Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contrast shown in Romeo and Juliet
Jekyll and hyde character jekyll and hyde comparison assessment
The strange case of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contrast shown in Romeo and Juliet
Duality can be powerful and needs to be controlled. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde the theme of duality is expressed significantly. These astounding works of literature show how everything has two sides. Therefore, duality needs to be accepted by both sides, or else, the evil will take over. Every story has two sides. In the novel Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde duality is represented by the good and evil in Dr. Jekyll. His dual personalities demonstrate how each story is two-sided. Because of Dr. Jekyll’s forbidden impulses, there are multiple factors that can affect his complexion. He does not try to intentionally be evil, but he can not help his need to be Mr. …show more content…
Dr. Jekyll’s two personalities represent the extremely good and truly wicked side of human nature. When those personalities were split it created complete chaos. Dr. Jekyll needed both sides of his personality to fit in with society. When one side is stronger it creates an imbalance and brings up the true evil of his demeanor. He has to create a balance in both sides for him to live respectively. As he holds in his evil side of his personality it grows stronger and brings out a far more menacing persona than he was expecting. He did not understand how powerful his evil side could honestly be. When the evil becomes too strong his good side has lost all the ability to control both sides. Robert Louis Stevenson wrote, “At the sight that met my eyes, my blood was changed into something exquisitely thin and icy. Yes, I had gone to bed Henry Jekyll, I had awakened Edward Hyde” (Stevenson, p.139). This quote illustrates how the evil side took control completely. However, Jekyll could have easily avoided this mistake by maintaining the balance of good and evil in not creating the potion that separated his personalities. Even in the story of Romeo and Juliet good and evil were better together through the possession of love. When Romeo first saw Juliet all he could see was the good in her not the evil from her family’s hatred towards the Montagues. As their love grew stronger love and war intensified. In Romeo and Juliet Tybalt was a pure …show more content…
All things in nature possess good and evil in order to keep balance in the universe. Evil can also bring out the good in people especially when they realize how their anger or hatred causes hurt or pain in one another. In Jekyll and Hyde, his experiment was never meant to cause harm; he just wanted to get rid of the evil in him. Little did he know that he would end up killing people and causing mayhem. He disrupted nature’s balance of good and evil, causing harm to those around him as well as himself. When he possessed both good and evil, he felt like something in his life was missing because he could not always feel the pleasures that he watched others enjoy. Jekyll had an urge to do an experiment on himself to help try to bring balance to his life so he could feel happier. However, when he split his good and evil side, he ended doing the opposite: complete true good and true evil. The good side of him knew that he had made a mistake. The more he tries to split the personalities, the stronger the evil grows. The same type of situation occurs between Romeo and Juliet. The more their families try to keep them apart, the more Romeo and Juliet need to be together. Evil came from the fate of Romeo and Juliet’s love story causing them to make rash decisions. As fate comes into play, the stronger everyone’s anger develops among the families. This evil ends up causing more hurt and pain than ever before, which in turn,
As Jekyll reached adult hood, he found himself living a dual life. He had become more curious in discovering his other side. Jekyll insists, “Man is not truly one, but truly two” (125). This eventually led Jekyll into the scientific interests of separating his good and evil side, and he finds a chemical concoction that transforms him into a more wicked man, Edward Hyde. At first, Hyde was of pure impulse, but in the end, he became dominate and took control over Jekyll. Jekyll had never intended to hurt anyone, but he was aware that something could potentially go wrong. Jekyll presumes, “I knew well that I risked death, for any drug that so potently shook the very fortress of identity… utterly blot that immaterial tabernacle which I looked to it to change” (127-129). One could say this makes Jekyll equally as menacing as Hyde. Jekyll couldn’t control the imbalance between the two natures. Jekyll foolishly allowed his evil side to flourish and become stronger. This is shown when Jekyll has awoken to find that he has turned into Hyde without taking the solution. Jekyll says, “But the hand in which I now saw, clearly enough in the yellow light of a mid- London morning…It was the hand of Edward Hyde” (139).
Good and evil exist in everyone and any attempts to repress your darker nature can cause it to erupt. Dr. Jekyll was more evil than he wanted to admit to himself or any one before he even separated his soul. Born into a world of privilege and wanting to keep the impression of goodness and morality, Dr. Jekyll really just wanted to indulge in his darkest desires, choosing to hide behind his serum like a coward. However this became his fatal flaw and at the end of the day he could longer hide his true self.
...ve duality of man;… if I could rightly be said to be either, it was only because I was radically both” Thus, Stevenson creates in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, two coexistent, and eternally opposed components that make up a “normal” individual. However, here, good and evil are not related but are two independent entities, individuals even, different in mental and physical attributes and constantly at war with each other. Evil now does not require the existence of good to justify itself but it exists simply as itself, and is depicted as being the more powerful, the more enjoyable of the two, and in the end ultimately it is the one that leads to Dr. Jekyll's downfall and death. Stevenson creates the perfect metaphor for the never-ending battle between good and evil by using Jekyll and Hyde. However, this novella is perhaps one of the few that truly show the power of Evil.
