Weakness Inspiring the Longing for Justice

394 Words1 Page

In Cicero’s The Defense of Justice he states that a sense of justice is not a characteristic that people are born with and that man never does what is just and right simply because it is just and right. He claims that justice was born from weakness and that it is only because people realize that they are weak that they feel a need for justice. How does a feeling of weakness inspire a longing for justice? I take it mean that because people know that they are weak when under the rule of the strong, they feel a need for justice. People like to feel safe and if they know that there is nothing stopping bigger, stronger, and more powerful people from doing them harm then they will feel endangered. They want assurance that there will be something

Show More
Related

  • Be Warned and Study Justice:The Shifting Definition of Justice in Virgil’s Aeneid

    4362 Words  | 9 Pages

    A twenty-first century reading of the Iliad and the Odyssey will highlight a seeming lack of justice: hundreds of men die because of an adulteress, the most honorable characters are killed, the cowards survive, and everyone eventually goes to hell. Due to the difference in the time period, culture, prominent religions and values, the modern idea of justice is much different than that of Greece around 750 B.C. The idea of justice in Virgil’s the Aeneid is easier for us to recognize. As in our own culture, “justice” in the epic is based on a system of punishment for wrongs and rewards for honorable acts. Time and time again, Virgil provides his readers with examples of justice in the lives of his characters. Interestingly, the meaning of justice in the Aeneid transforms when applied to Fate and the actions of the gods. Unlike our modern (American) idea of blind, immutable Justice, the meanings and effects of justice shift, depending on whether its subject is mortal or immortal.

    Read More

  • Plato's Response to Thrasymachus' Immoralist View of Justice

    1494 Words  | 3 Pages

    Initially Thrasymachus states that Justice is ‘nothing else but the interest of the stronger’. Cross and Woozley identify four possible interpretations; the Naturalistic definition, Nihilistic view, Incidental comment, and the more useful Essential analysis. The ‘Essential Analysis’: “An action is just if and only if it serves the interest of the stronger,” with Thrasymachus stating the disadvantages of Justice and advantages of Injustice. This leads to problems with the stronger man, is it merely the promotion of self-interests? If Justice favours the interests of the stronger, is this simply from the perception of the weak with morality not concerning the stronger? Cross re-formulates Thrasymachus’s view as ‘Justice is the promotion of the ‘strongers’ interest’, therefore both weak and strong can act justly in furthering the strongers interests. However, complication occurs when we understand that Justice is another’s good: “You are not aware tha...

    Read More

  • Cicero's Speech In Pro Caelio

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pro Caelio is a speech given by Roman politician and famed orator Marcus Tullius Cicero in defense of his former student and now political rival Caelius. Caelius was charged with political violence in the form of the murder of Dio. Caelius’ defense was structured so that Caelius first spoke in his own defense, following him was Crassus, and finally Cicero. Cicero attempted in his defense to not just refute the accusations brought forward by the prosecutors. Instead, he first demonstrates that Caelius is an upstanding citizen and provides many examples to prove this. He further defends Caelius by swaying the jury in his favor through the employment of comedy. Vice versa he turns the jury against the prosecutors through slander (i.e. he constantly

    Read More

  • Justice in Plato's The Republic

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s The Republic, he unravels the definition of justice.  Plato believed that a ruler could not be wholly just unless one was in a society that was also just. Plato did not believe in democracy, because it was democracy that killed Socrates, his beloved teacher who was a just man and a philosopher.  He believed in Guardians, or philosophers/rulers that ruled the state.  One must examine what it means for a state to be just and what it means for a person to be just to truly understand the meaning of justice.  According to Socrates, “…if we first tried to observe justice in some larger thing that possessed it, this would make it easier to observe in a single individual. We agreed that this larger thing is a city…(Plato 96).”  It is evident, therefore, that the state and the ruler described in The Republic by Plato are clearly parallel to one another.

    Read More

  • Marcus Brutus: An Honorable Man

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brutus, Honorable Man Brutus, an honorable conspirator? Honorable is defined as genuine, truthful and displaying integrity, while a conspirator is defined as one that engages in an agreement to commit an illegal or wrongful act. Anyone can clearly see that these two words do not belong together. There are also other reasons why Brutus should not be considered honorable. In the play, three distinct acts can be recalled.

    Read More

  • Justice Exemplified by Plato and Thucydides

    618 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato's Book I of The Republics presents three fundamental views on justice which are exemplified in Thucydides' On Justice, Power and Human Nature. Justice is illustrated as speaking the paying one's debts, helping one's friends and harming one's enemies, and the advantage of the stronger.

    Read More

  • Cicero And Cicero's The Defense Of Injustice

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    The feeling of weakness is brought about from the fear of those that are stronger, though the form of strength does not necessarily have to be physical. Justice can be used to protect oneself or possessions in the form of laws. The laws hides their weakness and prevents the strong from harming them. They dare not break the law for the fear of punishment. This fear contributes to why the law is considered just. One would not commit an unlawful action and get punished and call it justice. A roman philosopher named Marcus Tillius Cicero created “The Defense of Injustice”. In the short essay Cicero states “laws are not imposed on us by nature-or by our innate sense of justice. They are imposed by the fear of being penalized. In other words, human beings are not just, by nature, at all”(3). Human nature does not bring about justice, instead it is the fear of being punished that brings justice about. The island is unknown land for the group and reveals all our weaknesses. The need for order and a sense of protection of ourselves becomes evident. The laws we create are for the good of all of us. They provide a reason to work together and prevent those who want to take advantage of others. They provide a sense of security knowing that punishment for breaking the law acts as a

