Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversial issues pertaining to legalization of marijuana
Controversial issues pertaining to legalization of marijuana
Heavily debated legalizing marijuana
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Justin Trudeau, newly elected prime minister of Canada, and the Liberal Party made many promises during their election campaign to better the lives of the Canadian people, economy and make a positive change. With that being said he and his liberal party promised to legalize cannabis. In this paper, I will outline the promises made by Trudeau, discuss why Trudeau and the liberals are making this promise, explain how the promise will be kept and provide information to shed light on how legalization is a good idea for Canada. Justin Trudeau stated that if he and his party were elected they would be “taking action to legalize marijuana “right away”” (Elliot, 2015). He claims they will legalize, regulate and restrict access to marijuana (Liberal.ca, …show more content…
Justin Trudeau has stated that Stephen Harper and his Conservative government were “trapped in policies based on ideology rather than policies based on evidence and that is harmful to Canadians and to Canada. (Bryden, 2014). Justin Trudeau believes it is more harmful to have it illegal like it presently is, and more beneficial to society to have it controlled and regulated by the government. This is not based on ideology, as he states but rather evidence and what’s good for the Canadian people. With that being said, the ideology behind liberalism is that it “seeks to liberate the individual and maximize each individual’s freedom and potential” (Dyck, 2011, p. 218), and that it is “based on a belief in the rationality of the individual”, “liberty, and self-fulfillment” (Dyck, 2011, p. 229). One can see how the parties goal to legalize cannabis also ties into liberal ideology, as it would give much more individual freedom, and liberate the individual from the constrained system that is currently …show more content…
Although the bill was to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, its intent was to “increase enforcement against cannabis users”, by making it ticketable by police (Hyshka, 2009, p. 77). Police would try to catch people more since it’s an easier procedure thus causing a deterrence for people to not use it. (Hyshka, 2009, p.77) This can be seen as a bad approach and a different response that Trudeau government who wants to legalize and regulate as they believe prohibiting it and not regulating it gives the youth greater access and still puts money in the hands of organized criminals who distribute. (Liberal.ca, n.d.) They are more liberal to the drug, and we as a society know more about it and it’s minimal harm. It is not harming society, thus we should allow the government make money off of it and allow people to use it personally. That being said, it actually harms society to have it illegal as the profit from illegal sales goes into the hands of “criminal organizations, street gangs and gun-runners” as Trudeau states (As cited in Elliot, 2015) and it is easy to obtain by the youth when it is not regulated, thus, legalizing and regulating it under government control can prevent this (Liberal.ca,
Throughout history, the actions of governments have always been debated; however, occasionally there are certain events which spark much controversy, both at the time of the event and by historians today. One of these controversial acts was the invocation of the War Measures Act in 1970, an act which suspended the civil liberties of Canadian citizens. In October 1970, in what became known as the October Crisis, the Front de libération du Québec, (commonly known as the FLQ) which was a French Canadian organization advocating independence from Canada, kidnapped two politicians. This initiated a series of events, one of which was the invocation of the War Measures Act by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Many historians argue that Trudeau was justified in invoking the War Measures Act because the October Crisis ended shortly after the Act was invoked. However, this argument is invalid as justification; primarily because the War Measures Act was an extreme overreaction by Trudeau, as the threat of the FLQ was largely small-scale, and the demise of the FLQ was impending with the rise of the Bloc Quebecois. Furthermore, the Act may have inspired Quebecers who favoured separatism, as they saw the government desperately employ the most extreme measure to stop the FLQ. Finally, the War Measures Act suspended the civil rights of citizens within a democracy, violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The years following the Second World War were bleak in regards to Canada's future as a country, with the public and politicians alike set against each other, but soon a Québec man by the name of René Lévesque entered journalism, and then politics, voicing his views for all to hear, with great success and vigour. Though obstacles presented themselves often in his life, he changed the views of Québec, Canada and the world as a whole. René Lévesque was a passionate and charismatic politician who greatly contributed to post-war Québec and even today through his beliefs in separatism, founding the Parti Québecois and passing Bill 101.
“Just watch me.”Joseph Philippe Pierre Yves Elliott Trudeau said in 1970. He meant it as he fought to keep Quebec a part of Canada. Not only did he do that, he managed to be prime minister for 16 years, as well as being Canada’s youngest leader at the time. He brought greater civil rights to Canadians, Quebec citizens mainly. His charismatic personality matched his innovative ideas, that enhanced Canada for the better. For his entire political career, not only did Canada watch him, the whole world watched him change the country for the better. He made a radical change to Canada by championing the idea of officially implementing bilingualism. Trudeau was a trailblazer from the moment he was elected.
Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson was a prominent figure in Canada in the 1960s. Pearson was Canada's most significant post WWII prime minister because of his government's many innovations that still benefit Canadians today. He fostered Canadian nationalism, which continues to the present day, promoted equality throughout Canada – equality that now thrives as part of Canada's identity – and he introduced many social services that are still implemented today.
Canada’s parliamentary system is designed to preclude the formation of absolute power. Critics and followers of Canadian politics argue that the Prime Minister of Canada stands alone from the rest of the government. The powers vested in the prime minister, along with the persistent media attention given to the position, reinforce the Prime Minister of Canada’s superior role both in the House of Commons and in the public. The result has led to concerns regarding the power of the prime minister. Hugh Mellon argues that the prime minister of Canada is indeed too powerful. Mellon refers to the prime minister’s control over Canada a prime-ministerial government, where the prime minister encounters few constraints on the usage of his powers. Contrary to Mellon’s view, Paul Barker disagrees with the idea of a prime-ministerial government in Canada. Both perspectives bring up solid points, but the idea of a prime-ministerial government leading to too much power in the hands of the prime minister is an exaggeration. Canada is a country that is too large and complex to be dominated by a single individual. The reality is, the Prime Minister of Canada has limitations from several venues. The Canadian Prime Minister is restricted internally by his other ministers, externally by the other levels of government, the media and globalization.
