John Naughton Analysis

1517 Words4 Pages

In a world where technology is advancing rapidly, there are a plethora of thoughts and fears that approach as we advance technologically. There are non-millennial adults who believe that technology is reshaping our brains, and taking away capabilities and jobs while making tasks simpler. John Naughton approaches Nicholas Carr’s viewpoint on the way that technology affects our minds, and shows that the argument Carr joined is not necessarily a settled argument. John Naughton’s purpose is to persuade adults, who had adapted to the internet, to consider whether the internet is a positive or a negative factor on our minds’ capacities. He utilizes data analysis, inclusion of expert opinion, and emotional appeal for that purpose.
As a result, because …show more content…

The data analysis that Naughton uses persuades adults who had to adapt to the internet because adults born before 1982 are typically not experts of the internet. These adults would value an internet expert’s opinion over their own. Naughton builds up Carr’s viewpoint and says it could be a valid argument, but then Naughton states that “not all neuroscientists agree with Carr”(Naughton 442). Carr is not completely credible on the topic of neuron “plasticity” because he is merely a writer, but he is still agreed with by some neuroscientists. Naughton also states that “81%” of a “panel of more than 370 internet experts” agreed with the proposition that “people’s use of the internet has enhanced human intelligence”(Naughton 442). Naughton is likely to agree that there is not a lot of certainty because he states that “we may be losing some of the capacity for contemplative concentration,” but we gain “new and essential ways of working”(Naughton 443). His usage of “may” in his statement indicates that he is not entirely certain whether the internet is affecting our concentration. Naughton discusses Carr’s viewpoint, supports his claims, and then shows some disagreement with Carr’s viewpoint. He does not seem to settle on one point because he is not too certain himself as there is a 19% of individuals who do not completely agree that “people’s use of the internet has enhanced human intelligence”(Naughton 442). As we see, Naughton seems to be neither in agreement with the 19% or the 81% of internet experts, he is just in the middle on this unsettled argument. Certainly, Naughton utilizes the credibility of featured authors to show that good comes out of technology. Although Carr might believe that technology is completely ruining humans’ capacity to concentrate, Naughton would believe that even if there were issues with our capacity to concentrate attributed to technology, there are still good

Open Document