Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roman army project
Julius Caesars impact on Ancient Rome
Roman army project
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although the Roman Army had many strengths they also had many weaknesses. That didn’t stop the Roman Army from conquering and overthrowing other civilizations that they saw as a threat. The Roman Army was a projections of Roman power. Infact that was just the beginning of them marking their territory and the start of a new era.
The Roman Army divided their troops into social classes. They were aligned based on their age, specialties and importance there was six major divisions. the Velites- they were made up of the juvenile and poorest of the male population of the Roman Republic. Hastati- they were wealthier than the Velites they made up the first line of the melee in the army. The Principe’s which were typically located on the second line of the infantry in the Roman Republic these men were strong and healthy.The Triarii was a group of men who were on the third
…show more content…
and most experienced line of the Roman Republic they were the wealthiest members on the infantry. The Equites was Rome’s most wealthiest citizens. Finally the Auxilia’s made up the last group these were the non- citizens of Rome. This was a way of controlling and organizing not only the Roman troops but also to establish laws. In order to be in the Roman Army you needed to qualify. Males who were between the ages of 17- 46 qualified to be in the Roman Army. If you were in the Army you were liable to serve 16 years but normally 6 years consecutively. Males at a young age usually started training for the military. In order to be placed into a category they belonged, Levy’s were usually held. Moreover When in war those whom were captured became slaves on that property. A lot of people who owned land were forced to give them up because of long term military service, as an outcome they were forced out of their own land and into poverty. Because only property owners could serve in the military, and those without land were unavailable for military service. This is what mainly prevented soldiers from participating in the Army. This wasn’t a disadvantage to the Roman Army because that didn’t stop them for succeeding. The Roman Army was organized in a unique manner. Roman Armies were actually organized by legions; a total of four legions. Each of the four legions had the strength of roughly about 4,200 infantry men. Although there were many other leaders, Caesar came to be the most successful general.
“Caesar was born in 100 BCE to a noble family who believed deeply into political power.” His aunt Julia was the wife of Marius. Marius was a Roman general and statesman. He held the office of consul. Growing up, Caesar's family didn't really get a taste of what wealth really was. At the time of his childhood, it was the time where Rome was falling, democracy was breaking down in the Roman Republic. Rome had a lot of violence involved all the time. As Caesar grew up in this environment, this motivated him to change the lifestyle--he wanted to give his family power and wealth. The ruse of Sula happened after Marius’ death and this is where Julius Caesar rapidly knew his life was in total danger. At a young age, Julius served for the military. He launched his own triumphant political and military career. Rapidly rising to the fame, Caesar declared himself dictatorship.“In the era just prior to the time of Caesar the Roman republic was experiencing problems to corruption and governance. This is what built Caesars
career. The Roman Army was organized in a unique manner. Roman Armies were actually organized by legions; a total of four legions. Each of the four legions had the Aside from the four legions, there were three lines called for the infantrymen The three lines were called Hastati; were a class of infantry employed in the armies of the Roman Army who originally fought as spearmen, there were also the Principes who were spearmen, and later swordsmen, in the Roman Army and finally, the Triarii who were one of the elements of the early Roman army. “The legions were consisted of 120 hastatis, 120 principles, 60 triarii.” Soldiers in the Roman Army were assigned weapons based on their economical position. As the velites, they usually wore a small round shaped shield; wore a small amount of armor (protection). The small round shaped shield was called by the name of “Parma”. They also wore a protective cap on their heads which went by the name of “Galea”. Their primary weapon was a throwing spear otherwise called a “Verutum”. The verutum was 6 ft long made of iron. The velites were unable to afford expensive equipment, therefore; they got cheaper gear more appropriate for ranged combat or wars. The hastati used a curved rectangular shield called a “scutum”. The scutum was about four feet tall and was made by gluing two large pieces of wood together. Their main weapon was a short sword used for stabbing and thrusting called a “gladius”. The Principe’s were initially spearmen armed with a long stabbing spear called a “hasta”. The triarii were also spearsmen , but sometimes they would fall back on the third line of the infantry if the first two lines weren’t didn’t defeat their enemies they would rise to the position. Finally the auxilia were usually equipped by the state which meant they didn’t get a specific weapon. This shows that the Hastiti’s, principes, velites, triarii, and auxilia all used different types of weapons, shield. It also explains how each of these groups were very different, such as some groups being stronger than others, wealthier than others or they might have more powerful weapons. The Roman Armies were a projection of roman power. The size of the Roman army grew as the empire expanded. Its massive size is what led them to success.
Imagine it is the year 59 B.C.E., the greatest republic to date is collapsing and it seems it is doomed with a senate which does not care about its people. There seems to be no hope. But then comes a young man who has ideas of equality that could save the republic. That man is Julius Caesar. Conqueror of Gaul, Crosser of the Rubicon, member of the First Tiumbarant, Caesar was a brilliant politician and general. At the time, Rome was governed by Pompey and the senate. Both were in favor bettering themselves and not the poor people. Caesar was in favour of improving life for the lower class. This was not accepted by the senate or Pomey, making them question his ethics. As Caesar became more powerful, as when he conquered Gaul, Pompey and the senate began to plot. They could not have someone as dangerous as Caesar in Rome. Because of this, the senate planned and carried out an assassination attempt, and succeeded. This was only for the senate to maintain power and complete control over Rome. Along with caesar, a little bit of
Prior to Augustus’s reforms, when legions were raised, they were comprised almost entirely of Italian recruits. This was out of the question with this new standing army, and filling the ranks with Italians gave way to supplementing legions with local auxiliaries, then later integrating these Romanised locals into a legions structure proper.5 This action undertaken by Augustus seems to have had ramifications as the centuries progressed, with the percentage of Italian born recruits steadily dropping, to the point where by the time of Hadrian, there were almost not Italians serving in the legions. Augustus’s methods of recruiting elsewhere to support the strength of his legions became so successful that they became the primary method of filling the requirements of the Empires new professional
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
This paper will argue the history of the Roman Empire there have been numerous of important superiors who have come up to the forefront to protect the Roman Empire from devastation and failure. The superior’s and conquerors of the Roman Empire are limitless, but there is one superior who sets out from the others. His name is Octavian Caesar, Caesar support to Rome history assisted Rome to be the central empire that we learn and take in account today. Octavian without uncertainty became the best superior to come to power in the Roman Empire history.
