Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rise and fall of julius caesar essay
Analysis of Julius Caesar
Critical analysis of julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rhetoric is used on the daily by those that are involved in politics to gain the hearts of the crowd. In the poem The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, rhetoric plays a major role in convincing the crowds of citizens. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar revolves around the election of Caesar as the Roman leader. A group of people, called the conspirators, disagreed with the election and decided to take matters into their own hands. Someone named Cassius gathered the group up and even convinced Brutus, one of Caesar’s best friends, into joining them in the murder of Julius Caesar. After the murder, Brutus allowed Antony a chance to speak at Caesar’s funeral with conditions. Antony was told to not speak badly of them in front of the crowd. Antony does just …show more content…
By saying this, he’s leading the crowd to believe that Brutus is all-mighty. This is an example ethos because Antony is pointing out his trustworthiness to the crowd by pretty much putting it in the crowd’s head that Brutus allowed him to speak so he must be trustworthy. Another example of ethos would be the repetition of the phrase “Brutus is an honorable man” immediately after he states a reason of his death. He does this to hint at the crowd that none of the reasons are justifiable by fact; only by credibility. Antony slowly moves on to show all the good qualities of Caesar followed by a reason of his death and the phrase “Brutus is an honorable man”. By doing this, he is showing the crowd that they’re in the wrong for only trusting Brutus’ honor and not taking into account the actual good qualities Caesar had. All of these strategies were effective because now the crowd begins to questions whether or not Caesar was actually ambitious. They begin talking back and forth with each other with their thoughts of Caesar’s true personality. The crowd also begins to confide in Antony referring to him as …show more content…
Antony states, “If you have tears, prepare to shed them now” (III.ii.166). Antony says this to dramatically alter the mood to overall bring a high change in emotion for the crowd. Antony then proceeds to speak about Caesar’s accomplishments which makes the crowd’s mood sad. He then goes on to say, “This was the most unkindest cut of all; / For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, / Ingratitude, more strong than traitors’ arms, / Quite vanquished them. Then burst his mighty heart;” (III.ii.180-183). He pretty much tells the crowd that Caesar loved those who murdered him and that he was very heartbroken when he saw them stab. Antony uses loaded words such as “burst” and “mighty” to strengthen the already saddened mood and inject a bit of anger into the crowd. He then begins to use stronger words like “ingratitude”, “treason”, and “marred” to further destroy the reputation of the conspirators and make the crowd
Imagine yourself listening to a political debate, undecided as to which leader you agree with. One candidate begins to speak about unjust societal issues, such as the horrifying amount of people in the world that do not have food on their table. The candidate also begins to touch upon the topic of taxes and how he will lower them if he is elected. You find yourself being persuaded in the direction of emotions and morals. The power of language used to appeal others is not only present in the modern world, but also in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by famous English playwright William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar portrayed a story of how an aspiring leader, Julius Caesar, is assassinated by a group of schemers, lead by Marcus Brutus, who disagreed with Caesar’s decrees and ways of governing. Over the course of the text, it demonstrated the use of two rhetorical charms: ethos and pathos. While ethos refers to the moral and ethical appeal and pathos invokes to the emotional aspect, each one was evidently shown in the funeral speech for Caesar given by his best friend, Mark Antony. Prior to Antony’s speech, Brutus had given the plebeians a synopsis of what had occurred. However, Mark Antony knew that what Brutus had told the plebeians was false. In such manner, he allured the plebeians onto his side of the tragedy by touching upon ethical and emotional appeals.
Rhetorical devices have been around for many centuries, and they are used to convince and persuade people to believe in their cause. These strategies exploit individuals by influencing them to feel sympathy or trust the speaker. In Julius Caesar, a historic tragedy written by the prominent Shakespeare, Antony’s brilliant rhetorical strategies are used to trump Brutus and prompt the Roman people to unite with his rebellion against the unjust butcher of the beloved Julius Caesar.
While Mark Antony’s speech is a eulogy Caesar’s funeral, it gradually develops the energetic tone of an epideictic (praise-and-blame speech), which points to an ulterior motive. He draws in his audience with a solemn introduction that is meant to defer any bad feelings the Roman’s have towards him, and then he begins to exemplify Caesar’s good character. However, his tone soon becomes more passionate and he begins to use interjections to arouse the listeners. By shouting “O judgment!” as he questions the Roman’s loyalty, Antony is making use of ecphonesis to force a reaction: hopefully one that supports Caesar. Antony strategically spaces these throughout the course of the speech to ensure their enthusiastic spirit, yet hide his own zeal from the audience. Most notably, he exclaims “what a fall was there, my countrymen!” to emphasize the magnitude of Caesar’s death and in the last line he shouts to them “here was a Caesar!...
