Joseph Heller's Post Socratic Discussion

471 Words1 Page

Post Socratic Discussion Reflection
Joseph Heller dehumanizes characters in the chapters where people either work or preside in the hospital by portraying them as men with no set of principles. These men, whether be the doctors or patients only think about themselves and have no regard for the wellbeing of others and do not consider how they should all work together to win the war and ensure the survival of the men. Heller conveys these ideologies by providing just enough context that allows for further analysis in order to develop a deeper understanding as to the purpose of the hospital’s complex nature. People enter the hospital with the supposed idea that they will be cured if they are ill, however the hospital itself as an idea has no actual …show more content…

To the eyes of some people, humans are only there to be pawns in someone else’s game, the game being one that involves the higher-ups, which is why there is such a strong desire to obtain more power among the men. We properly conveyed the corruption that occurs in the novel by analyzing quotes and interpreting what the characters mean which in turn explains why they act in a certain manner.
Our group did not focus enough on how death is eminent even if it is not active, an idea that is prevalent throughout all of the chapters that have some form of association with the hospital. People may choose to ignore the idea of death, but it still exists and that is similar to the existence of the soldier in white. The reason that people ignore the soldier in white is because they fear to end up like him. We could have added more information in regards to the absurdity of the hospital and how many characters check themselves in, in attempt to control their fate and not die during the

Open Document