Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of western imperialism on india
The impact of western imperialism on india
Western culture impact on progress of india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of western imperialism on india
Glimpses of World History by Jawaharlal Nehru is a collection of journal entries Jawaharlal wrote for his daughter while he was in prison. Through these journal entries, Jawaharlal tried his best to explain world history, through his perspective of course, during 1930s while he was in jail and the history of the past centuries. I believe he did an excellent job in summarizing to the best of his ability so much history into a language that was easy to understand especially for his young daughter to one day read. So much history for one person to know can be unbelievable, some might have to question is it possible that everything in the book is accurate or could he have messed a couple of facts up? I must add how impressive it is that Nehru …show more content…
He did jump from event to event when they were to be compared or if he was clarifying why something was the way it was. Most of the letters did go back to European history, he did talk mainly on events that had impacted Europe in any particular way. In his journal entry titled “The Lesson of History,” Nehru states “a study of history should teach us how the world has slowly but surely progressed, how the first simple animals gave place to more complicated and advanced animals, how last of all came the master animal—Man, and how by force of his intellect he triumphed over the others. Man's growth from barbarism to civilization is supposed to be the theme of history. In some of my letters I have tried to show you how the idea of co-operation or working together has grown, and how our ideal should be to work together for the common …show more content…
To me history is simply things that has happened in the past which we learn from and try to use in order to better our situations. That is pretty much what he meant as well. Its showing us how the world is changing and how we are advancing as a whole and as individuals. I believe there’s no denying the fact that history has gotten us to where we are today despite there be certain instances where it may seem as if we haven’t learned anything. Nehru said that our ideal should be to work together for a common good, which might just mean more advances. The reason why there has been so much progression in the world is because of the new ideas that’s been spreading throughout influencing everyone to update their ways and hopefully be better than they were
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
In a comprehensive summary and analyzation of the history of mankind’s record of affairs, Mark T. Gilderhus tackles the many aspects of the overall biography of human existence. Through scrutiny of the goals of past and present historians, a brief explanation of the origins of historiography, a thorough exploration of the philosophies behind history, and a review of the modern approach to past events, Gilderhus sums up the entirety of historical thought in one hundred and twenty-five pages. His superior knowledge is exemplified through his work which effectively conveys the full extent of historiography.
Tignor, R., Adelman, J., Brown, P., Elman, B. A., Liu, X., Pittman, H., & Shaw, B. D. (2011). Worlds together, worlds apart A history of the world: V. 1 (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: WW Norton &.
To begin with, Mahatma Gandhi was a man who stood up for the less fortunate people in the world. In passage one, it states that “ Mahatma Gandhi didn’t have to walk endless miles and go without eating for days.” The text is stating that , He didn’t have to abandon his daily life to declare to the world. He chose to stand up for the populations and tell them what was right. It also states that, he grew up in a rich and wealthy family. This
Flory, Harriette, and Samuel Jenike. A World History: The Modern World. Volume 2. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1992. 42.
Dalton, Dennis. “Mahatma Gandhi Selected Political Writings.” Indianapolis, Indiana. 1996. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 125. Text
He argues that world history should not be viewed as separate, unconnected cultures of east and west, but rather that they were all connected in multitudes of ways and must be studied as such. Pointing out the inadequate ideal of separating the world into two sections which are not equal in geography, culture, population, or history itself, he instead poses a solution to the world history viewpoint: Studying the world through its interrelations between cultures and geographical locations. Hodgson’s proposed view of large scale history not only makes sense theoretically, but logically as it proves through the pages that the history or the world cannot simply be divided, but must be studied as a whole to be truly
Many of Gandhi’s critics accuse him for being a hypocrite. Gandhi is known for being an active user of the railroad but also its biggest critic. Others would argue that Gandhi is a hypocrite for criticizing the West when he himself received education and drew inspiration from influences in the West. These critics misunderstand that what Gandhi is truly critiquing is modernity. Gandhi was not criticizing the West per se, he was criticizing how the West traditionalized modernity. The characteristics of modernity he disapproved of is its secular scientific worldview, technocracy, and over-organization. But, the overarching message he wanted to convey is how modernity goes hand in hand with rationality which results in the dehumanization of society.
Kumar, Ravindra. Mahatma Gandhi at the Close of Twentieth Century. New Delhi: Anmol Publications, 2004. Print.
The intent of Gandhi in Gandhi's inten was to remove the India he loved from trusting in the greatness and infallibility of Western Civilization and to encourage her to take pride in India’s own identity as a civilization and culture. His enthusiasm slightly exaggerates the grandeur of India and accounts for some margin of error in his esteem for his homeland, but Gandhi’s overall message is sound and wise; India must be proud of her heritage and mindful of sacrifice, for by these means, true freedom and true swaraj will be reached.
Gandhi was a great man in a lot of ways he was born on October 2, 1869 in Western India. At the age of thirteen he married Kasturbi who was also thirteen before his father died. When he did his mother sent him to law school in England this was in 1888. While he was there he fell in love so to speak with the nonviolent ways of the Hindu scriptures of the Bhagavad-Gita, and in the bible tellings of Jesus.
Homo Sapiens, or what we know today as modern man.. The topic of this paper is
“The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims. His full name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, but he was given the name Mahatma later on in his life. He wanted to see an united India without the rule of the British Empire. He accomplished this with passive resistance or resistance by non violence because he wanted to show that violence is not always the best answer.
... his impact on scholars and educators, he was fit to utilize the school as a base from which he could take a real part in India's social, political, and social developments.
The term Homo sapiens (‘wise man’) that had been coined by Carolus Linnaeus was made to highlight the superiority of men in all the Kingdom Animalia, specifying the high level of intelligence and intellect of the entire species. However, an advanced and complex structure of a group of humans that flourish and exhibit a large extension of progress is called a civilization (Bartlett, 2012).