Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesar cassius character analysis
Analysis of Julius Caesar
Julius caesar cassius character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A hero is defined by their actions in the real world. One may be a hero to a whole population of people or just one. No matter what, each of these heroes earn their titles through their actions. In the play, Julius Caesar, by Shakespeare, the main characters embodies the question of who the tragic hero is. On one end, the story consists of the military leader Caesar, who is going to become ruler, but is assassinated through waging fear that he is going to rule as a tyrant. On the other end, the story consists of the character Brutus who backstabbed his best friend, Caesar, to preserve Rome as a republic. To decide who the tragic hero is, one must look at the traits that help identify what makes up one. The definition of a tragic hero, consists of the traits of reputation, prosperity, virtue, and a tragic flaw. Both characters embody these traits, but Brutus is the clearer choice for being tragic hero.
Reputation of Brutus and Caesar are exemplified greatly throughout the play. To begin,
…show more content…
Brutus had gained his reputation from his ancestors. In Rome’s history, Brutus’s ancestors fought to make Rome a republic, and they succeeded in their efforts (II.1.10-12). Because of this, Brutus has the gained the reputation of favoring Rome as a republic. Cassius was even able to manipulate Brutus through the fact that his family had developed Rome into a republic. Ultimately, Brutus had helped with the killing of Caesar in fear that during his reign, Caesar would maintain a Rome as a republic. Then, Caesar also has his own reputation, being that he was successful in the military. This known because the citizens of Rome were celebrating Caesar’s return, when he had just defeated Pompeii (I.1.30-31). As one may see, Caesar was returning victorious from battle, with the citizens of Rome celebrating his accomplishment. Caesar gained his reputation because of his military victories, as can be seen with the citizens. Overall, having a reputation demonstrates Brutus and Caesar’s qualification of being tragic hero. Throughout the play, Brutus and Caesar establish their prosperity. From the beginning, Brutus was very conflicted in his decision to join the conspiracy. Brutus is prosperous because of how he always does what he thinks is best. For example, although Brutus was a conflicted character, he went with his gut feeling of joining the conspiracy against Caesar (II,1,10-12). As one can see, when faced with a controversial decision, Brutus decides the outcome he believes would be best. This is an important trait for a tragic hero, as it largely contributed to Brutus’s success in the play. Caesar had also shown prosperity throughout the play. For Caesar, his prosperity consisted of being a loyal and trustworthy friend. In Brutus’s speech at Caesar’s funeral, he stated that Caesar was a very dear friend for him, because he believed that their relationship consisted of love (III,2,21-22). Being dead, Caesar had the person who assassinated him say that their relationship was dear to him. Because of this confession, Cesar’s prosperity is shown as he was loyal and trustworthy to Brutus. Not only was Caesar prosperous to Brutus, but also Marc Antony, as he avenged Caesar after his death. Virtue is a tragic hero trait that Brutus and Caesar display in Julius Caesar. The main virtue of Brutus is his loyalty to Rome because he puts the country first in his life. Brutus exemplifies this when he kills Caesar, as the thought of Caesar ruling Rome as a tyrant resulted in his commitment to the conspiracy (III,1,77). Brutus did not want to kill his dear friend Caesar, but felt that Rome would benefit greatly from Caesar's death. Even though the assassination of Caesar may not be virtuous, the reason why he had done it was greatly virtuous. Even though Brutus was virtuous, Caesar was also virtuous. Caesar’s virtue came from putting the citizens of Rome first in his decisions. An example of this, is when Marc Antony is reading Caesar’s will when he identifies that Caesar had left some of his wealth to give to the people of Rome (III,2,241-242). Caesar cared for his citizens, as after his death he was still helping his citizens. This act identifies Caesar as a virtuous person and how he felt towards the people of Rome. In the end, Brutus and Caesar both display their virtue in two varying ways. The downfalls of Brutus and Caesar are because of their tragic flaws. Brutus’s tragic flaw was not listening to others, but only doing what he thinks is right. When the conspiracy meets to plan the assassination, Cassius mentions that they must kill Marc Antony to prevent trouble later on. As Brutus does not listen to Marc Antony’s advice, after the assassination of Caesar a civil war begins led by Marc Antony (II,1,162-165). In this conversation, instead of listening to Cassius, Brutus values his opinion more, and ultimately goes with his decision. Because of this, a war wages between the conspirators and Marc Antony which leads to Brutus’s downfall, his death. Although Brutus had a tragic flaw that resulted in his death, Caesar also consisted of a tragic flaw that led him to the same fate. Arrogance and being too full of one’s self was the tragic flaw that plagued Caesar. On the day of his assassination, there were many warnings of this day being dangerous. Caesar valued his reputation of being the man who is not afraid of danger higher than the warnings of his wife and close friends (II,2,66). If Caesar had listened to the warnings, he would have not died that day. Rather his arrogance took the best of him and had him walk into the Rome court room, on the ides of March to be assassinated by the conspiracy. The deaths of Brutus and Caesar had tragic flaw that ultimately led to their deaths. Even though Brutus and Caesar both met the qualifications of being a tragic hero, Brutus is the better suited tragic hero of the play. To begin, Brutus was the most noble of the two. All throughout the play, every decision Brutus had made was for the city of Rome. The extent he went to protect the sovereignty of Rome, was to betray and backstab the power hungry best friend, Julius Caesar. Then, Brutus displays more noteworthy traits of a tragic hero than Caesar. His reputation was more noble, and his prosperity helped him decide what he was going to do that would benefit Rome. Furthermore, his tragic flaw was not listening to others, when comparing it to Caesar’s arrogance, Brutus’ tragic flaw was much less embarrassing. Then, his tragic flaw did not have die at the beginning of the play, but towards the end of the play. Overall, because of Brutus’s actions and nobleness, he is the more qualified hero. In the play, Brutus embodies the role of a tragic hero, but many others argue that this role belongs to Caesar.
