Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and analyze an earthquake
Lisbon earthquake 1755 voltaire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and analyze an earthquake
Judith Shklar begins her theoretical work with an historical account of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. The townspeople who were impacted were also adamant that this natural disaster was a punishment from God. However, other well-known philosophers, with the exception of Voltaire, shared different perspectives on where to place the blame. Rousseau strongly believed that the individuals who had political power were responsible for the earthquake’s impact. His reasoning stems from his knowledge of the city’s construction of houses with multiple stories that were not built to last against extreme force. In this case, the number of deaths could have been prevented if city officials were aware of the importance of satisfying housing regulations. Kant encouraged those around him to learn about the science behind earthquakes as well as proposed that wars are disasters. This is an excellent scenario where Shklar introduces her argument …show more content…
“We are likely to cry injustice,” when we have been wronged for either arbitrary entities that are simply out of our control or we have identified ourselves with a marginalized group due to personal experiences. On the other hand, when we have the slightest feeling that “we might be the actual or even imaginable victimizer,” our mindset inherently persuades us to label a situation as a misfortune in order to avoid blame and/or guilt. These two emotions are psychological aids that tend to help individuals to make sense as well as cope with injustices that they might have experienced. Rhetorically speaking, a misfortune gives off the connotation that an issue is of less severity and its impact is purely by chance. It is difficult to assign blame in this manner, especially when misfortunes occur on the daily basis. However, an injustice provokes an immediate urge to act, thus precluding the creation of more victims and labeling someone as a
Earthquake: a series of vibrations induced in the earth’s crust by the abrupt rupture and rebound of rocks in which elastic strain has been slowly accumulating; something that is severely disruptive; upheaval (Shravan). Tsunami: an unusually large sea wave produced by a seaquake or undersea volcanic eruption (Shravan). Combine these two catastrophic natural disasters, and it will be a day that will forever live in infamy through terror; a day much like that of October 28, 1746 in Lima, Peru, in which an entire city was destroyed within mere minutes. Author Charles Walker guides his audience through the devastation and wreckage of this heartbroken town and into the economic, political, religious, and social fallout that followed. Walker argues that the aftermath of this tragedy transformed into a voting of the citizens’ various ideas perceived of the future of Lima, theological consequences, and the structure of the colonial rule (p. 12).
The Haiti earthquake that occurred on January 12, 2010 just fifteen miles south of the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince was a severely large-scale earthquake, at a magnitude of 7.0. The initial shock was then followed by a series of aftershocks with magnitudes ranging up to 5.9. Over three hundred thousand people died due to this extreme chaos. Many buildings collapsed and disintegrated under the force of the quake; both the cathedral and National Palace in Port-au-Prince were heavily damaged. In the aftermath of this tragedy, efforts to aid the people of Haiti with medical assistance, water, and food were hampered by the loss of communication lines as well as by roads blocked by debris. Over one million people were left homeless due to this quake. Two days after the earthquake, journalist Leonard Pitts wrote “Sometimes the Earth is Cruel,” an article describing how the people of Haiti responded to the disaster. In “Sometimes the Earth is Cruel,” a major theme is that some things are inevitable.
Why is it that we as human beings feel the need to blame someone for every negative situation, which occurs? If we really look at the situation with any great depth, we may discover that an almost endless amount of things may be 'blamed' for the tragedy blaming an individual is pointless - only fate can really be blamed.
...hat he was completely undeserving of the inequitable allegations that the populace made toward his character. In the first sentence of the essay, Staples discusses his first “victim.” His use of this word at first provokes the reader to think that the author was a criminal, which illustrates the same mistake many other people had made in the real world. Staples realizes that, ultimately, there is nothing he can do about discrimination despite his innocence.
[23] Diagnosis may be simple, but remedy is never easy. Awareness is the key. As more people become more aware of the half-truths, distortions, injustices, and outright oppressions occurring in the world today, the future will become less of a variable. Americans can gain conscious control of their future, making choices that will allow for freedom and equality, for spiritual growth and renewal. A nation cannot learn from its own mistakes unless and until those mistakes are admitted and reconciled. That process must start now.
…many people now acquire "victimhood" through counseling. Being a "victim" draws sympathy. It explains the tragedies, the failures, the hardships, the health problems and the disappointments of life. It relieves people of some of life's natural burdens: dealing with complexity, facing things beyond their control, and accepting responsibility for decisions and actions.