Lazar, Harvey. “The Spending Power and the Harper Government.” HeinOnline. 34 Queen's L.J. 125 2008-2009
Those opposed to the legalization of the cannabis plant in a September 11th 2003 article claim that with legalization of cannabis will come further problems. They say that legalization would lead to greater drug use especially with children as well as drug trafficking from legalized areas. They claim the tobacco and alcohol cause enough problems and there is no reason to add a new product into the mix. The claim is also made that drugs such as cannabis lead to poverty, crime, and violence. They argue that although the drug war cannot be completely successful it is worth it to slow down drug trade and that truly very few people are brought up on a simple possession charge of cannabis. Finally they make the claim that if cannabis and other drugs were legalized it would prevent court ordered addiction treatment. I understand the basis of all these claims and understand where they come from. Many arguments are made generally about the legalization of all illegal drugs including cannabis and I do agree that drugs other than cannabis should be kept illegal for all the reasons listed above. Where I find fault with the expose is the unfair grouping of cannabis into the article.
The Prime Minister of Canada is given much power and much responsibility. This could potentially create a dangerous situation if the government held a majority and was able to pass any legislation, luckily this is not the case. This paper will argue that there are many limitations, which the power of the prime minister is subject too. Three of the main limitations, which the Prime Minister is affected by, are; first, federalism, second the governor general and third, the charter of rights and freedoms. I will support this argument by analyzing two different types of federalism and how they impact the power of the Prime Minister. Next I will look at three of the Governor Generals Powers and further analyze one of them. Last I will look at the impact of the charter from the larger participation the public can have in government, and how it increased the power of the courts.
Marijuana has long been the subject of many heated debates and political platforms. With lack of un-biased materials on marijuana, it quickly became victim to publications and political propaganda in the early 1900s. Richard Isralowits writes, “Publications from the period had such titles as Marijuana-Sex Crazy Drug Menace, Marijuana-The Weed of Madness, and Marijuana: Assassin of Youth”(Use of Marijuana,105). Surely in this modern age and heightened public awareness our marijuana laws, drafted in a time of extreme bias, have got to be obsolete. Although many people still have strong opinions against the legalisation of marijuana, after review of current un-biased studies and reports they will find that this is not the case. Marijuana should be legalised in Canada because of the cost, the justice system, and the health concerns.
From watching his dad become Prime Minister to becoming one himself, this fellow Canadian has impacted Canada’s worldview of 2017 the most!
In conclusion, Canada should not be legalized for marijuana because it causes a lot of negative effects to everyone. Nowadays, everyone knows how bad marijuana is, how can it affect on people’s lives, and how terrible to human. Therefore, people should not use marijuana in their lives for maintaining their health, having a better relationship with their partners and families, and improving the public safety. Also, there are several ways for people or education institutions to avoid using marijuana, schools should teach the right information about marijuana to the next generation, and parents should be good models for their children.
What would a modern liberal say about the Canadian government legalizing cannabis? Before answering this question we should look at what modern liberalism is. Modern liberalism is a variant of liberalism. Liberalism is an ideology that believes no one, not even the government should interference with the freedom of other individuals, they therefore believe in negative freedoms. One other belief is that the individual is more important than society which causes them to have a strong belief in individual freedoms. Since liberalism grew during the age of enlightenment, they believe that humans should use reason to break bondage from ignorance. Liberals believe in justice in that each to his own doing. If I am hard working, I should be rewarded but if I cause harm to another individual I should be punished. They also believe that the individual should be a tolerant towards what others believe in, while still maintaining their own beliefs. Liberals think that the government should be small and not interfere with the market. They believe that government should provide safety nets but it should be minimal. People today that subscribe to these core themes are known as classical liberals
Over seventeen thousand arrests are made regarding cannabis a year. Almost ninety percent of these arrests are for simple possession, not trafficking or sale. This is an inappropriate use of valuable law enforcement resources that should be focused on more serious and violent crimes. I don’t know about you, but I would rather have a midnight toker for a neighbor than a midnight stalker. The spending of government money needs to be reevaluated. Our government needs to take a step back and admit they were mistaken to think they could successfully discontinue the use of marijuana. “You cannot have illegal what a significant segment of the population in any society is committed to doing. You simply cannot arrest, prosecute, and punish such a large number of people, particularly in a democracy” (Incardi 285). Ultimately it is not the role of the government to tell it’s adult citizens what risks to take. Bicycles kill ten thousand people a year and yet no one is proposing to make them illegal.
The legalization of marijuana is considered a controversial issue, something that can benefit people for medical purposes, but what about recreationally? Marijuana has been illegal since 1937, but there’s never been a bigger push for legalization. There are several reasons why it is illegal, because of government propaganda and big industry not wanting to lose money, but this will be discussed later. The purpose of this paper is to educate, theorize, and discuss various aspects of marijuana, such as its history, development, and the advantages and disadvantages of marijuana legalization. Finally, my personal reflection on legalization and marijuana in general will be discussed.
Impaired driving accidents are one of the leading criminal causes of death in Canada. In fact, Canada has the highest percentage of deaths caused by alcohol related automobile accidents when compared to other wealthy nations (Quan). In March of 2017, Prime Minister Trudeau announced the introduction of a bill that would legalize recreational use of marijuana to anyone over the age of 18. According to the latest scientific research, the effects of marijuana appears to show an adverse effect on driving performance similar to that of alcohol, while someone who is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana is more than four times as likely to be involved