Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morals and values in the crucible
Red scare in 1920s
Social impact of salem witch trials
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Everyone is willing to go some distance to preserve their reputation and integrity but how far they go is determined by their strength of character. John Proctor and Reverend Parris represent the polar opposite ways people go about protecting their integrity. Though they went about different ways of preserving their dignity, they both showed an immense conviction to do so. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller uses John Proctor and Reverend Parris to reinforce the substantial effect that risk to a person’s reputation has on their thoughts and actions.
At the end of The Crucible, John Proctor is faced with the choice to confess to false allegations of witchcraft and save his own life or to retain his integrity by refusing to sign the false confession
…show more content…
Parris wishes only to preserve his own reputation among the townspeople so that he can slowly leech them of their money. “Abigail, I have fought here three long years to bend these stiff-necked people to me, and now, just now when some good respect is rising for me in the parish, you compromise my very character” (Miller 888). Reverend Parris has lived in Salem for three years trying to gain the townspeople’s trust and managed to gain enough money to buy real golden candlesticks to be used in a puritan church hall. “But Parris came, and for twenty week he preach nothin’ but golden candlesticks until he had them” (Miller 923). John Proctor criticizes Parris’s frivolous spending on expensive golden candlesticks because the ones made by Franklin Nurse from pewter do the job well and aren’t a waste of the townspeople’s money. Puritan life is also meant to be lived in a simple fashion and golden candlesticks clearly reject such an idea. Parris has been an instigator of the witch hunt since it began because he wanted to protect his own reputation by condemning others. “Tonight, when I open my door to leave my house- a dagger clattered to the ground. You cannot hang this sort. There is danger for me. I dare not step outside at night” (Miller 962). Parris is so afraid for his life that he begged judge Danforth to …show more content…
People in America at the time were accusing others of being Soviet spies due to the propaganda created by Senator John McCarthy in his attempt to increase his political influence. “Mary Warren! Drawback your spirit out of them! (Miller 950). Danforth jumps to the presumptuous conclusion that Mary is bewitching the girls because they act like supposed “victims” of her specter. Danforth utilizes no rational thought in deciding that Mary has begun tormenting the girls while remaining ignorant that the girls are lying to him to protect themselves. During the Red Scare people would condemn other to accusations of espionage because of John McCarthy’s lies and to avoid being accused themselves. The Salem Witch Trials and the Red Scare draw several characteristic similarities to each other. Both involved senseless and baseless accusations of people due to a paranoia generated by people in high positions of power and authority. Seeing all this on stage, we are free to reflect that something very like these trials had been going on in recent years in the United States” (Warshaw
In the Crucible, people were continuously accused of doing witchcraft. Those people who were being accused had to either confess or die despite of the truth. Struggling in this moral decision, people began to recoil and lie to others and even to themselves in order to save their lives. Marry, who was first accused of doing witchcraft told the judges that John Proctor was connected to the devil. Obviously, Marry chose to live as a liar. Eventually, It was John Proctor’s turn to decide: to confess and lie or refuse and die. Struggling in a decision that drives people into craziness, John Proctor chose to refuse anything despite of being hanged.
Accusations became widespread, and, since confession was the only way to avoid a hanging, confessions became widespread as well. When only a small group of stubborn resisters were left, the main character John Proctor had to make a difficult decision on whether he should confess or hang, and ends up hanging along with a few others to help save the integrity of their community. In his play The Crucible, Arthur Miller demonstrates that while some may view self-sacrifice as a pointless loss due to pride, the decision to sacrifice one’s life for the good of his community and the elimination of conformist attitudes is very noble. The enormity of this decision can instill a feeling of guilt and responsibility upon another, as occurs to the protagonist John Proctor, and can cause one’s views and actions to be altered.
John Proctor was a main character in The Crucible. As a main character, he has a special role in the story. He was a husband to Elizabeth Proctor with three children but at the same time, he had an affair with Abigail Williams - a girl of only 17 years old. John is known as a tragic hero in the story due to of a few flaws that determined his fate by the end of the story. John proctor is a tragic hero because of his tragic flaw, free choice, and his increased awareness of what was happening to him.
