Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cause and effects of youth homelessness
Compare and contrast juvenile justice and restorative justice
Compare and contrast juvenile justice and restorative justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cause and effects of youth homelessness
Juvenile Justice, Homelessness and Remand
YOUTH ACTION ADVOCACY AND POLICY ASSOCIATION
By Andrew Kyu Sun Choi
“Youth Action Advocacy and Policy (YAPA) is the peak organisation representing young people and youth services in NSW. YAPA works towards a society where all young people are supported, engaged and valued (Youth Action Advocacy and Policy Association, n.d.)”
Executive Summary
Young people have increasingly been subjected to remand when navigating through the juvenile justice system (Vignaendra et al., 2009). The causal relationship between youth homelessness and remand remains to be at the heart of this predicament (Richards, 2011). The enactment of the Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) has attempted to reorient the public discourse around restorative justice to balance the needs of both juvenile offenders and the public at large. The corollary to the effect of this legal paradigm has been a shift towards detention as a last resort for juveniles. Despite this, the high incidence of homelessness amongst juveniles, weak legal protections for housing security and a corresponding lack of state-sponsored accommodation have exacerbated pre-trial custodial sentencing. This report will contest to the notion that a recalibration of the discourse around young offenders within a right-based framework delivers greater recourse within the criminal justice system towards both protecting and serving the best interests of homeless juveniles.
The Issue and its Context
The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) s 7 has enshrined Articles 2, 3, 6 and 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of a Child (1984) 1557 UNTS 3, cementing principles of non-discrimination, acting in the ‘best interests...
... middle of paper ...
...f_htm/publications/research/May%202009%20recent%20trends%20in%20legal%20proceedings%20for%20breach%20of%20bail%20juvenile%20remand%20and%20crime%20FINAL.pdf.
Weatherburn, D., McGrath, A. and Bartels, L. (2012), ‘Three Dogmas of Juvenile Justice’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 779-809.
Wong, K., Bailey, B. and Kenny, D.T. (2010), Bail Me Out: NSW Young People and Bail, Youth Justice Coalition, Marrickville, viewed 23 March 2014, http://www.yjconline.net/BailMeOut.pdf.
Wood, J. (2008), Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection Services in NSW, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, viewed 24 March 2014, http://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/publications/news/stories/?a=33794.
Youth Action Advocacy and Policy Association n.d., About Youth Action, YAPA, Sydney, viewed 21 March 2014, http://youthaction.org.au/about/.
This an extremely well written and powerful book written by Edward Humes. Humes shared his thoughts, observations, and criticisms about the juvenile justice system after a “riveting ride” through the Los Angeles Juvenile Court within his book, “No Matter How Loud I Shout.” The manner in which the book is written makes it fairly easy to read, demanding your attention while allowing for a simple follow along. I feel as if the book has given me much more insight and broader knowledge of the juvenile justice system, particularly the juvenile court system of Los Angeles.
Jenkins Jennifer “On Punishment and Teen Killers.” Juvenile Justice Information Exchange, 2 August 2011. 7 May 2014.
In February 2002, the House of Commons passed the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). The Act came into effect in April 2003, replacing the Young Offenders Act (Mapleleaf). The new legislation attempts to balance the legalistic framework of the Young Offenders Act and the social needs approach underlying the Juvenile Delinquents Act. This goal is apparent in the Declaration of Principle stating th...
Allerton, M, Butler, T, Champion, U & Kenny, D 2003, 2003 NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey: A Summary of Some Key Findings. Australian Institute of Criminology, [Online]. Available at: http://aic.gov.au/events/aic%20upcoming%20events/2003/~/media/conferences/2003-juvenile/kenny.ashx, [Accessed 14 April 2011].
In all the analysis, the youth justice policy analyst has to judge the use of specific words and their interpretations conveyed and the interpretations captured by society and formalise a method which in all way tries to curb the spread of wrong interpretation. Moral panic, demonization, and politicisation are of invaluable use for the youth policy analyst as the interpretations of these words makes most of the difference in the way juvenile crime is viewed and accepted by society at large.
Vito, Gennaro F., and Clifford E. Simonsen. Juvenile justice today. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2004. Print.
Young people who face family problems, parental separation in the beginning, lack of support and encouragement by society and lack of self-esteem may end up in the youth justice system. The existing youth justice framework is totally unable to map out the solution where the young offenders can get rid of this all social problems and pass a happy righteous life.
Most young offenders get into trouble with the law only once. But the younger children are when they first break the law, the more likely they are to break the law again (Statistics Canada study, 2005). The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) attempts to acknowledge that different youth need different sentences within the justice system, while ensuring that it is fair and equitable for them. Many people, both in Canada, and around the world, believe that youth are not reprimanded harshly enough for the crimes they commit and that they are, in general, are able to squeeze through the justice system without punishment. Others, believe that the justice system does not treat youth fairly and punishes them without acknowledging that rehabilitation
...ing beckoned in with the 21st century. While U.S.’s JLWOP laws are inconsistent with many human rights treatises and with international law, it is more important for our policies to be based on a thorough understanding of the issue- the most essential being a separation of the processes for juvenile and adult criminal offenders. With an emphasis on rehabilitation for juvenile offenders, and the goal of encouraging maturity and personal development after wayward actions, the futures of many teens in the criminal justice system can become much more hopeful.
2011). Some research suggests that the recent prevalence of targeted youth work is further stigmatizing the young people involved (Scanlon et al 2011; Jenkinson 2013). It is the role of the youth worker to challenge these negative agreements, to help young people find their truth. Rogers (1980) and Ruiz (2012) describe a process where a person, e.g. youth worker, values the significance and worth of another person. Through this acceptance the young person will begin to adopt a similar attitude and they will experience a rise in self-worth. Thus, they create a new agreement, that they are worthy of being valued and cared for.
The Legal Status of Sixteen and Seventeen Year Old Youth in Ontario. Toronto, Ont.: Canadian Foundation for Children Youth and the Law (Justice for Children & Youth), 1993. Print.
This paper will discuss the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has come to be what it is today. When a juvenile offender commits a crime and is sentenced to jail or reform school, the offender goes to a separate jail or reforming place than an adult. It hasn’t always been this way. Until the early 1800’s juveniles were tried just like everyone else. Today, that is not the case. This paper will explain the reforms that have taken place within the criminal justice system that developed the juvenile justice system.
John P. Wright, Kären M. Hess, Christine H. Orthmann. "Juvenile Justice." Cengage Learning; 6 edition, 2012
Youth and juvenile crime is a common and serious issue in current society, and people, especially parents and educators, are pretty worried about the trend of this problem. According to Bala and Roberts, around 17% of criminals were youths, compared to 8% of Canadian population ranging between 12 to 18 years of age between 2003 and 2004 (2006, p37). As a big federal country, Canada has taken a series of actions since 1908. So far, there are three justice acts in the history of Canadian juvenile justice system, the 1908 Juvenile Delinquents Act, the 1982 Young Offenders Act, and the 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Act. In Canada, the judicial system and the principle of these laws have been debated for a long time. This paper will discuss how these three laws were defined and why one was replaced by another.
Stokes, D. 2004. Submission to the Youth Justice Agency. [Online] Available from: www.youthreach.ie [Accessed 7th May 2012]