Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Johnny got his gun ap essay
Liberalism used in world war 2
Johnny got his gun ap essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Johnny got his gun ap essay
The largest issue that surrounds war is not one about strategy, but one of morality. This issue is debated in the novel, Johnny Got His Gun, by Dalton Trumbo. This novel analyzes the validity and morality of war, as well as, the truth and reality of defending democracy. This novel takes a personal approach to the otherwise tactical and unemotional side of war. Trumbo writes this novel with a vehement anti-war sentiment that belligerently attacks the purpose of war. Additionally, this is demonstrated through the irregular circumstances of the main character, Joe Bonham. The author use of his physical disabilities made a resonating message for the reader. Trumbo is using this graphic imagery to make his point. He reinforces the point that true …show more content…
liberty should be questioned. This novel is meant to show the propaganda and blind support of the war is something Americans should not accept. Trumbo was able to convey his message of anti-war sentiments through the techniques of point of view, as well as, sub-themes. The use of point of view is used to convey the message of helplessness and the failures of the war. This use novel is where Trumbo defines his stance and beliefs surrounding war. The novel’s purpose is to give the reader an opportunity to look at an alternative to the common beliefs of World War I. His overarching message is the personal and emotional destruction that is caused by war and its effects on life. The message on war is one that will force the reader to reevaluate what is commonly thought about war. This novel was not written to conform to the normal beliefs and the support of the war in the United States. The importance of his vehement language toward war is a major contribution to the theme. The best vehicle to attain his theme was what he wrote. The novel did not have a subtle message to tell. Trumbo gave abundant examples to the reader that war was not only immoral but did not drive men to fight. When Joe thought “This is war and war is hell and what the hell and so to hell with it” (Trumbo) he is making war a personal conflict. This is not the conventional thoughts of war. The typical thoughts of war are to look at its travesties as impersonal issues. However, Joe is using himself to show the “hell” that war has put them through. He shows that there is proof that war involves humans and not just soldiers on the ground. He is not trying to show that he was just another man that was proud to die for his country. Joe is proving that actual lives have to go out and fight in the war. Joes is living proof of the poor lives that war creates for soldiers. This quote gives a side to war that is not viewed by the doctors or the man who delivers his medal. This contrast shows that different views on the bravery and sacrifice of war are answered in this novel. The dissent on the use of war is effectively delivered by Trumbo. In Johnny Got His Gun, the lack of abilities that Joe has physically is part of the theme.
This is the particular way that Trumbo is able to prove the hypocrisy of liberty. He attacks this theme in the book by asking the reader if Joe is truly free. Joe is immobilized for the duration of the novel except for when he goes into a flashback. Until the end, Joe is unable to communicate with the outside world and is unaware of his surroundings, location, and year. He was unable to recall the year or even track time at one point. He had to concentrate all of his energy on trying to track the days as the nurses came in to take care of him. This lifestyle is something that made Joe asks if he is truly living a “free life”. He was told that he was going to fight for democracy and liberty. However, he is incapacitated and is unable to live his life after the war affected his life. This change is making Joe go crazy. Joe is pleading to have contact with the outside world. The lack of contact is making him realize that he is a dead man living. He is the spokesmen of the dead. He lets the reader know that no one thinks of their country in their dying moments, but the family that they will be leaving behind. The pain of his suffering is even pushed aside by the doctors that are responsible for his life. After be told he couldn’t talk he remarks, “They were forcing him to be silent. They didn't want to hear him. They weren't interested in anything but getting him off their minds” …show more content…
(Trumbo). His suffering was not a concern. The doctors saw the easy way out of calling him crazy and ignored his requests. He proved himself right. The people did not care about those harmed by war. He knew that those were not truly affected by war did not care of its heinous acts. He was unable to achieve his goals because the powers in charge were not willing to help him in his time of need. This issue of personal liberty shows how quickly war will tarnish this. This novel’s method of storytelling is a key factor in the delivery of the theme. Trumbo is keenly aware of the fact that Joe is the only person that the reader will experience throughout the novel. However, the novel is not in Joe’s direct thoughts. Trumbo creates a limited third person that will give us Joe’s thoughts from a person that can read Joe’s thoughts. The purpose of this choice was to give the reader the notion that the information that has been given is accurate and reliable. Joe constantly has flashbacks and fits of anger that would have the reader question his legitimacy as a narrator. Trumbo knows that the point of his novel is not to hear Joe’s message from raw, emotional thoughts. His intentions were to have the message of the story resonate with the readers. It would not have been possible with his self-narration. Additionally, this narration style makes Joe a passive character. The use of “he” instead of “I” does not give Joe the control of having power in the novel. The use of this passive style is the important factor that gives another way to show Joe is not able to control his life. The novel proves this through many setbacks he has physically, and it also shows this as he does not have the ability to narrate his own story. The point of view is a crucial vehicle for the theme to get across, as it helps reinforce it. The anti-war sentiment of this novel is expressed by sub-themes and point of view.
