In the story “Intervention”, Marilyn is stuck in her past and feels regret for the shame she put Sid through. She lets guilt get the best of her which leads to her depression. Marilyn’s mistake leads her to blame herself for everything causing her to lose the sense of control she has. She hides her feelings about her concern of Sid’s drinking and refuses to help him. The story “Intervention” by Jill McCorkle includes the sentence: “She can’t stop what she has put into motion, a rush of betrayal and shame pushing her back to a dark place she has not seen in years.” This sentence is referring to Marilyn’s depression giving her a lack of control. She can easily manage situation but denies the control she has, which is present throughout the whole …show more content…
story. Marilyn lets the guilt and shame from her mistake take away her happiness, when she could easily forgive herself and move on.
Sid forgave her immediately and has not told anyone about her affair. She is the only one holding on to her mistake that is making her life depressing. In the text, it states “She wanted him to hate her right then. She wanted him to make her suffer, make her pay” (McCorkle 1069). Marilyn feels like she needs punishment for what she did, she does not want to let it go like Sid is doing. Sid tells Marilyn she is not that kind of girl “the times when self-loathing overtook her body and reduced her to an anguished heap on the floor” (McCorkle 1069). Marilyn has an understanding, forgiving husband that supports her through everything and she still cannot let her mistake from the past go. If she would just forgive herself and accept what she did to Sid, she could move on from her depression to live a happy …show more content…
life. When Sid’s intervention is put into motion, Marilyn does not want to go through with it because she was an alcoholic before, but still allows it to happen. She could tell the kids to stop what they are doing and she could talk to Sid herself about his drinking, but instead, she does not say anything and never tells Sid his drinking worries her. During the intervention, Sid’s asks “You’re worried, honey? Why haven’t you told me?” (McCorkle 1071). If Marilyn would have told him about the way she felt, he would have been willing to change for her. Marilyn does not speak up for herself, instead she lets the kids take control of the situation. When the kids are putting the intervention together and Sally says Rusty is a professional and that is what he does for a living, Marilyn wants to say “Sid lives for a living, but she lets it all go” (McCorkle 1068). This may be because of her previous alcoholism and how Sid always backed her up and forgave her. Marilyn refuses to help him recover and this is shown when she fixes Sid a drink at the end of the story. When Sid is under the influence, he puts himself in danger and Marilyn does not stop him even though it worries her.
When Sid drives drunk, she could easily take his keys from him. In the text it states, “there were times when she watched Sid pull out of the driveway only to catch herself imagining that this could be the last time she ever saw him” (McCorkle 1062). If Marilyn was really worried it seems like she would step in the situation and take control. She lets her inner guilt prevent her from protecting her husband. Marilyn also does not want Sid to know what he runs over/hits when he drives drunk. In the text it states, “Sometimes the car is parked crooked […] and she goes out to straighten it up so the neighbors won’t think anything is wrong. She had repositioned the mailbox, touched up paint on the car and the garage” (McCorkle 1067). Marilyn covers his “tracks” when he gets home and never mentions it to Sid. Marilyn does not want Sid to get behind the wheel when he is under the influence, yet she does not do anything to prevent it from
happening. Marilyn is in denial of the control she has because of her guilt and shame from her mistake in the past. She develops a depression which gives her a lack of control. When she did not feel comfortable with giving Sid an intervention, she does not do anything to stop it. Also, when Marilyn worries about Sid getting behind the wheel drunk, she does not take his keys from him. She allows him to leave and even covers up his “tracks” when he gets home. Marilyn hides her feelings and blames herself for everything. The only thing stopping her from living a happy life is not forgiving herself.
moreover, it shows us that she is like an animal that is trap in a cage suffering from the burden of not enjoying herself. Thus, lashing out at her husband while disregarding the danger she is putting her family through mentally traumatic events. As well as strains on the fact that she is not acknowledging the effects and extent of her addiction. Thus, shutting everyone out and eating herself apart. Therefore, she avoids discussing her issues with her husband on the movement to the city which might help with resolving her issue or lessen the magnitude of the stress she is going through.
Nevertheless, her attempts are futile as he dismisses her once more, putting his supposed medical opinion above his wife’s feelings. The story takes a shocking turn as she finally discerns what that figure is: a woman. As the story progresses, she believes the sole reason for her recovery is the wallpaper. She tells no one of this because she foresees they may be incredulous, so she again feels the need to repress her thoughts and feelings. On the last night of their stay, she is determined to free the woman trapped behind bars.
For the past few weeks, we have been reading the book Speak, by Laurie Halse Anderson. The book is about a girl named Melinda Sordino, who for the most part refused to speak or interact with others after being raped at a end-of-the-summer party before the start of her freshman year in highschool. Ever since she was raped, she completely changed. However, I think she shows signs of improvement during the second half of the year.
Ann is justified in her decision to "sleeps" with Steven, John’s friend. John has not been paying much attention to Ann and he leaves her alone in their house with Steven. Ann also has prior feelings for Steven from when they where in school together. Ann felt that she is unimportant to John because he frequently leaves her alone; she states, "It isn't right to leave me here alone. Surely I'm as important as your father." Ann just wants to feel loved by John but because he doesn't make her feel loved. She sees Steven as the only person who can give her the love and affection she needs.
