Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of computer technology on modern society
The impact of computer technology on modern society
Impact of computer on Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of computer technology on modern society
Throughout our everyday lives whether we think about it or not. Computers and technology are and have been an integral part of our lives. Computers and technology assist us with so much, such as the way we drive and the way we learn. We no longer have to deal with the hassle of driving stick and we no longer have to be in a physical classroom with the advent of online education. In Clive Thompsons’ essay “Smarter than you think how technology is changing our minds for the better,” he discusses how the ever changing capacity of technology improves the mental cognition of human beings.
One of the main points that Clive Thompson poses. Is that technology should be used as a tool. He brings up as an example the most strategic and tactically driven
…show more content…
game of all chess. More specifically how in nineteen ninety-seven the grand master chess champion Gary Kasparov played against IBM’ S Deep blue super computer and lost .Thompson elaborates on how Kasparov pondered the idea of using computers in competition. A human and a computer versus another computer and a human. As they would play, a player would make a judgement then reassess it in the computer’s data base, hence using the computer as a tool. As an outcome the two opponents were forced to make split second decisions like a computer program improving their overall mental cognition. Furthermore Clive Thompson discusses that we as human beings are becoming more like computers ourselves.
As he says “our tools are everywhere linked with are minds working in tandem” (347). Like computers we are now able to retain more information than ever. And just as how computers are linked together we as a race are as well with being able to communicate with each other more efficiently. He also backs up his point with the extended mind theory. It basically states that humans are dominant because we use our minds to create things that alter our thinking process. He uses books and paper as examples how we used these tools to store information and increase our memory as well as put down our thoughts on paper. These were very primitive technologies. But there effect on our mental cognition are the same as that of computers. Making us as Clive Thompson believes more like computers in the sense we are able to store more …show more content…
information. Another topic Clive Thompson discusses is the positive trend of technology in our culture. One of the aspects he considers is public thinking. And how social media allows us to improve our minds by listening to the insight of others. As he says ‘‘were becoming more conversational thinkers’’ (352). Clive Thompson finds it very positive how we can spread knowledge and ideas on the internet. He makes a reference to Wikipedia which he calls “a global forest of eloquent bloggers, citizen journalism, political fact checking” (352-353). He also makes the point that we refine our tools. And how books from the past have been refined as have computers. Thus technology is positive on our culture. Clive Thompson also talks about how technology speeds things up in our daily lives and how we can become faster learners.
And the skills we try to learn can be less strenuous to obtain. He takes us back to kasparov and how when he was coming about in the soviet union only a few kids that showed promise could get lessons from a grand master and then be able to access records to famous chess games. Clive Thompson considers the fact that computers have leveled the playing field. Now any kid anywhere in the world that has access to the internet can learn more about chess games. Playing an artificial opponent made the game a little faster and the instincts of a player became fast as well. A player could also experiment and see what the outcome of different moves could be. This also means grandmaster players are being produced at a much younger age than ever before. He makes a reference to grand master Bobby Fischer who became a grand master at age fifteen. He does this to show how with the emergence of computers new grand masters are getting younger and younger. Such as Sergey Karjakin who became grand master in two thousand and two at the age of twelve. This clearly shows how computers speed up the learning
process. In the end, Clive Thompson has a strong belief that technology is a positive tool for our minds, it can greatly increase our mental cognition and that using computers are progressing applications and human life. A popular product of technology today is the internet, from blogs to websites full of information there is an endless amount learning and advancement. So finally weather its driving stick or taking an online class technology greatly improves our mental cognition.
Smarter than You Think starts out with a cautionary tale of how in 1997 world chess champion Garry Kasparov was beaten by Deep Blue, an I.B.M. supercomputer. This was a considered a milestone in artificial intelligence. If a computer could easily defeat a chess champion, what would happen to the game and its players? A year after Kasparov was defeated by the program he decided to see what would happen when a computer and person were paired up. He called this collaboration the centaur; A hybrid consisting of the algorithms and history logs of chess as well as the brain to “analyze their opponents’ strengths and weaknesses, as well as their moods.” ...
...ysterious technology. When referencing the new technology he states, “They supply the stuff for thought, but they also shape the process of thought” (6). Carr’s main point is the effect of technology, especially the Internet, is changing the programming of the brain.
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
In Nicholas Carr 's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” he discusses the effect that technology has on our brains as the world becomes more advanced. He gives examples of how technology has helped us and hurts us. Nicholas Carr tells about his own experiences with technology and others as well. In this paper, I will talk about the first part of Carr’s article, I will then agree with Nicholas Carr, give examples from his article, talk on his structure, sources, counterarguments or solutions, and end with why I agree with what he has said.
Humans are becoming more technologically-efficient every day. New inventions and innovations are constantly being made. The Internet is becoming more “reliable” every day. However, how much do we really get from the constant advancement of Internet use and smarter technology? Should we look at their contributions to the world as a benefactor or a curse? The common effect of “artificial intelligence” in the technology we use every day is examined by two brilliant authors, Nicholas Carr and Jamias Cascio. In Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, he explains the effects of the Internet and technology in our society and claims that the overuse of technology is dangerous and can affect how our mind operates. Jamias Cascio, on the other hand, uses his article “Get Smarter” to show the positive effects of technology in our constantly adaptive society claims that technology may just be making our society smarter and more efficient. While Carr and Cascio both use the claim of cause in their articles to provide valid points on how technology affects our society, Carr’s article proves to be more effective because it focuses on skeptical-based evidence and uses a variety of appeals and proofs.
Karp also questions whether the Internet has changed his course of thinking (Carr, 732). Bruce Friedman explained how he barely has the tolerance for reading long pieces, and skimming is now how he reads (Carr, 732). By Carr discussing changes brought by other technologies, he strengthens the support of his claims. He proves that technology does have a way of affecting us cognitively whether the effect is negative or positive. Carr also proves that as technology advances our mind is modified to according to those advances.
