Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the history of the anglican communion
Essay on the history of the anglican communion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the history of the anglican communion
“Truth can be stated in a thousand different ways, yet each one can be true.” Swami Vivekananda
Even though there are some similarities between Presbyterian and Anglican denominations, there are many more differences. These differences include their opposing views on predestination, the sacred texts they use in their church, their sacraments, and their interpretation of the Lord’s Supper. Therefore, although Anglicans and Presbyterians are both Christian denominations that were formed from the Protestant Reformation, they have fundamentally different theological structures, and they disagree on many key aspects of doctrine.
The Presbyterian position on predestination is inherently based on Calvinistic doctrine. John Calvin played a integral
…show more content…
part in many of the aspects of the Presbyterian doctrine, such as predestination and the sovereignty of God. “God preordained, for his own glory and the display of His attributes of mercy and justice, a part of the human race, without any merit of their own, to eternal salvation, and another part, in just punishment of their sin, to eternal damnation.” Calvin was one of the fathers of Protestantism, and Presbyterians are one of the main branches from it. Presbyterians believe that because God is omniscient, he was able to choose the people who would come to salvation and those that would not. As a whole, the Presbyterians are somewhat divided on the topic of predestination. Contrary to this ideology, Anglicans believe that God extends his grace to all mankind and anyone can be saved. As 1 Timothy 2:4 says, “This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.” While the Anglicans believe that all human beings can be saved, the Presbyterians believe that only those who have been elected by God can be saved. Ironically, both of these views can be found in scripture, and the subject of predestination is a problematic theological debate. Although they were created within a few centuries of one another, Anglicans and Presbyterians have extremely different views on which sacred texts are used in the church. Anglicans refer to The Common Book of Prayer, which includes The Catechism, as a book of their beliefs. They most frequently use the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, which includes the Apocrypha. Although they do not believe that the Apocrypha was divinely inspired by God, they still include it in their Bible. On the contrary, the Presbyterians do not believe that the Apocrypha is part of the canon of scripture. The Anglicans also use the 39 Articles of Religion to define their doctrine and outline theological concerns. Presbyterians, however, have no religious texts or books that they refer to other than the Bible. This is because the main focus of Presbyterians is salvation, and the promise of salvation is found solely in the Bible. Additionally, the Anglican Church uses the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed in its worship services, and as a general statement of faith. These two denominations also differ greatly in their interpretations of the Lord’s Supper.
The Lord’s Supper is a ceremony that most Christian denominations would include. Traditionally, it is comprised of a loaf of bread and a cup of wine which represent Jesus’ body and blood, respectively. Anglicans refer to the Lord’s Supper by the names Holy Communion or Eucharist. This sacrament is made up of two parts: the Word of God and the Holy Communion. The Word of God can be broken into seven different components. These include the Collect of the Day, The Lessons, The Holy Gospel, the Sermon, the Prayers of the People, The Confession, and The Peace. The Eucharist includes The Offertory, The Great Thanksgiving or the Prayer of Consecration, The Breaking of the Bread, and The Communion of the People. Communion is one of the two sacraments for the Presbyterians. Their approach to communion is very simple and unsystematic. They focus less on rituals or customs, but more on the hearts of their congregation and the great sacrifice of Christ. When Jesus met with his disciples in the upper room, he gave them the Lord’s Supper to continue as an act of remembrance in his name. The name the Lord’s Supper refers to the fact that it is celebrated on the Lord’s Day, which is Sunday. The Presbyterians concentrate on the two symbols that make up communion; the bread and the wine. It is of great importance that these two symbols show clearly “the fullness, wholeness, and goodness of God’s grace in Christ” . Another crucial difference is that Anglicans use an altar for the emblems of the Eucharist, and Presbyterians use a table for the Lord’s Supper. While these two denominations have different perceptions of the Lord’s Supper, they both include the two most paramount elements; the bread and the wine. As it says in 1 Corinthians 11:24-25, “and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after supper
he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.” Thus, these two groups celebrate communion differently. The Anglican church believes in the seven sacraments of the Church, while the Presbyterians believe there are only two sacraments. A sacrament is a religious ceremony or act of the Christian Church that is regarded as an outward and visible sign of inward and spiritual divine grace, in particular. The seven sacraments included in the Anglican Church are baptism, Eucharist, confirmation, marriage, anointing of the sick, reconciliation, and ordination. The Bible talks about the anointing of the sick in James 5:14-15 where it says, “Is anyone among you sick? Let them call the elders of the church to pray over them and anoint them with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the Lord will raise them up. If they have sinned, they will be forgiven.” The Presbyterians believe there are only two sacraments: baptism and The Lord’s Supper. We can see these two sacraments clearly outlined in the New Testament, and displayed by Jesus himself. Both of these sacraments are covenants that Jesus made to the early Church, while he lived on this Earth. The covenant of the Lord’s Supper is clearly shown in 1 Corinthians 11:26, which says, “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.” In