Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government of the Roman republic
Government of the Roman republic
The political system of Republic Rome
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cicero’s Against Catilina orations tells the reader more about Cicero himself than what the role of consul in the Roman Republic consists of. That’s not to say that Cicero’s orations don’t tell the reader anything about the role of Roman consulship, it’s just that they more insight about Cicero in the long run. Written works often tell one more about the author than they could ever tell you about the subject. From this speech alone, one can infer Cicero’s morals and values. He values reputation very highly. He also has a certain set of standards and morals that he holds himself to as well as everyone else. He doesn’t neglect those morals and he doesn’t expect others to either.
The prosecution of Catilina was a really big deal for Cicero. Cicero believed that this was the thing could potentially prove his worth. Cicero came from a poorer family, outside of Rome. He was a citizen of Italy, but not of Rome. Most of the men in the Senate came from really old and really rich families within Rome. Their family names held power and meaning, simply because of the age and wealth that accompanied them. Cicero’s family held no weight and power, because his linage stemmed from outside of Rome. Everything Cicero was was self made. He had to build up his own reputation and make himself known. He won his consulship by complete chance. No one
…show more content…
actually thought he would do much, but Cicero wanted to make a name out of himself and prove his worth. He began actively searching for suspicious activity within Rome, hoping that it would be his big break. Which is what the Catilina prosecution were. In exposing Catilina’s conspiracy against Rome, Cicero had a platform to prove his worth within the eyes of Senate and the people of Rome. Throughout all of these speeches, he is trying to reassure the people that he is worthy and that what he has to say matters. He even equates his opinion to that of Rome in order to make people listen to him. One such example is on page 86, “ If our country spoke to you in such terms, ought not her plea to be granted, even if she did not have the power to back it with force” (Cicero 86) Through his orations, one can also get a glimpse of Cicero’s moral standards. Cicero really values Rome and what it used to stand for. He believes that Rome and country should be put before all things. He calls Rome, “Your country, the common parent of us all” (Cicero 85), equating it to the role of a parent. The Romans had a strong sense of love and loyalty for their parent, especially their fathers. Killing one’s parent was considered taboo. (Class Notes) In making that statement, Cicero is declaring that one should treat Rome like they would their parents and have undying love and loyalty towards her, meaning that he does. This is a potential explanation for why he describes Catalina’s conspiracy as such an offensive crime. Catalina was attempting to betray and destroy Rome, which is like betraying and killing a parent in Cicero’s eyes. Cicero also has a high amount of respect for Roman law. He believes that the law is a law and that nothing should or could warrant breaking. Throughout his orations, Cicero frequently makes references to the deeds of other consuls, who took the law into their own hands when dealing with a criminal. One such example is “Gaius Servilius Ahala who with his own hand slew Spurius Maelius for plotting a revolution.” (Cicero 77) While Cicero supports their actions and thinks that what they did was ultimately the right thing to do, he would never do it himself. He is far too attached to his morals. He could never abandon them, even if he wanted to. He’s considered it, certainly, but he still wishes to abide by the law and would rather have the permission of the senate and the people before taking action. While Cicero’s orations tell the reader a great deal about him, they also give the reader some insight on what it is like being a Roman consul at least according to Cicero. Based strictly off of these orations, one can tell that consuls held a substantial amount of power. They themselves weren’t at liberty to do much but, they could convince the senate or the assembly to agree with them and then grant them the power to do whatever they wanted. In order to do that, they had to be very persuasive. Cicero frequently uses his persuasive skills within these speeches. He knows his audience and changes his wording and language accordingly. One such example is in speech three, when he is addressing the people. He lists some things in order of most valuable to slightly less valuable, which he states were in danger because of Catilina’s attempt to destroy Rome. “ Romans: your country, and the lives of every one of you, your property, your fortunes, your wives and children, this centre of your illustrious government, this most fortunate and beautiful of cities.” (Cicero 110). He puts Rome, their lives and their money/property and the very top,knowing that the Roman people fear to lose them the most. Then he plays the role of hero and states that he was the one who “gave them back to you safe and sound.” (Cicero 110). In a way, making the Roman people in debted to him, because he saved that which was most precious to them. Using this type of persuasive language, Roman consuls could easily persuade feeble minded people to do what they wanted them to do According to Cicero, consuls are supposed to be men of a very high moral ground.
