Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

575 Words2 Pages

In Shakespeare’s “the tragedy of Julius Caesar,” Shakespeare uses irony to prove the point in the speech. His repetition of phrases makes the readers question if Brutus really is an honorable man. Caesar is murdered by a bunch of assassins who turned against him, trying to make the people of Rome against Caesar too, until Caesars loyal friend steps in to prove all their opinions about Caesar to be wrong. Antony tries to prove Caesar to be a great leader and a caring man using irony and repetition.
Throughout the speech, Antony continuously repeats the same phrases until the speech finally ends. His use of repetition was actually very effective against Brutus and really made me, and the people of Rome question, is Brutus really and honorable man? He repeats “But Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.15) and “Brutus says Julius is ambitious” (3.2.10), to make the reader question if he actually is honorable or not. The first time he says that he is an honorable man, I wondered why he is saying that and thought that he was against the assassins, but as he starts repeating the phrase I figured out why he was. Sometimes repetition sounds quite sarcastic, which I can …show more content…

Antony makes it seem that he isn’t trying to disprove anyone, or trying to offend Brutus, but really he is trying to change the public’s opinion of his deceased friend Caesar. He writes something good about Julius Caesar then uses the repetitive phrases to question Brutus’ claims. In the text it says “I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse: was this ambitious? Yet Brutus says he is ambitious, and, sure, he is an honorable man…” (3.2.20) He continuously proves Brutus to be some sort of liar, using his effective speech to turn Rome against him. The way Antony speaks, even though he had to follow Brutus’ conditions, still managed to change the public’s view on Julius

Open Document