Jean Toomer's Blood-Burning Moon

1004 Words3 Pages

Published in 1923 as part of “Cane”, Jean Toomer’s “Blood-Burning Moon” provides a Harlem Renaissance adaptation of the Gothic that depicts a nightmarish South still fraught with the ghosts of antebellum racial and economic principles. Toomer adapts an Anglo-American Gothic narrative in order to intensify and dramatize the more ostensible themes of racial violence and miscegenation in “Cane”. “Blood-Burning Moon” depicts a love triangle, ominous blood-red moon, and violent lynching that are truly uncanny: familiar Gothic conventions appearing unexpectedly in an avant-garde Modernist text.
Given this predictable determinism, the Gothic form of “Blood-Burning Moon” makes for an awkward if not improbable fit with the political and aesthetic avant-gardism …show more content…

As a plantation Gothic, “Blood-Burning Moon” transplants the evil count, the maiden, and the ineffectual suitor of a feudal Gothic into the American South. Louisa, a black housekeeper and servant, shares her love and sexual affections with both Bob Stone, the son of her white employers, and Tom Burwell, a black field hand on the Stones’ sugarcane farm. Stone and Burwell’s inevitable discovery of the other’s relationship with Louisa culminates in a violent showdown in which Burwell slashes Stone’s throat only to be captured by an ensuing lynch mob and burned at the stake. Even though the Gothic form and American Southern history anticipate this ending, ‘Blood-Burning Moon’ remains a Modernist experiment that attempts to break open the overdetermined politics of identity. This unstable union of the Gothic and Modernism bears traces of Toomer’s personal pursuit of a new identity and race that transcends the dilemmas of difference. Initially, the story allegorizes this quest through the female Gothic heroine. “Blood-Burning Moon” thematically extends these female perspectives on sexuality and identity, racial mixing, and Southern economic frustration by opening with a female Gothic narrative. But instead of giving Louisa the enduring introspection consistent with the preceding prose, …show more content…

Telltale signs of uncertainty subvert Louisa’s optimism: “As she sang softly at the evil face of the full moon. A strange stir was in her” (28). The moon simultaneously pathologizes and externalizes Louisa’s conflict, stripping her of any heroic agency. Under the moon’s gaze, she relinquishes her Modernist willingness to cope with complexity for the passive hope that Burwell’s marriage proposal will be delayed and major disorder avoided. Though she guards herself against the moon with song, she ultimately possesses no power to alter the story’s outcome. Stone and Burwell’s narrative sections quickly overrun Louisa’s female Gothic narrative. Her power to internalize the lovers’ problem proves inadequate. She is reduced to an object of desire and becomes the psychical, physical and narrative link between Stone and Burwell. The narrative of homosocial desire, which silences Louisa’s voice, ultimately disables the possibility of achieving the reconstructed female Gothic consciousness that was expected. But even supplanted, Louisa’s ability to imagine and possibly embody a reconciliation of multiracial desire evokes the progressive reconfiguration of race that Toomer imagined for himself. Toomer boldly confesses his desire for such political and philosophical reconciliation. As Louisa shows, this new racial possibility can only be fantasized about by using the familiar

Open Document