Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thomas Paine's view on independence
The impact of Puritans on America
The impact of Puritans on America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thomas Paine's view on independence
In every era in history there is always a leader who brings about a new belief or philosophy which helps change the way people think. For example, before the war against England for independence most of the colonists either did not want to fight against England due to their loyalty to them or because they were uncertain of whether they should go to war or not. However, when Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet called Common Sense, in the pamphlet he writes that independence from England must come, because America lost touch with its home country (Levine, 2012). As well as, in the pamphlet he says,“ The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from …show more content…
John Winthrop was convinced God elected him to salvation or in Puritan terms, to “sainthood” (Dunn, 2016). So, from his early teens he began his scriptural studies and prayers to become a full-fledged Puritan. Winthrop also dedicated himself the world as he saw it, arguing, “…the life which is most exercised with trials’ and temptations is the sweetest, and will prove the safest (Dunn, 2016).” On the other hand, Benjamin Franklin saw religion as worthless unless it is used to promote virtuous behavior and saw Jesus as a great moral teacher, instead as a God (Fea, 2011). As well as, a couple of weeks before Franklin died Ezra Stiles wrote a paper about Franklin’s beliefs. In the excerpt, he says, “…As for Jesus of Nazareth…I think the system of Morals and Religion as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw…but I have…some Doubts to his divinity… (Fea, …show more content…
For Winthrop, for example, he quotes the bible by saying, “…all men would have need of one another” this shows he believed all social classes were “made” by God (Geneva Bible, John 13:35). So, to Winthrop he thinks the mutual need between people came from God to help one another while Benjamin Franklin had a similar idea but a secular view on individualism. Franklin even quotes Winthrop speech on A Model of Christian Charity saying, “more nearly together in the Bonds of Brotherly affection… (Wood, 2014).” In other words, this means to Franklin bonds are created not from God but simply from the bond between people to help one another. Winthrop also believes that social advancement and individual improvement comes from God. His belief is shown in his speech “city upon the hill,” because in his speech he tells other Puritans that they should be role models for rest of the world to show how they should behave (Levine, 2012). Franklin on the other believes both social and individual improvement came from one’s actions. For example, Franklin developed his daily routine to help on a daily basis with his routine it helped him become an author, freemason, scientist, diplomat and much more. In his biography, he writes, “Often I sat up in my Room reading the greatest Part of the Night, when the Book was borrow’d in the Evening and to be return’d early in the Morning lest it should be miss’d or
Hmmm…this was a very interesting letter written by John Winthrop to Sir Nathaniel Rich and is definitely very different from Sebastian Brandt’s letter describing Jamestown. Winthrop is the first governor (and very proud!) of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and clearly wrote this letter with authority and confidence. As the governor, he also had the “burden” to prove to the audience, in this case, Sir Nathaniel Rich, a wealthy Puritan sympathizer in England, that the Colony was thriving and in good condition. In contrast, Winthrop’s 1631 letter to his wife had a much different tone. In it, he wrote that the Massachusetts colony was not faring well until a ship bearing supplies finally arrived. It is clear that Boston wasn’t faring as well as it
Summarize the reasoning given by John Winthrop for why humankind is separated into economic and political classes.
The Great Awakening was before the American Revolution, therefore the forefront in the minds of many colonists was religion. But, it also caused some tensions between religious ideologies. The American Revolutionary era was a period where the nation was finding an identity to unify with. Both George Washington and Jonathon Edwards, believed that religion was necessary for the stability of a nation. However, the way how Washington and Edwards accomplished their plans with religion were different. The differences between the two men show varying degrees of religious acceptance. Both men wanted religion in America, but only by their own definition of religious acceptance.
“Religion is the backbone of evolution.” Without the cultural differences and belief systems we would not have a regulated religious base. It is evident some religions can be both alike but yet still very different. The historical William Bradford and Jonathan Edwards demonstrate this theory. William Bradford portrays more leniencies while allowing for more religious tolerance within the puritan community. With some contrasting beliefs but familiar goals, Jonathan Edwards, pursued a stricter religious background. Both of these author’s play an important role in sculpting the puritan way of life.
What would influence you to fight for American Independence? Would your family's’ views, your friend’s views, or the views of a political pamphlet influence you? In the beginning of the American Revolution, a man by the name of Thomas Paine wrote a political pamphlet that would influence many Americans to fight for independence from Britain. Thomas Pain used several ideas that include government is a necessary evil, America will eventually be independent, Britain will always oppress the American Colonies to influence the American People, and the importance of allies.
