Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of juvenile court research paper
A juvenile court case essay for class
Juvenile court cases essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of juvenile court research paper
1) When George moved to the four-day workweek scheme, should he have expected his managers to work five days a week for four days' pay?
No, George shouldn’t have expected them to work five days and get paid for four. Now, if he wanted the upper management to do it for a short period of time because upper management was salary then he need to run that by the union or board.
2) Should George tell anyone except his immediate staff about the impending layoff before the details have been worked out? What about the board of directors? The union? The employees? I think it was important to talk to his board of directors and union. I would save the talk with employees and immediate staff members until things were worked out. There is no need to cause
…show more content…
Are there situations in which it is best to try to keep a lid on such information?
In the way the case read, I felt that George was so new to his job title that things he did in his 1st year wouldn’t necessarily be things that he would do again. George knew he had an issue 6 weeks before that, he might of waited too long to share the news that the company was heading for trouble. To answer the 2nd question, I would say that “keeping a lid on things” is best for no one. I think there is a short “grace period” when a company is in trouble and then that needs to be shared with all who work there.
4) The particular jobs cut at ACI were chosen on the basis of the long-range interests of the business and not on the nationality of the work force. As the reporter's questions implied, shouldn't American businesses favor American employees over foreign employees? What do you think George said to the TV reporters?
I went back and forth on this question. I think American employees should have been favored over foreign employees, if the business is in America. Now, business might make different decisions based on labor rates. It’s no surprise that foreign workers will work for less. To answer the 2nd question, I’m assuming George told the reporters something like this: “we respect all of our employees here at ACI, and we will continue to do what we can to save jobs and keep the company going in the right
had no ideas of fair play in regards to his employees. He is comparable to a
Roger & Me shows that GM's board of directors used company profits not to create new jobs, but to buy already existing assets, such as data processing companies (EDS) and weapons manufacturers (Hughes Aircraft) at inflated prices, and to automate their current assembly lines, and build new plants in Mexico and in Asia -- destroying jobs in the United States in the process. In Mexico, GM pays the worker only $.70 an hour, as opposed to at least minimum wage in the United States of America.... ... middle of paper ... ... This man is also upset because the point of unions is to increase the workers strength in bargaining with employers.
This will affect both the employees and the employers by changing the employer’s level of management. They could have been one of the top managers in the company but will get put onto the lower management along with everyone else. This will make everyone on the same level. (Texas)
...usly shamed, embarrassed, and demeaned their employees. I think this kind of behavior is a way of separating employers from employees. It helps keep employees in line and also adds the benefit of making employers feel good about themselves at the expense of their employees. Demeaning actions prevent employees from organizing or protesting for higher wages or better conditions. It keeps them “in their place” and does not allow them to hope or strive for anything better. In spite of the dehumanization of employees by employers, there are silent rebellions committed by lower class employees such as jokes, gossip, doing other's work, and just in general helping each other out. These are silent protests, they do not change the status quo in any way, that would be too risky for these employees. It is survival and caring in a corporate world that does not care about them.
Another problem seems to be his morale at his current job because of the new changes that the company is implementing in the organization. Miller seems to be upset over these changes and not willing to change with the company. This has caused his morale to plummet. This could result in not only his morale to diminish but also those employees that look at Miller as a leader as a coworker. He has been there for twenty seven years and there are those that look up to Miller as figure to the company.
Juvenile court is a special court that deals with under age defendants that are charged with crimes, who are neglected, or out of their parent’s control. The average age of the Defendants are younger than 18, but juvenile court doesn’t have jurisdiction in cases in which a minor is charged as an adult. The procedure of juvenile court is to involve parents or social workers and probation officers in order to achieve positive results and prevent minors from future crimes. However, serious crimes and repeated offenses can result in the juvenile offender being sentenced to a prison, with a transfer to a state prison when they reach adulthood. According to the film “Prison States”, Christel Tribble’s was a 15-year-old from Kentucky who was diagnosed
The problem of dealing with juvenile justice has plagued are country for years, since the establishment of the first juvenile court in 1899. Prior to that development, delinquent juveniles had to be processed through the adult justic3e system which gave much harsher penalties. By 1945, separate juvenile courts existed in every single state. Similar to the adult system, all through most of the 20th century, the juvenile justice system was based upon a medical/rehabilitative representation. The new challenges of the juvenile court were to examine, analyze, and recommend treatment for offenders, not to deliver judgment fault or fix responsibility. The court ran under the policy of “parens patriae” that intended that the state would step in and act as a parent on behalf of a disobedient juvenile. Actions were informal and a juvenile court judge had a vast sum of discretion in the nature of juvenile cases, much like the discretion afforded judges in adult unlawful settings until the 1970s. In line with the early juvenile court’s attitude of shielding youth, juvenile offenders’ position was often in reformatories or instruction schools that were intended, in speculation, to keep them away from the terrible influences of society and to encourage self-control through accurate structure and very unsympathetic discipline. Opposing to the fundamental theory, all through the first part of the century, the places that housed juveniles were frequently unsafe and unhealthy places where the state warehoused delinquent, deserted, and deserted children for unclear periods. Ordinary tribulations included lack of medical care, therapy programs, and even sometimes food. Some very poor circumstances continue even today.
