Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effects of censorship
Negative impact of censorship
Literary censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Julie Taymor’s presentation of violence in Titus differs and compares to Shakespeare’s presentation of violence in Titus Andronicus; the following paper will discuss and analyze three major scenes where this comparison can be made. Taymor’s presentation of violence is broadcasted in scene one. She not only presents violence, but forces emotions onto the viewer by using other characters reactions as tools to subliminally tell the viewer how they too should react to what occurs in the film. Shakespeare, on the other hand, leaves only black and white text on a page, and therefore the viewer is left to make his or her interpretation. According to a film review published in the New York Times, It’s a Sort of Family Dinner, Your Majesty, Titus is …show more content…
used in scene one to “portray violence as an escalating fever, an addictive mass hysteria that consumes the characters and turns them into bloodthirsty fiends” (Holden 1999). As scene one opens, soldiers are seen performing. Taymor creates an intriguing combination both appealing visually due to the synchronicity of the soldiers’ movements, and also dark, and threatening enough for the viewer to understand fear and violence awaits the characters in the film. In this scene Taymor uses young Titus as an instrument to control the viewer’s reaction; his face depicts emotions that are afraid, scared, shocked, and slightly in admiration for the soldiers. The emotions depicted by young Titus are exactly how Taymor wants the viewer to feel during this scene. In Shakespeare’s vision however, we are not able to understand this effect, and therefore the reader is left to create his or her subjective interpretation of the text. Aside from observing characters reaction, Taymor intentionally presents violence alongside rituals in nearly every scene where violence occurs; this creates a stark contrast, causing the viewer to question whether tradition and rituals are justification for such violence. Shakespeare does not specifically create this theme through such blunt presentation of concepts. A vivid example of this is in scene three, when Titus seeks revenge on Chiron and Demetrius for Lavina’s rape. Taymor presents Titus as calm and clean; he slowly, elegantly, and systematically informs Chiron and Demetrius of their fate. Through this scene, Taymor emphasizes how systematic and ceremonial his revenge is. According to a film review published by The Guardian, this scene is not just a “splatter fest” (Gardner 2014). Taymor makes it clear that this was a carefully throughout plan, and once again, this sense of clean ritual is in sharply contrasted with the vengeful sight of the boys hanging upside down “like sausages” bleeding from their throats (Ebert 2000). This scene presents an example where barbaric and systematic organized revenge are connected, where as in Shakespeare’s version, these two concepts can be equally understood through a deeper analysis, but are not directly presented in a blunt and stark manner. The last major comparison that can be made between Taymor and Shakespeare’s version is through visual and sound aspects of film.
While Shakespeare emphasizes violence through explanation, Taymor takes advantage of the sound and camera angles to underline important aspects that otherwise may have been left underappreciated. According to a film review by Roger Ebert, Taymor “moves the camera in time with music or sound effects to zoom into important aspects,” forcing the viewer to stare blatantly into the face of violence (Ebert 2000). After Titus serves the pie of Tamora’s sons, Taymor uses close-ups to emphasize the grotesqueness of violence. The first close-up is of the two pies placed on a windowsill to cool. The next close-up is of the sliced pie that Titus serves to Tamora. Taymor presents the pie as raw and bloody, emphasizing the disgust and violence of the act. The scene is shot at eye level, and there are numerous close-ups of each characters face. When the pie eating begins, Taymor uses several close-ups of blood dripping chunks of pie sticking to Tamora’s teeth. In this scene Taymor’s use of camera angle forces the audience not only to be engulfed in the barbarity of the act, but to bask in it; by the close observation of the characters bloody chomping and chewing on undercooked human flesh, disgust and obscurity are forced onto the audience, thus enhancing the violent nature of the
act. Taymor brilliantly uses all the advantages of film and modernity to enhances what Shakespeare already brilliantly created. Through Taymor’s presentation of violence, a higher level of both disgust and appreciation are depicted. Works Cited Ebert, Roger. "Titus." All Content. N.p., 21 Jan. 2000. Web. 15 Feb. 2015. Gardner, Lyn. "Titus Andronicus Review- Shakespeare's Bloodbath Becomes a Sadistic Delight." The Guardian, 11 May 2014. Web. 15 Feb. 2015. Holden, Stephen. "Titus (1999) Film Review; It's a Sort of Family Dinner, Your Majesty." New York Times, 24 Dec. 1999. Web. 16 Feb. 2015.
