Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of change
Change can be difficult in many situations because it is easy to get complacent and stuck in our ways. In a corporate setting change can be even more difficult. On a corporate level change will involve many people, many departments, and even a whole corporate culture. In the case of John Smithers he was asked to implement a new quality control system for the company he worked for. In the end the program never gained any traction and John felt his days were numbered because some staff changes were already being made. There were a few things that John could have done differently to prevent putting himself into this situation. These include not listening to his initial instincts or gut feeling, not getting enough involvement from ownership, …show more content…
Smithers even said when he took on the position, ”I am skeptical about the ability to effect change.” There were already many factors that gave him concern including that a program of this sort might raise worker’s expecting too high. Also Smithers knew that the separation between engineering and operations already existed to an extreme between the two departments at Sigtek. He had already had many run-ins with his counterpart, Sam Murphy, who would be leading the quality change program in the operations side. Smithers said it was a joke saying, “It was like putting oil and water together.” With all of these known concerns Smithers should have listened to his intuition and passed on the position or strongly brought up these concerns for before accepting it. Even with all these doubts he felt obligated and wanted to show loyalty to the company. Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio of the University of Southern California tells us that it is important to pay attention to "somatic markers." They send messages that something just feels right—or it doesn’t. The more you pay attention to the outcome of trusting your intuition in combination with facts, the better your future decision-making can become. cite: @. (2015). Scientific Proof That Your Gut Is Best At Making Decisions. Retrieved September 18, 2016,
All information about the following characters in the case study were retrieved and/or inferred from A Consequence of Testing ALL Students article.
The most important question when regarding the settling of Jamestown and its early years is whether Captain John Smith, world renowned hero of the Jamestown colony, is in fact a liar, as most of what we know about him comes from his own works of novelistic intent about his experiences in the new world. We can analyze other first-hand records and other historical writings and weigh these accounts against Smith’s writings to decide if his are in fact accurate.
Elite Engineering has been unable to successfully implement change because they haven’t been able to get the employees to see the need for the change and to believe in the change. “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things.” (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) Change is often met with resistance. When it comes down to it many people fear change. At Elite Engineering, the engineers were happy with the way things were being run. They enjoyed the billable work they were doing and did not want to take the time to collaborate with others, as it would take away time from their billable work. The engineers saw the billable work they were doing as a way to ensure they received their bonus at the end of the year. However, they were failing to see that the litigation business was going to begin to shrink and in order for them to remain competitive, changes needed to be made. Kotter and Schlesinger state that there are for common reasons that people resist change. The four reasons are the desire not to lose something of value, a misunderstanding of the change and its implications, a belief that the change does not make sense for the organization, and a low tolerance for change. (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) At Elite Engineering, I think upper management was unsuccessful at implementing change because the employees didn’t want to lose their bonuses (something of value to them), they misunderstood the change, and they didn’t feel that the change made sense for the organization.
There are several areas that Miller has problems with concerning his job and the current recommendations from the consultant firm. The first problem is that Miller has been at his current for a long time and on the production line for twenty seven years. This shows that he has not had any initiative to promote within the company and may be complacent in his job now. He knows his job and does it proficiently. So proficiently that he is able to run two machines at the same time where most employees may only be able to run one machine. Even though Miller seems content and not burnt out on his job now, these new changes could push him to that point (Greenberg, 108).
Jaune Quick-to-see Smith is an instrumental and influential modern day artist due to her Native American Background, her medium, and her vision. Her piece Indian Country Today is one that represents who she is as an artist as well as where she came from and where she hopes her people will go. Throughout her life, Quick-to-see Smith overcame racism and oppression from within her community and from outside of it, while connecting with her familial artistic past to become the artist she is today. Her work Indian Country Today is an influential piece stemming from her people’s history, current situation within the United States, as well as her hopes for the future of her people. This piece is dramatic and captivating, creating a sense of unity within the Native American community while acknowledging that these nations continue to be unrecognized by the larger American community, something Quick-to-see Smith feels needs to be remedied.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
Summarize the key facts and events of the case including the critical issues leading to the departure of Stephanie Whitney.
Mr. Nardelli could have spent more time demonstrating why the changes were necessary and why the urgency. Taking a look at the communication strategies (discussed later in this paper), there appeared to have been a great deal of one way communication, but less collaboration and some employees could have felt their opinions did not matter. As such, not everyone agreed with the changes, however, he did place a sense of urgency.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Bipolar disorder is an overwhelming mental illness that can affect one’s life drastically. Bipolar is a disorder that is characterized by recurring episode of mania and depression. Most people who suffer from bipolar disorder are often misdiagnosed, and undergo ineffective treatments, which may hinder recovery and lead to the progression of the illness. In the movie “Mr. Jones”, (1993) the main character experiences broad symptoms of bipolar disorder that lead to an improper diagnosis. The article chosen to support this paper Emotional Reactivity in Bipolar Depressed Patients ( P. Stratta, D. Tempesta, R. L. Bonanni, S. de Cataldo, and A. Rossi Journal of Clinical Psychology 2014), broadly debates that bipolar disorder has
John Kotter studied success and change. During this process, he learned that change has to go through several phases. According to Clawson (2012) “Kotter’s research outlined eight reasons that corporate change fails and eight corresponding ways of managing them. Kotter’s counsel was that change leaders should (1) establish a sense of urgency, (2) create a guiding, powerful coalition, (3)
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
Middlebrook, B., Caruth, D., & Frank, R. (1984, Summer 85). Overcoming Resistance to Change. Management Journal, 50(3), pp. 23.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used