Here then, as I lay down the pen and proceed to seal up my confession, I bring the life of that unhappy Henry Jekyll to an end.”(Jekyll and Hyde chap 10, last paragraph). This quote shows how Jekyll was willing to give up his life, which at that time was profoundly frowned upon, to let Hyde live; even though he knew Hyde wouldn’t last long at all. This human corruption and good vs evil theme also shows up in William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet. “Within the infant rind of this small flower/ Poison hath residence and medicine power/ In man as well as herbs, grace and rude will;/ And where the worser is predominant, /Full soon the canker death eats up that plant”(II iii 23-30). Friar Lawrence makes the connection in this quote with plants; that there are good and evil parts, and that if evil has more power than the good: the plant will die. As Shakespeare said that the evil will overpower the good, Stevenson does the same with the personalities of Jekyll and Hyde. Jekyll started out stronger than Hyde, but the longer he stayed Hyde, the more he enjoyed what he was doing as Hyde; this shows how humans will indulge in sins even if it meant eternal damnation. Another novel from around the same time as Jekyll and Hyde that shows the duality of man in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. At a glance
Jekyll plays man as a whole, good and bad, he was “wild” and also “smooth-faced” at the same time. Both characters lack vital emotional outputs that make humans socially, even though the psychopath is more cunning than the sociopath. “…lack of conscience, remorse or guilt for hurtful actions to others….There may be an intellectual understanding of appropriate social behavior but no emotional response to the actions of others” (“Psychopath vs. Sociopath” -- http://www.diffen.com/difference/Psychopath_vs_Sociopath). Both are social defaces, and cannot be helped; however to the naked eye, these two characters are savage. Both victims of anti-social disorder are lacking factors that make humans acceptably sociable, one lacking empathy while the other lacks sensibility. Diffen, a website, tells us, “Psychopaths…lack of empathy; no conscience…sociopaths…high impulsivity” (“Sociopathy versus Psychopathy” -- http://www.diffen.com/difference/Sociopathy_versus_Psychopathy). Dr. Jekyll shows no empathy by using and manipulating people close to him, and Mr. Hyde, as intended, has no sensibility to act with caution resulting himself in trouble for barbaric actions. This, in turn shows the comparison and contrast of the psychopathic creator and his sociopathic creation which in reality are two halves to a whole.
Jekyll says, “With every day, and from both sides of my intelligence, the moral and the intellectual, I thus drew steadily nearer to that truth, by whose partial discovery I have been doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck: that man is not truly one, but truly two” (Stevenson 83). Jekyll believes he will get pleasure from both alters without any backlash; however, Hyde soon becomes more powerful than his ‘good’ alter and ultimately leads Dr. Jekyll to his doom (Singh). Stevenson creates in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, to coexistent to make up a “normal” individual (Singh). Seeing things as Jekyll did, “Humans are half-good, half-evil” Stevenson separated the two, making one pure good (Jekyll) and one pure evil, as Jekyll says, “Edward Hyde, alone in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil” (Stevenson 88). After all, good and evil are independent objects, people; they possess distinctive psychological characteristics and consistently fight with each
The story takes place during the Victorian age, a time when there were only two categories of people: good people and bad people. There was no way that one man could be considered acceptable without suppressing his evil side almost entirely. The reason that Jekyll restrained his evil side for so long was because of this dichotomous Victorian society. Most people, including Jekyll’s friends, Lanyon and Utterson, are content to stay molded in this ideal. However, Dr. Jekyll soon became tired of this hypocritical mindset and states that he “it was rather the exacting nature of my aspirations…. that made me who I was and…. severed in me those provinces of good and ill which divide and compound man’s dual nature” (123). He had determined that he would find a way to indulge his more human nature while still yet living in acceptance among his colleagues. Dr. Jekyll soon did discover a method, but it inevitably came with a curse. Stevenson uses this to display that people generally tend to go with the societal flow and conform to other people’s ideas so that they will fit in.
In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, by Robert Louis Stevenson, the dual nature of man is a main theme. Jekyll says: "Man is not /truly one, but truly two"(125), meaning all people have both a good and a bad side. Dr. Jekyll creates a potion to fully separate good and evil, but instead it awakens a dormant character, Mr. Hyde. Throughout the novel, Stevenson uses society, control, and symbolism to tell the reader about human nature.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is good versus evil as well as our bad side triumphing over your good side. Even if some critics may think that your bad side almost always triumphs because of movies or any other place that has happened, the yin and yang symbol is of perfect balance, and someone cannot possibly have a double-sided appearance where the two sides are opposite. It is clear to see that in Robert Louis Stevenson’s writing, a person can have two opposite personalities, the yin and yang symbol is not evenly balanced, and your bad side can triumph your good side. As Robert states, “All human beings are commingled out of good and evil” Hopefully those critics may now understand not to believe what they see or may hear about when dealing with good versus evil and evil triumphing over
In his creation of Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll tries to separate the sides of his nature privately in order to satisfy his darker side without affecting his public reputation of his better half. Robert Stevenson portrays the two contradictory sides all human have within themselves, and when each side truly comes outs. He does this by interpreting the actions of his main character, Dr. Jekyll.