This is a comparative analysis that seeks to examine Shakespeare's play, Titus Andronicus, and compare it to several scenes from Julie Taymors’ film, Titus. The main focus is to see whether the film stays true to the play when it comes to violence and dialogue. Both are filled with grotesque scenes that have to do with rape, mutilation, murders and even cannibalism. The most important topics are revenge and violence, for that reason violence is going to be the center of focus in this analysis.
Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus demonstrates how aggressive challenges and divisions are born out of conflicting belief systems. For example, because the Roman citizens, the Goths, and Aaron the Moor all differ in matters of consciousness, tension ensues. Nicholas Moschovakis comments extensively about these clashes in his essay ““Irreligious Piety” and Christian History: Persecution as Pagan Anachronism in Titus Andronicus,” and Moschovakis not only magnifies persecution, but he remarks extensively about the major elements in Titus Andronicus that can be understood as anachronistic. While Moschovakis carefully and thoroughly observes the Shakespearean realms of violent “human sacrifice,” the “relevance of Judeo-Christian sacrificial discourses,” the anti-papist Elizabethan attitudes, and other religious and pagan traditions, Moschovakis plainly admits that “Titus evades all attempts to be read as partisan invective” (Moschovakis 462). Because Shakespeare included a wide range of conflict and overlapping belief systems, assertions tend to become, as Moschovakis puts it, “curiously inconsistent” and “overshadowed” (Moschovakis 462). What can be claimed as transparent in Titus Andronicus, and what I think is appealing to the masses, is that Shakespeare drew upon the major controversial motifs in human history and religion, and he included the evils of hypocrisy which allow for realistic interest regardless of what your religious or political stance is. Moreover, I would argue that Shakespeare exposes a more obvious anachronistic element that can serve in expanding Moschovakis’ arguments. Titus Andronicus demonstrates the time honored obsession over first born sons, and because the play includes a first born son in each family t...
At first glance, these categories appear entirely incompatible, unable to exist together. However, in Julie Taymor's adaptation of Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus, we find that they are compatible after all. With elaborate sets, stunning costumes, and a remarkable film score, Taymor blurs the boundaries that divide them and creates a world that accommodates both ancient Rome and modern America.
Lindroth, Mary. "'Some device of further misery': Taymor's Titus brings Shakespeare to film audiences with a twist." Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 107-115.
Throughout the play Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare in the 16th century, there is consistent theme of conflict featured in terms of both mental, physical and emotional means. The way this dispute is embodied throughout the duration of the play alternates subject to subject to the character in question- but can be represented through many means.
Conflict has many different meanings for both physical and verbal abuse. Conflict could be a viscous feud or a full on physical fight. These days in television soap dramas we intend to see more verbal conflict than physical violence. But over the last couple of years new television programmes have been released which contains a lot of action-packed fighting and physical conflict of some kind. Some programmes include physical and verbal conflict including, “Eastenders”, “The Bill” and other programmes similar to these. The releasing of films such as, “Indiana Jones”, and “Rambo” catches the audience’s attention by involving action-packed, exciting features such as heavy arguments or thrilling battles. Some films are made to include action and excitement but when audiences watch it they cannot help feeling sorry for the victim or just generally sad for the people having the fight. In the same way Romeo and Juliet presents conflict more intense than most soap dramas. When the play was first performed in “The Theatre”, in Shoreditch in the mid 1590’s, the Elizabethan audience was shocked at how Juliet disobeyed her father and also how Romeo and Juliet disobeyed their families. Sympathy must be felt for the audience because they would have never known the idea of a son or daughter disobeying their father. The law at that time stated that the daughter was the property of her father until the daughter got married then her husband “owned” her as property. From this sympathy must be felt for Juliet because she is a victim of arranged marriages. When the play was first performed it got massive great responses which then lead to the play being transferred to The Globe theatre at the start of the 1600’s. Props and different costumes helped ...
Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo and Juliet is a film that converts Shakespeare’s famous play into a present-day setting. The film transforms the original texts into modern notions, whilst still employing Shakespearean language. Compared to Franco Zeffirelli’s adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, Luhrmann’s picture is easier for a teenage audience to understand and relate to because of his modernisations. Despite the passing of four centuries Shakespeare’s themes of love, hate, violence, family and mortality remain the same regardless of the setting.
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. Elements of Literature. Ed. Deborah Appleman. 4th ed. Texas: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2009. 843-963.
The play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare showcases many characters and events that go through many significant changes. One particular character that went through unique changes was Julius Caesar. The 16th century work is a lengthy tragedy about the antagonists Brutus and Cassius fighting with the protagonists Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus over the murder of Julius Caesar. Although the play’s main pushing conflict was the murder of Julius Caesar, he is considered a secondary character, but a protagonist. Throughout the theatrical work Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts display his diverse changes.
The movie Titus directed by Julie Taymor a well awarded director who has created many visual arts, made countless thought-provoking choices when directing Titus, a movie based off the book Titus Andronicus by William Shakespeare. Titus Andronicus is a tragedy highlighting Titus, a roman general that becomes obsessed with getting revenge with Tamora, a previous prisoner of his and the Queen of Goths. When Taymor directed the film Titus she incorporated many aspects from the present (when the movie was made) and the era the book was written in, during Shakespearean times, to relate to the audience at that time and still remain true to the story. She tried her best to stay as close to the book as possible and portray the characters as well as they could be interpreted. In some illustrations she was spot on and in others she was not.
‘Titus Andronicus ‘is a play by William Shakespeare that went to become very popular during his time. The play was performed in Rome after the defeat of the Goths by the Romans. The Goths were people from German who invaded their country. Throughout the play, violence can be seen inform of brutal murders, sexual violence and mutilation, suicide, wars and conflicts. This is normally heightened by the urge of the characters to revenge. Examples of such cases include: the raping and mutilation of Lavinia, Titus’s daughter and the killing of Alarbus. Shakespeare presents stage violence that makes the audience concentrate and understand in a better way.
Written one year apart from the other, one cannot fail to recognize the parallels between William Shakespeare's tragedies Julius Caesar and Hamlet. To begin, they are both stories of assassinations gone horribly wrong. Although the details of the plays are different, the two assassins (Brutus and Hamlet) provide interesting comparison. Through these two killers, Shakespeare reveals the different levels of justice; one’s personal sense of justice; others’ perception of justice; the justice of the monarchy that supports Shakespeare’s craft. Through this, the audience realizes that a just person is not always a humble one, a condition that may turn out to be a fatal flaw in the end. When a man decides to play God by taking justice into his own hands, the world can unravel much more quickly than he had ever imagined.
Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. Elements of Literature. Ed. Edwina McMahon et al. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1997.
As a Shakespearean tragedy represents a conflict which terminates in a catastrophe, any such tragedy may roughly be divided into three parts. The first of these sets forth or expounds the situation, or state of affairs, out of which the conflict arises; and it may, therefore, be called the Exposition. The second deals with the definite beginning, the growth and the vicissitudes of the conflict. It forms accordingly the bulk of the play, comprising the Second, Third and Fourth Acts, and usually a part of the First and a part of the Fifth. The final section of the tragedy shows the issue of the conflict in a catastrophe. (52)
The theatre life of these times is called Elizabethan. In the sixteenth century the most powerful form of literature or drama was non-religious and more concerned with the inner workings of the human personality. Shakespeare's writings were tragedies that focused on human actions without thought to the consequences of these actions. There are two examples in this movie that come to mind illustrating this humanistic approach. First, Shakespeare falls in love with Viola, his muse, and follows his heart knowing that she has already been promised to marry someone else. Second, is the theatrical representation of Romeo and Julie and the tragic love story it entails.