Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society's expectations of gender roles
Society's expectations of gender roles
Society's expectations of gender roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society's expectations of gender roles
In viewing males and females at the Argyros Forum Einstein Brothers Bagels and Jamba Juice seating area, it became noticeable that people tend to remain in the social constructs of their own gender. In our culture, there seems to be room “for only two genders… and anyone who doesn’t clearly fit one or the other is instantly an outsider” (Johnson, 2006, p. 16). In order to appear normal, people act the way they are supposed to. The females acted more polite towards the employees or bubbly when talking to one another, while the males cared less whether they spared a smile or “thank you” after ordering or would speak to each other in a more laid back manner, for instance. However, one of the traits that looked as if it was pretty much the same …show more content…
On this particular day, there were three men and one woman working. Most of the time, they seemed to share most of the obligations. They all switched around making smoothies and taking orders. One glaring difference, however, was that the woman was the only one to ever do the dishes. The men only seemed to put the dirty utensils in the sink. The woman, on the other hand, went back and forth from taking orders, to making smoothies, to cleaning the dishes. This duty seems to parallel to the common view of women being the keeper of the household; hence, they did the dishes. Today, even without knowing it, people tend to stick to these gender constructions. One case where it is recognized is in the story “Two Women, Three Men on a Raft.” It only came to the narrator’s attention after his journey that he and one of the other males “proceeded to undermine the women” (Schrank, 1977, p. 35). They subconsciously took the power away from the females in order to “protect them.” All they really appreciated them doing was their “normal duties,” such as “[carry] food bags, buckets, and ropes” (Schrank, 1977, p. 28) while the men inflated the raft. Even though it can be pushed by men, it seems that women just tend to gravitate toward areas where they can feel that they are taking care of someone. So maybe the employees did not tell her she had to do the dishes. Maybe she just cleans them out of habit or …show more content…
Many of the girls, when walking up to the counter, would smile and greet the employee. After they would order, they would generally smile and say “thank you.” In contrast, the boys would walk up to the counter, greet the employee without smiling, and then leave the counter when they were done with their order. It is assumed that girls have to be nice and polite to fit into the typical female role that society requires of them. With men, they are perceived as less of a man if they show too much emotion. Emotion is a feeling that seems to be “allowed for women and discouraged in men… [and the] patriarchal culture puts a low value on it compared with appearing to be tough and always being in control” (Johnson, 2006, p. 33). Even this small series of actions demonstrates that this culture
For a long time ago, women just did anything at home: clean the house, wash clothes, cook the meals, and work outside the house and nutrient their children. Then they followed to order from their husband at home, and listen to the words of their husband. In addition, they made many little things in the military: wash clothes, serve the meals, and fix the clothes. The next things that it was convinced me when women had their own value in society. They began to raise their own worth and sense of themselves to build their country even though no one explained to them. People can consider that they endured very much but they did not still accept
Both Deborah Blum’s The Gender Blur: Where Does Biology End and Society Take Over? and Aaron Devor’s “Gender Role Behaviors and Attitudes” challenges the concept of how gender behavior is socially constructed. Blum resides on the idea that gender behavior is developed mainly through adolescence and societal expectations of a gender. Based on reference from personal experiences to back her argument up, Blum explains that each individual develops their expected traits as they grow up, while she also claims that genes and testosterones also play a role into establishing the differentiation of gender behavior. Whereas, Devor focuses mainly on the idea that gender behavior is portrayed mainly among two different categories: masculinity and femininity,
Being a Native American, women were expected to care for families, husbands, tribal guest. They fed others before they fed themselves. Cleaned up after others because that’s what was expected of them. They were expected to stay home and care for children and cook for their husbands while the men went out hunting. That was how Indians lived before Americanization, and it’s how some of them still lived according to Mary Crow Dog. “So the women are continuously busy cooking and taking care of guest… I spent a good many years feeding people and cleaning up after them.” (Pg. 174) Mary Crow Dog writes a lot about the ways women were supposed to fill this role that they belonged at home, caring for children and cooking for their men and other house guest. But she also explains that a woman’s role isn’t as always as it seems, and with the American Indian Movement, women took on a whole new role.