An example may be, Caesar was just as or even more noble to Rome. Because of his military victories and the his care for the citizens of Rome , Caesar was more noble. Although this is a valid point, Caesar was becoming a power hungry, tyrant that was going to run Rome into the ground. Another argument maybe that the play is named after Caesar , so logically he would be the tragic hero. The rebuttal to this point is that the story follows Brutus in his struggle to decide between friendship or country, and to deal with the consequences of his actions. Furthermore, the play does not focus on Julius Caesar but rather Brutus. Finally, some may argue that Caesar’s virtue outweighs Brutus’s. As stated before, these motives would have changed if he came into power, as he was going to an autocratic ruler. Marcus Brutus is the better tragic hero when comparing to Julius
Caesar. A tragic hero is someone who has reputation, prosperity, virtue, and a tragic flaw. When comparing these traits between the two characters, Marcus Brutus comes out as the victor. Brutus is much more noble than Caesar with all of his decisions thought out from the perspective of Rome. To conclude, this decision came down to each character’s actions. Many believed that Caesar was going to rule as a tyrant because of his previous endeavors. Because of this reason, he was assassinated. Others respected Brutus’s actions as he was respected for being one of the most noble. The heroes in a story are defined by their actions.
“Wherefore rejoice? What conquest brings he home? - What tributaries follow him to Rome, To grace in captive bonds his chariot-wheels?”
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar could definitely be thought of as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a character in a story that is high standing in society, but has a flaw that inevitably leads to their downfall. Julius Caesar definitely fits this description. He is a leader in Rome and has everything he could ever want. However, he does have a weakness which will be devastating to his life. There are many people who would like to kill him but Caesar is not worried. Julius Caesar’s flaw is arrogance and believes he is invulnerable. He also, right before his death discovers a discernment more devastating than the knife wounds, and finally he is and unsympathetic character because of many reasons.
In Shakespeare’s play, the conspirators are not justified because of their selfish motives. During the beginning of the play, Cassius is depicted as covetous when he tries to convince Casca to join the conspirators by speaking poorly of Caesar. “What trash is Rome, what rubbish and what offal, when it serves for the base matter to illuminate so vile a thing as Caesar” (I.II.108-110). Using a disgusted pattern of diction, Shakespeare helps to convey a bitter tone when Cassius states, “trash”, “rubbish” and “offal” to express his belief that Rome will become a terrible place when Caesar rules. Also, the fact that Cassius says, “a thing”, to describe Caesar shows how disrespectful he is, portraying his revolting attitude as a bad motive. This language characterizes Cassius as jealous and greedy of Caesar’s power,
What is honor? Honor coins an individual’s nature. A principle that exists on the purpose of perception, a martyr willing to conform and accomplish. In the case of Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus was the most honorable of men. A brother to Caesar, but a father to Rome, he persist and perish for the future of his child. The idea of ignorance, and the belief of a false faith, turns this noble man toward a vulgar grave, with virtuous notions.
“Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (3.2.24) This quote reflects the motive of Brutus for the assassination of his friend, Caesar. I believe Brutus killed him not out of disrespect, but in a selfless act to protect Rome from the decree of Caesar yet to come. I also believe that he did this out of force from the manipulation from his “friend” Cassius. In Shakespeare's “Julius Caesar”, Brutus’ two most significant characteristics are virtue and unconscious hypocrisy. In order to fully understand these characteristics, it is necessary to analyze all other contributing characteristics, the manipulation of friendship that Cassius uses against him, and the motivations for
The definition of a tragic hero is perceived as on who is neither wicked nor purely innocent, one who “is brave and noble but guilty of the tragic flaw of assuming that honorable ends justify dishonorable means”. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus takes the role of the tragic hero. Brutus’s honor, nobility, and self-righteousness makes him “a tragic figure, if not the hero” (Catherine C. Dominic).