Throughout “The Crucible”, John Proctor is tormented by his past mistakes and haunted by his wrongdoings as the Salem Witch Trials begin. His final and most crucial decision comes when he must choose whether to lie and confess to witchcraft, saving his life, or to stick by the truth and die with his name untarnished. John Proctor made the right decision by choosing to be honest and die with his dignity.
Bad reputations during this time period had greater influence on people’s lives. One way to prove this is by reading The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller. This play displays the effects of acquiring a bad reputation. Many characters from this play deal with a conflict based on a reputation they have gained. The characters with the most significant conflicts resulting from reputations are John Proctor, Reverend Parris, and Abigail Williams.
To admit to adultery takes integrity. To tell the truth no matter what the consequences takes integrity. To stay true to one's morals and be able to accept any punishments to keep one’s integrity, is a genuine trait. During the Salem witch trials many were unable to keep their integrity, but there were some who did. The Crucible written by Arthur Miller takes place during the Salem witch trials, when many people were forced to lie in order to live. John Proctor is looked at in the play as an adulterer, and sinful man. Nevertheless, John Proctor's public and private selves differ dramatically, but overall Mr. Proctor is truly a honest and integrity filled man.
?What is left when honor is lost?? Publilius Syrus' quote, though dating from 100 B.C., still seems pertinent to our era (Quotations). Many people still feel that once integrity is lost they are nothing and many are willing to stand up to keep their integrity. Without integrity, we are nothing. During the time that Arthur Miller wrote his most famous play, The Crucible, innocent men and women are accused of having Communist leanings. Their whole lives are ruined in a short amount of time because they refuse to compromise themselves by selling out their friends. Miller tries to make a statement about these unfair trials by comparing them to the Salem witch-hunts and trials of 1692. The main protagonist of his play is a man named John Proctor who is accused of witchcraft but stands up to maintain his name and his honor, even though he is hanged for it. During the H.U.A.C. trials some took stands for their beliefs with the knowledge of possibly being shunned by society. Knowing this, instead of taking the cowards' way and giving the names of their friends, they refuse to tell the committee anything in the same way that John Proctor stands up against a court that is ruining the lives of innocent people.
John Proctor is guilty of both spoken lies and lies conveyed from his actions. John Proctor has to deal with the decision to stay true to himself and not let his frustration condemn him to falsify the truth. Accused of conjuring with the devil among many other innocent Puritans in the town, John has to face making the right decision to either be hanged and keep his soul pure or lie to save his life and oblige to the magistrates that he did indeed conjure with devil. The tendency to want to keep your life is within any human being on this Earth, however John is faced with the decision of saving his life or faulting his already remorseful heart by lying. As John Proctor makes the decision to lie and keep his life, he begins to doubt how others will now think of him knowing he conjured with the devil. When asked to sign his name on paper for the entire town to see he refuses and exclaims, “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies…” (143) While John passionately speaks this, his immense frustration is finally released and shows his desire to stay true to himself and others in the town. Refusing to sign the paper conveys the lie he initially told and the truth he sought for once realizing the guilt and remorse he would have for the rest of his life. John Proctor’s feeling of frustration
Honor, dignity, and integrity are traits that are becoming more and more rare in our society. The Crucible, a play written in 1952 by Arthur Miller, is based on the Salem witch hunts of 1692 and parallels the Red Scare and McCarthyism in the 1950s. In the play, Miller attempts to focus his themes around traits such as honor, dignity, and integrity, and as a result, the theme "is it better to die honorably or live dishonorably" becomes vital to the story and well conveyed throughout it. The characters that exemplify this idea are John Proctor and Giles Corey, both of whom die by the end of the play, and Reverend John Hale and Abigail Williams, who live through the trials.
