John Muir Naturalism Analysis

1111 Words3 Pages

Naturalism and Romanticism: The Philosophies of Nature The ancient Greek philosopher Socrates once said, “He is richest who is content with the least, for content is the wealth of nature” (brainyquote.com). Over two thousand years later, this same sentiment can be found in John Muir’s “The Calypso Borealis” and William Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud.” In these two works, Muir and Wordsworth express their complete awe and wonderment of nature and how nature can inspire man in a spiritual way. The authors, however, come from two distinct philosophical movements, and thus convey their message to the reader using different, although sometimes overlapping, points of view.
In The Calypso Borealis, John Muir expresses his relationship with nature using a Naturalistic viewpoint. First, Naturalists, like scientists, describe what they see without making any moral judgments (literarydevices.net). John Muir uses …show more content…

For example, he writes that he wandered “through innumerable tamarac and arbor-vitae swamps, and forests of maple, basswood, ash, elm, balsam, fir, pine, spruce, [and] hemlock” and that he struggled “through tangled drooping branches and over and under broad heaps of fallen trees.” These passages are objective and descriptive, similar to how scientists write. Second, Naturalists believe that humans are almost like pawns in the universe, that that they struggle for survival in a hostile society reminiscent of Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory. “I began to fear that I would not be able to reach dry ground before dark, and…have to pass the night in the swamp,” Muir writes, and adds that he “began, faint and hungry, to plan a nest of branches on one of the largest trees or windfalls like a monkey’s nest.” While Muir doesn’t outright say that his situation is dire, through his

Open Document