Additionally, the use of point of view is to add depth to the meaning of this novel. Trumbo proves that he is not afraid to act a normal and widely-accepted belief. He is not worried about acting war beliefs. He wants to inform the reader that the emotional side of the war is detrimental to soldiers. This novel gives an emotional side to an otherwise strategical battle. Johnny Got his Gun is a novel that attacks the core of the values that sent the US to war: democracy and liberty. These two fundamental rights are questioned by Joe. He feels that the ability to walk and talk and lead a normal life is something that all people should be able to do. He is not worried about having the protections the US affords him, or the liberty that he fought to defend. Joe is the personal side to war that Trumbo wants to expose for everyone to see. The ability to understand what Joe is thinking is part of the reasoning behind the part of speech. He is not the direct storyteller. This allows Trumbo to erase the debate of a reliable narrator and focus on the themes that he wrote for the story. This novel not only attacks war, but it is meticulous in pulling apart its faults and
atrocities.
Nothing in life is permanent, everything one day will have to change. A basic necessity of life, change is the fuel that keeps our society moving. In the novel Johnny Tremain by Esther Forbes, Johnny Tremain, a fourteen-year-old boy gifted in craftsmanship, experiences changes in all aspects of his life. From a crippled hand to fighting against the British for his country's independence, war transforms Johnny Tremain from a selfish child into a patriotic hero. As the war relentlessly continues, Johnny learns the effects that it has on him as he must focus on the real issue rather than centering around his individual concerns. By reading this novel, we can learn from Johnny how in times of conflict, young men like him must mature into men who
...it may help us arrive at an understanding of the war situation through the eyes of what were those of an innocent child. It is almost unique in the sense that this was perhaps the first time that a child soldier has been able to directly give literary voice to one of the most distressing phenomena of the late 20th century: the rise of the child-killer. While the book does give a glimpse of the war situation, the story should be taken with a grain of salt.
The Vietnam War was a psychological and physical battle for all the young men who were drafted or volunteered. Caputo's own reasons for volunteering illustrate the mentality for some of the men entering into this journey. Those who are inducted into Vietnam face disturbing moral dilemmas that can be expected in an "ethical wilderness." The draft introduced a myriad of young men to the once forgotten moral ambiguity of war. Average American citizens must balance right from wrong in a world without morals or meaning. Caputo himself struggles with the idea that killing in combat is morally justified.
They sensationalize the war, but Charlie and his family know the truth and refuse to go. In Johnny Got His Gun, the masters of war use propaganda to glorify the war and occasionally “force” men to fight. They convinced the young men it is exciting and they have an obligation to serve their country. The Masters of War makes it sound amazing. This is nothing close to the truth.
Tim O’Brien begins his journey as a young “politically naive” man and has recently graduated out of Macalester College in the United States of America. O’Brien’s plan for the future is steady, but this quickly changes as a call to an adventure ruins his expected path in life. In June of 1968, he receives a draft notice, sharing details about his eventual service in the Vietnam War. He is not against war, but this certain war seemed immoral and insignificant to Tim O’Brien. The “very facts were shrouded in uncertainty”, which indicates that the basis of the war isn’t well known and perceived
War always seems to have no end. A war between countries can cross the world, whether it is considered a world war or not. No one can be saved from the reaches of a violent war, not even those locked in a safe haven. War looms over all who recognize it. For some, knowing the war will be their future provides a reason for living, but for others the war represents the snatching of their lives without their consent. Every reaction to war in A Separate Peace is different, as in life. In the novel, about boys coming of age during World War II, John Knowles uses character development, negative diction, and setting to argue that war forever changes the way we see the world and forces us to mature rapidly.
Controversy. A topic surrounded by a double-edged sword in which any argument made is instantly berated. However, if the topic is sustained with formidable evidence and eloquence—it draws the majority to it's favor. One such example of this is in the novel, Johnny Got His Gun by Dalton Trumbo. It is an antiwar novel that sheds light upon the harrowing unjustly consequences of war through the main character, Joe Bonham. Trumbo is able to execute this claim perfectly through a distinct style composed of his eye-grabbing way of words, brilliant symbolism, and imagery.
When you think of Hispanics, the first thing that comes to mind is, obviously a group of men mowing your lawn or an uneducated single mom with five young kids. Most people think that we, Hispanics, do not know how to speak English at all or are illegally in the United States. All Hispanics have been put into the category of the stereotypical Hispanic by Americans. We are all viewed falsely the same way uneducated, illegal, and all Mexican.