To begin with, Proctor was considered a strong person in the community, and he was respected for it. He was a handsome, hard-working, and revered man in the community. To the people of Salem, he was a dedicated farmer that had done nothing to blacken his family name. His attitude was “. . . even-tempered, and [he was] not easily lead. . .” by the rumors and hysteria surrounding Salem at the time of the witch accusations (Miller 21). When other were jumping to the conclusion of witchcraft and starting to fear, Proctor kept a realistic, skeptical look on the situation. Contrary to the ideas of the time, Proctor would miss church and openly disagree with Reverend Parris (Scheidt and Calandra). Despite this, he had a strong belief in God and followed his own moral standards more than strict rules the Puritan church set out at that time. He was revered in Salem as an honest man who always spoke his mind, and who had the ability to silence the hypocrites with his quick logic (Sparknotes Editors). Whenever Reverend Parris would try to tear Proctor down with criticism on his church attendance and Sunday activities, Proctor would always cou...
Reverend Parris is far from being a minister and is not a true spiritual leader because of his greed. In Act II John Proctor claims that when the church was first built, Francis Nurse’s pewter candlesticks were placed upon the alter. But when Parris came, he preached for golden candlesticks for twenty weeks until his demands were met. Frankly, this shows Parris’ greed because he values material possession over preaching about God. A minister’s job is to preach about theology, not demand for superfluous goods. However, Parris is the exception; he is a minister that values material possession more than the God he is supposed to be preaching about. Parris claims that all contributions are under the name of God, but this is clearly fallacious. Reverend Parris is a man who abuses his power as a minister to justify his rule because nobody would dare challenge the leader of a theocracy—anything out of the ordinary in Salem is assumed to be witchcraft, a hangable offense. As a result, he has
The witch hunt in the crucible is initiated when Abigail and her friends fear the consequences of their ‘dancing’ in the forest. This connects to McCarthyism as the HUAC is represented by the judges and the ‘accuses’ (the girls) are representatives of Elia Kazan and others like him. The theocratic society of Salem is what the girls fear as the forest is seen as the devils resting place and the puritan nature of the town forbid dancing as it was seen as ‘vain enjoyment’ which as Miller himself states at the beginning of the novel to not be allowed. The character of Mary Warren begs the girls to just admit they were dancing as “…you’ll only be whipped for dancin’…”, but as Abigail is questioned and Parris mentions the kettle and how he believed “…there to be some movement- in the soup…”, the devil becomes prominent in the conversation. This is due to Abigail fearing that she will be blamed for devil worshipp...
Reverend Parris and Reverend Hale share this motive because it would save more individuals’ lives in the town and validate that there are witches in Salem. Proctor has a good reputation in the town; therefore, if he were to confess, others would follow his actions. Parris believes John Proctor’s name in the village “...is a weighty name; it will strike the village that Proctor confess. I beg you, let him sign it” (1230). Parris begs Proctor to sign his confession on paper to hang up on the church doors. He knows if the village and others being accused see John’s name signed for confessing, it would validate that there are witches in Salem and that Parris did not call Reverend Hale for nothing. Hale desires Proctor’s signed confession because others being accused of witchcraft would see Proctor’s good name and they will confess along with him. Hale believes the less people who get hanged for being accused of witchcraft, the less guilt he will have to feel for being involved with these trials. Hale still has guilt for the individuals who have already been hanged: “There is blood on my head! Can you not see the blood on my head!” (1224). Hale’s guilt starts to grow on him and he regrets his involvement in the witch trials. He knows he has already committed enough wrong doings, and Proctor’s confession would stop others from being hanged. Reverend Parris and Reverend
In “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, I found myself struggling to grasp the full intensity he portrayed. One intense subject he really pinpointed was reputation. Reputation seemed to be a major focus of almost all they characters in this literary work. Whether it be reputation as a good member of the Salem Massachusetts community, or reputation as most successful preacher, the townspeople seemed to revolve around reputation. Many townspeople including John Proctor, Reverend Parris, as well as Giles Corey. This was not always necessary a bad thing, as it kept them in check, but in this case, the longing for a good reputation overpowered many lives, literally. Too much want for a triumphant
Have you ever been accused of something that you didn’t do, and then up being hung for it? Well thats exactly what happened to John Proctor. You see, John Proctor was alive during one of the horrifying times in American history, the Salem Witch Trials, which lasted from February 1692 to May 1693. The main two characteristics that he displayed that I noticed the most were his honesty and pride. I will also be answering the question of whether or not John Proctor is a tragic hero or not.