Jim Crow Dbq

1293 Words3 Pages

On January 1st, 1862, Abraham Lincoln created the Emancipation Proclamation, releasing all African Americans from slavery, this lead to the 14th amendment being validated July 8th, 1868. This amendment had addressed citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws. It was proposed in response to the issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War. This amendment and proclamation was also very controversial in the South. The Southerners felt that African Americans had been in their possession for so long (slaves) that this creation of new laws was unfair. They had felt that the creation of the 14th amendment had destroyed their way of life. The feeling of ‘unfairness’ had ultimately created the Black Codes restricting the …show more content…

Around 1828, Thomas "Daddy" Rice developed a routine in which he blacked his face, dressed in old clothes, and sang and danced in imitation of an old and decrepit black man. Rice published the words to the song, "Jump, Jim Crow," in 1830. Beginning in the 1880s, the term "Jim Crow" saw wide usage as a reference to practices, laws or institutions that arise from or sanction, the physical separation of black people from white people. A Montgomery, Alabama, ordinance compelled black residents to take seats apart from whites on municipal buses. At the time, the "separate but equal" standard applied, but the actual separation practiced was hardly equal. Jim Crow laws in various states required the segregation of races in such common areas as restaurants and …show more content…

Ferguson was a combination of rulings passed by the U.S. and state Supreme Courts after Reconstruction. Many of these decisions allowed and even required that Jim Crow segregation laws continued in the Southern states. Plessy v. Ferguson was an 1896 decision by the US Supreme Court that confirmed the principle of "Separate but Equal" and minority segregation. This case began in Louisiana in 1892. Homer Plessy agreed to be arrested to test the 1890 law establishing whites only train cars. Although it was believed that he had been one-eighth black and seven-eighths white, he was still legally required to sit in the "colored" car of the train. The judge at the trial was John Howard Ferguson, a lawyer from Massachusetts who had previously declared the Separate Car Act "unconstitutional” on trains that traveled through several states. After the decision had been made they returned to whites being superiority over blacks and that the 13th Amendment had taken that away from them after the Civil War. Plessy vs. Ferguson was the final step in erasing the policies put in place during Reconstruction. In Plessy's case, however, he decided that the state could choose to regulate railroad companies that operated only within Louisiana. He found Plessy guilty of refusing to leave the white car. Plessy appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which upheld Ferguson's

More about Jim Crow Dbq

Open Document