Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bribery in international politics
Julius caesar research
Julius caesar research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bribery in international politics
Fidel Castro dominated Cuba with an iron fist and lack of mercy, but pushed for the removal of their corrupt government administration. Saddam Hussein turned an entire nation into a war- like state and killed thousands of people, but when he was in the hospital, he would save the crust from his bread to feed the birds. Joseph Stalin ruled Russia and had as many deaths on his hands as Hitler, but he wrote romantic poetry. All three of these leaders have two things in common: they were all brutal dictators that everyone knew about and they all had a soft side to them that nobody knew about. One could say that Julius Caesar and Bill Clinton could fall into the same grouping as the three tyrants mentioned above. Because of these real world and …show more content…
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Act I, scene ii, lines 135- 150, Cassius emphasizes Caesar tyranny by stating “Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about to find ourselves dishonorable graves.” To get to be the dictator that Caesar was, he had to start from the ground up. At a young age, Caesar decided that to become a “somebody” in politics, he had to buy his way in. Caesar conducted bribes, gladiator shows, banquets, contests, and games to gain popularity in the political world. He also married into fame; his first wife being Cornelia Cinna minor, whose father was a politician and a political ally to Caesar’s family. When he became a general in an army, Caesar began to demolish several different tribes of people and take their land to create provinces for Rome. He invaded Germany and Britain, as well. After those triumphs, Caesar went back to Rome and took it over by force. He and his army defeated the last remaining member of the First Triumvirate, Pompey, and drove him away to Egypt, where he was assassinated. This is briefly mentioned in Act I, scene i, lines 32- 35 by Marullus, a follower of Pompey: “Wherefore rejoice? What conquest brings he home? What tributaries follow him …show more content…
In Act III, scene ii, lines 87- 99, Antony, Caesar’s beloved friend, effectively displays some of Caesar’s good deeds by stating: “He was my friend, faithful and just to me; but Brutus says he was ambitious...He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill...When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept...You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” While a part of the First Triumvirate, Caesar made some wonderful reforms that helped improve the life of those living in Rome. He limited the grain welfare program to only those who needed it. With this change, people in real poverty got what they needed, resource wise, because all of it was going to them and not to others who could get it on their own. He made a law that limited the number of slaves that an estate could have to allow more opportunities for the poor to work; if those in poverty were slaves, they couldn’t work and make money for their family. He even reduced taxes and collections and made governors strictly responsible for their people’s money to prevent their government from losing the public’s money. Ceasar also helped Rome with his battle achievements. He gave the land he won in battle to soldiers and landless peasants to help establish more Roman colonies and ended the civil war that
During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...
Julius Caesar elected himself as the dictator of Rome. He became a favorite to many of the people of the lower classes. Unlike many leaders, Caesar valued the poor. Most people agreed with his decisions, but some of the higher classes’ did not. On March 15 44 BCE, now called the Ides of March, a few of Caesars’ closest peers decided to murder Caesar. Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar, on March 15.
Plutarch writes of Caesar’s character, “He had an ability to make himself liked which was remarkable in one of his age, and he was very much in the good graces of the ordinary citizen because of his easy manners and the friendly way in which he mixed with people” (Plutarch 257). By examining Caesar’s character, one can understand how he used his love of the people to gain power and to keep it with his military victories which had brought a vast amount of wealth and land to Rome. Caesar embarked on creating Rome’s biggests debts in order to achieve friends. Plutarch remarks on Caesar’s enemies who “thought that this influence of his would soon come to nothing, once he stopped spending money, and they stood aside and watched it grow among the common people. Later on it had become too great for anything to be done about it, and was plainly aimed at a complete revolution in the state” (Plutarch 257). Caesar relied on friendship, and used his friends tactically in forming the First Triumvirate with Pompey and Crassus, and he was able to gain their followers while also establishing his own name. Caesar learned from Sulla’s decree of proscriptions on one’s enemies and instead pardoned his enemies to make them his friends. This ultimately would turn out be disastrous for Caesar, as those whom he pardoned would switch sides at the last minute and stab
His first contribution to Rome’s downfall came in the form of the formation of the First Triumvirate, which enabled him to illegally take Gaul, and further undermine the senate. Caesar made his way to power by gaining important alliances. Unlike Marius, he was born into a fairly important high class family in Rome. The First Triumvirate, formed in 60BC was composed of himself, Crassus and Pompey. Crassus was the wealthiest man in Rome at the time, and Pompey had just been awarded his third Triumph. The mere existence of such a group undermined the ideals of the senate, as it worked on the basis that no one man could have enough power to do anything without the support of the senators. The Triumvirs worked to achieve their own individual goals, whilst simultaneously supporting one another. Caesar was consul in 59BC, with Marcus Bibulus, and made the sheer influence of the three men public with the introduction of his land redistribution law. Crassus and Pompey supported this proposal, and Pompey filled Rome with his soldiers. Bibulus tried to void the law but Caesar’s armed supporters drove him out of the senate and forced him into house arrest. This meant that Caesar essentially had a sole consulship and gained enough power and support to overturn his proposed governorship and allowed himself