In the play the Life and Death of Julius Caesar (just as in all of Shakespeare’s tragedies) there is much death, much tragedy, and of course, a tragic hero. However unlike most of Shakespeare’s plays this time the tragic hero is not particularly obvious. Throughout the play a few main characters present themselves as possibilities for being the tragic hero. But as being a tragic hero is not only having a tragic flaw but also entails much more, there really is only one person to fit the mold. The character Brutus is born into power and is higher/better then we are. He has a tragic flaw that causes his downfall and at the end he realizes his mistake (a trait none of the other characters can really claim).
The second reason why Brutus should not be a tragic hero is because he has a tragic flaw and this flaw leads to his ultimate downfall. The tragic Flaw for Brutus is his idealistic view of the world. He contracts this view about Caesar after Cassius persuades him by saying that Caesar will be a tyrant. Because of this, Brutus joins the conspirators and kills Caesar. This shows that Brutus, like other tragic heroes uses his tragic flaw and thus will cause his eventual defeat. Later in the play Brutus directs, as any ideological man would, to charge rather than wait for the enemy to attack. This is an excellent exemplar of the Brutus’s tragic flaw since Brutus did this so that he would not lose support in Rome.
A tragic hero is defined as a person of high social rank, who has a tragic flaw or flaws that lead to their downfall. These heroes’ downfalls are usually either complete ruin or death. Tragic heroes face their downfall with courage and dignity. While many characters in Julius Caesar could fit these conditions, the person who fits the role of a tragic hero the best is Marcus Brutus. Brutus develops into a tragic hero throughout the play, and this is shown though his qualifications of a tragic hero, his high status, his tragic flaws, and his courage in the face of his death.
The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is the story about the men who conspired and followed through with the assassination of the great Julius Caesar. These men fear that Caesar will take the crown and become the next king of Rome. The roman people had a true averse feeling toward the idea of monarchy. So in order to prevent this they come up with a plan to end Caesars life, which is duly followed through on March 15, 44 B.C. Out of these conspirators there is one man that stands out to be a tragic hero, and that is a man by the name of Brutus. He was a great friend of Caesar who ultimately became one of Caesars worst adversaries. He betrayed Caesars trust and friendship when he agreed to be part of the assassination plot. A tragic hero is someone who is in a place of high standings or a place of power. This leads to a huge fall from greatness to death. A tragic hero must have many deep complex character flaws that are revealed throughout the course of the story. They then must ultimately accept responsibility for their mistakes; along with being humbled and enlightened. Brutus demonstrates all of the attributes of a tragic hero.
In conclusion, Brutus is a tragic hero in this awe-inspiring play because he is burdened with countless character flaws that engender his inevitable awakening, enlightenment, and death. They also lead to his dramatic change from a despicable fiend, to a loved companion of Rome. Through massive loses, and profound change in character, Brutus is transformed into a kingly tragic hero.
There is no such thing as the perfect person. We may dream of such a person, but sadly, everyone has flaws. These flaws are what make us human. Something else that makes us human is our need for heroes. We attribute 'perfect' qualities to our heroes. In reality even our heroes are flawed. The closest thing to the idealized person, or hero, is the Shakespearean tragic hero. The tragic hero is someone of high standing, good character, and a flaw. While it may be only one flaw, it is often fatal. An example of a tragic hero can be best seen in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is a prominent leader and noble citizen of Rome who leads in the assassination of Julius Caesar. We see that Brutus plays the role of the tragic hero through his noble standing, fatal flaw, and legacy.
A tragic hero is the character whose actions deeply affect the other characters and who creates a series of events that eventually lead to the character’s downfall and the downfall of his loved ones. Such a hero possesses a flaw in character that influences his actions and thinking and especially his judgments. In logically determining who the hero in Julius Caesar is, one simply must find the one character who fits the above guidelines. Marcus Brutus is the only one, and, thus, he is the tragic hero.
In the world today people consider a hero to be someone like Superman or Spider-Man. In the dictionary a hero is considered or defined as a person of distinguished courage or ability, admired for their brave deeds and noble qualities. Though a hero is thought to be free of mistakes they all have tragic flaws like everyone else. A tragic flaw is explained by Aristotle’s definition, which says that: a tragic hero as a character of great reputation and prosperity whose misfortune is not due to depravity or vice, for the hero is a virtuous man or woman but to an error in judgment resulting from a tragic flaw. Sometimes this flaw is an excess of virtue. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare people are arguing over who is the perfect tragic hero Julius Caesar or Marcus Brutus. They both fit the criteria of a tragic hero, but Marcus Brutus proves to be the better and more fit of the two.