Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rousseau's influence
Influence of rousseau
Frankenstein's view on creation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rousseau's influence
Manufactured Monster®
Who or what decides what makes one person better than another? Why should anyone or anything decide in the first place? The only thing that differentiates people is society. Whether it’s sports, school, or even getting hired for a job, someone is always the best. The most athletic, the smartest, the most qualified. Society puts these classifications on people. Things were not always this way though. Before humans were so “advanced” and before any society, there was a time when nothing mattered except self preservation. But things have changed; things always change and evolve. Throughout humanity society was developed into what it is today. Jean-Jacques Rousseau describes these steps in detail. He describes how society came about and how it has created evil. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, shows the evolution of human society through the Creature according to Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s beliefs.
Mary Shelley learned about Rousseau before she wrote the book Frankenstein, which influenced her writing throughout the book.. Throughout the her book, Shelley makes many subtle connections to Rousseau. One of the obvious references is that, “Jean Jacques Rousseau was born in Geneva in the year 1712” (Beacon), the same city Frankenstein takes place. Shelley is making a direct gesture to Rousseau through Geneva. Since Mary Shelley lived after Rousseau, many of his ideas would have already been know by society because, “the success and popularity of Rousseau was seen to coincide with a rise in similar tastes in much of Europe” (Sherwin). Shelley grew up and was educated in a time when Rousseau’s ideas were known, and this influenced her writing in Frankenstein.
The Creature, in Frankenstein,started off as a noble savage, fr...
... middle of paper ...
...m and become the best. After all of the evil acts of violence and twisted thoughts, the Creature becomes the monster he was never meant to be.
Work Cited
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive, Foundation. "Jean Jacques Rousseau: 1712-1778. Socialism And Education." Beacon Lights Of History, Vol. 13 (2006): 9-21. History Reference Center. Web. 29 May 2014.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Maurice Cranston. A Discourse on Inequality. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin, 1984. Print.
Sherwin, Paul. "Frankenstein: Creation as Catastrophe." PMLA 96.5 (October 1981): 883–903. Quoted as "Frankenstein: Creation as Catastrophe" in Bloom, Harold, ed. The Sublime, Bloom's Literary Themes. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2010. Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 29 May 2014
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. N.p.: Bantam Dell, 1818. Web. 30 May 2014.
The creature was also misguided, his treatment from others led to him becoming a monster but he realized this and did the right thing in the end, showing that he was just misunderstood.
According to Rousseau, the greatest good that humanity could achieve is to become a self-sufficient, self-reliant, and independent human being. Humans were able to become self-reliant by being raised according to nature. Rousseau writes that "all we lack at birth, . . . is the gift of education."1 This education is to help humans achieve happiness. According to Rousseau, we gain this education from nature. Rousseau writes that a person's "first feeling is one of pain and suffering."2 Pain is an essential part to the development of a child; in fact it is the most important and useful lesson. It helps a child gain strength and experience. Rousseau holds that a child should run and "fall again and again, the oftener the better."3 The more the child falls the more accustom it will become to pain. When the child grows older, it will be more equipped to deal with hardships because it has already learned at...
in Frankenstein: Contexts, nineteenth century responses, criticism. By Mary Shelley. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. Norton Critical Edition.
Mary Shelley created here most popular novel when she was eighteen years old and finished it when she was only nineteen year old. It was published on January 1st, 1818. Mary Shelley had a very interesting life and many things influenced her writing including that of “Frankenstein.” Throughout this paper I’m going to discuss her life and her influences as well as the book “Frankenstein.”
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W.
Works Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
The former, a product of the human empathy and responsible for the preference of seeing no harm come to other living creatures so long at the latter is maintained. Together these maxims form the basis of the savage man’s natural state and, by extension, his tenancy of gentleness towards his fellow man (121). The civilised man, in contrast, comes to be as a result of “perfectibility”. Perfectibility, according to Rousseau is an innate human attribute to want to learn and better oneself, particularly to overcome obstacles in one’s environment. Rousseau’s description of perfectibility implies that the conditions of one’s environment have a direct influence over their character and that one can therefore deduce that regardless of man’s natural gentleness, he can develop the capacity to be cruel if so prompted by elements in his environment. Such a prompt comes as man looks to collaborate with others out of mutual self-interest. Rousseau notes that, “their connections become more intimate and extensive … there arose on one side vanity and contempt, on the other envy and shame … Men no sooner began to set a value upon each other, and know what esteem was, than each laid claim to it … It
Rousseau, Jean, and Donald A. Cress. "Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men." Basic political writings. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co., 2011. 27-92. Print.
Mary Shelley, with her brilliant tale of mankind's obsession with two opposing forces: creation and science, continues to draw readers with Frankenstein's many meanings and effect on society. Frankenstein has had a major influence across literature and pop culture and was one of the major contributors to a completely new genre of horror. Frankenstein is most famous for being arguably considered the first fully-realized science fiction novel. In Frankenstein, some of the main concepts behind the literary movement of Romanticism can be found. Mary Shelley was a colleague of many Romantic poets such as her husband Percy Shelley, and their friends William Wordsworth and Samuel Coleridge, even though the themes within Frankenstein are darker than their brighter subjects and poems. Still, she was very influenced by Romantics and the Romantic Period, and readers can find many examples of Romanticism in this book. Some people actually argue that Frankenstein “initiates a rethinking of romantic rhetoric”1, or is a more cultured novel than the writings of other Romantics. Shelley questions and interacts with the classic Romantic tropes, causing this rethink of a novel that goes deeper into societal history than it appears. For example, the introduction of Gothic ideas to Frankenstein challenges the typical stereotyped assumptions of Romanticism, giving new meaning and context to the novel. Mary Shelley challenges Romanticism by highlighting certain aspects of the movement while questioning and interacting with the Romantic movement through her writing.
Burns, Alisa. “Frankenstein of the Future.” Frankenstein Commentary. N.p., Sept. 2002. Web. 24 Apr. 2011. .
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
In Rousseau’s book “A Discourse On Inequality”, he looks into the question of where the general inequality amongst men came from. Inequality exists economically, structurally, amongst different generations, genders, races, and in almost all other areas of society. However, Rousseau considers that there are really two categories of inequality. The first is called Natural/Physical, it occurs as an affect of nature. It includes inequalities of age,, health, bodily strength, and the qualities of the mind and soul. The second may be called Moral/Political inequality, this basically occurs through the consent of men. This consists of the privileges one group may have over another, such as the rich over the poor.
While the writings of Karl Marx and Jean-Jacque Rousseau occasionally seem at odds with one another both philosophers needs to be read as an extension of each other to completely understand what human freedom is. The fundamental difference between the two philosophers lies within the way which they determine why humans are not free creatures in modern society but once were. Rousseau draws on the genealogical as well as the societal aspects of human nature that, in its development, has stripped humankind of its intrinsic freedom. Conversely, Marx posits that humankind is doomed to subjugation in modern society due to economic factors (i.e. capitalism) that, in turn, affect human beings in a multitude of other ways that, ultimately, negates freedom. How each philosopher interprets this manifestation of servitude in civil society reveals the intrinsic problems of liberty in civil society. Marx and Rousseau come to a similar conclusion on what is to be done to undo the fetters that society has brought upon humankind but their methods differ when deciding how the shackles should be broken. To understand how these two men’s views vary and fit together it must first be established what they mean by “freedom”.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “The Social Contract”. Modern Political Thought, Second Edition. Ed. David Wootton. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2008. 427-487.