How amazing is it to realize that our generation is the generation of the future? Who would have ever thought that spending your free time on the computer could contribute to something so much bigger? Clive Thompson is a Canadian freelance journalist, blogger and science and technology writer. In the second chapter, “Public Thinking,” of Clive Thompson’s book Smarter Than You Think, Thompson describes how various technological innovations impacts our society for the better.
The first is, that I agree with Thompson’s claim that we do live in a society where things are constantly changing, and we need to keep up with this by advancing our understand in technology because it can help us for the better. The second reason I agree with Thompson’s claim is that advancing our understanding and applying this new technology in our lives is making us more creative and daring. I believe that studying and learning about this new technology is making us more creative because we can do and learn things that we never would have been able to without it. Lastly, I agree with Thompson’s claim that technology is making us receive and learn information a thousand times faster than we could before. For example, before the internet and computers we would have to go to hard copy books and try and find the information we needed, but now that is a thing of the past. We can find the information we need and apply it a lot faster, which saves time, effort, and leads the person to be able to get a lot more done in a time period than before this
...know how to use it have adapted a new sense of technological understanding. People in today’s generation have the ability to pick up on the latest gadgets at an alarming young age. Because our minds have become so fixated on various types of screens, our allocation of brainpower is being distorted. The brain does not pose the capacity to perform at max efficiency with an added sense. If Sacks research suggest that the brain adapts and four other senses become more powerful after one sense is loss, than it is not possible for the brain to perform at normal capacity if another sense is added. Our brainpower allocation is spread too thin. Carr exemplifies how the added technology lowers human intelligence through various examples. It clear to say that the research and findings of Sacks “The Mind’s Eye” does not provide a solution to Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
It makes the acquisition of much information instantly and easily, which sequentially has made us smarter.However, many argue that we rely more on the internet, which will weaken our brain and make us lazy thinker. Thompson clarifies that technology is a tool to advance our cognitive and it is the individual who chooses the use of either a book it the internet, and it is better to balance between the two “One of the great challenges of today's digital thinking tools is knowing when not to use them, when to rely on the powers of older and slower technologies, like paper and books"(Thompson
The role of technology throughout my life has been up and down to say the least. While technology has aided my dysgraphia by helping teachers read my essays and papers, it has also played the part of being not only a distraction during my school work, but a distraction in my life as a whole. Yet technology is not bad or good in and of itself, the positives and negatives of technology truly depends on or are relative to the user and how they utilize the technology given to them.
As a young boy, I never once imagined that cell phones would be a daily routine in everyone’s life today, or that the current generation would rely on the internet so much. I grew up engaged with toys and playing outside. If one were to ask me what the internet was back then, I would look perplexed. I’ve seen technology advance each and every year; dazzling inventions and innovations never once thought before. All the technology today is immensely impacting our lives, by facilitating once difficult tasks, and enabling us to quickly access online libraries and databases that hand us important knowledge. Would we be where we are today or be as intelligent if technology never advanced?
The internet is becoming an extremely important tool for nearly everybody. It is the most recent and progressive media surely to be the “medium” of the future. Yet the debate persists that the internet may or may not benefit the human mind. The web/internet makes the human mind collectively more intelligent. For instance, if a person searches for a topic online, the answer would be immediately available rather than going to the library to find several books and periodicals for information. While a person searches through the internet for data, this research process helps develop areas of the human brain not normally used.
According to article b, “what really makes us intelligent isn’t our ability to find lots of information quickly. It’s our ability to find lots of information quickly. It’s our ability to think deeply about that information” With everything a click away, we aren’t truly thinking deeply as we would with a book in our hands- with technology you can transport nearly anywhere and get the information without truly searching for it. Making a connection to real life, you are more likely to remember information you write down- which is why a teacher makes you rewrite words and their definitions. With technology or texting, the information just flies past us- and there are studies to support this. As according to a new study, “Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer of Princeton University and UCLA Los Angeles respectively, students who wrote out their notes by hand actually learn more than those who type their notes on laptops” This proves my point, and goes as far as to suggest that new information goes down the drain. We have grown so attached to our phones, and spend less time to enjoy the moment, and there are many studies that would back it up, but we’ll reference a study by Fairfield University in 2003 found that “taking photos reduces our memories” and it's as if the phone has separated us, making people more scatterbrained, forgetful, and even ignorant. however, even with all this information, we have been advancing, and the pros outweigh the cons- not everyone can take a pen and paper everywhere they go- phones help us everyday and there isn’t enough evidence to suggest we are becoming more
Technology not only oppresses the amount of information our brain can uphold but also the way we react in certain situations we can see how it has an effect on our everyday lives. “Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master,” quoted by Christian Lange. Although, technology may make our lives easier, we expect it to complete our tasks for us. It has warped our society into believing it can only bring positive outcomes and yet we still face serious declines; from how we make decisions to cognitive and analytical skills. Mentioned before experts do not have a complete grasp of how our minds functioning and its capacity but experts do have an understanding on how technology negatively affects our lives. As Albert Einstein said “I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.” Einstein was warning the future that with the increase of technology comes how humans handle it. Not letting technology twist our way of life. Our society is so content on the idea of mass production, it has not focused on the outcomes of its productivity towards the human brain. “It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.” The idea that technology will someday exceed human capabilities and take over our complete mindset of our emotional, physical, and mental ways, is exactly what Einstein dreaded. Giving us a clear idea of what the future will hold if we continue to let technology oppress the way the brain operates. The only solution being to create a healthy balance between the amount of technology we consume a day and the amount we face without