Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rule of law theory
Justice system in america
The rule of law theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the film “ A Few Good Men” the rule of law and fundamental justice were not followed by Lance Cpl. Harold and Pfc. Louden Downey. The rule of law was disobeyed as soon as Cpl. Lance and Pfc. Louden acted above the law. They committed a criminal offence and disregarded Pvt. Santiago's rights. Although, the orders were given by superior officer, Col. Nathan Joseph, the fact of the matter still remains the same, a crime was committed . Pvt. Santiago’s rights were not taken into consideration, which inevitably lead to his death. Although Cpl. Lance and Pfc. Louden clearly disregarded the rules of law and acted above the law, procedural justice was still exercised. Both Cpl. Lance and Pfc. Louden were given rights to a fair trial and the
In the film Twelve Angry Men, I believe justice was served. Without juror number eight, however, the outcome most assuredly would have been different. The subtle force and confidence that he displayed allowed the narrow minds of the other eleven jurors to be broadened.
The motion picture A Few Good Men challenges the question of why Marines obey their superiors’ orders without hesitation. The film illustrates a story about two Marines, Lance Corporal Harold W. Dawson and Private First Class Louden Downey charged for the murder of Private First Class William T. Santiago. Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee, who is known to be lackadaisical and originally considers offering a plea bargain in order to curtail Dawson’s and Downey’s sentence, finds himself fighting for the freedom of the Marines; their argument: they simply followed the orders given for a “Code Red”. The question of why people follow any order given has attracted much speculation from the world of psychology. Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, conducted an experiment in which randomly selected students were asked to deliver “shocks” to an unknown subject when he or she answered a question wrong. In his article, “The Perils of Obedience”, Milgram concludes anyone will follow an order with the proviso that it is given by an authoritative figure. Two more psychologists that have been attracted to the question of obedience are Herbert C. Kelman, a professor at Harvard University, and V. Lee Hamilton, a professor at the University of Maryland. In their piece, Kelman and Hamilton discuss the possibilities of why the soldiers of Charlie Company slaughtered innocent old men, women, and children. The Marines from the film obeyed the ordered “Code Red” because of how they were trained, the circumstances that were presented in Guantanamo Bay, and they were simply performing their job.
An officer in the military will listen to the officers ranking higher than him more readily than someone of a lower rank. It does not matter whether the rank is by a title such as in a military situation or in the way someone is perceived to be, like in Zimbardo and Milgram’s experiments. In the film A Few Good Men there is one puzzling statement near the end of the movie said by Private Louden Downey. After the sentencing Downey loudly questions Lieutenant Commanders Galloway and Kaffee as to why Dawson and Downey were still found guilty of “conduct unbecoming of United States marines”. He said “what did we do wrong? We did nothing wrong!” Private Downey was referring to the fact that he is a marine, he gets an order and he follows it, with no questions asked. The puzzling idea that those following orders because it was an order given by someone of a higher rank means that Dawson and Downey are not responsible for their actions. Is anyone responsible for their actions and the consequences of those actions if they were “just following orders?” The ability to tell someone what to do and to have them listen to your command is determined by your status relative to theirs.
„h I lieutenant Harry Breaker Morant, state to you all today, as god as my witness, in the fight for justice, that my actions and behavior did not at any time breach those of orders given to me by the British High Command during periods of combat. However it was ironically clear that the corrupt jury did not listen, appreciate, or respect Handcock, Whitten or myself in the one eyed courtroom. It was as if we Australians where playing a tails, on a double headed penny, there was no possibility of victory.
Justice and perception are words that often overlap. What is seen as justice by one generation can be seen a hateful act of violence by the next. The point is, justice can only truly be construed by the one perceived as the victim. In A Thousand Splendid Suns a picture of sorrow and desperation that grasp Afghanistan is painted as the backdrop to the story. Mariam, a harami, was taught by her mother to endure. That her sole purpose as a woman was to endure the suffering that a man causes. Then, one day, she takes justice into her own hands and kills her abusive husband to save her sister wife and only true companion in her life. This crime leads to her execution; even her final moments a sense of purpose fulfills her because she knows that by sacrificing her life and saving Laila’s, Laila can start anew.
In CrimJ 100 we were talking a lot about how to court system works and the different severities of sentences. I was asked to watch the movie A Few Good Men, I was able to watch it on Popcorn time. The purpose of watching this movie was so I could relate what I was learning in class to this movie. The movie is about two marines; LCcl Harold and PFC Downie were ordered a code red on a fellow marine that was requesting to leave his company. The Commanding Officer Nathan Jessep ordered the code red to “train” the marine to get use to the conditions in Cuba. The code red back fired on the commander when Santiago died from the code red. The commander tried to stay under the radar and erase his name from getting tracked back to him. The protagonist Lt. Daniel Kaffee has to prove the Lt. Kendrick called the code red on Santiago. Another main character in this film is Lt. Cdr. Galloway, she is PFC Downie’s attorney for this case. There are many themes that we have covered in class that occur in the movie. This is great representation of how a real court case would play out. The movie showcase key themes, such as Plea bargains, Responsibilities of the Criminal Defence Attorneys, Responsibilities of the Procsector, Bringing in a witness, and also showcases judges in a courtroom scenario.
