Jonathan Swift Satire

443 Words1 Page

Jonathan swift a very sarcastic Irishman. The idea to eat children would provide food and deal with the overpopulation problem. All of his references to the slaughtering of innocent children were just a way to open up the eyes of their society to how the beggars were not being given any type of assistance. Unlike today’s society where we have government funded housing and food programs for the less fortunate, this town had nothing of the sort. The landlords were no nonsense and instead of supporting their own good and services, the shopkeepers bought from elsewhere.
The first eight paragraphs of the essay are concerned with the unhappy state of the Irish poor and their children. Swift talks about beggars flooding the streets and parents not able to support their children. He also brings up the horrid practice of voluntary abortions …show more content…

This has the effect of literalizing the metaphor as the butchery, sale, and consumption of the "product" are worked out. This also was a satirical strategy we saw in Jonson's Volpone (feigned madness becomes a real madness, leading to incarceration). This proposal could be compared with More’s Utopia because they both use satire to discuss the welfare of society. More used a more appealing alternative to create his utopia, a place where everyone was equal and where sharing everything solved class divisions. Distancing the subject from England helps readers play More's game since it reduces their drive to test the utopian constructs against "reality." By contrast, Swift used the horrendous proposal of devouring children to make a statement about the society in which he lived, in effect making England and Ireland seem strange, alien places, a negation of the popular vision. Such a "negative Utopia" could be called a

Open Document