An obsession exists in the world today based solely upon the use of scapegoats. According to the dictionary, a scapegoat consists of a person or group made to bear the blame for others or to suffer in their place. Some of the most influential scapegoats consist of Jesus Christ taking suffering for the sins of civilization, the Jewish population being punished for the problems in Germany, and more recently the U.S. citizens who perished in 9/11 being punished for the sins of America. Scapegoats have come in many forms over time and have been very destructive. The usage of scapegoats in our society, such as in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, has proved to be damaging, and an end must be found in order to find peace.
Victimology is the scientific study of the physical, emotional, and financial harm people suffer from illegal activities. A common struggle Victimologists face is determining who the victim is. In general, crimes don 't have an “ideal victim”. The term ideal victims refer to someone who receives the most sympathy from society (Christie, 2016). An example of this would be a hardworking, honest man who on his way to work, had his wallet taken by force. Most people in society would have sympathy for him. He spent his life making an honest living to earn what he has and was a victim of a robbery. Victimologists study the interactions victims have with criminals, society, and the criminal justice system (Karmen, 2015). According to (Karmen, 2015)
In society today, if we were to travel across the world or walk down the streets of Cincinnati, the injustice and suffering of many people is apparent. We acknowledge suffering exists yet, in protecting our own self from misfortune and deviating from the crowd, we tend to feel bad for a moment and then move on. Merely allowing strings to guide our motives, accepting the suffering that these people face is the fault of their own. The purpose for this short story is to encourage a turning away from conventional standards and to recognize the innocence of suffering.
Zdaniuk, Agnes and Bobocel, D. Ramona. "Vertical Individualism And Injustice: The Self-Restorative Function Of Revenge." European Journal Of Social Psychology 42.5 (2012): 640-651. Academic Search Premier. Web. 31 Oct. 2013.
This is shown in “Serving in Florida” by Barbara Ehrenreich when the author heard that the Czech dishwasher was accused of stealing from the diner they both worked at, and the author did not stand up for the dishwasher and try to defend him or prove his innocence. She just stood by and kept her mouth shut. Because of her silent injustice, (it being unjustified since she knew he was innocent) the dishwasher was fired and struggled financially and then had a problematic situation with money which impacted his life greatly like it would any other person. In this specific situation, the injustice that was committed by the author impacted another person’s life. However, injustices performed by a person could also impact that performer’s life as well, which can be related to the author and the guilt she has to live
...riving a society of justice, and showing compassion to those who commit one of the greatest evils a man can commit, expresses cruelty to the society, especially toward those loved ones of the victim who yearn for justice.
Karma is a term often used in the face of calamity, but the actual definition is neither positive nor negative. Karma is, to put it simply, the law of cause and effect. Karma is a cosmic principle that states that what happens to a person is a logical consequence of their actions. In the perspective of karma, God is not the determiner of fate, but the dispenser of fate, which is indirectly dictated by a person’s own voluntary or involuntary actions (Das). Some people, including Hamlet himself, argue that “there is special providence [even] in the fall of a sparrow” (Ham. 5.2.233-234), that fate controls everything, that fate simply plays a game with people’s lives in which they are powerless pawns. Ho...
In their book Homicide, evolutionary psychologists Margo Wilson and Martin Daly identify one such conflict between human nature and the contemporary cultural order. They argue that humans have an innate concept of justice which is based on the idea of personal revenge. According to this concept of justice, it is legitimate and even praise-worthy for people to whom a wrong has been done to avenge the wrong-doing themselves.
Somebody who constantly endures ridicule from the public suffers greatly from decreased mental stability. Furthermore, bullying is a form of public abashment, and research has shown that both bullying and public shaming affect the victim’s mental health more than other major problems in the world. For example, recent studies conducted in the United States and Great Britain prove that “[a] victim of bullying [is] nearly four times more likely to suffer from mental health problems than a victim of child abuse” (Lewinsky 293). Victims of bullying often undergo persistent humiliation, much like a criminal who is sentenced to public shaming would; consequently, public humiliation is unacceptable in all areas of society, especially when research indicates that it affects a multitude of people. Also, if people consistently remind a person of their mistakes, the victim could always live in regret and remorse for their actions and they might be unable to overcome the amount of disgrace they experience. Public shaming not only affects the criminal, but also it can affect a faultless third-party. Humiliation affects innocent third-parties, such as family members, because the public mortification will promote the criminal to everybody in the community and possibly everyone on social media; therefore, guilt by association can accompany the family members. The extent of the punishment has the potential to be so significant that “[i]f a sign reading ‘A violent felon lives here’ [i]s posted in front of a man 's house, the felon 's blameless child ‘might get bullied because of the exposure and humiliation of the father’” (Morrison 3). Unfortunately, a simple sign that reads “a criminal lives here” can alter the life of an innocent third-party. Companies are also affected because public reprimanding would expose an employee who