    Read More

  • Glaucon's Challenge and Plato's Theory of Justice in Plato's Republic

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s Republic focuses on one particular question: is it better to be just or unjust? Thrasymachus introduces this question in book I by suggesting that justice is established as an advantage to the stronger, who may act unjustly, so that the weak will “act justly” by serving in their interests. Therefore, he claims that justice is “stronger, freer, and more masterly than justice” (Plato, Republic 344c). Plato begins to argue that injustice is never more profitable to a person than justice and Thrasymachus withdraws from the argument, granting Plato’s response. Glaucon, however, is not satisfied and proposes a challenge to Plato to prove that justice is intrinsically valuable and that living a just life is always superior. This paper will explain Glaucon’s challenge to Plato regarding the value of justice, followed by Plato’s response in which he argues that his theory of justice, explained by three parts of the soul, proves the intrinsic value of justice and that a just life is preeminent. Finally, it will be shown that Plato’s response succeeds in answering Glaucon’s challenge.

    Read More

  • Justice In Plato's The Republic

    1072 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the time period of The Republic, the problems and challenges that each community was faced with were all dealt with in a different way. In the world today, a lot of people care about themselves. For many people, the word justice can mean many different things, but because some only look out for themselves, many of these people do not think about everyone else’s role in the world of society. The struggle for justice is still demonstrated in contemporary culture today. One particular concept from Plato’s The Republic, which relates to contemporary culture is this concept of justice. In the beginning of The Republic, Socrates listeners, Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, ask Socrates whether justice is stronger than injustice, and

    Read More

  • Cicero and Stoicism

    3690 Words  | 8 Pages

    Cicero, was truly a man of the state. His writings also show us he was equally a man of

    Read More

  • Plato Justice And Ethics

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Republic, Plato discusses many topics, including the issue of justice versus injustice (Plato 34). Plato’s argument indicates that justice works interchangeably with proper ethics (Plato 35). According to Plato, in order for a person to live the “best life”, they must live with justice and ethics (Plato 35). These two terms are similar in the sense that it is subjective to each individual. One’s definition of justice results from their own beliefs of ethics, which varies from person to person. Plato claims that doing “justice” is the better way of living, even if it brings misfortune in the end (Plato 34-35). This brings up the ethical dispute that misfortunes from justice is better than rewards earned from injustice. However, as seen in modern day, there is still no universal idea as to whether or not something is justifiable or abides by the ethical conduct that is expected. Often times, an action may seem justified to one individual while it seems unjustified to another. In order for someone to get what they want, they don’t think about their actions, whether or not it is following their ethical codes. In this case, the idea of “justice” and “ethics” is purely a mirage of the mind that people created so that they have a reason to feel good about themselves. In today’s society, many people get away with doing “injustice” while the actions of “justice” are disregarded. The definition of “justice” and “ethics” is still open-ended as demonstrated by justice system of the United States. There are people getting away with crimes and innocent people being put into prisons. Many times, these cases communicate the racial discrimination in the states.

    Read More

  • Justice in Plato's "The Republic"

    521 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cephalus is the first to give his opinion of justice as simply "speaking the truth and giving back what one takes." In even simpler terms, it is to do the right thing. (Republic 331) Socrates argues that to give a borrowed weapon back to a friend that has become insane is not justice but injustice. Cephalus concedes that his definition of justice is flawed and leaves.

    Read More

  • Justice in Plato's Republic

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Justice. What is justice? In this world where many people look out only for themselves, justice can be considered the happiness of oneself. But because selfish men do not always decide our standards in society, to find a definition, society should look at the opinions of many. Just as in the modern society to which we live, where everyone feels justice has a different meaning, the society of Plato also struggled with the same problem. In this paper, I will look into the Republic, one of the books of Plato that resides heavily on defining an answer to the meaning of Justice, and try to find an absolute definition. I will also give my opinion on what I personally think justice is.

    Read More

  • Justice as Defined by Augustine and Aristotle

    1753 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Justice removed, then, what are kingdoms but great bands of robbers?” (Augustine, The City of God against the Pagans, p. 147[1]). Augustine makes quite a claim here. The presence or absence of “justice,” he implies, can make or break a great kingdom. What is this justice that Augustine speaks of? Is it the philosopher kings that define Plato’s “just city[2],” or perhaps Aristotle’s “good life[3]”? Augustine approaches the challenge of defining justice in a different, but not necessarily contradictory way, than his predecessors. In The City of God against the Pagans, man’s relationship with justice is only secondary; for Augustine, justice is about God.

    Read More

  • Cicero's Views On Human Dignity And Human Responsibility

    182 Words  | 1 Pages

    Cicero believes that human dignity provides humans with moral duties and responsibilities. One of those responsibilities is to uphold the superiority placed upon them by living a life that is guided by reason and not by urges. Cicero uses the term superiority to compare humans to animals. He distinguishes humans from animals by the ability to reason. Animals cannot reason; thus, they live their lives by following instincts. Humans, on the other hand, have the ability to reason. As a result, Cicero believes that the ability to reason has made humans superior to animals. If humans were also to act based on primal instincts and desires, their actions would be befitting to those of an animal and not a human. Consequently, humans would fail to uphold

    Read More

More about Weakness Inspiring the Longing for Justice

Open Document