Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and roles of women in literature
Essay on female authors
Gender and roles of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The essay “His Talk, Her Talk” written by Joyce Maynard on her views about the interaction of men and women. She describes her observations about the differences that men and woman have in regards to communicating.
She verbalizes women need conversation for emotional stabilization as well as for social interests. Men hang out with other men socially, and for talking about topics of intellectual, worldly matters. Mrs. Maynard simulates the conversations between men, pertaining to: life, love and happiness, are indeed, about the same things as women, but spoken in different ways. She and her friends have a tendency of splitting into groups of all men and all women, which she feels, is because, “it’s a natural instinct to seek out the company of one’s own sex, exclude members of the opposite sex, and not feel guilty about it.” She compares the way her husband tells a story to “the way he eats a banana: in three efficient chews.” On the other hand, he has a hard time staying focused when she shares a story with him, because she has a tendency to exaggerate the details, making her stories too long.
As a society, we have fought to have equal opportunity for both men and women, but as people, Mrs. Maynard points out, that we still
…show more content…
need to be around friends that are our same sex for “women talk” or “men talk.” She explains neither sex has the upper hand, only their interests are different. Her husband enjoys talking about sports and cars with his friends. She and her friends like to talk about more intimate subjects like their children and clothes shopping. However, she feels the mechanics of their relationship works for them, and at the end of the day, she feels her husband likes being her significant other. The essay “Man to Man, Woman to Woman written by Mark A. Sherman and Adelaide Hass was about their study from a nationally distributed questionnaire on same sex conversations. They observed the differences that the men and women had, on topics like: “relationship problems, family, health and reproductive concerns, weight, food and clothing.” Men didn’t feel comfortable speaking about them and would rather talk about “current events, music and sports.” Men and women agreed to talk about “work, movies, and television” as all were common interests for both genders. Moreover, they found that husbands and wives had little to talk about, plus, bickered more from misunderstandings when they did talk. The general consensus was that talking served different purposes for men and women. According to Mr.
Sherman and Ms. Haas, men feel it is easier to talk to other men because the flow of conversation is more on practical subjects and they have humor, and they don’t feel they had to watch what they say. Women, on the other hand, need same sex conversations for sisterly bonding, as women are more “sensitive to emotions that men feel are unimportant.” To bridge the gap, men should take courses on how to be better listeners, and women should take courses on how to be more assertive. They feel that some of the underlying problem of communication between men and women is on the use of language discriminates against woman. There have been changes put into practice to replace “he” to “he or she” to fix this flaw in our
society. In conclusion, even though both articles were about socialization between men and women. I would recommend, for all to read, the essay “Man to Man, Woman to Woman” over the article “His Talk, Her Talk” by Joyce Maynard because it is statistically motivated, and their basis for the essay is researched information and not from their own point of view. Mostly, people hang around with other people that they have common ground and interest with, such as people who attend the same school or church. No matter whom you are, you will get along with others as long as you are sincere and show courtesy and respect to other people. Moreover, honesty and mutual respect are necessary to form a bond by both men and women.
In the past there were many biases against women and their lack of abilities compared to men. Although the male perspective has changed over the past few centuries, there are many feminists who still fight for ...
In her article “But What Do You Mean” Deborah Tannen, claims that there is a huge difference in the style of communicating between men and women. Tannen breaks these down into seven different categories; apologies, criticism, thank-yous, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. With each of these she compares men to women by explaining the common misconceptions that each of the genders do. The different style of communication can cause some problems at the workplace and even affect the environment. The different styles of communication has been around forever and almost becomes a “ritual”(299). Tannen is effective with mainly women and not men. She is primarily successful with women due to the fact that her tone targets women, also the organization
Deborah Tannen is the author of “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why is it So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other”. Tannen is a linguist who researches the relationships between men and women. She has not only conducted research, but has information published in several books and essays about this topic. Her research includes talking with several of groups and collecting data on the behalf of their response. In her essay, “Sex, Lies and Conversation,”Tannen argues that complications arise in marriages and relationships because individuals are not able to communicate with members of the opposite sex.