Risman (1988:14) notes that “early childhood socialization is an influential determinant of later behavior, and research has focused on how societies create feminine women and masculine men.” Rather than focusing on gender as natural and fixed, Risman (1998) suggests instead that gender can be viewed at three levels: individual, interactional, and institutional. Instead of viewing the differences between men and women outlined in “If I Were A Boy” as natural and fixed, sociologists would instead look to socialization and societal norms to explain why men and women appear dissimilar. Additionally, many sociologists view gender as being continuously created; Risman (1988:10) notes “the pervasive differences between male[s] and female[s]…are continuously created by the gendered structures in which we all live.” Sociologists, who would instead view these perceived differences as a product of our society, would heavily dispute the gender essentialist perspective taken in “If I Were A Boy”.
In contrast, men have been seen as more dominate than women because of their masculine abilities and other traits and most importantly their profound responsibility of being the provider and head of the household. Americans constantly uses theses two distinct stereotypes that in many cases present many biases regarding gender codes in America. Things have changed over time the women are no longer just house wives taking care of the house and children waiting for their husband to come home from his nine to five occupations. Andrea L. Miller explains in her article “The Separate Spheres Model of Gendered Inequality” that, “A common theme in the study of gender is the idea that men and women belong in distinct spheres of society, with men being particularly fit for the workplace and women being particularly fit for the domestic domain” (Miller 2). Miller gives two very specific examples on how gender is viewed in American
“Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls”: few of our cultural mythologies seem as natural as this one. But in this exploration of the gender signals that traditionally tell what a “boy” or “girl” is supposed to look and act like, Aaron Devor shows how these signals are not “natural” at all but instead are cultural constructs. While the classic cues of masculinity—aggressive posture, self-confidence, a tough appearance—and the traditional signs of femininity—gentleness, passivity, strong nurturing instincts—are often considered “normal,” Devor explains that they are by no means biological or psychological necessities. Indeed, he suggests, they can be richly mixed and varied, or to paraphrase the old Kinks song “Lola,” “Boys can be girls and girls can be boys.” Devor is dean of social sciences at the University of Victoria and author of Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality (1989), from which this selection is excerpted, and FTM: Female-to-Male Transsexuals in Society (1997).
This article was written to bring attention to the way men and women act because of how they were thought to think of themselves. Shaw and Lee explain how biology determines what sex a person is but a persons cultures determines how that person should act according to their gender(Shaw, Lee 124). The article brings up the point that, “a persons gender is something that a person performs daily, it is what we do rather than what we have” (Shaw, Lee 126). They ...
Due to the high performance in education, workplace and family, society expects women more than before, such as: A wife must cook “good” food for her family, give “more” respect to her husband and nurture her children “properly”. A female employee is often perceived as a careful, conservative, considerate and friendly character of others. Regardless to any nature of individual and the group, an outstanding woman constantly involves conflicts because of her need and desire; now, need evolves to basic luxury need and the desire mutates to “I must have it”. Not only men, women fight for a better home, salary, job promotion, status and many more too. In the article, Cunningham speculates women’s smile as their burdens more than a weapon: “ Woe to the waitress, the personal assistant or receptionist, the flight attendant, or any other woman in the line of public service whose smile is not offered up to the boss or client as proof that there are no storm clouds-no kids to support, no sleep that’s been missed rolling into the sunny workplace landscape” (372). On that occasion, Cunningham sounds like a victim. In comparing to their social image, women have a stronger mentality and perseverance in the reality. The emotional appeal (ethos) is wonderful, it connects audience and writer instantly, but there is a risk; some rational readers might suspect writer is an implicit bias because her article laden with too much
As meaning making creatures, humans attempt to categorize and definitively understand anything they observe. Although this crusade for understanding is not inherently bad, it often produces unintended negative consequences. As humans sort, classify, and define everything, they simultaneously place everything into a box that constricts creativity and fluidity. Concerning gender, these boxes create harmful conceptions of each person on the planet. Although these conceptions of gender are constructed and not “real” by any means, they have real implications in the process of socialization that influence how each person lives his/her life. In the United States, the commonly socialized “boxes” of gender have done a great
One thing my grandma would always say every time she was doing work around the house is that, “A woman’s work is never done.” Posted on an online magazine website author, Jessica Grose, wrote an article titled “Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier,” published March 13th, 2013. As she got into the article she argues that men in our lives more recently started taking on more of the childcare and cooking, while the cleaning still falls unfairly on women. Jessica Grose starts to build her credibility with personal facts and using reputable sources.
