More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of social identity theory
The consequences of social identity theory
The consequences of social identity theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of social identity theory
The strategy used by third grade teacher Jane Eliott to teach children about discrimination and racism was a great idea. Besides who would be able explain to third graders why Dr. king was assassinated. The children were divided into two groups which consisted of brown eyes and blue eyes. The blue-eyed individuals were instantly happy when they were told they would have playtime first with extra recess time. The brown-eyed people were not allowed to drink from the water fountain nor play with the blue-eyed people on the playground. During recess the brown eyed people expressed how they felt not being able to play with the blue-eyed friends. One child stated that it felt as if his friend was being taken away. A fight was ensued due to the name calling (brown-eyed), one of the children referred being called brown …show more content…
It was out of extinct that they joined because they were not allowed to really have contact with the other group. In addition, the fact that Jane was part of their environment as a superior, also influenced the students. At times, she would say things that made one group feel more superior or inferior like commenting how fast the superior group were at their test. Having an authoritative figure made the superior group feel more superior than they were already. I believe that the children of the second group started to boast and discriminate the inferior group because of the social identity theory. The theory states that people favor ingroups over outgroups in order to enhance their self-esteem. Thus, the children of the second superior group started to belittle the other group in order to enhance their self-esteem, which was previously hurt being in the inferior group. When people are rejected or discriminated against by a group of people or faced with social rejection (“superior” or not), are more likely to respond
The case started with a third-grader named Linda Brown. She was a black girl who lived just seen blocks away from an elementary school for white children. Despite living so close to that particular school, Linda had to walk more than a mile, and through a dangerous railroad switchyard, to get to the black elementary school in which she was enrolled. Oliver Brown, Linda's father tried to get Linda switched to the white school, but the principal of that school refuse to enroll her. After being told that his daughter could not attend the school that was closer to their home and that would be safer for Linda to get to and from, Mr. Brown went to the NAACP for help, and as it turned out, the NAACP had been looking for a case with strong enough merits that it could challenge the issue of segregation in pubic schools. The NAACP found other parents to join the suit and it then filed an injunction seeking to end segregation in the public schools in Kansas (Knappman, 1994, pg 466).
This made the author dislike and have hatred towards the parents of his fellow classmates for instilling the white supremacy attitude and mind-set that they had. It wasn’t possible they felt this way on their own because honestly growing up children don’t see color they just see other kids to play with. So this must have meant that the parents were teaching their children that they were better and above others because there skin was
Blue eyed people are better than brown eyed people. Because of this, the brown eyed people will not talk to blue eyed people on the playground. Brown eyed people do not receive the five extra minutes of recess along with no right to use the drinking fountain. The brown eyed children are given a collar to wear to differentiate them. One of the brown eyed students explained her day by stating, “…you felt like you didn’t even want to try to do anything.” The second day, the students switched roles. First, Mrs. Elliott noticed that one of the blue eyed students did not wear his glasses. He was showing off his eye color. Once the blue eyed students put the collar on, everything changed. The teacher watched as the brown eyed students shaved three minutes off of their time for the flashcard activity. When asked why this happened, one of the students mentioned, “We just kept thinking about those collars.” Without the collars, they felt smarter. The blue eyed students also did a noticeably worse job on the second day. Mrs. Elliot quoted, “I watched wonderful, thoughtful children turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating little third graders.” Before the simulation began, Mrs. Elliot asked a few questions determining the importance of Black people
"My Children are black. They don't look like your children. They know that they are black, and we want it recognized. It's a positive difference, an interesting difference, and a comfortable natural difference. At least it could be so, if you teachers learned to value difference more. What you value, you talk about.'" p.12
E. D. Hirsch and Lisa Delpit are both theorist on teaching diverse students. Both of these theorist believe that when teaching diverse students, teachers need to see their students for who they are. Seeing your students for who they are, means you look past the color of your students’ skin and recognize their culture. According to Stubbs, when teachers look at their students equally, no matter the color of their skin, then the teacher is considered colorblind (2002). Being colorblind is not a great thing because we should not treat all of our students the same, since each student is different. It is important to see our students for who they are because our classes are unique. Instead, our classes represent a rainbow underclass. According to Li, the rainbow underclass is the representation of families who are culturally diverse and economically disadvantaged (2008). In order to meet these student’s needs, teachers need to think about the struggles that each student face.
After watching the documentary, “A Class Divided,” I was very impressed by the lesson that the teacher was performing with her students. Discrimination is an issue that has been around for a long time dating back to slavery and probably before that. Over time, society has become more welcoming but discrimination still exists today and may never completely go away. By doing this exercise with her students, the teacher is changing the world. If a group of ten people went through this exercise, then they learn that everyone is the same and they stop discriminating based on race. Those ten people later go on and tell their children, friends, and family about this exercise and they may also have a change of heart. That number now changes from ten to twenty to thirty. In the documentary, the teacher mentioned that this exercise is hurtful to some people and should not be performed on everyone because of controversial issues and how it can be emotionally traumatizing for some people. A small group still does so much for a society to change and evolve. The brown eye, blue eye method has a large impact and I wish more people knew of it
While raining, your child walks six blocks to the bus stop with no shelter. When the bus finally arrives, it is in need of thirty minutes to get to school. Eventhough, there is a school a couple blocks down from their house, it is not even a thought in the eyes of the law due to the mere color of their skin. This is not just the story of Oliver Brown and his family, but many other families experiencing discrimination throughout the world. Brown was ready for a change, so he and the NAACP gathered evidence to take on the courts. Through the process of many getting denied the acceptance of their children in school, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People gathered evidence for a lawsuit against the courts. Oliver Brown and many others were tired of the saying seperate but equal and the inferiority they were given through out their lives. Instead of just accepting the opinions of others and sitting around wanting a change, they stood for what they believed in, becoming the turning point in America. Judith Conaway was the author of the book Brown vs. Board of Education. In this book, Conaway describes in detail, the discrimination and experiences our ancestors had to go through. Through the triumphs they experienced, laws changed where segregation was abolished and everyone is equal. She says that the "supreme court had ruled that racial segregation in public schools denied African Americans equal protection under the law." She also said that the courts agreed that seperate schools harmed black children both academically and psychologically. For example, African American children would choose white dolls over black dolls because the black dolls were considered ugly with their heads down. This decision of the c...