Today, the court system in this country is divided into two groups when comparing juveniles and adults. One is the Adult Criminal Justice System, and the other is the Juvenile Justice System. The terminology can be very different between the two systems. For instance; if an adult is arrested, they will be subject to a bail hearing. If a juvenile is arrested they must go through a detention hearing. Adults have trials which can be decided by a judge or jury. Juveniles go through a fact finding hearing and don’t receive verdicts because they are adjudicated. “They are not found guilty, but delinquent or involved” (Komiscruk). Another difference between the two is that juvenile court rooms are usually closed to the public, which includes the media. Their records are often confidential, protecting children from carrying the burdens of their delinquent activity into adulthood. Also, their records are supposed to be sealed. But what happens when a juvenile’s criminal case is transferred to an adult court? Are the guidelines or rules different from any other adult offender? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the sentencing guidelines?
In today's society juveniles are being tried in adult courts, given the death penalty, and sent to prison. Should fourteen-year olds accused of murder or rape automatically be tried as adults? Should six-teen year olds and seven-teen year olds tried in adult courts be forced to serve time in adult prisons, where they are more likely to be sexually assaulted and to become repeat offenders. How much discretion should a judge have in deciding the fate of a juvenile accused of a crime - serious, violent, or otherwise? The juvenile crime rate that was so alarming a few years ago has begun to fall - juvenile felony arrest rates in California have declined by more than forty percent in the last twenty years. While California's juvenile population rose by a half a million since the middle and late 1970's, juveniles made up less than fifth-teen percent of California's felony arrests in 1998, compared to thirty percent in 1978; according to the Justice Policy Institute. The juvenile arrests have dropped back, even as the population of kids between ages of ten and eight-teen has continued to grow, and the number of kids confined in the California Youth Authority (CYA) has fallen. With all the progress our society has made in cutting back in juvenile crimes there is still a very serious problem. But if locking kids up is the best way to address it, how do we explain a drop in crime when there are more teens in California and fewer in custody? First we must look at the economy around us. With so many job opportunities available more and more teenagers find honest ways to keep busy and make money. Our generation has a brighter future than the generation a decade ago. Next we look at successful crime prevention efforts: after-school programs, mentoring, teen outreach programs, truancy abatement, anti-gang programs, family resource centers. There is evidence that these programs are beginning to pay off. Sending more, and younger teens through the adult court system has been a trend across the country in reaction to crimes, such as school shootings and violent rapes. Yet evidence shows that treating youth as adults does not reduce crime. In Florida, where probability wise more kids are tried as adults then in any other state, studies found that youth sent through the adult court system are twice as likely to commit more crimes when they're release...
We are asking all the employees their opinion in the idea of 4-day work week (10 hours day shift). If you are interested in participating in this proposal, this coming Friday, November 3 at 2:30 p.m., we will have the first-round table to discuss, answering questions, and explaining more deeply the benefits and challenging of this proposal.
The historical development of the juvenile justice system in the United States is one that is focused on forming and separating trying juveniles from adult counterparts. One of the most important aspects is focusing on ensuring that there is a level of fairness and equality with respect to the cognitive abilities and processes of juvenile as it relates to committing crime. Some of the most important case legislation that would strengthen the argument in regard to the development of the juvenile justice system is related to the reform of the justice system during the turn of the 19th century. Many juveniles were unfortunately caught in the crosshairs of being tried as adults and ultimately receiving punishments not in line with their ability
Though crime, in general, is on the decline there are specific crimes and group offenders that are actually increasing. Specific crimes such as hate crimes, those crimes motivated by hostility to the victim as a member of a group, based on color, creed, gender, or sexual orientation, and juvenile crimes have become escalating debates. Lionel Tate, a 12-year-old boy at the time of his actions, is a suitable case to investigate. Using his case, I will address the increase in juvenile delinquency, the contributions to the malice acts, the severity of the crimes being committed by youth, and possible, yet reasonable repercussions.
...gy.” (Stephens, 2011) The administration claims that they reached the decisions due to the fact that they were concerned for the laid off Solyndra employees. The decision were made so that those Solyndra employees could qualify for aid under another program for employees that have been displaced from their employment by foreign competition.
The O.P. Henley Textile Mill had a significant divide between employees and management and the working conditions were poor. There would have been many opportunities to make improvements such as improved working conditions, training and promotion programs, communication, and the building of trust. Significant wage increases may not have been necessary as long as they were competitive for the local market. In fact, a well-structured profit or gain-sharing program, benefitting both parties, may have been sufficient.
When the Fair Labor Association completed its audit they found the following problematic issues. For example, during peak production periods, operated by the Taiwanese firm Foxconn, had exceeded 60 hours per week, and many employees were also required to work more than seven consecutive days before having a day off. According to Apple’s code of conduct, an employee is only required to work 40 hours a week, and should receive a day off after working 5 days. In addition Apple noted, 14% of workers that worked overtime were not receiving fair pay for overtime. The Chinese factor...