Caesar came from an old patrician family, where he received an education, and began his journey into a political career (Hart 337). He started just as any man would trying to make something of himself and not die the same way he was born, average. Without having conquered Gaul and crossed the Rubicon he would just be another politician in a corrupted government. “Julius Caesar reached a mature age without achieving astonishing success (qtd. Hart 7). Unlike rulers like Alexander The Great, Caesar was into his 50’s with nothing to show for it. The most influential people are usually geniuses or prodigies that can’t help but make a difference in the world. Unlike people like Einstein who mastered Calculus before he was 15 he was just a white sheep amongst others.
Not much information is given about Julius Caesar’s early life because he had lost the works he had written as a child. It is known that Caesar was educated by a man named Marcus Antonius Gnipho. In his late adolescence, he took up a political position during the Roman Civil Wars. He quickly learned to associate himself with the most powerful people of Rome; he would only marry Cornelia, “the daughter of the most powerful Roman of the era, the consul Lucius Cornelius Cinna”. Shortly after that, Lucius was killed by Sulla, the future “dictator” of Rome. Sulla demanded that Caesar divorce Cornelia; he refused, so Sulla stripped him of his priesthood of Jupiter and extracted his dowry from his marriage to Cornelia.
During their time, the strategy the Roman’s employed was second to none. The success of their strategy started with the Roman’s separating their armies into smaller, more specific types. They used many different types of infantry throughout the years, but the main types they used were the velites, hastati, principes, triarii, and later the famous Legionaries were introduced (Roman Empire Wars). These infantry worked together on the battlefield to effectively eliminate the enemy and win the battle.
1. The works of literature that exhibit a tragic hero, an anti-hero, and a modern hero are as follows: Julius Caesar, A Separate Peace, and Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.
To a soldier, war was not romantic nor an intellectual adventure: It was a job of work to which he brought a steady, stubborn, adaptable schooled application (Adcock 6). A grouping of men called Legions were the main force in the Roman Empire. In the Republican times the legions were given a serial number (I, II, III, etc.) each year they were recruited. The smallest unit in the legion was the century, made up of one hundred men. Legionaries used javelins to begin the battle at long range and disrupt enemy battle lines before charging forward to engage the enemy at close range with swords and shields. The normal strength of a Legion was four thousand infantry and two hundred calvary, which could be expanded to five thousand in an em...
Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare that takes place in the year 44 B.C. in Rome. This play is based on a true event-- the assassination of the ruler, Julius Caesar, by the traitorous conspirators that stood beside him at the capitol. This group of conspirators consisted of Marcus Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Trebonius, Ligarius, Decius Brutus, Metellus Cimber, and Cinna. This play is a tragedy, meaning that it is a work that brings the main character or characters extreme suffering, usually at the fault of one or several tragic flaws. The possession of one or more tragic flaws is what marks the difference between a hero and a tragic hero.
Honor and power is what drives the conspirators to assassinate Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Caesar is now the single leader of Rome, and members of the Senate have concerns that he will abuse his sole power. Therefore, they plot and accomplish the assassination of Caesar in an attempt to rebuild the balance of Rome. Rome falls into chaos with an unknown future with no central leader for the people to follow. In Act I, Scene 2, Cassius, a member of the Senate, explains to his friend, Brutus, that Caesar is not the god he makes himself out to be. Instead, he argues both he and Brutus are equal to Caesar and are just as deserving of the throne. Cassius’ speech to Brutus diminishes Caesar’s godly demeanor through
While reading the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar you see all the flaws that Julius possesses, although there is various ones, there is one flaw that will be most agreeable. The greatest flaw that Julius holds is his arrogance, and this brought his downfall.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an intimate portrayal of the famed assassination of Julius Caesar and the complex inner workings of the men who committed the crime. In one particularly revealing scene, two of the men closest to Caesar, one a conspirator in his murder and one his second-in command, give orations for the deceased. Despite being simple in appearance, these two speeches do much of the work in developing and exposing the two characters in question. Though both have a love for Caesar, Mark Antony's is mixed with a selfish desire for power, while Brutus' is pure in nature, brought to a screeching halt by his overpowering stoicism. These starkly-contrasted personalities influence the whole of the play, leading to its tragic-but-inevitable end.
A tragic hero is the antithesis for the common protagonist. Most protagonists show how they overcome great obstacles however, the tragic hero shows a more humane character, that stumbles and falls. The tragic hero usually exhibits three specific traits that lead to his or her downfall. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters of Brutus and Caesar both exhibit the three attributes of a tragic character. The first trait of any tragic hero is a high rank and potential for greatness. Both Brutus and Caesar hold his trait, as they are beloved high ranking Romans. The second characteristic a tragic hero must possess; is a fatal flaw that dominates their personality, and Brutus’ sense of justice and Caesar’s ego, fulfill this
Power is how much control and support one has. Power can be controversial because the people who want it sometimes don't know how to handle it. In Julius Caesar, written by Shakespeare, many different people possess power. They gain the power in varied ways and react to having it differently. Since there are so many situations in Julius Caesar, power shifts are very common because diverse times call for the amounts of power to vary between different people.