“In 1950, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People asked a group of African-American parents that included Oliver Brown to attempt to enroll their children in all-white schools, with the expectation that they would be turned away”(NAACP). Since Oliver Brown’s daughter was turned away from the all-white school four blocks from her home she had to walk a fairly far distance to catch the bus to her all black school. “Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school”(Missouri 1929). This was no fair to her because she is being forced to go out of her way when there is a school just down the street she could go to, but she can’t because of her skin tone. This is what the start for the education system changing forever was known as Brown vs. Broad of education.
Conflict on the local level, in the Kern High School District, has arisen in the past year dealing with The Bluest Eye's explicit content. Sue Porter, mother of an East Bakersfield High School Student objected to having her 11th grade daughter read the book in her honors English class. She believed the book was "pornographic" and inappropriate for children. She pushed to have the book banned from the California Department of Education's list of recommended reading. This started a ripple effect in the community.
The exercise showed how a child that never had any racism towards them in the exercise they turned against their friends because of the color of their eyes. The children for those two days got the chance to experience both sides of discrimination. The children once day felt segregated and inferior to the children that were placed in the group with more privilege. Then the next day, the children that were placed in the privileged group were in the segregated group. The theory is if you can teach a child how to discriminate against a person that you can just as easily teach them how not to.
I agree with her outlook on her daughter's pre-school Cultural Diversity Day. Susan repeatedly tells her daughter's teacher that they are 100% American. Susan was born in America, as was her husband and their daughter as well. Teaching young children about where they came from at such a young age simply confuses them. I believe that you should let them grow up and get used to the way that American culture is before parents or teachers start shoving all these ideas into their heads. My main question is why is it necessary to teach children that they are different from their friends? On page 92 Konig states, “Later in the month, Miss Laura admits that her class is not quite getting the whole skin-color thing. ``I tried to show them how we all have different skin,'' she chuckled. Apparently, little Henry is the only one who successfully grasped the concept. He now runs around the classroom announcing to anyone who'll listen, ``I'm white!'' Miss Laura asked the children what color her own skin was. (She is a light-skinned Hispanic, which would make her skin color . . . what? Caramel? Mochaccino?). The kids opted for purple or orange. ``They looked at me like I was crazy!'' Miss Laura said. I just smile.” Young children don’t ...
Vivian Gussin Paley is a white, Jewish teacher who is highly respected by parents, educators all over the country, and anyone who reads her thoughts on basic issues such as gender, story, play, and how children, especially kindergarteners, think. Paley is able to expose these young children to racism and separation in the classroom. In 1979, White Teacher was the first book Paley got published. This book is her argument that it is important to teach children to like themselves for who they are, but also appreciate and recognize the beautiful differences in their classmates. This book is an amazing learning experience for anyone who reads it.
The leakey boys had a lot of nannies like their father before him leakey was 11 when he entered the Duke of York Secondary school. The settlers believed they had won a victory and the mood reflected that struggle and that belief. On his first day of school leakey called for racial equality like his father.Calling him a “Lover of niggers” the students locked him in a wire cage and poked him with sticks. The school board blamed leakey after he was caned for missing chapel.
The story begins as Jane lives with the Reed family in their home at Gateshead Hall. Here, the theme of education vs. containment develops immediately, as Jane is kept confined indoors on a cold winter day. The other children (Eliza, John, and Giorgiana) are "clustered round their mamma in the drawing-room" (Bronte: 39) being educated, as Jane had been excluded from the group. Jane tries to educate herself by reading from Berwick's History of British Birds, but once again, she is held back from her attempt at enlightenment by the abuse of John Reed, who castigates her and throws the heavy book at her. In anger, Jane cries out, "You are like a murderer - you are like a slave-driver - you are like the Roman emperors" (Bronte: 43). In this passage, Jane compares John Reed to a slave-driver because, like a slave-driver, he deprives Jane of her attempt at education and keeps her suppressed. Afterwards, Jane is blamed for the entire incident and...
At the beginning of the book, Jane was living with her aunt Mrs. Reed and her children. Although Jane is treated cruelly and is abused constantly, she still displays passion and spirit by fighting back at John and finally standing up to Mrs Reed. Even Bessie ‘knew it was always in her’. Mrs. Reed accuses Jane of lying and being a troublesome person when Mr. Brocklehurst of Lowood School visited Gateshead. Jane is hurt, as she knows she was not deceitful so she defends herself as she defended herself to John Reed when he abused her, as she said “Wicked and cruel boy! You are like a murderer – you are like a slave driver – you are like the Roman emperors!” to John Reed instead of staying silent and taking in the abuse, which would damage her self-confidence and self-worth. With the anger she had gotten from being treated cruelly, she was able to gain ...