They are supposed to be selfless, and always put Rome and the people above themselves. They speak on behalf of the Roman people. They speak for them and are always supposed to do what is right by them. Cicero mentions his selflessness often throughout the speeches. One such example is “I am perfectly prepared to endure this storm of unjustified, undeserved hatred if only the menace of a horrifying and iniquitous war can be averted from all of you.” (Cicero 101) Consuls have to be willing to put themselves on the line in order to make sure Rome
prevails. It is also known that the consuls often were commanders of the army. Cicero was in no way a military man, but he did attempt to put on a brave face and act like he could potentially be one if he had to. Essentially his message is that while he isn’t a general, he would fight and give up his life in order to save Rome. One such example “The interests of our country are in my watchful care.” (Cicero 103). Cicero states that it is the duty of the consul to watch over Rome and protect it when it needs him most, even if he is lacking in military skill. Everything that Cicero has written, has told the reader way more about him than about anything else. Cicero’s core morals and values shine through in his writing. He is a man who is constantly trying to prove his worth in the eyes of the Roman people. He highly values reputation, and according to him, it is the lifeblood of the government. Reputation is what makes a man important. He also values Rome above all other things. He thinks that as a Roman consul, one should also highly value Rome, as well as have a sense of duty and honor. Cicero also happens to be a stickler for the rules and refuses to break any, because in doing so, he would be betraying the Roman people and Rome herself. To Cicero, Rome is everything.
Cicero’s essay, titled On Duties, presents a practical approach concerning the moral obligations of a political man in the form of correspondence with his young son. Essential to the text, the incentive for Cicero to undertake On Duties emerges from his depleted hope to restore the Republic within his lifetime. Cicero therefore places such aspirations in the hands of his posterity. The foremost purpose of On Duties considers three obstacles, divided into separate Books, when deciding a course of action. Book I prefatorily states, “in the first place, men may be uncertain whether the thing that falls under consideration is an honorable or a dishonorable thing to do” (5). Cicero addresses the ambiguities present under this consideration and codifies a means through which one can reach a justifiable decision. Subsequently, he expounds the four essential virtues—wisdom, justice, magnanimity or greatness of spirit, and seemliness—all of which are necessary to conduct oneself honorably. As a result, the virtues intertwine to create an unassailable foundation upon which one can defend their actions. Cicero’s expatiation of the four virtues, though revolving around justice and political in context, illuminates the need for wisdom among the populace in order to discern a leader’s motivations. This subtly becomes apparent as Cicero, advising his son on how to dictate decision-making, issues caveats regarding the deceptions that occur under the guise of virtue.
“Whatever distinction a Roman Equestrian can possess—and it can undoubtedly be very great—has always been judged as belonging to Marcus Caelius in the fullest measure, and is still so judged today” (Pro Caelio 3, pg 130). This quote is taken from the early parts of the defense speech and is used by Cicero to build a foundation surrounding the character of Cicero. Cicero states himself that “he must sway the hearts of the audience” that is exactly what he is doing with this statement about the character of Caelius. He is first refuting the assertion made by the prosecution that Caelius is a vagabond of types who does not obtain the traits of a Proper Roman because of his Equestrian ancestry. Cicero utterly deny’s that and instead demonstrates that Caelius is a man above reproach who comes from an esteemed line of Roman Equestrians and that the Equestrian class is not a class to be looked down on. “Being the son of a Roman Equestrian is something that the prosecution should never have used as a slur before these jurors, or before myself as an advocate.” (Pro Caelio 4, pg 130). There is quite a bit of irony in this statement, Cicero is to an affect reprimanding the prosecution for utilizing slander in order to tear down Caelius. This is something that Cicero himself will do later in his speech when he attacks the
...ee tasks are accomplished can vary to suit the orators purpose or the circumstances surrounding their speech. Cicero does just this and he does it with a purpose. He avoids heavy emotional appeals because they don’t suit the day and go against the relaxed almost careless tone he utilizes throughout the rest of his monologue. He emphasizes the use of persuasive arguments in order to detract from the claims of his opponent in the only way he can (since the case contains no material evidence) and Cicero flatters and entertains the jurors in the hopes that they will view his arguments more favorably. Everything he says and does in this speech of his drive toward his ultimate goal, an acquittal for his client, and from this speech one can see how Cicero not only achieves the three goals he sets forth, but how and why those three goals can and should be adapted at need.
In looking at the late Roman Republic, one can find many different accounts on how politics worked in Rome. One of these accounts by Polybius gives us a sense of the way politics worked in Rome. Polybius believed, “in all politics, we observe two sources of decay existing from natural causes, the one external, the other internal and self produced” (Polybius 506). The second account by Cicero gives us a framework of how Roman politics play out, stating “The canvass for office resolved itself into an activity of two kinds, of which one is concerned with the loyalty of friends, the other with the feelings of the people” (Cicero 37). By examining these two different views of Roman politics: Polybius’ The Histories of
Originally, it is thought, there was a law that prevented second consulships, and another that prevented holding another consulship until ten years had passed from the end of the prior. Marius bypassed both of these rules, maintaining the title of consul for five terms (104-99BC). Plutarch, the historical biographer, writes that “the people would tolerate no opposition” [to Marius’s second consulship], which shows us that Marius gained his power through support of the masses rather than support of the senate, which is what would be expected. Plutarch gives more evidence that Marius won his power by gaining the affection of the military and the plebeians, rather than the aristocracy whom he offended with his “violent speeches, full of contempt and arrogance” . From this we learn that Marius was not only supported by the people, but he was opposed by the higher class, and more important figures in Roman society.. The picture that Plutarch paints gives the impression that Marius gained his consulship in ways that were unconventional, much like the nature of the consulship itself. Breaking the mold like this paved the way for more fortunate ambitious men, like Sulla and Caesar, as he was showing that great power could be achieved without necessarily adhering to the preference of the
The Significance of the Gracchi "When Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus sought to establish the liberty of the common people and expose the crimes of the oligarchs, the guilty nobles took fright and opposed their proceedings by every means at their disposal" - Cicero. The Gracchi brothers were clearly well intentioned men who had the interests of Rome at heart, instead of their own, which was a common attitude amongst the other senators. The reforms of the Gracchi were long over-due and their programs were genuine attempts to deal with Rome's problems. During the Gracchi's existence, Rome was facing a number of social, political and economic problems. They were frustrated with the conservatism and selfishness of the oligarchy and so adopted methods which threatened the balance between the senate, the magistrates and the people which had existed for a very long time - in this way they can be regarded as revolutionary.