However, MacIntyre does not think that a state putting forth such a thin conception of the good can rationally settle competing theories of justice (chapter 17 in After Virtue is devoted to this argument). Just as debates in public morality, such as abortion, cannot be settled rationally by members of society, neither can philosophers or a nation’s citizens settle the debates on justice. Though interesting, the validity of this argument will not be explored here, as the objective of this section is not to carefully examine why MacIntyre thinks the neutralist state fails,
There are many leaders in this film making choices, while they were not all educated choices, like the Spanish who kidnapped the slaves and were working on the Amistad. To those like the abolitionists, their lawyer, and the former president, who all wanted nothing but justice for these Africans. Another detrimental decision maker in this story are the judges both in the Supreme Court and the state level they are both the ultimate decision makers and any choice they make, direct affects the Africans and others involved. While retributive justice is used to keep social order. In the context of the movie, these courts were used to keep social order, whether the outcome is or way or
Justice is achieved by telling the truth and being courageous. The path to achieving justice is explored in both the play 'Twelve Angry Men' by playwright Reginald Rose and the film 'On The Waterfront' by director Elia Kazan. While triumph can result through challenges and conflict, it is not possible to achieve without justice. However, when faced with inequality and an oppressed society it can be hard for individuals to act courageously to achieve justice. Lastly, when faced with a lack of remorse and empathy it can be difficult to achieve justice. Each text demonstrates the difficulties individuals can be faced with when striving for justice.
In Flannery O’Conners, A Good Man is Hard to Find, the use of allusions convey the theme of death. While they were all driving through Georgia, the grandmother noticed this landscape. “They passed a large cotton field with five or six graves fenced in the middle of it, like a small island.” (132) The six graves emphasize the theme of death. In Baileys family, there are six members. This highlights the fact that they are going to die later on. Additionally, the island too, represents death and isolation. Towards the ending of this short story the family members are surrounded by the men and the misfit. This can allude to how an island is fenced (just like how the graves were fenced) by a body of water. Moreover, in this short story,
In every good story there is a protagonist and antagonist that drive the story and provide entertainment. In “A Good Man Is Hard To Find” by Flannery O’Conner, the story follows the Grandmother and her family on their journey to Florida. In this story, O’Connor created a dynamic character in the poor, doomed grandmother. By using someone very simple, who at the same time possesses great depth, the story is driven by the conflict, which the grandmother creates. Although she’s never given a name, her character is the most memorable role.
The Host praised the Lawyer for his tale, and urged the Parish Priest to tell a tale. The Parson chides the Host for swearing, and he in turn mocks the Parson as a "Jankin" (a contemptuous name for a priest). The Shipman decides that he will tell a tale next. In the fragments that remain of the Canterbury Tales, however, the Shipman's Tale exists later in the manuscripts, in the seventh set of stories. The Wife of Bath's Tale follows instead.
In And Justice for All’s final courtroom scene, the use of mid close ups and close ups were able to capture the viewers emotion. Close ups are able to catch the viewers’ attention since the screen is solely focused on one person. Since there is only one person on the screen they are able to convey all their emotions to the viewer. In this scene Al Pacionos expressions should be award winning since he does a great job showing raw emotion to the jury and everyone in the courtroom that the judge he is defending is guilty. Not only Al Pacionos close ups were great but close ups were used to capture everyone in the courtrooms emotion.
Sir Malory once again makes us ponder whether this could be true after we witness Lancelot’s actions in “Morte D’Arthur”. Sir Lancelot’s heroism and constant response to King Arthur’s call of duty show us that he is chivalrous. However, once Sir Lancelot “slew Sir Agravain, and after twelve of his fellows” his chivalry was stained (p 444). The controversy of Lancelot’s chivalry is inflamed when his “love for Guinevere drives him into battle” and causes the “deaths of Sir Gareth and Sir Gaheris” (Harrington 67). Is the killing of several people justified by one act of chivalry? Sir Lancelot essentially “modifies his points of honor” in order to justify his actions.(Harrington 69) Sir Lancelot’s need to modify his code of honor in order to escape a predicament let us know that his character is at times
Has justice always prevailed in your life? Well, it hasn't in mine. There have been many times where I didn't think that justice prevailed. For example, I have volleyball almost every single weekend. There are always two days we get to play. The first day is to place us in a pool for sunday which is single elimination and championships. My team always wins every game on Saturday but looses on Sunday. To me justice does not prevail in this case. We are such a good team and always win but somehow, the win always falls into better hands for the other team on Sunday. This just doesn't make sense. Why doesn't justice prevail? Why can't things always work the way we want them to? To me, justice does not always prevail. Knowing this, I know that I will never always have justice prevail in my case. In life, we will not always be happy about every decision that is made. Another example from my life is on test I take. I always study my hardest and think I am always going to do my best. I usually get nervous before I take my test. I start to not think about what I learned and what I've studie...