the same way, the covenant of baptism signifies new life in Christ and the death of the past life. This is shown in Colossians 2:12, “having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.” Although the sacraments from both denominations are different, they are still relevant interpretations of the Bible. Another imperative difference between Anglicans and Presbyterians is their levels of governing bodies. The Anglican governing body starts with the parish, which is led by a Rector and a Vestry. The parish is guided by the priest, who wears the Anglican vestments. The Vestry is comprised of elected members of the parish. A deanery is a grouping of parishes within a diocese. A diocese is a geographic area under the jurisdiction of a Diocesan Bishop as chief pastor. A diocese is governed by a diocesan synod composed of the bishop and elected members of the clergy and laity chosen by the parishes. Bishops are elected by diocesan synods. An Archdeaconry is a unit within a diocese, larger than a deanery, headed by an Archdeacon. An Ecclesiastical Province is a grouping of dioceses into a common area. In contrast, the Presbyterians are guided by the Presbyterians Polity. The Presbyterian governing body starts with the congregation, which is led by Presbyters, who are elected by congregation members who serve on assemblies. Groups of Regional groups of congregations form a Presbytery. Groups of Presbyteries are governed by a Synod. All of the Synods make up the General Assembly . Although there are many differences between the governing bodies of the two denominations, they both share the belief that the head of the church is the Lord Jesus Christ. As Colossians 1:17-18 says, “He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.” Another difference between the Anglicans and Presbyterians is their contradictory views on the sacrament of baptism. Presbyterians and Anglicans both believe that infants can be baptized; however, Anglicans believe that baptism is necessary for salvation. This view is clearly shown in a verse from the Common Book of Prayer, which says, “Dearly beloved, forasmuch as all men are conceived and born in sin, and that our Saviour Christ saith, None can enter into the kingdom of God, except he be regenerate and born anew of water and the holy Ghost; I beseech you to call upon God the Father, through our Lord Jesus Christ, that of his bounteous mercy he will grant to this child that thing which by nature he cannot have, that he may be baptized with water and the holy Ghost, and received into Christ’s holy Church, and be made a lively member of the same.” Presbyterians see this sacrament differently because they believe that salvation is by faith in Christ alone, and that baptism is not necessary for a sinner to be saved. They hold to the account of the thief on the cross, where Jesus clearly said, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” This story clearly shows that baptism is not necessary for salvation because the thief was never baptized, but was in Heaven that same day. In conclusion, one of the things that set these denominations apart is their interpretations of the Bible. However, all members of different Christian denominations are all part of the universal church. Although Anglicanism and Presbyterianism are exceptionally different from one another, they have the same basic belief, in that Jesus Christ is the centre of their faith and worship. Therefore, although Anglicans and Presbyterians are both Christian denominations that were formed from the Protestant Reformation, they have fundamentally different theological structures, and they disagree on many key aspects of doctrine. As 1 Corinthians 12:3 says, “Some of us are Jews, some are Gentiles, some are slaves, and some are free. But we have all been baptized into one body by one Spirit, and we all share the same Spirit.”
I have always found communion to be an important sacrament to the Christian faith, but sometimes its meaning can be lost in repetitiveness. Sara Miles, in her book Take This Bread, has shed a new light on what it means to take communion as she writes about her transformation into being a Christian by receiving bread and wine. Hunger is the main theme of the book, whether it be spiritually or physically, all humans are linked by that common need. This transformation goes beyond her and pours into the souls and bodies of the San Francisco community, by sharing not only food but the body of Christ. This book has pushed me to get past my comfort zone and heavily consider the way in which food can be an important aspect of my faith and how I share
During the period between 1500 and 1700 different Protestant ideals and religions such as the views of Luther, Henry VIII, and Calvinism reflected varying degrees of closeness between church and state. Luther's views of the state being above the church represented a distance between the church and state that many other Protestant religions at the time did not have. Henry VI and Calvinism on the other hand, intertwined the church and state so that their relationship was much closer. Calvinism went much further than just intertwining church and state though; it became a complete combination: the church working as state.
The Reformed Church also better known as Presbyterian, whose leader was John Calvin. John had many beliefs which had been adopted by the Presbyterian Church. Presbyterians believe in the Trinity as Catholics do but differ with the ideas like original sin, salvation, and penance. Presbyterians believe that original sin is rooted in faithlessness which brought man to fall. The idea of salvation to Presbyterians is that salvation is reached through the grace of God, rooted in the deep faith of a
St Paul of Tarsus is a model for all Christians as he made Christianity accessible to the whole world, and set it on its path to becoming a global religion by writing much of the Christian Theology that still forms the foundations of Christian beliefs, teachings and community that exists today. Paul established the Eucharist as the principle ritual for Christians, and discussed the appropriate manner by which this ritual is to be celebrated. “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 11:26-27) The belief and teachings of the Eucharist allowed and continues to allow adherents to be brought closer to God by enabling them to give thanks, and be brought closer to ...
