Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The case of jodi arias
Death penalty law in the usa
Death penalty law in the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The case of jodi arias
Jodi Arias Should Receive the Death Penalty
Jodi Arias should receive the death penalty for violently murdering Travis Alexander. Arias planned on murdering Alexander when she traveled to Arizona. Arias brutally murdered a man who did not want to be in a relationship with her and then Arias lied about it. Alexander’s family and friends would like to see her receive the death penalty. Arias also said she would like the death penalty in an interview. Arias has been manipulative and deceiving through the trial and she made statements that were defamatory to Alexander’s character. She is not remorseful for what she has done.
Arias drove to Arizona from Northern California with the intentions of murdering Alexander. Arias stole her grandfather’s gun with the intentions to shoot Alexander, rented a car, brought extra gas cans along to avoid a paper trail, and she shut off her cell phone to prevent being tracked by cellular towers. She went through all those precautions so she would not be traced to the area and be considered a suspect.
If Arias was in an abusive relationship with Alexander then she should not have driven from Northern California to Arizona. Common sense would say to stay away from an abuser. Someone driving from Northern California to Arizona with a stolen gun has intentions of murdering someone. Arias was the abuser because she would stalk Alexander by showing up to his house unannounced, stalk the women he was dating, and she slashed his tires.
Arias gave an interview with a local reporter and said she would prefer the death penalty over life in prison. Arias has looked at her whole situation as a joke. She should get the death penalty because she originally said she wanted the death penalty. She h...
... middle of paper ...
... not find another man and become obsessed with him and murder if he does not reciprocate the same feelings? Arias purposely took another man’s life and has used this trial to gain fame and notoriety. Arias wants attention and does not care if it is negative. Arias is clearly a terrible, selfish person who does not have any morals. Jodi Arias does not have any remorse for what she has done to Travis Alexander and his family.
Works Cited
Gaynor, Tim. “Jodi Arias Found Guilty of Murder”. South Florida Sun – Sentinel 9 May 2013. A4. ProQuest. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
Skoloff, Brian. “Jodi Arias Pleads For Life in Prison For Murder”. Pittsburgh Post – Gazette 22 May 2013. A16. ProQuest. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
Steiber, Zachary. “Jodi Arias Trial: Experts Say Defense at a Disadvantage with New Jury in Sentencing Phase”. Epoch Times 27 Mar. 2014: n. pag. Web. 29 Mar. 2014
They found Casey Anthony, who was charged with first degree murder of her 3-year-old, not guilty. While she was not guilty of murder, she was convicted on counts four through seven for false information given to the police. The judge sentenced her to one year in county jail for each one of the four counts, but she was released 10 days after she received 1043 days credit. If I was part of the jury I would have said she was guilty of murdering her daughter. Even if she did not kill her, she is still part of the reason why she died. Casey neglected her child either way and did not report the crime to the police until someone else did. I am shocked that the visual evidence did not convince the jury that she was guilty. From the strand of hair in the trunk that matched the past child’s hair, to the extensive research on chloroform found on all web browsers, it was very evident that she did or was at least part of murdering her
Crime & Punishment. 2014. “James Desmond Booth Found Guilty in 2011 FL Slaying of Debra Gibson.” Retrieved April 25, 2014 (http://www.cncpunishment.com/forums/showthread.php?9197-James-Desmond-Booth-Found-Guilty-in-2011-FL-Slaying-of-Debra-Gibson).
The Free Lance-Star (Fredericksburg), "Tony Lee Convicted of Murder." May 25, 1972. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4NpNAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2YoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2403,4982008&dq=tony+lee+convicted&hl=en (accessed April 4, 2012).
Christopher, Liam. “Mother ‘vindicated’ after girl’s murder suspect held.” Daily Post. 18 Aug. 2006: 19. Proquest Newsstand. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Puente, Maria. "Death Expert Takes Up Lizzie Borden Case". USA TODAY. 11 Feb 1992: 02A. USA TODAY.com. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Few trials have been polarized to the extent that the Jodi Arias murder trial has. There are several factors set out in determining the proper punishment in a case like this, but does this trial meet all the criteria? There is a lot of evidence to go over in respect to the Jodi Arias trial and much of it is very compelling, but do people understand the difference between a woman guilty of murder and a woman who is legally eligible for the death penalty. Many people do not recognize the boundaries between legal and personal belief when it comes to murder trials. People tend to have a preconceived notion of the crime committed and their own ideas regarding the death penalty, but not many people take into account the specifics that must be met in order to enforce a law. So the question now remains; did Jodi Arias commit a murder that is eligible for the death penalty? More importantly, should Jodi Arias receive the death penalty based on the criteria? Jodi Arias should receive the death penalty because she has been convicted of murder, and also because the murder fits all criteria set forth by the state of Arizona in regards to being eligible for the death penalty.
