Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis

676 Words2 Pages

In Act III scene ii, Antony and Brutus used different rhetoric devices for their speeches; although both were successful in influencing the Roman citizens. In Brutus’s speech he uses alliteration to ask “Who is here so base that would be a bondman?” and “Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?” However, these questions are not only alliteration, but also rhetorical questions. He asks these to guilt trip the Romans into thinking that they would be selfish to not care about their own country. Even though this is the reason why Brutus killed Caesar, the conspirators except for him were not attempting to save Rome when assassinating Caesar. Brutus also uses repetition in his speech; after every rhetorical question he asks “If any, speak; for him have I offended.” When he repeats this it makes his questions seem more like accusations. Brutus basically influences the audience to think the conspirators were all …show more content…

Antony also uses repetition in his speech like Brutus did. He constantly repeats “And Brutus is an honourable man.” However, Antony doesn’t truly mean what he says. Brutus told him to only speak good of the conspirators and Antony found a way to not tell a lie and also let the citizens know that the conspirators are not good people. This sends a silent message to the people that the conspirators do not notice. Antony’s speech truly riles the crowd up and starts a riot. Antony says “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny.” But to make the crowd upset was his intention. He’s saying this to seem not responsible to the conspirators. Since the will is a large sum of money; Antony holds off on reading it to them. His will is a gift of seventy-five drachmas to every person in the commonwealth. As expected, this infuriates the citizens of Rome. The people who bad mouthed Caesar’s death earlier, now want to avenge him. A citizen said “Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his

Open Document