On a cold northern morning the body of a man lay still in his bed. His blood did not flow, his heart did not beat, and his chest didn’t fall with breath. His wife sits still downstairs in the gloomy house that she views as a cage. Her stare is blank and her hands move slowly as if she is in some trance that shows absolutely no remorse. Minne Foster is guilty of murdering her husband which becomes apparent through the evidence and details given by Susan Glaspell in “A Jury of Her Peers”. Glaspell gives evidence and shows the realization that both women in the story also know that Mrs. Foster is guilty. Minnie Foster is guilty of murdering her husband, but a defense could be made to protect her.
being free from “repression." She is no more able to staff off the feeling that
In 2011, Donna Hicks wrote her book Dignity: The Essential Role It Plays in Resolving Conflict. Hicks’ Ph.D. in educational psychology and twenty years of experience in international conflict resolution allowed her to write this text about psychological injuries to a person 's sense of self-worth. In her text, Donna Hicks discusses the damaging effects a negative authoritative figure could have, especially on young children and their dignity. Also mentioned is how impressionable children can be and how those impressions can follow them into adulthood. The author’s intended audience appears to be anyone interested in remedying their psychological injuries and improving their sense of self-appreciation. Hicks’ reasoning for composing this text
Though, acceptance of trauma can allow hindered development, eventually allowing full self-acceptance. Bernice, a once strong woman has been verbally, emotionally and physically abused since her childhood. Resulting in a loss of her sense of being. Within the beginning of the novel, when she is reflecting on her past memories, it becomes clear to the reader that in order for her to be able to accept herself, she needs to surface her past traumas. Bernice explains that, “In the tendrils, Bernice realizes there is remorse in her body and she is trying to kick it out. Her shell rejects remorse. Shame. Feeling bad over feeling good” (49). This mindset is negative and expresses her inability to share her emotions due to previous emotional abuse from her family and the many men that have taken advantage of her. This idea of disallowing happiness hinders her ability to accept herself and her past actions. However, through more time of self-reflection (over 200 hundred pages of her lying in bed with the author switching perspectives, confusing the hell out of me lol) Bernice realizes that she must learn to cope with these traumas and attempt to have a positive outlook on life. As Bernice is accepting the damaged part of herself, she comes to the realization that, “She can feel her body now, its loose and stiff at the same time. Her head, though will be the hard part. Part of her lost for so long that it is hard to enunciate what, exactly, she has found” (228). In comparison to when Bernice was unable to acknowledge her feelings and thoughts, it is now clear that she is slowly learning to manage her issues. By Bernice discovering that she is beginning to acknowledge her thoughts, this is the first step to being able to accept one’s self. In Total, It is shown that Bernice is deeply affected by the trauma within her life, however she is able to
To initiate on the theme of control I will proceed to speak about the narrators husband, who has complete control over her. Her husband John has told her time and time again that she is sick; this can be viewed as control for she cannot tell him otherwise for he is a physician and he knows better, as does the narrator’s brother who is also a physician. At the beginning of the story she can be viewed as an obedient child taking orders from a professor, and whatever these male doctors say is true. The narrator goes on to say, “personally, I disagree with their ideas” (557), that goes without saying that she is not very accepting of their diagnosis yet has no option to overturn her “treatment” the bed rest and isolation. Another example of her husband’s control would be the choice in room in which she must stay in. Her opinion is about the room she stays in is of no value. She is forced to stay in a room she feels uneasy about, but John has trapped her in this particular room, where the windows have bars and the bed is bolted to the floor, and of course the dreadful wall paper, “I never worse paper in my life.” (558) she says. Although she wishes to switch rooms and be in one of the downstairs rooms one that, “opened on the piazza and had roses all over the window. ...” (558). However, she knows that, “John would not hear of it.”(558) to change the rooms.
Gina Meyers and Jill McDonough both illustrate a lack of control within the poems “Hold it Down” and “Accident, Mass. Ave.”. “Hold it Down” by Gina Meyers describes a long narrative of the problem, a lack of control, impossibilities and frustration in everyday life, while “Accident, Mass. Ave.” presents a narrative of a problem, a moment of loss of control, aggression and frustration in a single moment that happen on a specific day. Similarly the poems are long and include long enjambed lines disturbed by few short and small lines. Contrasting the poems are ordered and structured very differently.
In the final moments of this story, the woman’s husband returns to see her. She writes, “He stopped short by the door. ‘What is the matter?’ he cried. ‘For God’s sake, what are you doing!’ I kept on creeping just the same, but I looked at him over my shoulder. ‘I’ve got out at last,’ said I, ‘in spite of you and Jane. And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back!’ Now why should that man have fainted, but he did, and right across my path by the wall, so that I had to creep over him every time!’” This final passage shows that, when this woman rebels, and “escapes the wallpaper”, it is not highly looked upon. The woman made a power statement, by telling her husband that she had, in essence, found a new role in life, and he can not push her back. When he can not handle her actions, she continues her new ways right over him.
Her tense mind is then further pushed towards insanity by her husband, John. As one of the few characters in the story, John plays a pivotal role in the regression of the narrator’s mind. Again, the narrator uses the wallpaper to convey her emotions. Just as the shapes in the wallpaper become clearer to the narrator, in her mind, she is having the epiphany that John is in control of her.
She would not have grieved over someone she did not love. Even in the heat of her passion, she thinks about her lost love. She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked safe with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. Her love may not have been the greatest love of all time, but it was still love. Marriage was not kind to Mrs. Mallard, her life was dull and not worth living, her face showed the years of repression.
Mrs. Baker seen in MCCRC on 03/02/2018. She is eating her lunch and doing quite well. She has become much less of a nuisance to other residents, is not at all loud. Does not want into rooms nearly as frequently, it maybe because the ones that are most sensitive to this intrusion have left. She has been on Risperdal 0.25 in the morning, 2:00 p.m. and twice that dose at bedtime as well as a small dose of Depakote as a mood stabilizer. She is on ranitidine for GERD that had been problematic. She is not on an antidepressant that would account for better appetite. She has gained 2 pounds. On the negative side, her hemoglobin remains at 9.9 with an MCV of 104. Her TSH again was 0.05 and a free T4 was 1.6 with her upper limits
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.