Firstly, Antony says a general statement that, “the evil that men do lives after them” (III.ii.74), when in fact he is subtly and sneeringly referring to the conspirators actions. The Roman commoners don’t realize that this general statement is swaying them, but the rest of Antony’s speech further convinces them of the evil the conspirators have done. Later, Antony talks about Brutus says that “sure, [he] is an honourable man” (III.ii.98), emphasis on the sure. Because he uses a scornful tone while sarcastically saying this statement, he is really beginning to show the audience his true feelings on the situation. Knowing that even Antony bitterly disagrees with the choices of the conspirators, it further persuades the common people of Rome to turn against Brutus and the rest of Caesar’s murderers. These occasions show Antony’s sour tone, especially towards the conspirators, and Antony’s tone also riles up the Roman citizens. His tone helps to exasperate the commoners with Caesar’s murder, and therefore assists Antony in achieving his purpose to manipulate the audience to turn against
In the beginning of Brutus’s speech it’s shown that he is using ethos to convince the citizens of Rome of his credibility. “Believe me for mine honor and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom and awake your senses that you may the better judge.” (Shakespeare) In this first quote he obviously tries to convince the audience to believe in what he is about to say by telling them that he should be trusted because he is a truthful man. “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar's, to him I say that Brutus' love to Caesar was no less than his.” (1) Then again he persuades the crowd by telling them can be just as trustworthy as anyone else that knew Julius personally as a friend.
Now knowing that he, Antony, had the crowd listening used this to show how Caesar was killed used a strategy of persuasion such as emotions or pathos. Antony called the conspirators envious which is a strong emotion to people. Antony used this emotion in persuading the crowd that what the conspirators had done was wrong. Using this Antony caused a case of mutiny against Brutus and the conspirators making the crowd hate them enough to kill them.
In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare employs various rhetorical strategies such as direct address, repetition, and apostrophe in Antony’s eulogy to convince the crowd into believing that Caesar was a good ruler. His excellent use of rhetoric begins before he starts his speech through the establishment of familiarity. Before Antony begins his speech, he refers to the crowd as “friends, romans, [and] countrymen” to establish a personal connection, indicating the use of direct address (3.2.82). By referring to the crowd as “friends,” Antony removes any separation between him and the audience, establishing a close bond by choice. As it came first on his list, it emphasizes the importance of his friendship with the audience as friendship implies
Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.
When constructing an effective argument, the triple rhetoric must be considered. In the tragedy of Julius Caesar, both Brutus and Antony attempt to persuade the people of Rome. They each take a different approach while trying to convince them. In the end, one speech is more successful than the other in the way that the crowd agrees with one.
The art of persuasion is a hard talent to learn, and even harder to perform successfully. Convincing others to believe one’s argument is a key skill in life, and has been for centuries. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” persuasion is used by most of the characters throughout the story for a variety of reasons, but one figure in the play gives multiple speeches with the same purpose. Decius Brutus sneakily and sharply uses rhetorical devices in all of his speeches to sway himself and his audience to believe that his rash decisions and actions regarding Caesar were justified.
...d saddened by Caesar’s death, this is also hyperbole. Antony is exaggerating his current emotions. He doesn’t truly need a moment before he goes on. He simply wants the crowd to react to his speech so far. In saying his heart died with Caesar, the pathos generated moves the crowd and gives them an opportunity to respond to Antony.
Antony is delivering this speech, after Brutus's speech, in front of the Roman peo0ple shortly after Caesar’s death. He is delivering this speech in spite of Brutus and Cassius killing good Casar. Having known they killed Caesar after all he did for them and Rome was shocking to him. The speech was delivered under the circumstance that Anotony wanted to related to the “common folk” and somehow raise their spirits as he talked about all of Caesar's motivation,achievements, and ambition. The people of Rome are all hearing his speech and are agreeing with his every word. The people are still very upset and distressed by
Finally Antony finishes the speech by crying and exclaiming “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause until it returns to me.” When Antony said this he single handedly turned the crowd onto brutus and the other conspirators without providing one bit of solid evidence that put the conspirators in wrong. By using pathos Antony overcame the disadvantages placed on him by speaking after Brutus and the crowd already being against
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, persuasion and rhetoric play a crucial role in a myriad of events and outcomes that occur. In Act one Cassius is trying to convince Brutus to turn against Caesar and join the conspiracy. Later, in Act three, Brutus and Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus convinces the Roman people that what he and the conspirators did was for the good of Rome. Antony then persuades the plebeians that the conspirators had no reasonable judgement to kill Caesar and that all Caesar’s future plans were to help Rome. Though many characters appear to be rhetorical, Antony could be considered as the most. Persuasion and rhetoric are used throughout Julius Caesar when Cassius is trying to coax Brutus to join the conspiracy, and when Brutus and Antony convince the crowd at Caesar’s funeral.
The speech made by Marcus Antonius, called Antony, in Act Three, Scene Two of Julius Caesar shows that despite being considered a sportsman above all else, he is highly skilled with the art of oratory as well. In the play by William Shakespeare, this speech is made at the funeral of Caesar after he is killed by Brutus and the other conspirators. Brutus claimed earlier, in his own funeral speech, that the killing of Caesar was justified. He felt that Caesar was a threat, and too ambitious to be allowed as ruler. Much of this sentiment, however, was developed by the treacherous Cassius. Antony, on the other hand, felt that the conspirators were traitors to Rome and should be dealt with. This speech used a variety of methods to gradually bring the crowd to his side, yet maintain his side of the deal with Brutus. This deal was that he, “shall not in your funeral speech blame us...” (3.1.245) for the death of Caesar. Antony holds his end of the deal for the majority of the speech, yet by doing so convinces the crowd of Brutus' and the others' disloyalty. In many ways, this speech can be seen as the ultimate rhetoric, and it includes all three of Aristotle's methods of persuasion. This are the appeal to credibility, called ethos, the appeal to emotions, called pathos, and the appeal to logic, called logos. All three of these devices are used to great effect during the speech of Marcus Antonius.