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
One important aspect of Roman life is that of tradition. By Marius consecutively holding seven consulships in a row and doing so whilst not present for some strayed away from political tradition and enabling actions of later romans. Because of a foreign threat up north of Rome, the people knew they needed him in office, which helped him hold his consulship for so long. Marius was elected consul again each year until his sixth consulship in 100; the people disregarded the lex Annalis didn’t allow the senate to prolong his consulship (Scullard 1982 52).
As we regained consciousness one by one, we found ourselves on a deserted island. After gathering all the food and supplies we could find, it was decided that certain rules should be enacted so we may live together civilly. We need to maintain our politeness and courtesy as we do not know how long we may be stranded on the island. To preserve what we have left, the first rule that should be enacted must benefit the group as a whole. The rule to have every able bodied individual work to benefit the group. That means that a person must work at gather food, water, build shelter, and any other tasks that are required. This should be the most important rule as it will maintain order and will provide justice in our group.
The author of the From the Orations, more specifically, the First Oration Against Catiline, is Marcus Tullius Cicero. Cicero was a Roman lawyer, writer, and statesman. Born in 106 BCE, in Arpinium, Italy to a wealthy family, he was educated in both Rome and Greece. Known as a judicial officer with great power, he won his election as chief magistrate, by cause of the people fearing his rival Catiline’s revolutionary ideas. This particular piece is addressed to both the senate and to Catiline. Cicero is responding to an attempt on his life by Catiline and is wanting to expose him for his appalling intendments against himself and members of the Senate.
Of Cicero it can be said he possessed a bias towards roman life and doctrine. For Cicero
While “young aristocratic men… became increasingly attracted to… philosophy,” Cato dismissed the study as “’mere gibberish.’” Cato firmly believed in the judicial process and the importance of Rome’s laws, calling on the Senate to “bid adieu to the [Greek] envoys” and go back to studying the judicial code and its practice. Though Cato was a staunch individual and even more so as a senator, his beliefs at times were contradictory. Despite decrying the love of Greek culture and the extravagant, luxurious lifestyles the rich had, Cato had the first known basilica in Rome, placed atop the Forum in the Republic’s capital. Cato was a charismatic figure, stepping away from his wealth and political prestige in Rome to serve in the army, believing discipline had decayed since he had served in his youth. Cato the Elder did far more than stand by his words, he also inspired others to do the same. Julius Caesar is said to have studied and even practiced Cato’s published speeches multiple times, learning and refining the art of speaking publicly and swaying an audience’s
The republic was in crisis, and its citizens needed a strong, organized, devoted leader that would reform and bring it back to its former strength and glory. Rome was in a dysfunctional period of its history with rebellions on every street corner and power-hungry politicians killing off their competitors so they could become supreme leader of the then most powerful governmental system in the world. The commoners, or Plebeians, needed a political figure that they could trust, and they needed that politician to give them just the slightest hint of hope to aid them to strive to rebound the falling republic. That is where the well-known Roman leader comes in, and his name was Julius
Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.
Marcus Tullius Cicero[n 1] (/ˈsɪsɪroʊ/; Classical Latin: [ˈmaːr.kʊs ˈtʊl.lɪ.ʊs ˈkɪ.kɛ.roː]; 3 January 106 BC – 7 December 43 BC) was a Roman politician and lawyer, who served as consul in the year 63 BC. He came from a wealthy municipal family of the Roman equestrian order, and is considered one of Rome's greatest orators and prose stylists.[2][3] His influence on the Latin language was so immense that the subsequent history of prose, not only in Latin but in European languages up to the 19th century, was said to be either a reaction against or a return to his style.[4] According to Michael Grant, "the influence of Cicero upon the history of European literature and ideas greatly exceeds that of any other prose writer in any language".[5] Cicero introduced the Romans to the chief schools of Greek philosophy and created a Latin philosophical vocabulary (with neologisms such as evidentia,[6] humanitas, qualitas, quantitas, and essentia)[7] distinguishing