I understand that I am going to attempt to keep Johnny out of jail because what he had done in my perspective was self defense. This happened in The Outsiders book. Hinton, S. E. The Outsiders. New York: Viking, 1967. Print. I feel that you may think that Johnny is guilty of homicide because he had killed Bob during the evening by the park. He had not attempted to kill him, he was using self defence, as the novel had stated in chapter 4, Johnny warns the socs that showed up that they were in a part of town that they were not supposed to be in but the socs ignored the warning and still provoked the fight. Later in chapter 4 it also informs us that the socs were starting to drown Ponyboy so Johnny had used his switchblade without really meaning to kill anyone. Johnny has informed me that he and Ponyboy Curtis were walking in the park in the evening and that a vehicle had shown up and some boys had gotten out and threatened them. These boys had pulled out a knife and threatened to use it against them. One of the boys then started to assault Johnny and another attacked Ponyboy. The one attacking Ponyboy then decided to move him to a fountain and tried to drown him. When Johnny realized what they were doing he had turned to them and pulled out a knife and flung at them without meaning to kill Bob. But keep in mind that Bob was drowning Ponyboy so this act was used in defense. I feel that Johnny is innocent because he was using self defense, but he should not have ran from the crime scene. Another thing in chapter 4 was that a little while later when Ponyboy came conscious again Johnny said, "I had to. They were drowning you, Pony. “They might have killed you. And they had a blade... they were gonna beat me up...." I found this informat...
Experiences and Emotions in The Things They Carried Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried is not a novel about the Vietnam War. “It is a story about the soldiers and their experiences and emotions that are brought about from the war” (King 182). O'Brien makes several statements about war through these dynamic characters. He shows the violent nature of soldiers under the pressures of war, he makes an effective antiwar statement, and he comments on the reversal of a social deviation into the norm. By skillfully employing the stylistic technique of specific, conscious detail selection and utilizing connotative diction, O'Brien thoroughly and convincingly makes each point.
War novels often depict a war hero facing off against an enemy, with a winner on the other side. However, Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Slaughterhouse Five takes an opposite approach to the telling of a war story. The narrator uses the protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, to display his own anti-war sentiment. Vonnegut’s style of writing as well as his characters help to portray the effect of war on individuals and society as a whole.
Tim O’ Brien’s narrative, How to Tell a War Story depicts the livelihood and experience of American soldiers during the Vietnam War. More so evaluating the life Tim O’ Brien and several other characters in his platoon. The sequences of stories reveals the thoughts and behavior of many post-Vietnam veterans and also can be related to the behavior of many veterans today. Throughout the segments of stories, “How to tell a War Story”, “Speaking of Courage and Notes”, and “The Things They Carried”, O’ Brien illustrates a common theme of guilt and sacrifice among the key characters Lieutenant Cross, Rat, and O’ Brien himself. Each character are presented with an unexpected responsibility and are forced to serve their state. A sense of discomfort
War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning, written by the talented author Chris Hedges, gives us provoking thoughts that are somewhat painful to read but at the same time are quite personal confessions. Chris Hedges, a talented journalist to say the least, brings nearly 15 years of being a foreign correspondent to this book and subjectively concludes how all of his world experiences tie together. Throughout his book, he unifies themes present in all wars he experienced first hand. The most important themes I was able to draw from this book were, war skews reality, dominates culture, seduces society with its heroic attributes, distorts memory, and supports a cause, and allures us by a constant battle between death and love.
Usually when someone is murdered, people expect the murderer to feel culpable. This though, is not the case in war. When in war, a soldier is taught that the enemy deserves to die, for no other reason than that they are the nation’s enemy. When Tim O’Brien kills a man during the Vietnam War, he is shocked that the man is not the buff, wicked, and terrifying enemy he was expecting. This realization overwhelms him in guilt. O’Brien’s guilt has him so fixated on the life of his victim that his own presence in the story—as protagonist and narrator—fades to the black. Since he doesn’t use the first person to explain his guilt and confusion, he negotiates his feelings by operating in fantasy—by imagining an entire life for his victim, from his boyhood and his family to his feeling about the war and about the Americans. In The Man I Killed, Tim O’Brien explores the truth of The Vietnam War by vividly describing the dead body and the imagined life of the man he has killed to question the morality of killing in a war that seems to have no point to him.
Evidence of professionalism on the part of the two killers, Al and Max, is that they both wear a uniform? They wear overcoats. that are too tight for them, gloves to prevent finger prints, and Derby hats. This might be for intimidation, to suggest they are. gangsters or something similar, or it could be that they are not so.