Jumping Into Biblical Analysis In Genesis 1-3

993 Words2 Pages

Jumping into biblical analysis is extremely difficult without any direction; luckily that direction comes in the form of biblical analysis methods, chiefly the historical and theological methods. In Genesis 1-3 there are two different stories of creation, each written by a different author. Both methods examine the stories of the Bible with different assumptions. On one hand, the historical method assumes that there is cultural and historical information that can be found within the Bible, whereas the theological approach assumes that the Bible was written as a self-revelation of God. While reading the Bible in a historical approach, readers are interested in information such as, who wrote this story, when were they alive, why did they write this story, and where did this happen. Theological critics argue that …show more content…

The most important difference between the two methods is the theological approach looks for answers in the text of the Bible, while the historical method looks to find the historical context of the story or the culture of the time period (New American Bible, RG 8). Both the historical method and the theological method provide different viewpoints on the creation story, but The Catholic Church examines both viewpoints.
Genesis opens with the priestly story of creation. Interestingly, this version of creation is written after Genesis 2-3. The historical method can provide the reader with an explanation as to why there are two separate creation accounts in the Bible and how scholars know that they are, in fact, different texts. First, the key reason why these are two different text is that the verbs change from Genesis1-2. Genesis 2 seems to have a more human approach to creation, using verbs like, sent, formed, and built, whereas Genesis 1 verbs include, set, blessed, and created; in Genesis 1 God simply

Open Document