Dr. Jekyll is a symbol of both the good and the bad in mankind, while Mr. Hyde represents pure evil. For instance, when Dr. Jekyll is himself, he is seen as a respectable man who is adored by his colleagues: “he became once more their familiar quest and entertainer; and whilst he had always been known for his charities, he was now no less distinguished for religion” (Stevenson 29). However, when Dr. Jekyll transforms to Mr. Hyde his morals are quickly disregarded. An example of this occurs when Mr. Hyde murders Sir Danvers, shortly after Dr. Jekyll submits to the temptation of changing to Mr. Hyde: “instantly the spirit of hell awoke in me…with a transport of glee, I mauled the unresisting body, tasting delight from every blow” (Stevenson 56). Even though the carnal side of Dr. Jekyll enjoys the incident, this event also illustrates the conscience side of Dr. Jekyll because in the mist of this brutal murder, he begins to feel guilty for committing the crime.
Hyde to support the universal theory that all humans have a natural duality, and there is good and evil in everything. In the critical essay, Robert Louis Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde and the Double Brain Anne Stiles further criticizes characteristics of the novella when she presents, “Like these scientists, Stevenson explores the potentially heretical possibility that human beings are inherently double, even in a healthy state.According to Jekyll’s narration, both he and Hyde existed before the discovery of the salt that enables them to lead separate lives” (Stiles 4). Jekyll is aware of his desire for the wicked and has been searching for a way to separate the good from the evil. Like drugs ease the pain of addicts, the salt that Jekyll adds to the potion eases the stress of the duality in his own mind. He abuses his body in order to escape the chains of his own mind and not feel the guilt of wanting to be malicious. Whether healthy or mentally ill, Jekyll is a pronoun example of the inherent duality in human minds. Additionally, Stevenson incorporates an extension of duality that is good v evil. In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Thomason discloses, “Stevenson argues that the novel is ‘a symbolic portrayal of the dual nature of man, with the moral inverted: not to impress us by the victory of good or evil, but to warn us of the strength and ultimate triumph of evil over good once sin is suffered to enter human habitation’” (Thomason 9). It is evident that Dr. Jekyll is a prestige example that humans do not know their own strength mentally, nor do they know their own strength physically. In Jekyll’s upright attempt to separate the good from the evil, evil prevailed over good. Evil, Edward Hyde, had the highest victory over good, Henry Jekyll, in being fatal to both
In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll has a desire for splitting his personalities and taking pleasure in two different lives. A sinister, malicious, abnormal, small man would control one life while; an honorable, wise doctor would control the other life. Dr. Jekyll produces a potion, which allows
Robert Louis Stevenson’s novel, the Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, is a Victorian novel that explores the psychological implications of the nature of duality. This novel explores the idea of doubleness, duality with the separation of moral obligation and human nature in Dr. Jeykll and Mr. Hyde. Stevenson uses the character Mr. Utterson to narrate the novel and give a logic perspective to Dr. Jeykll and Mr. Hyde’s duality, however Utterson has his own duality that echoes Dr. Jeykll’s. In the novel, Mr. Utterson has a dream that Stevenson uses to explore Utterson’s duality in terms of light and dark symbolism, a separation of his logical mental state, a physical separation between his actions
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a little different then Frankenstein in a way that the monster isn’t identified as a monster as much for his appearance as he is for his actions. Dr. Jekyll was a scientist and as a scientist he had to keep and good name but he didn’t want to be good he want to be bad. So, he decided he would have two personalities. Thinking that if he had two personalities he could be good and evil. He made a potion that transforms himself into a man without a conscience. So, He could do all those bad things that he wanted to do but then had a way to cover it up by saying it was someone else. But, eventually this plan got out of hand yes, he had two personalities of Dr. Jekyll being the good doctor and then Mr. Hyde being the murder, but he started no being able to control when he was Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde. He fears that he will turn into Jekyll permanently. Society doesn’t except this because your not supposed to be two different people. Trying to be two different people is monstrous because that just doesn’t happen and him to think that is okay is monstrous. Also, for him to murder people makes him a monster. By Dr. Jekyll’s friend starting to get suspicious about this situation drive Dr. Jekyll to worry then, he turns back to Mr. Hyde and thinks it’s a good idea to kill himself. So, society drove his monstrosity to kill himself, which made him to continue to be a