Calvin begins the argument in the right place. He begins by addressing important issues of true understanding of Christianity. Calvin has already formed the doctrine of providence in chapter 16. In this chapter, he confronts the wrong understandings of providence. In the first premise stated above, it can be seen as a different way to understand why things take place. People view events as a result to fortune instead of accounting them to be controlled by God. It was a great idea for Calvin to bring up this first point because it is one of the major alternatives of the
Attending a non-denominational church we start out with worship and being free to sing and dance and let our spirits take over. This may come out as someone running around the pews, or on their knees, but while in the Catholic Church the environment was much different. It was a lot more structured and formal in a sense than that of the non-denominational church where I practice my faith. Another difference was the offering, or as the Catholic Church calls it, the Gift. I am use to this concept, but rather than taking Gifts at the beginning of the service they take it at the end; then came communion. This is where you take part in eating the bread and drinking the wine in symbolism of Jesus’ body and blood. This I was also familiar with, but was informed by the couple that I went with that they partake in com...
Being catholic since I was born, I know a lot of the history and traditions of the Catholic Church. I took part in a program called Religious Education at my church from 1st grade to 8th grade and performing my First Communion and Confirmation. I am going to tell a little about each religions tradition behind Communion and how it is done. Then I am going to compare and contrast Communion of the Catholic Church and the Methodist Church. The Communion rituals are similar in how it is performed, but there are a few significant differences.
In 1536 a man by the name of John Calvin authored a book titled, “Institutes of the Christian Religion.” In this incredibly detailed theological work, Calvin outlines and defines the doctrines and systematic theology of the Protestant faith. Prior to the release of Calvin’s book, there were little to no reformation movements that were operating on a large scale in the nation of France. But as the impact of Calvin’s work began to grow, there became a growing mass of followers interested in the biblical framework Calvin highlighted. One group, the Huguenots were followers of Calvin and soon began to take steps in starting a Protestant Reformation within the nation of France.
The atonement of Christ on the cross for us is central, and one could even say pivotal to the Gospel as we know it, communion represents the atonement and is something we do to remember our saviour on the cross, there are many theories of the atonement, but we must not get side tracked by theories, but continue to read Scripture for the answers.
In John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion he spends a great deal of time expounding his doctrine of God's Divine providence in all of creation. He explains not only how God continually governs the laws of nature, but also how God governs man's actions and intentions to bring about His own Divine Will. Calvin believes that God's providence is so encompassing in creation that even a man's own actions, in many ways, are decreed by God. Because of this belief there arises the question, "Does Calvin leave room for the free will of man?"
Calvin seems to present predestination not as an impending and sorrowful truth, but rather as a core component of the gospel itself. His belief in predestination is the culmination of the doctrine of sola gratis. Calvin is determined to contend that salvation begins not with faith, as Luther believed, but with election. Calvin refers to election as the “parent of faith” as Paul also declared. Calvin goes much deeper than Paul.
This essay will review the details that caused this well-known theologian, reformer and biblical scholar to leave the Catholic faith and turn to the Christian faith. This essay will also detail that John Calvin helped shape and positively impact the Protestant Reformation because of his significant ideas and guidance that helped reform the church.
John Calvin concludes with his answer when it comes to Divine Truth and defends the truth when it is attacked. Calvin explains that Christians should not allow for “adulteration of one single iota of it.” Calvin clearly understands that God’s is full control over the Devil’s actions and antics. He explains that if the reader understands the concepts of the spirit, the soul, and the point of death when Christ returns, then He has no objections towards those individuals. However, if the read believes that the soul ends up perishing, then John Calvin does oppose to that individual. Calvin continues to explain that people that have defended their position with Biblical verses, used ones that are irrelevant and that he considers these uses of Scripture as false authority. Calvin stands firm that any use of Scripture that is misused or misleading is a false representation of the Scriptures and they need to look into themselves to realise that any false representation of the Scriptures will lead people into a false impression of God and His Word. Calvin desires that all of his audience is to remember that the “Catabaptists […] are the authors of this famous dogma. Well may we suspect anything that proceeds from such a forge - a forge which has already fabricated, and is daily fabricating, so many monsters.”
This emphasis on doing, on acting to transform a sinful world, became one of the chief characteristics of Calvinism. “In emphasizing God 's sovereignty, Calvin 's Institutes lead the reader to believe that no person, king, bishop, or anyone else can demand our ultimate loyalty” (Curtis).
This ideology greatly differs from Luther, Carlstadt, and Zwingli, as their beliefs were that by faith alone salvation could be obtained, where no mention of predestination is referred. However, though Calvin’s predestination theory was widely dissimilar than Luther, Carlstadt, and Zwingli, his view of people not being able gain salvation by deeds done in the temporal world are reaffirmed in his writings are reform doctrine (The European Sourcebook, 165-167). Calvin’s goal was in efforts to control the morals normed by scripture and to condemn anything remotely considered blasphemy or Catholic in their origin. Calvinism has been considered closely related to Puritanism given that Calvin ideology was to repress lewd or indecent human behavior inevitably calling for proper less freeing behavior. Despite Calvin’s strict regulations of social and behavioral norm accepted Calvin appealed to helping people socially that later would equate to a Godly