives or performs. The big question that I am going to discuss throughout this essay is do juvenile offenders who appear before teen courts recidivate?
The basis came from Shelden (1999) which states that “youths’ exposure to the justice system may be more harmful than beneficial”. Moreover, It was believed that children who were diverted to community based intervention are less likely involved in future delinquency (Whitehead & Lab, 2001) In the book, Juvenile Delinquency: Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention; It highlighted that diversion is beneficial to the youth, community, and society. Furthermore, It also discussed that diversion fill the gaps of the formal juvenile justice system that diversion effectively reduced the labelling and stigmatization and the rate of recidivism. It also serves a deterrence, a net widening – where youth are given vast number of services rather than the prescribed number of service, and a balanced and restorative justice – where children are made accountable to their actions, to the community and the society as whole. One of the recommendations are to further improve the programs and services given to CICLs. It would also be better if they will be engaged in a community-based intervention. (Redding, et.al,
The majority of youth can be served by these community-based services. Too often incarceration is used as a first step rather than a last resort. By using the money currently spent on incarceration and focusing it on community-based options for treatment and supervision that keep youth close to home should lead to more productive future adults.
According to Yoder, Whitaker, and Quinn (2017), recent years have shown that although detention as well as incarceration is necessary for a given small percentage of deliquescent youths, long-term confinement experiences can lead to more harm than good to the youths, and it often lead to continued offending as well as recidivism. Instead, the use of community based programs have proven that it can lead to decreased re-offending for all youths including those who commit violent and serious crimes. Additionally, the public opinion in the United States concerning the use of punitive approaches while dealing with the youths have been changing as more people suggest the use of a more rehabilitative system. However, these community based systems and provisions have been left to take care of the mental health needs of the youth which are always not well addressed. A research by Zajac, Sheidow, and Davis (2015) showed that many of the juvenile justice systems do not have proper equipment to deal with the youths having mental health disorders. The typical mental health services offered to the youths in juvenile justice systems such as detention are often unavailable or inadequate. The inadequate mental health services are helped by a number of barriers. The barriers include lack of proper training of the staff and inadequate
This paper describes the various legislations and movements that were established in 19th century to address the issue of juvenile justice system. It outlines the challenges faced by the legislation and movements and their implications in addressing the issues of the juvenile justice system.
Community based programs are alternative options available to juveniles, instead of incarceration that safely serves juveniles and give juveniles a second chance to become productive members of society. Community based programs aim to efficiently rehabilitate and prevent juvenile delinquency and reduce deviant behavior in juveniles (Alarid & Del Carmen, 2012).
My first reason juvenile offenders should be put in jail is because it will bring down the amount of crimes committed by young kids. My evidence comes from a website called Child Trends. It says that treating juveniles as adults helps with crime rates. According to Le Monde, in 2008 80% of those in juvenile facilities reoffend. Le Monde also says that 75% of
The problem with Juvenile Detention Centers is that they are a punishment facility. They have no correctional tendencies. Delinquent acts are generally caused by a social structure flaw within their family. Children learn what is right and wrong based on what they see and hear. They see and hear what their family does and says. Why are we not adding more structure? These teens have learned not to respect authority, and this is why they fail. Teach them and they will learn. Punish them and they resent authority for the rest of their
Even though those are great ways the detention centers can help, one problem that keeps coming up is the fact that overcrowding can happen. When there are too many people in the center, it gets hectic plus it is harder to help and have that one on one with each of the kids. One solution to the problem can be opening a community center instead of sending all delinquent youths to the centers, just send the ones that commit a serious crimes like armed robberies, sex offenses and homicides and the ones that don’t fall into the category of “serious” crimes, can be sent to
Community-based corrections alleviate overcrowded correctional facilities, reduce taxpayer burden, and rehabilitate offenders, while providing effective, efficient low cost methods of supporting public safety, community rehabilitation, behavior modification and personnel responsibility, because it uses multiple approaches and involves both legislative and judicial personnel in all steps of the process. Community-based corrections facilities are located in the community and support diverse rehabilitative programs including restitution, community service and repayment of monetary fines (Moses, 2007). Community-based correction is not incarceration; there is accountability, responsibility and supervision with graduation within nine and twenty four months of enrollment (Honarvar, 2010). Probation, day reporting and house arrest, which use global positioning satellite tracking devices, are forms of community-based corrections, which cost less than five dollars a day (Honarvar, 2010). The efficiency by which community corrections reduce cost, prison populations, and decreases this rate judges should disposition to these programs in lieu of incarceration (Honarvar, 2010). The state spends taxpayer money on building correctional facilities and staff to supervise offenders, while the research shows reduced recidivism rates when community service and other alternative methods of rehabilitation are used (Hovarvar, 2010). However, to maintain the balance of justice and rehabilitation, society demands incarceration for all criminals. Judges continue to support determinate sentencing guidelines over reducing the taxpayer’s burden and placing victimless crime offenders in community workhouses (Taylor, 2011). The issues of restitution and pub...