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
Tannen, Deborah. “His Politeness Is Her Powerlessness.” You Just Don’t Understand: women and men in conversation. New York: HarperCollins, 1990. 203-5. Print.
At the end, both Rachel Rafelman and Ronald Macaulay are very good writer they brought their thoughts in distinct ways to address their audience. Macaulay strongly opposing the stereotypes of men’s and women’s talks’. Whereas, Rafelman kept her evidence and plugged effective examples to make her context understood. Over all, Rafelman presented her context better than Macaulay.
The audience sees through staging and conversation between the two main characters that the communication of modern relationships
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
Interpersonal communication is everywhere in society, both the past, present, and the future. “Marty,” a love story, and a movie made in the fifties, shows many examples of interpersonal communication. In this movie, the main character, Marty, who is a decent, socially awkward man who is pressured by his peers and family to find love and get married. He then gets fed up and goes to a club in town and meets a woman named Claire, who is in similar circumstances to him. Marty and Claire then interact and spend time together and Marty experiences companionship for the first time. As time goes on, Marty’s bachelor friends and his mother are expressing their disapproval of Claire. Marty then gets angry with everyone, and tells them all I like here and I have a good thing going and he does not want it to be messed up. Although the movie ends on a cliffhanger note, the assumption is that Marty and Claire will keep courting and they will hopefully get married.
She suggests that male-female conversation is cross-cultural communication and that miscommunication results because of intolerance for the opposite gender marked language. While this is true, it could also seem to the audience that both characters have different wants and needs for their future, so perhaps the language isn’t a strong enough factor in the miscommunication. What is certain through the text is that the male American has much more dominance and certainty in his dialogue whereas the female Jig’s dialogue tends to stretch the conversation more rather than have a fixed standpoint. This can be seen through her mentioning the “white elephants” (9, Hemingway) or snapping about how they “look at things and try new drinks” (34). It is clear that Jig’s dialogue is driven by fantasy whereas the American’s dialogue is driven by facts and what is. Smiley does have a point when she suggest that women’s language focuses on emotions rather than facts and objects, but this could be since they are socially primed to be more emotionally open about their thoughts than are men. If male gender-marked language is more direct and less trivial than that of women it is due to culture, not
Rebecca Solnit, author of the article Men Explaining Things to Me, addresses the matter of misogyny that is present in our society as well as all over the world today. In her article she presents the reader with multiple examples of what goes wrong in conversations between men and women. She writes about men that claim they know things and generally assume that women do not. Her efforts to persuade the audience to realize that men are defying women’s knowledge works efficiently by her proper placement of quotes and real-life situations. Solnit’s powerful use of diction convinces the audience to agree with her claim that no matter what the situation, serious or not, a woman’s voice is just as plausible as that of the opposite gender.
Jenkins, M (1980). Woman to woman: speaking the common language. In C. Kramarae (Ed.). The voices and words of women and men (pp. 319-323). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press Inc.
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
From the beginning of time, females have played a powerful role in the shaping of this world. They have stood by idly and watched as this country moved on without them, and yet they have demanded equal rights as the nation rolls along. Through the years the common belief has been that women could not perform as well as men in anything, but over the years that belief has been proven wrong time and time again. So as time marches on, women have clawed and fought their way up the ladder to gain much needed equal respect from the opposite sex. However, after many years of pain and suffering, the battle for equal rights has not yet been won. Since women have fought for a long time and proven their importance in society, they deserve the same rights as men.
Fairclough (1992: 88) is of the view that “ideologies reside in texts” (p. 88). But it is noe necessary that the discourse would be interpreted in the same way as desired by the producers. Several interpretations can be made of a single piece of discourse. The ideological import may keep on changing with each new interpretation of discourse (Fairclough, 1992: 89).