On August 20th, 1989 Lyle and Erik Menendez killed their parents inside their Beverly Hills home with fifteen shot gun blasts after years of alleged “sexual, psychological, and corporal abuse” (Berns 25). According to the author of “Murder as Therapy”, “The defense has done a marvelous job of assisting the brothers in playing up their victim roles” (Goldman 1). Because there was so much evidence piled up against the brothers, the defense team was forced to play to the jurors’ emotions if they wanted a chance at an acquittal. Prosecutor Pamela Bozanich was forced to concede that “Jose and Kitty obviously had terrific flaws-most people do in the course of reminding jurors that the case was about murder, not child abuse” (Adler 103). Bozanich “cast the details of abuse as cool, calculated lies” (Smolowe 48)...
Bartlett, Matthew D.. 20 April 1999. Capital Punishment, Justice Served. Justice For. All.19 April 2001.www.prodeathpenalty.com.
Don’t get me wrong, if a person proven guilty of murder, especially as heinous as this crime was, they deserve the death penalty but only if there was “no shadow of a doubt” hard pieces of evidence, more real proof, not circumstantial evidence, are connecting that person to the crime.
When someone is legally convicted of a capital crime, it is possible for their punishment to be execution. The Death Penalty has been a controversial topic for many years. Some believe the act of punishing a criminal by execution is completely inhumane, while others believe it is a necessary practice needed to keep our society safe. In this annotated bibliography, there are six articles that each argue on whether or not the death penalty should be illegalized. Some authors argue that the death penalty should be illegal because it does not act as a deterrent, and it negatively effects the victim’s families. Other scholar’s state that the death penalty should stay legalized because there is an overcrowding in prisons and it saves innocent’s lives. Whether or not the death penalty should be
“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.
Prosecutors found that she murdered him in a jealous rage because he wanted to break up the relationship. Arias was found guilty for the murder and she now has to be in prison for life. She shot alexander and stabbed him thirty times; they found alexander in the shower dead with hid throat cut open. Arias told the judge she wanted the death penalty but the judge refused to listen to her. She said alexander tried to attack her in self-defense but she quickly stabbed him. My personal view on this population is that the inmate serving life in prison shouldn’t have too many special services, especially to those who murder. The offender murdered someone and they should pay for that. Most of the inmates serving life without parole didn’t murder, some robbed, and some sexually assaulted other people. Inmates serving life for robbing should be treated better than the ones who murdered or the one who raped someone. Some facilities treat the prisoners that murdered or raped someone just life the other prisoners, the inmate that committed murder or sexually assaulted should not be treated as if what they did is
Fein, Bruce. "Individual Rights and Responsibility - The Death Penalty, But Sparingly." Speech. American Bar Association. Feb. 2003. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
The judge was a middle-aged male who looked intimidating and seemed to be well respected. To my surprise, we did not have to stand up when he entered the room. After the judge came out I assumed the jury would follow quickly after. However I quickly learned that there would be no jury for this particular trial. After a few minutes, the handcuffed defendant entered the room wearing an orange prison jumpsuit. He was a middle-aged, African-American male who was involved in a narcotic conspiracy case. In addition to the defendant a probation officer, the prosecutor and the defendant’s lawyer were also present. Aside from me, my classmate and a student from Georgetown the defendant’s wife and sister were in the
The heaviest punishment towards convicts is death penalty in law. It means to atone for an offense is dead. Of course, it will not execute for every criminal. Death penalty is only for felons. For example, a people who murdered someone would not get the death penalty. The death penalty is for murders who related to the smuggling of aliens or committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting. Sometimes, however, the felons also can avoid the death because some countries (or actually states) don’t allow death penalty. Then, what decision would the convict get? It is a life sentence, which means the prisoner should be in a prison until he or she dies. However, it is not good idea to keep felons. Death penalty should be allowed and get more active because life sentence is costly, unsafe, and insincere for a victim and the family.