Winthrop was a wealthy English puritan lawyer and one of the leading figures in the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He presented twofold liberty. Which are: the natural and the civil or liberal. Thus, to explain his understanding of liberty, Winthrop used an analogy to the status of women within the family to explain his understanding of liberty. Winthrop used women as a good example of how women as humans, behave well and not do evil things to have a nice family and a well lived life. Winthrop considered woman status in the family as an example of liberty, he meant to say that a woman position is family is like a good homemaker, where she expects by all rules, maintains discipline, follow the rules, and customs made by society and
Henry David Thoreau and Benjamin Franklin had a lot of similar ways of life. The men didn’t believe in the Christian religious conviction of the time. Franklin supported Deism, in which people think that God shaped human beings and the soil, but would not get in the way of human development in it. Thoreau supported Transcendentalism, which is the faith that human beings are independent, unique people, who are one with the natural world. The beliefs of both these philosophers were very different than what the rest of society deemed socially acceptable, but this did not affect them in the least bit. In fact, their religious beliefs are part of what made these men such influential figures in American history. Franklin’s beliefs in Deism reflect his outlook on life. He was a very driven, hard-working person who, if he discovered a problem with society, he would do everything in his power to fix it. The fact that Deists believe that God will not get in the way of human development suggests that He will not fix one’s problems for them. They are expected to fix it themselves, which is exactly what Franklin ...
Instead of believing “their foot shall slide in due time” (Edwards, 209), Franklin and Emerson view individuals as empires full of potential rather than lives managed by God. Franklin seldom goes to public worship, because “their aim seeming to be rather to make us Presbyterians than good citizens.” (Franklin, 580) Yet, he still gives money to some churches because he thinks the churches will use the money to do good, not because
In the Constitution of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery and the Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage of 1787, President of the Society, Benjamin Franklin states, “It having pleased the Creator of the world, to make of one flesh, all the children of men – it becomes them to consult and promote each other’s happiness, as members of the same family, however diversified they may be, by color, situation, religion, or different states of society.” (Doc. B). Mr. Franklin talks about how if we are to please God, we all need to act as one huge family despite whatever race, religion, financial income, etc. Throughout Document B, Benjamin Franklin continues to speak that a Christian’s obligation should extend their power to everyone and express the true meaning of freedom. “And who acknowledge the oblig...
Religious conscience in America has evolved considerably since the first settlers emigrated here from Europe. Primary settlements were established by Puritans and Pilgrims who believed "their errand into the wilderness [America] was above all else a religious errand, and all institutions - town meeting, school, church, family, law-must faithfully reflect that fact" (Gaustad 61). However, as colonies grew, dissenters emerged to challenge Puritan authority; indeed, many of them left the church to join untraditional religious sects such as "the Ranters, the Seekers, the Quakers, the Antinomians, and the Familists" (Westbrook 26). Debates over softening the stance on tolerance in the church engendered hostility in many religious leaders, priming some officials to take action. Whether it was in direct response to "the liberalizing tendencies beginning to take hold in some [. . .] New England churches" (Westbrook 65), or a "reaction against the attempt in the Age of Reason to reduce Christian doctrine to rationalistic explanation" ("Great Awakening"), the Great Awakening impressed upon the issues of religious conscience. Moreover, what spawns from this controversy is a query over the juxtaposition of morality and spirituality: the question of whether these conditions are actually related. The gradual escalation of unconventional thinking in religious affairs facilitated new ideas on what defined spirituality; one religious theory, boosted by Thomas Paine and his book, The Age of Reason, denounced both Christianity and Atheism, proposing instead, a new concept: the middle path of Deism.
John Winthrop and Jonathan Edwards were two different authors, writing in two different time periods, but had a common goal. They were working bring people both to Christ and back to Christ. Winthrop was preaching his sermon called, “A Model of Christian Charity” on the ship to the “New World.” Winthrop preached about men giving gifts to other men so that God could give people who have gifts the satisfaction of helping someone in need. On the other hand, Edwards was writing, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" in a time period called the Great Awakening, in an attempt to bring “corrupted people” back to the church with scare tactics. Winthrop and Edwards were both exceptional authors and preachers, but lived in different times with different
Winthrop had decided to leave England to found a godly community in the new world. Like most Puritans, Winthrop was extremely religious and subscribed fervently to the Puritan belief that the Anglican Church had to be cleansed of Catholic ritual. Winthrop was convinced that God was going to punish the English Puritans for its heresy against God. As the leader of the party heading for the new world he believed in creating a society based on a moral code that was rooted in the bible. Winthrop and the other Puritans hoped to establish in the new world a pure church that would offer a model for the churches in England, thus purifying the Anglican Church from within. "They sought homogeneity, not diversity, and believed that the good of the community outweighed protecting the rights of its individual members".
We are so politically divided today that it can break friendships, marriages, etc. Has it always been that way? I used to find adults fighting like children over political parties amusing and entertaining. I always wondered why people fought so passionately over politics like their lives absolutely depend on it. I recently found out how America was born out of deeply divided opinion. A majority of people wanted to be faithful to the King while the other majority wanted the opposite. After gaining independence from Great Britain, Federalists wanted a strong central government while the Democratic-Republicans wanted a government where the majority has the say in the government (Democracy). In the election of President Abraham Lincoln, the country
The definition of a leader is a person who influences people to a common purpose. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr are examples of great leaders who brought about social change through alternative means in the 20th century. Their means were through nonviolent protests of freedom. Gandhi fought for freedom from Great Britain, and King fought for freedom from segregation and equal rights for all Americans.
...ls. He says, ."..their Aim seeming to be rather to make us Presbyterian than good Citizens." (Pg. 94) Franklin felt as though individual study should be emphasized over dogma.