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar follows the fall of the famous Roman emperor of the same name. Caesar as a character himself is very corrupt. He wants all the power he can get, but he does so with
Rome is also known as “the eternal city” because the Romans believed that no matter what happened to the world, the city of Rome would last for eternity. Rome is believed to be founded by two twin brothers: Romulus and Remus. Early Rome was once ruled by a King, but later was ruled by a government known as the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was eventually ended by three men: Marcus Licinius Crassus, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, also known as Pompey, and Julius Caesar. Although these three men each wanted power for their own and had different views, they agreed to join forces to rise over the Roman Republic and prevent a civil war. These three men formed something called the First Triumvirate. Later when he was in a battle, Crassus was killed
In a well functioning republic, the leaders must listen to all that the people say and not do whatever he wishes. This part of the play displays Caesar’s sexism but also his lack of thought for others concerns that is similar to a tyrant view. Lastly, Caesar shows arrogance subtly through his words to make himself feel powerful. When Calpurnia warns Caesar of her visions, Caesar starts speaking in third person that personally seems like the zenith of someone being supercilious. “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me/Ne’er looked but on my back; when they shall see/ The face of Caesar, they are vanishéd.” (II.ii.10-11). Caesar basically says that because he is so great and powerful he will never be defeated. He also talks in third person which is quite arrogant of a leader to do. Whenever people feel too anxious for leadership they may let it all go to their head, another reason why he turned into a tyrant. People need to watch for tyrannical or corrupt politicians as they can get too power hungry and cannot be
Caesar a Tragic HeroCaesar ended up doing something that partly defines him as a person and that would be he could no let go of something and that he just had to do something about it, which what he did was worse than them taking him hostage. This is a direct quote from the first site I went on, "Caesar made good on that threat. He had the pirates' throats slit before crucification, however, in a show of leniency owing their easy treatment of him in capyivity. This determination of Caesar's, to do exactly what he said he would do, become one of his defining characteristics throughout his life." Caesar should have never taken lives of people yes I know it was wrong for the pirates to take a person hostage and he may have prevented anyone
“Pitifully he reached his hand to Brutus and stammered “E tu Brutii?”” In the story “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, there are two arguments made on how Julius Caesar should be portrayed, a hero or a tyrant. Julius Caesar definitely was a hero. He was a tragic hero, one that died and was brought down by his friends, the only people who he trusted. Caesar did so many great things for Rome and he was unreasonably killed because the conspirators did not trust another dictator to govern their land.
	Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank. Every Roman followed his leadership and Caesar also defeated the great Pompey. First of all, At the Feast of Lupercal Caesar manipulated the commoners and made himself look noble to the commoners. Casca said, "Why there was a crown offered to him;...people fell a-shouting" (I,ii,221-223). Next, To show how noble and great Caesar was, the Romans would stand along the street sides to watch him pass by. "Madam not yet, I go to take my stand; /To see him pass on to the Capitol," said the soothsayer (II,iv,25-26). Finally, Caesar had the greatest rank possible as he would have been crowned king if it wasn’t for the conspiracy’s plot. As Casca said, "Indeed they say senators tomorrow; /Mean to establish Caesar as king..." (I,iii,87-88).
A tragic hero is the antithesis for the common protagonist. Most protagonists show how they overcome great obstacles however, the tragic hero shows a more humane character, that stumbles and falls. The tragic hero usually exhibits three specific traits that lead to his or her downfall. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters of Brutus and Caesar both exhibit the three attributes of a tragic character. The first trait of any tragic hero is a high rank and potential for greatness. Both Brutus and Caesar hold his trait, as they are beloved high ranking Romans. The second characteristic a tragic hero must possess; is a fatal flaw that dominates their personality, and Brutus’ sense of justice and Caesar’s ego, fulfill this
Throughout history, the world has seen a copious amount of emperors, but Julius Caesar was a historic model to the society of Rome. According to McKay, Hill, Buckler, Crowston, Weisner- Hanks, and Perry, (2014), born in 100 B.C. to an honorable family, Caesar went to school and received an outstanding education, which he later advanced by studying in Greece with some of the famous Greek teachers we learn about today. Caesar’s first wife Cornelia was the daughter of the consul at the time, Lucius Cornelius Cinna. His original plans were to marry the daughter of a wealthy business class family, but considering he wanted to be the flamen he had to marry a patrician. Even though he fulfilled the requirements and married Cornelia, consul Cinna never
Why would a title be a name of a fairly minor character? Yes Julius Caesar was a character of major power, but he was killed off in Act 3! The title should include Marcus Brutus, seeing as he is the actual main character. He was the one who was in the play a vast majority and made a very big impact on the plot!