Sociological study on the gendered division of labour within the domestic sphere has perennially been characterised by evidence of a clear inequality concerning the allocation of unpaid chores within the home between men and women (Warren, 2003:734). While men have traditionally been regarded as primary breadwinners, the management of home-maintenance has remained largely women’s responsibility (Breen & Cooke, 2005:47). A number of theories exist to explain this unequal distribution of domestic labour, in particular the economic exchange model (which argues that women perform domestic duties in ‘exchange’ for financial support from their husbands), and the gender display model, which asserts that household labour is divided on the basis of the symbolic importance of gender (Baxter, 2002:401). While this paper will argue the inherent features of both models, it will also discuss the importance of gender stereotypes in maintaining the unequal distribution of household labour, despite women’s increasing involvement in the workforce. The paper will also demonstrate that the issue of a gendered division of labour holds great significance for sociological study, particularly surrounding issues of power, dominance and authority in the gender regime.
During one of the in class assignments, I had the opportunity to observe individuals who visited the campus Starbucks. It was observed, that females and males express their gender by the way they address. For example, when comparing both genders when wearing shorts, females wore shorter shorts than males. Females seem to wear tighter clothing than men. Another way people express their gender, is by the way they walk. Men tend to walk more stiff, with less movement, while females tend to walk loosely with their hips.
Around the world gender is genuinely seen as strictly male or female. If you step out of this “social norm,” you could be considered an outcast. This disassociation includes, biological males/females, interssexed, and transgendered individuals. These people are severely suppressed by society because their gender identification, behaviors, and even their activities deviate from the norm. Most Americans are exceedingly devoted to the concept that there are only two sexes. Therefore, the constrictive American ideals of male and female gender identities inhibits growth and acceptance of gender expression.
Gender is defined as the scopes of genetic, physical, mental and behaviour characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and feminity, meanwhile inequality is defined as in a situation where there is an unfair situation or treatment in which certain people have more privileges or better opportunities or chances than other people. Thus, from the definition stated gender inequality refers to unequal or unfair management, treatment, or perceptions of persons or individuals are based on their gender. In a parallel sense, gender inequality can be said as the world in which there was discrimination against anyone based on gender. In this introductory, the general understanding of gender inequalities will be discussed further into three significant factors that influence the allocation of housework between men and women. Household chores can be classified as cleaning, cooking and paying bills. Division of housework serves as an important element in the continuation of the function of a family and it requires contribution from both spouses (Tang, 2012). However, current society’s perception on housework is based on gender, so the three major factors that influence the division of household chores within the couples are education level, economic resources, and time availability (refer to Figure1 in Appendix 1).
Who’s to say that just because you are male you have to act manly and if you are female you must be girly? Over the years, gender roles have had a dominant place in society, different families emphasizing different roles. Society places certain expectations on men and women, designating particular responsibilities to each.Throughout the years, society 's rules and expectations for men and women have changed, therefore, it 's important to know where gender roles come from and how they affect people because they play an important role in shaping the way we think about others in society.